Articles | Volume 10, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1101-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1101-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
12 Jun 2025
Research article |
| 12 Jun 2025
| 12 Jun 2025
Swell impacts on an offshore wind farm in stable boundary layer: wake flow and energy budget analysis
Geophysical Institute, Bergen Offshore Wind Centre, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
Mostafa Bakhoday-Paskyabi
Geophysical Institute, Bergen Offshore Wind Centre, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
Related authors
Xu Ning and Mostafa Bakhoday-Paskyabi
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4390, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4390, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
Ocean waves shape winds close to the surface and extend their impact throughout the atmospheric boundary layer. In this study, we built a new modeling tool that allows simulations to follow the moving wave surface itself. By testing different wave and wind conditions, we show how waves change air motion, turbulence, and energy exchange above the ocean. This approach improves our ability to represent air–sea interactions, with implications for weather studies and offshore wind energy.
Hai Bui and Mostafa Bakhoday-Paskyabi
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.16043, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.16043, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a new way to improve the correction of data by using a probability-based method called kernel density estimation. Our approach adapts the size and shape of the core probability functions, leading to more accurate corrections while also allowing us to measure the uncertainty of the results. Tests on both simple and realistic datasets show that our method outperforms existing ones, offering a practical tool for more reliable data analysis.
Xu Ning and Mostafa Bakhoday-Paskyabi
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4390, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4390, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
Ocean waves shape winds close to the surface and extend their impact throughout the atmospheric boundary layer. In this study, we built a new modeling tool that allows simulations to follow the moving wave surface itself. By testing different wave and wind conditions, we show how waves change air motion, turbulence, and energy exchange above the ocean. This approach improves our ability to represent air–sea interactions, with implications for weather studies and offshore wind energy.
Hai Bui, Mostafa Bakhoday-Paskyabi, and Joachim Reuder
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-91, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-91, 2025
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
Strong low-altitude winds, known as low-level jets (LLJs), significantly impact offshore wind turbines. We analyzed LLJs at the FINO1 site using LiDAR observations and reanalysis data. Our results show that models tend to underestimate LLJ intensity. To address this, we introduced a new method to characterize wind profiles and applied a correction to 50 years of reanalysis data, yielding a more accurate long-term representation of these wind features.
Mostafa Bakhoday Paskyabi
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1631–1645, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1631-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1631-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The exchange of momentum and energy between the atmosphere and ocean depends on air–sea processes, especially wave-related ones. Precision in representing these interactions is vital for offshore wind turbine and farm design and operation. The development of a reliable wave–turbulence decomposition method to remove wave-induced interference from single-height wind measurements is essential for these applications and enhances our grasp of wind coherence within the wave boundary layer.
Hai Bui, Mostafa Bakhoday-Paskyabi, and Mohammadreza Mohammadpour-Penchah
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4447–4465, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4447-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4447-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a new wind turbine wake model, the Simple Actuator Disc for Large Eddy Simulation (SADLES), integrated with the widely used Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model. WRF-SADLES accurately simulates wind turbine wakes at resolutions of a few dozen meters, aligning well with idealized simulations and observational measurements. This makes WRF-SADLES a promising tool for wind energy research, offering a balance between accuracy, computational efficiency, and ease of implementation.
Maria Krutova and Mostafa Bakhoday-Paskyabi
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-79, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-79, 2023
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
Wind turbine wake studies often rely on engineering models, which consist of simple analytical expressions. We review an atmospheric event resulting in a strong wind flow change within tens of minutes and apply several wake models to see how they respond to new conditions. We find that two models are consistent with their predictions, and one of them, the super-Gaussian model, predicts the wake shape particularly well; more attention should be paid to its development and implementation.
Maria Krutova, Mostafa Bakhoday-Paskyabi, Joachim Reuder, and Finn Gunnar Nielsen
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3553–3564, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3553-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3553-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Local refinement of the grid is a powerful method allowing us to reduce the computational time while preserving the accuracy in the area of interest. Depending on the implementation, the local refinement may introduce unwanted numerical effects into the results. We study the wind speed common to the wind turbine operational speeds and confirm strong alteration of the result when the heat fluxes are present, except for the specific refinement scheme used.
Maria Krutova, Mostafa Bakhoday-Paskyabi, Joachim Reuder, and Finn Gunnar Nielsen
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 849–873, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-849-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-849-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We described a new automated method to separate the wind turbine wake from the undisturbed flow. The method relies on the wind speed distribution in the measured wind field to select one specific threshold value and split the measurements into wake and background points. The purpose of the method is to reduce the amount of data required – the proposed algorithm does not need precise information on the wind speed or direction and can run on the image instead of the measured data.
