Articles | Volume 6, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1107-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1107-2021
Research article
 | 
08 Sep 2021
Research article |  | 08 Sep 2021

On sensor optimisation for structural health monitoring robust to environmental variations

Tingna Wang, David J. Wagg, Keith Worden, and Robert J. Barthorpe

Related subject area

Operation, condition monitoring, and maintenance
Floating wind turbines: marine operations challenges and opportunities
Rahul Chitteth Ramachandran, Cian Desmond, Frances Judge, Jorrit-Jan Serraris, and Jimmy Murphy
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 903–924, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-903-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-903-2022, 2022
Short summary
Analysing the effectiveness of different offshore maintenance base options for floating wind farms
Nadezda Avanessova, Anthony Gray, Iraklis Lazakis, R. Camilla Thomson, and Giovanni Rinaldi
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 887–901, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-887-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-887-2022, 2022
Short summary
Wind turbine drivetrains: state-of-the-art technologies and future development trends
Amir R. Nejad, Jonathan Keller, Yi Guo, Shawn Sheng, Henk Polinder, Simon Watson, Jianning Dong, Zian Qin, Amir Ebrahimi, Ralf Schelenz, Francisco Gutiérrez Guzmán, Daniel Cornel, Reza Golafshan, Georg Jacobs, Bart Blockmans, Jelle Bosmans, Bert Pluymers, James Carroll, Sofia Koukoura, Edward Hart, Alasdair McDonald, Anand Natarajan, Jone Torsvik, Farid K. Moghadam, Pieter-Jan Daems, Timothy Verstraeten, Cédric Peeters, and Jan Helsen
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 387–411, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-387-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-387-2022, 2022
Short summary
Data-driven farm-wide fatigue estimation on jacket-foundation OWTs for multiple SHM setups
Francisco d N Santos, Nymfa Noppe, Wout Weijtjens, and Christof Devriendt
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 299–321, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-299-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-299-2022, 2022
Short summary
Identification of wind turbine main-shaft torsional loads from high-frequency SCADA (supervisory control and data acquisition) measurements using an inverse-problem approach
W. Dheelibun Remigius and Anand Natarajan
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 1401–1412, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1401-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1401-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Barthorpe, R. J. and Worden, K.: Emerging trends in optimal structural health monitoring system design: From sensor placement to system evaluation, Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks, 9, 31–51, 2020. a
Bull, L. A., Worden, K., Fuentes, R., Manson, G., Cross, E. J., and Dervilis, N.: Outlier ensembles: A robust method for damage detection and unsupervised feature extraction from high-dimensional data, J. Sound Vib., 453, 126–150, 2019. a
Cross, E. J., Manson, G., Worden, K., and Pierce, S. G.: Features for damage detection with insensitivity to environmental and operational variations, P. Roy. Soc. A-Math. Phy., 468, 4098–4122, 2012. a, b
Deraemaeker, A. and Worden, K.: A comparison of linear approaches to filter out environmental effects in structural health monitoring, Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 105, 1–15, 2018. a, b, c, d
Eshghi, A. T., Lee, S., Jung, H., and Wang, P.: Design of structural monitoring sensor network using surrogate modeling of stochastic sensor signal, Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 133, 106280, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106280, 2019. a
Download
Short summary
This paper illustrates two sensor placement optimisation techniques designed for damage detection while taking into account temperature effects. A case study of a glider wing shows that, compared to the normalised method using the temperature label, the linear method that did not require temperature labels provided features that were less sensitive to damage. However, it is cheaper and more convenient to extract temperature-robust features in practical engineering.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint