Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2026-19
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2026-19
13 Feb 2026
 | 13 Feb 2026
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal WES.

Validation of RANS-calibrated engineering models and ANN-based surrogate for wind farm flow simulation and layout optimization

Jens Peter Schøler, Ernestas Simutis, M. Paul van der Laan, Julian Quick, and Pierre-Elouan Réthoré

Abstract. Accurate yet efficient wake modeling is essential for wind farm layout optimization (WFLO). Wind turbine wakes are disturbed regions of flow behind a wind turbine, characterized by lower mean wind speeds and higher turbulence, which reduce downstream power production and increase structural loading. This study compares an Artificial Neural Network (ANN)-based surrogate trained on Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) data with two representative engineering wake models based on the TurbOPark and Super-Gaussian formulations. The work includes recalibration of the engineering models, a systematic flow simulation study across varying turbine counts and spacings, and WFLO benchmarks validated against RANS-based Annual Energy Production (AEP). Results show that the ANN surrogate achieves the lowest RMSE and MAPE across all scenarios in flow estimation, albeit at a higher computational cost. In WFLO, the TurbOPark-based model produced the highest RANS-validated AEP layouts, despite having lower predictive accuracy, suggesting that optimization complexity influences outcomes. Blockage modeling increased computational cost without improving accuracy.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Jens Peter Schøler, Ernestas Simutis, M. Paul van der Laan, Julian Quick, and Pierre-Elouan Réthoré

Status: open (until 13 Mar 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Jens Peter Schøler, Ernestas Simutis, M. Paul van der Laan, Julian Quick, and Pierre-Elouan Réthoré

Data sets

RANS-AD flow data: For low-fidelity model validation Paul van der Laan and Jens Peter Schøler https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18305003

Model code and software

RANS-Surrogate-Validation Repositories Jens Peter Schøler et al. https://gitlab.windenergy.dtu.dk/surrogate-validation-study

Jens Peter Schøler, Ernestas Simutis, M. Paul van der Laan, Julian Quick, and Pierre-Elouan Réthoré
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 13 Feb 2026
Download
Short summary
Wind turbines create wakes, with lower speeds that reduce downstream power. Optimizing turbine placement requires accounting for these reductions. We compared a neural network trained on CFD simulations against engineering wake models across various farm sizes. The neural network predicted flow most accurately but was slower. Surprisingly, a simple TurbOPark model produced layouts with higher validated energy output, suggesting that accuracy is not the only important metric for such models.
Share
Altmetrics