Cited articles
Aiyer, A. K., Deike, L., and Mueller, M. E.: A sea surface–based drag model for large-eddy simulation of wind–wave interaction, J. Atmos. Sci., 80, 49–62, 2023. a
Aiyer, A. K., Deike, L., and Mueller, M. E.: A dynamic wall modeling approach for large eddy simulation of offshore wind farms in realistic oceanic conditions, J. Renew. Sustain. Ener., 16, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0159019, 2024. a
Allaerts, D. and Meyers, J.: Gravity waves and wind-farm efficiency in neutral and stable conditions, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 166, 269–299, 2018. a
Antonini, E. G. and Caldeira, K.: Atmospheric pressure gradients and Coriolis forces provide geophysical limits to power density of large wind farms, Appl. Energ., 281, 116048, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116048, 2021. a
Ardhuin, F., Rogers, E., Babanin, A. V., Filipot, J.-F., Magne, R., Roland, A., van der Westhuysen, A., Queffeulou, P., Lefevre, J.-M., Aouf, L., and Collard, F.: Semiempirical dissipation source functions for ocean waves. Part I: Definition, calibration, and validation, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 40, 1917–1941, 2010. a
Bakhoday-Paskyabi, M., Bui, H., and Mohammadpour Penchah, M.: Atmospheric-Wave Multi-Scale Flow Modelling, Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15583295, 2022. a
Bastankhah, M. and Porté-Agel, F.: Wind farm power optimization via yaw angle control: A wind tunnel study, J. Renew. Sustain. Ener., 11, 023301, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5077038, 2019. a
Breton, S.-P., Sumner, J., Sørensen, J. N., Hansen, K. S., Sarmast, S., and Ivanell, S.: A survey of modelling methods for high-fidelity wind farm simulations using large eddy simulation, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A, 375, 20160097, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0097, 2017. a
Charnock, H.: Wind stress on a water surface, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 81, 639–640, 1955. a
Chen, S., Qiao, F., Jiang, W., Guo, J., and Dai, D.: Impact of surface waves on wind stress under low to moderate wind conditions, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 49, 2017–2028, 2019. a
Chen, S., Qiao, F., Xue, Y., Chen, S., and Ma, H.: Directional characteristic of wind stress vector under swell-dominated conditions, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 125, e2020JC016352, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC016352, 2020a. a
Chen, S., Qiao, F., Zhang, J. A., Ma, H., Xue, Y., and Chen, S.: Swell modulation on wind stress in the constant flux layer, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL089883, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL089883, 2020b. a
Deardorff, J. W.: Stratocumulus-capped mixed layers derived from a three-dimensional model, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 18, 495–527, 1980. a
Deskos, G., Lee, J. C., Draxl, C., and Sprague, M. A.: Review of wind–wave coupling models for large-eddy simulation of the marine atmospheric boundary layer, J. Atmos. Sci., 78, 3025–3045, 2021. a
Donelan, M. A., Hamilton, J., and Hui, W.: Directional spectra of wind-generated ocean waves, Philos. T. R. Soc. S.-A, 315, 509–562, 1985. a
Donelan, M. A., Drennan, W. M., and Katsaros, K. B.: The air–sea momentum flux in conditions of wind sea and swell, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 27, 2087–2099, 1997. a
Dörenkämper, M., Witha, B., Steinfeld, G., Heinemann, D., and Kühn, M.: The impact of stable atmospheric boundary layers on wind-turbine wakes within offshore wind farms, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 144, 146–153, 2015. a
Drennan, W. M., Graber, H. C., Hauser, D., and Quentin, C.: On the wave age dependence of wind stress over pure wind seas, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 108, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JC000715, 2003. a
Grachev, A. and Fairall, C.: Upward momentum transfer in the marine boundary layer, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 31, 1698–1711, 2001. a
Högström, U., Sahlée, E., Smedman, A.-S., Rutgersson, A., Nilsson, E., Kahma, K. K., and Drennan, W. M.: Surface stress over the ocean in swell-dominated conditions during moderate winds, J. Atmos. Sci., 72, 4777–4795, 2015. a
Jenkins, A. D., Paskyabi, M. B., Fer, I., Gupta, A., and Adakudlu, M.: Modelling the effect of ocean waves on the atmospheric and ocean boundary layers, Enrgy. Proced., 24, 166–175, 2012. a
Jonkman, J., Butterfield, S., Musial, W., and Scott, G.: Definition of a 5 MW reference wind turbine for offshore system development, Tech. rep., National Renewable Energy Lab.(NREL), Golden, CO (United States), https://doi.org/10.2172/947422, 2009. a
