Basu, S., Holtslag, A. A., Van De Wiel, B. J., Moene, A. F., and Steeneveld, G.-J.: An inconvenient “truth” about using sensible heat flux as a surface boundary condition in models under stably stratified regimes, Acta Geophysica, 56, 88–99,
https://doi.org/10.2478/s11600-007-0038-y, 2008.
a
Bates, P., Marks, K., and Horritt, M.: Optimal use of high-resolution topographic data in flood inundation models, Hydrological processes, 17, 537–557,
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1113, 2003.
a
Beare, R. J., Macvean, M. K., Holtslag, A. A., Cuxart, J., Esau, I., Golaz, J.-C., Jimenez, M. A., Khairoutdinov, M., Kosovic, B., Lewellen, D., Lund, T. S., Lundquist, J. K., Mccabe, A., Moene, A. F., Noh, Y., Raasch, S., and Sullivan, P.: An intercomparison of large-eddy simulations of the stable boundary layer, Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 118, 247–272,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-004-2820-6, 2006.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f,
g,
h,
i,
j,
k,
l,
m,
n,
o,
p
Berg, J., Troldborg, N., Menke, R., Patton, E., Sullivan, P., Mann, J., and Sørensen, N.: Flow in complex terrain-a Large Eddy Simulation comparison study, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1037, 072015,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1037/7/072015, 2018.
a
Bilskie, M. V., Coggin, D., Hagen, S. C., and Medeiros, S. C.: Terrain-driven unstructured mesh development through semi-automatic vertical feature extraction, Advances in Water Resources, 86, 102–118,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.09.020, 2015.
a
Chow, F. K., Street, R. L., Xue, M., and Ferziger, J. H.: Explicit filtering and reconstruction turbulence modeling for large-eddy simulation of neutral boundary layer flow, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 62, 2058–2077,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3456.1, 2005.
a,
b,
c,
d
Cuxart, J., Holtslag, A. A., Beare, R. J., Bazile, E., Beljaars, A., Cheng, A., Conangla, L., Ek, M., Freedman, F., Hamdi, R., Kerstein, A., Kitagawa, H., Lenderink, G., Lewellen, D., Mailhot, J., Mauritsen, T., Perov, V., Schayes, G., Steeneveld, G.-J., Svensson, G., Taylor, P., Weng, W., Wunsch, S., and Xu, K.-M.: Single-column model intercomparison for a stably stratified atmospheric boundary layer, Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 118, 273–303,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-005-3780-1, 2006.
a
Dai, Y., Basu, S., Maronga, B., and de Roode, S. R.: Addressing the grid-size sensitivity issue in large-eddy simulations of stable boundary layers, Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 178, 63–89,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-020-00558-1, 2021.
a,
b,
c,
d
Dar, A. S., Berg, J., Troldborg, N., and Patton, E. G.: On the self-similarity of wind turbine wakes in a complex terrain using large eddy simulation, Wind Energ. Sci., 4, 633–644,
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-4-633-2019, 2019.
a
Doubrawa, P., Debnath, M., Moriarty, P. J., Branlard, E., Herges, T. G., Maniaci, D., and Naughton, B.: Benchmarks for model validation based on lidar wake measurements, in: Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1256, 012024,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1256/1/012024, 2019.
a
Elgendi, M., AlMallahi, M., Abdelkhalig, A., and Selim, M. Y.: A review of wind turbines in complex terrain, International Journal of Thermofluids, 17, 100289,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijft.2023.100289, 2023.
a
Feng, Y., Miranda-Fuentes, J., Guo, S., Jacob, J., and Sagaut, P.: ProLB: A Lattice Boltzmann Solver of Large-Eddy Simulation for Atmospheric Boundary Layer Flows, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 13, e2020MS002107,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002107, 2021.
a,
b,
c
Fernando, H. and Weil, J.: Whither the stable boundary layer? A shift in the research agenda, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 91, 1475–1484,
http://www.jstor.org/stable/26233051 (last access: 2 February 2026), 2010. a
Gadde, S. N., Stieren, A., and Stevens, R. J.: Large-eddy simulations of stratified atmospheric boundary layers: Comparison of different subgrid models, Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 178, 363–382,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-020-00570-5, 2021.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f
Germano, M., Piomelli, U., Moin, P., and Cabot, W. H.: A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model, Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics, 3, 1760–1765,
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.857955, 1991.
