Dear Authors,

As you can see both reviewers are happy with the importance of the paper, and recommend publication. However, Reviewer 2 expressed some disappointment in the way you responded to his comments (i.e. only responding to him in your responses, but not discussing the issue in the paper itself). In fact Reviewer 1 expressed the same sentiment, but nevertheless recommended to accept the paper in its current form.

Therefore, I'm asking you to provide a minor revision of your manuscript, in which you more explicitly include the relevant parts of discussions from the responses to the reviewers in the manuscript itself (see in particular the comments of Reviewer 2 related to wind speed and line sag). Also correct the further minor comment related to notation of matrices.

Please, provide a new manuscript and a separate list of changes in which you each time insert the comment of the reviewer, and the changes you made to the manuscript (page and line), and provide an annotated manuscript with the changes in color.

Sincerely,
Johan Meyers

Dear Authors,

Please see some further textual corrections in attached file. After incorporating them, I will be able to accept your paper.

Yours Sincerely,
Johan Meyers

In addition to the comments by the associate editor I would like to avoid the abbreviation "AWE" in the Conclusion and Outlook since some people only reads the abstract and the conclusion.
Sincerely, Jakob Mann