Kahma, K. K., Donelan, M. A., Drennan, W. M., and Terray, E. A.: Evidence of energy and momentum flux from swell to wind, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 46, 2143–2156, 2016. a
Klemp, J., Dudhia, J., and Hassiotis, A.: An upper gravity-wave absorbing layer for NWP applications, Mon. Weather Rev., 136, 3987–4004, 2008. a
Liu, C., Li, X., Song, J., Zou, Z., Huang, J., Zhang, J. A., Jie, G., and Wang, J.: Characteristics of the Marine Atmospheric Boundary Layer under the Influence of Ocean Surface Waves, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 52, 1261–1276, 2022. a
Maas, O.: From gigawatt to multi-gigawatt wind farms: wake effects, energy budgets and inertial gravity waves investigated by large-eddy simulations, Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 535–556, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-535-2023, 2023a. a
Maas, O.: Large-eddy simulation of a 15 GW wind farm: Flow effects, energy budgets and comparison with wake models, Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering, 9, 1108180, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmech.2023.1108180, 2023b. a, b, c, d
Maas, O. and Raasch, S.: Wake properties and power output of very large wind farms for different meteorological conditions and turbine spacings: a large-eddy simulation case study for the German Bight, Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 715–739, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-715-2022, 2022. a
Maronga, B., Gryschka, M., Heinze, R., Hoffmann, F., Kanani-Sühring, F., Keck, M., Ketelsen, K., Letzel, M. O., Sühring, M., and Raasch, S.: The Parallelized Large-Eddy Simulation Model (PALM) version 4.0 for atmospheric and oceanic flows: model formulation, recent developments, and future perspectives, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2515–2551, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2515-2015, 2015. a
Maronga, B., Banzhaf, S., Burmeister, C., Esch, T., Forkel, R., Fröhlich, D., Fuka, V., Gehrke, K. F., Geletič, J., Giersch, S., Gronemeier, T., Groß, G., Heldens, W., Hellsten, A., Hoffmann, F., Inagaki, A., Kadasch, E., Kanani-Sühring, F., Ketelsen, K., Khan, B. A., Knigge, C., Knoop, H., Krč, P., Kurppa, M., Maamari, H., Matzarakis, A., Mauder, M., Pallasch, M., Pavlik, D., Pfafferott, J., Resler, J., Rissmann, S., Russo, E., Salim, M., Schrempf, M., Schwenkel, J., Seckmeyer, G., Schubert, S., Sühring, M., von Tils, R., Vollmer, L., Ward, S., Witha, B., Wurps, H., Zeidler, J., and Raasch, S.: Overview of the PALM model system 6.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1335–1372, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1335-2020, 2020. a
Monin, A. S. and Obukhov, A. M.: Basic laws of turbulent mixing in the surface layer of the atmosphere, Contrib. Geophys. Inst. Acad. Sci. USSR, 151, 163–187, 1954. a
Munters, W. and Meyers, J.: Dynamic strategies for yaw and induction control of wind farms based on large-eddy simulation and optimization, Energies, 11, 177, https://doi.org/10.3390/en11010177, 2018. a
Nilsson, E. O., Rutgersson, A., Smedman, A.-S., and Sullivan, P. P.: Convective boundary-layer structure in the presence of wind-following swell, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 138, 1476–1489, 2012. a
Ning, X.: Swell impacts on an offshore wind farm in stable boundary layer: wake flow and energy budget analysis, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10890846, 2024. a
Ning, X. and Paskyabi, M. B.: Parameterization of wave-induced stress in large-eddy simulations of the marine atmospheric boundary layer, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 129, e2023JC020722, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JC020722, 2024. a
Ning, X., Paskyabi, M. B., Bui, H. H., and Penchah, M. M.: Evaluation of sea surface roughness parameterization in meso-to-micro scale simulation of the offshore wind field, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 242, 105592, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2023.105592, 2023. a
PALM Model System: palm_model_system, GitLab [code], https://gitlab.palm-model.org/releases/palm_model_system (last access: 3 June 2025), 2021. a
Paskyabi, M. B., Zieger, S., Jenkins, A. D., Babanin, A., and Chalikov, D.: Sea surface gravity wave-wind interaction in the marine atmospheric boundary layer, Enrgy. Proced., 53, 184–192, 2014. a
Patton, E. G., Sullivan, P. P., Kosović, B., Dudhia, J., Mahrt, L., Žagar, M., and Marić, T.: On the influence of swell propagation angle on surface drag, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 58, 1039–1059, 2019. a