a
Geuzaine, C. and Remacle, J.-F.: Gmsh: A 3-D finite element mesh generator with built-in pre-and post-processing facilities, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 79, 1309–1331,
https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.2579, 2009.
a
Ghaisas, N. S., Archer, C. L., Xie, S., Wu, S., and Maguire, E.: Evaluation of layout and atmospheric stability effects in wind farms using large-eddy simulation, Wind Energy, 20, 1227–1240,
https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2091, 2017.
a,
b
Högström, U.: Non-dimensional wind and temperature profiles in the atmospheric surface layer: A re-evaluation, in: Topics in Micrometeorology. A Festschrift for Arch Dyer, Springer, 55–78,
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119875, 1988.
a
Holtslag, A., Svensson, G., Basu, S., Beare, B., Bosveld, F., and Cuxart, J.: Overview of the GEWEX Atmospheric Boundary Layer Study (GABLS), in: ECMWF GABLS workshop on Diurnal cycles and the stable boundary layer, 7–10 November 2011,
https://www.ecmwf.int/en/elibrary/74887-overview-gewex-atmospheric-boundary-layer-study-gabls (last access: 2 February 2026), 2012. a
Huang, J. and Bou-Zeid, E.: Turbulence and vertical fluxes in the stable atmospheric boundary layer. Part I: A large-eddy simulation study, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 70, 1513–1527,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-0167.1, 2013.
a,
b,
c
IRENA: Future of wind: Deployment, investment, technology, grid integration and socio-economic aspects, Tech. Rep., Future of wind: Deployment, investment, technology, grid integration and socio-economic aspects, ISBN 978-92-9260-155-3,
https://www.irena.org/publications/2019/Oct/Future-of-wind (last access: 2 February 2026), 2019. a
Klemp, J. B., Skamarock, W. C., and Fuhrer, O.: Numerical consistency of metric terms in terrain-following coordinates, Monthly Weather Review, 131, 1229–1239,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2003)131<1229:NCOMTI>2.0.CO;2, 2003.
a
Kraushaar, M.: Application of the compressible and low-Mach number approaches to Large-Eddy Simulation of turbulent flows in aero-engines, Theses, Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse – INPT,
https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00711480 (last access: 2 February 2026), 2011. a
Kumar, V., Svensson, G., Holtslag, A., Meneveau, C., and Parlange, M. B.: Impact of surface flux formulations and geostrophic forcing on large-eddy simulations of diurnal atmospheric boundary layer flow, Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 49, 1496–1516,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAMC2145.1, 2010.
a,
b
Larsson, J., Kawai, S., Bodart, J., and Bermejo-Moreno, I.: Large eddy simulation with modeled wall-stress: recent progress and future directions, Mechanical Engineering Reviews, 3, 15-00418,
https://doi.org/10.1299/mer.15-00418, 2016.
a
Lattanzi, A., Almgren, A., Quon, E., Natarajan, M., Kosovic, B., Mirocha, J., Perry, B., Wiersema, D., Willcox, D., Yuan, X., and Zhang, W.: ERF: Energy Research and Forecasting Model, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 17,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024MS004884, 2025.
a
Lazeroms, W.: Turbulence modelling applied to the atmospheric boundary layer, PhD thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology,
https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:117888647 (last access: 2 February 2026), 2015. a
Lilly, D. K.: A proposed modification of the Germano subgrid‐scale closure method, Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics, 4, 633–635,
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.858280, 1992.
a
Lundquist, K. A., Chow, F. K., and Lundquist, J. K.: An immersed boundary method enabling large-eddy simulations of flow over complex terrain in the WRF model, Monthly Weather Review, 140, 3936–3955,
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00311.1, 2012.
a
Marta, G.: Development and validation of the Euler-Lagrange formulation on a parallel and unstructured solver for large-eddy simulation, PhD thesis, institut national polytechnique de Toulouse,
https://theses.hal.science/tel-04412673 (last access: 2 February 2026), 2009.
