Dear authors,

Thank you for responding so thoroughly and thoughtfully to the abundant reviewer comments and questions on your manuscript. This manuscript represent an important contribution to the community's understanding of global blockage and how it varies with atmospheric stability and turbine operating characteristics.

While I would like to accept the revised manuscript as is, I note that the Data Availability statement is terse and does not address all the data presented in the manuscript. Please expand it to address the availability of the meteorological measurements (used for calculating atmospheric stability) and the actual turbine locations. (R3C5 requests the turbine spacing. Because the spacing is irregular, your comment rightly notes that presenting a "spacing" could be misleading. However, the reference to figure 1b is inadequate as the resolution of that figure does not allow a reader to calculate spacing.) Perhaps you could include a supplemental data file to include the turbine locations or a reference to where this information could be found. Several online archives such as zenodo or the journal Earth System Science Data could be useful repositories for the meteorological data, the lidar data, and/or the turbine locations.

Congratulations on an important and meaningful contribution to our understanding of global blockage, and thank you for submitting to Wind Energy Science.

Please follow the suggestions for technical correction by the associate editor.
Thanks for publishing with WES,
Sincerely, Jakob Mann