43 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Floating Offshore Wind Turbines: Current Status and Future Prospects M. Barooni et al. 10.3390/en16010002
2. Aerodynamic design optimization: Challenges and perspectives J. Martins 10.1016/j.compfluid.2022.105391
3. Aerostructural Design Optimization of Wind Turbine Blades S. Batay et al. 10.3390/pr12010022
4. FastSVD-ML–ROM: A reduced-order modeling framework based on machine learning for real-time applications G. Drakoulas et al. 10.1016/j.cma.2023.116155
5. Efficient Mesh Generation and Deformation for Aerodynamic Shape Optimization N. Secco et al. 10.2514/1.J059491
6. An efficient geometric constraint handling method for surrogate-based aerodynamic shape optimization K. Wang et al. 10.1080/19942060.2022.2153173
7. Integrated design optimization of spar floating wind turbines J. Hegseth et al. 10.1016/j.marstruc.2020.102771
8. Airfoil Separation Constraint Formulation for Aerodynamic Shape Optimization M. Abdul-Kaiyoom et al. 10.2514/1.C037365
9. pyOptSparse: A Python framework for large-scale constrained nonlinear optimization of sparse systems E. Wu et al. 10.21105/joss.02564
10. Multifidelity aerodynamic shape optimization for airfoil dynamic stall mitigation using manifold mapping V. Raul & L. Leifsson 10.1016/j.jocs.2024.102213
11. Aerothermal optimization of a ribbed U-bend cooling channel using the adjoint method P. He et al. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.05.075
12. Aero‐hydro‐servo‐elastic coupling of a multi‐body finite‐element solver and a multi‐fidelity vortex method N. Ramos‐García et al. 10.1002/we.2584
13. Coupled Aeropropulsive Design Optimization of an Over-wing Nacelle Configuration M. Abdul-Kaiyoom et al. 10.2514/1.C037678
14. Optimum aerodynamic shape design under uncertainty by utility theory and metamodeling X. Du & L. Leifsson 10.1016/j.ast.2019.105464
15. Kriging-based shape optimization framework for blended-wing-body underwater glider with NURBS-based parametrization D. Zhang et al. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.108212
16. Blade-Resolved CFD Simulations of a Periodic Array of NREL 5 MW Rotors with and without Towers L. Ma et al. 10.3390/wind2010004
17. Field inversion machine learning augmented turbulence modeling for time-accurate unsteady flow L. Fang & P. He 10.1063/5.0207704
18. Laminar-turbulent transition characteristics of a 3-D wind turbine rotor blade based on experiments and computations Ö. Özçakmak et al. 10.5194/wes-5-1487-2020
19. RANS-Based Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of a Wing Considering Propeller–Wing Interaction S. Chauhan & J. Martins 10.2514/1.C035991
20. Data-driven modal parameterization for robust aerodynamic shape optimization of wind turbine blades J. Li et al. 10.1016/j.renene.2024.120115
21. Development of a second-order dynamic stall model N. Adema et al. 10.5194/wes-5-577-2020
22. Invertible Neural Networks for Airfoil Design A. Glaws et al. 10.2514/1.J060866
23. Adjoint-based aerodynamic shape optimization including transition to turbulence effects G. Halila et al. 10.1016/j.ast.2020.106243
24. A synthetic approach for high-fidelity aerodynamic performance optimization of large-scale wind turbine blades based on hybrid deep learning networks J. Gong et al. 10.1063/5.0264659
25. pyGeo: A geometry package for multidisciplinary design optimization H. Hajdik et al. 10.21105/joss.05319
26. Grand challenges in the design, manufacture, and operation of future wind turbine systems P. Veers et al. 10.5194/wes-8-1071-2023
27. Convergence enhancement of SIMPLE-like steady-state RANS solvers applied to airfoil and cylinder flows A. Dicholkar et al. 10.1016/j.jweia.2021.104863
28. Aerodynamic shape optimization of wind turbine rotor blades using the continuous adjoint method M. Farhikhteh et al. 10.1007/s11081-023-09868-y
29. Effective adjoint approaches for computational fluid dynamics G. Kenway et al. 10.1016/j.paerosci.2019.05.002
30. Numerical study of ice-induced loads and dynamic response analysis for floating offshore wind turbines M. Barooni et al. 10.1016/j.marstruc.2022.103300
31. Effects of a Near Wake model on the performance of a Multi-Megawatt wind turbine with an active flap A. Gamberini et al. 10.1088/1742-6596/2767/2/022056
32. On the Contribution of Wall Distance Fields to the Adjoint of a RANS Model M. Ugolotti et al. 10.1080/10618562.2023.2176487
33. Capturing tip-corrected blade element momentum loading with wind turbine models D. Selvatici & R. Stevens 10.1016/j.renene.2024.122265
34. Numerical Simulations of the NREL Phase VI Wind Turbine with Low-Amplitude Sinusoidal Pitch A. Akbarzadeh & I. Borazjani 10.3390/fluids8070201
35. On the importance of the root-to-hub adapter effects on HAWT performance: A CFD-BEM numerical investigation S. Mauro et al. 10.1016/j.energy.2023.127456
36. Design optimization methodology of small horizontal axis wind turbine blades using a hybrid CFD/BEM/GA approach C. Rodriguez & C. Celis 10.1007/s40430-022-03561-4
37. Coupled aeropropulsive design optimization of a podded electric propulsor M. Abdul-Kaiyoom et al. 10.1007/s00158-024-03904-w
38. CFD-based curved tip shape design for wind turbine blades M. Madsen et al. 10.5194/wes-7-1471-2022
39. Dynamic interaction of inflow and rotor time scales and impact on single turbine wake recovery S. Andersen et al. 10.1088/1742-6596/2767/9/092002
40. ADflow: An Open-Source Computational Fluid Dynamics Solver for Aerodynamic and Multidisciplinary Optimization C. Mader et al. 10.2514/1.I010796
41. Adjoint-Based High-Fidelity Concurrent Aerodynamic Design Optimization of Wind Turbine S. Batay et al. 10.3390/fluids8030085
42. A Jacobian-free approximate Newton–Krylov startup strategy for RANS simulations A. Yildirim et al. 10.1016/j.jcp.2019.06.018
43. Optimum aerodynamic shape design under uncertainty by utility theory and metamodeling X. Du & L. Leifsson 10.1016/j.ast.2019.105464