a,
b
Matheou, G. and Chung, D.: Large-eddy simulation of stratified turbulence. Part II: Application of the stretched-vortex model to the atmospheric boundary layer, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 71, 4439–4460,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-13-0306.1, 2014.
a,
b,
c,
d
Min, M. and Tombouldies, A.: Simulating Atmospheric Boundary Layer Turbulence with Nek5000/RS, Tech. rep., Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States),
https://doi.org/10.2172/1891130, 2022.
a,
b,
c
Monin, A. S. and Obukhov, A. M.: Basic laws of turbulent mixing in the surface layer of the atmosphere, Contrib. Geophys. Inst. Acad. Sci. USSR, 151, e187,
https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:198942767 (last access: 2 February 2026), 1954. a
Moriarty, P., Hamilton, N., Debnath, M., Herges, T., Isom, B., Lundquist, J. K., Maniaci, D., Naughton, B., Pauly, R., Roadman, J., Shaw, W., van Dam, J., and Wharton, S.: American WAKE experimeNt (AWAKEN), Tech. rep., Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States); National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States); Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States); Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States); Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, CO (United States),
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1806419 (last access: 2 February 2026), 2020. a
Moureau, V., Domingo, P., and Vervisch, L.: Design of a massively parallel CFD code for complex geometries, Comptes Rendus. Mécanique, 339, 141–148,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crme.2010.12.001, 2011.
a
Porté-Agel, F., Bastankhah, M., and Shamsoddin, S.: Wind-turbine and wind-farm flows: a review, Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 174, 1–59,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-019-00473-0, 2020.
a
Sanchez Gomez, M. and Lundquist, J. K.: The effect of wind direction shear on turbine performance in a wind farm in central Iowa, Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 125–139,
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-125-2020, 2020.
a
Sanz Rodrigo, J., Churchfield, M., and Kosovic, B.: A methodology for the design and testing of atmospheric boundary layer models for wind energy applications, Wind Energ. Sci., 2, 35–54,
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2-35-2017, 2017.
a,
b
Senocak, I., Ackerman, A. S., Kirkpatrick, M. P., Stevens, D. E., and Mansour, N. N.: Study of near-surface models for large-eddy simulations of a neutrally stratified atmospheric boundary layer, Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 124, 405–424,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-007-9181-x, 2007.
a,
b,
c,
d
Stoll, R. and Porté-Agel, F.: Large-eddy simulation of the stable atmospheric boundary layer using dynamic models with different averaging schemes, Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 126, 1–28,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-007-9207-4, 2008.
a
Stoll, R., Gibbs, J. A., Salesky, S. T., Anderson, W., and Calaf, M.: Large-eddy simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer, Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 177, 541–581,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-020-00556-3, 2020.
a
Sullivan, P. P., Weil, J. C., Patton, E. G., Jonker, H. J., and Mironov, D. V.: Turbulent winds and temperature fronts in large-eddy simulations of the stable atmospheric boundary layer, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 73, 1815–1840,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-15-0339.1, 2016.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e
Veers, P., Dykes, K., Lantz, E., Barth, S., Bottasso, C. L., Carlson, O., Clifton, A., Green, J., Green, P., Holttinen, H., Laird, D., Lehtomäki, V., Lundquist, J. K., Manwell, J., Marquis, M., Meneveau, C., Moriarty, P., Munduate, X., Muskulus, M., Naughton, J., Pao, L., Paquette, J., Peinke, J., Robertson, A., Rodrigo, J. S., Sempreviva, A. M., Smith, J. C., Tuohy, A., and Wiser, R.: Grand challenges in the science of wind energy, Science, 366, eaau2027,
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau2027, 2019.
a
Vigny, U., Voivenel, L., Zeoli, S., and Benard, P.: Neutral (Andren) and stable (GABLS1) boundary layer dataset, Zenodo [data set],
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17566567, 2025.
a
Walters, R. A., Lane, E. M., and Hanert, E.: Useful time-stepping methods for the Coriolis term in a shallow water model, Ocean Modelling, 28, 66–74,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2008.10.004, 2009.
a
