Articles | Volume 11, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-11-737-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Gearbox bearing crack growth prognostics and uncertainty quantification with physics-informed machine learning
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 04 Mar 2026)
- Preprint (discussion started on 05 Sep 2025)
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor
| : Report abuse
-
RC1: 'Comment on wes-2025-157', Anonymous Referee #1, 07 Sep 2025
- AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Mario De Florio, 27 Oct 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on wes-2025-157', Anonymous Referee #2, 15 Sep 2025
- AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Mario De Florio, 27 Oct 2025
Peer review completion
AR – Author's response | RR – Referee report | ED – Editor decision | EF – Editorial file upload
AR by Mario De Florio on behalf of the Authors (27 Oct 2025)
Author's response
Author's tracked changes
Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (12 Nov 2025) by Michael Muskulus
ED: Publish as is (14 Nov 2025) by Carlo L. Bottasso (Chief editor)
AR by Mario De Florio on behalf of the Authors (14 Nov 2025)
The manuscript “Gearbox Bearing Crack Growth Prognostics with Physics-Informed Machine Learning and Uncertainty Quantification” presents a solid and valuable study. The use of the X-TFC framework for predicting the remaining useful life of gearbox bearings is innovative, and the integration of fracture mechanics with physics-informed machine learning is carried out very well. Results on both vibration- and SCADA-based health indices are convincing, and the uncertainty analysis adds further strength.
The paper is original, timely, and clearly relevant for the wind energy and prognostics fields. The methods are well explained, the results are well supported, and the conclusions are logical. The writing is clear and well structured, making the paper accessible to a wide audience.
I do not see any major issues, and the manuscript is already at a very good standard.
Recommendation: Accept as is.