Porchetta, S., Muñoz-Esparza, D., Munters, W., van Beeck, J., and van Lipzig, N.: Impact of ocean waves on offshore wind farm power production, Renew. Energ., 180, 1179–1193, 2021. a
Sanchez Gomez, M., Lundquist, J. K., Mirocha, J. D., and Arthur, R. S.: Investigating the physical mechanisms that modify wind plant blockage in stable boundary layers, Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1049–1069, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1049-2023, 2023. a, b, c
Semedo, A., Sušelj, K., Rutgersson, A., and Sterl, A.: A global view on the wind sea and swell climate and variability from ERA-40, J. Climate, 24, 1461–1479, 2011. a
Smedman, A.-S., Guo Larsén, X., Högström, U., Kahma, K. K., and Pettersson, H.: Effect of sea state on the momentum exchange over the sea during neutral conditions, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 108, 3367, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JC001526, 2003. a
Sood, I., Simon, E., Vitsas, A., Blockmans, B., Larsen, G. C., and Meyers, J.: Comparison of large eddy simulations against measurements from the Lillgrund offshore wind farm, Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 2469–2489, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2469-2022, 2022. a
Sullivan, P. P. and McWilliams, J. C.: Dynamics of winds and currents coupled to surface waves, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 42, 19–42, 2010. a
van der Laan, M. P. and Sørensen, N. N.: Why the Coriolis force turns a wind farm wake clockwise in the Northern Hemisphere, Wind Energ. Sci., 2, 285–294, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2-285-2017, 2017. a
Van Wijk, A., Beljaars, A., Holtslag, A., and Turkenburg, W.: Evaluation of stability corrections in wind speed profiles over the North Sea, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 33, 551–566, 1990. a
Wu, L. and Qiao, F.: Wind Profile in the Wave Boundary Layer and Its Application in a Coupled Atmosphere-Wave Model, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 127, e2021JC018123, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JC018123, 2022. a
Wu, L., Hristov, T., and Rutgersson, A.: Vertical profiles of wave-coherent momentum flux and velocity variances in the marine atmospheric boundary layer, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 48, 625–641, 2018. a
Xiao, S. and Yang, D.: Large-eddy simulation-based study of effect of swell-induced pitch motion on wake-flow statistics and power extraction of offshore wind turbines, Energies, 12, 1246, https://doi.org/10.3390/en12071246, 2019. a
Yang, D., Meneveau, C., and Shen, L.: Effect of downwind swells on offshore wind energy harvesting – a large-eddy simulation study, Renew. Energ., 70, 11–23, 2014. a
Yang, H., Ge, M., Abkar, M., and Yang, X. I.: Large-eddy simulation study of wind turbine array above swell sea, Energy, 256, 124674, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124674, 2022a. a
Yang, H., Ge, M., Gu, B., Du, B., and Liu, Y.: The effect of swell on marine atmospheric boundary layer and the operation of an offshore wind turbine, Energy, 244, 123200, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123200, 2022b. a, b, c
Yousefi, K., Hora, G. S., Yang, H., Veron, F., and Giometto, M. G.: A machine learning model for reconstructing skin-friction drag over ocean surface waves, J. Fluid Mech., 983, A9, https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2024.81, 2024. a
Zhang, Z., Hao, X., Santoni, C., Shen, L., Sotiropoulos, F., and Khosronejad, A.: Toward prediction of turbulent atmospheric flows over propagating oceanic waves via machine-learning augmented large-eddy simulation, Ocean Eng., 280, 114759, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114759, 2023. a
Zou, Z., Zhao, D., Zhang, J. A., Li, S., Cheng, Y., Lv, H., and Ma, X.: The influence of swell on the atmospheric boundary layer under nonneutral conditions, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 48, 925–936, 2018. a
Short summary
Waves interact with the overlying wind field by modifying the stresses at the atmosphere–ocean interface. We develop and employ a parameterization method of wave-induced stresses in the numerical simulation of an offshore wind farm in a stable atmospheric boundary layer. This work demonstrates how swells change the kinetic energy transport and induce wind veer and wake deflection, leading to significant variations in the power output of wind turbines at different positions of the wind farm.
Waves interact with the overlying wind field by modifying the stresses at the atmosphere–ocean...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint