Articles | Volume 11, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-11-2427-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-11-2427-2026
Research article
 | 
10 Jul 2026
Research article |  | 10 Jul 2026

OC7 project Phase II: comparison of global-to-local load transfer approaches in floating structures

Michael Karch, Friedemann Borisade, Fabian Wendt, Romain Pinguet, Thang Do, Jérôme de Lauzon, Lucas Tessier, Jon Cerrada-Garcés, Alvaro Olcoz-Alonso, Jesús Artal, Borja Servan-Camas, Julio García-Espinosa, Cai Wei Sun, Haruki Yoshimoto, Takaya Nagumo, Go Tsuneto, Roger Bergua, Lu Wang, Jason Jonkman, Amy Robertson, Constance Clement, and Guillaume Potier

Viewed

Total article views: 709 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
510 169 30 709 19 17
  • HTML: 510
  • PDF: 169
  • XML: 30
  • Total: 709
  • BibTeX: 19
  • EndNote: 17
Views and downloads (calculated since 05 May 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 05 May 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 709 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 685 with geography defined and 24 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 10 Jul 2026
Download
Short summary
As part of the Offshore Code Comparison Collaboration 7 (OC7) project, load transfer from global analysis models to local structural designs was examined. Different load-mapping workflows from project participants were compared using a shared reference design and consistent checks. Results show that load-mapping choices, pressure application, and treatment of structural flexibility can influence predicted stresses and fatigue, highlighting key sources of uncertainty and providing guidance for more consistent global‑to‑local assessments.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint