Articles | Volume 11, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-11-825-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-11-825-2026
Research article
 | 
17 Mar 2026
Research article |  | 17 Mar 2026

Dual-lidar profilers for measuring atmospheric turbulence

Maxime Thiébaut and Neil Luxcey

Related authors

Evaluating the enhanced sampling rate for turbulence measurement with a wind lidar profiler
Maxime Thiébaut, Louis Marié, Frédéric Delbos, and Florent Guinot
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 1869–1885, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1869-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1869-2025, 2025
Short summary
Experimental evaluation of the motion-induced effects on turbulent fluctuations measurement on floating lidar systems
Nicolas Thebault, Maxime Thiébaut, Marc Le Boulluec, Guillaume Damblans, Christophe Maisondieu, Cristina Benzo, and Florent Guinot
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-126,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-126, 2023
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Gaussian mixture models for the optimal sparse sampling of offshore wind resource
Robin Marcille, Maxime Thiébaut, Pierre Tandeo, and Jean-François Filipot
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 771–786, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-771-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-771-2023, 2023
Short summary
Deriving atmospheric turbulence intensity from profiling pulsed lidar measurements
Maxime Thiébaut, Marie Cathelain, Salma Yahiaoui, and Ahmed Esmail
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2022-53,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2022-53, 2022
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary

Cited articles

Bodini, N., Lundquist, J. K., and Newsom, R. K.: Estimation of turbulence dissipation rate and its variability from sonic anemometer and wind Doppler lidar during the XPIA field campaign, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 4291–4308, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4291-2018, 2018. a
Browning, K. A. and Wexler, R.: The determination of kinematic properties of a wind field using Doppler radar, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 7, 105–113, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1968)007<0105:tdokpo>2.0.co;2, 1968. a
Brugger, P., Träumner, K., and Jung, C.: Evaluation of a procedure to correct spatial averaging in turbulence statistics from a Doppler lidar by comparing time series with an ultrasonic anemometer, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 33, 2135–2144, https://doi.org/10.1175/jtech-d-15-0136.1, 2016. a
Burchard, H., Craig, P. D., Gemmrich, J. R., van Haren, H., Mathieu, P.-P., Meier, H. M., Smith, W. A. M. N., Prandke, H., Rippeth, T. P., and Skyllingstad, E. D.: Observational and numerical modeling methods for quantifying coastal ocean turbulence and mixing, Prog. Oceanogr., 76, 399–442, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2007.09.005, 2008. a
DNV: Lidar-measured turbulence intensity for wind turbines, Tech. Rep. DNV-RP-0661, https://www.dnv.com/energy/standards-guidelines/dnv-rp-0661-lidar-measured-turbulence-intensity-for-wind-turbines/ (last access: 16 March 2026), 2023. a, b
Download
Short summary
This study tested a two-lidar system to measure wind variations more accurately than traditional single-lidar methods. By comparing 30 days of measurements with a reference instrument, we found that the new approach better captures turbulence and reduces errors in both along- and cross-wind directions. The results show that it can provide more reliable ground-based wind measurements, supporting improved weather monitoring and wind energy assessments.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint