The authors present an important contribution to the field, a computational scaling study for fixed-wing ground-generation AWE systems. The present manuscript is a revision of an earlier submission and many issues have been solved and the scientific quality improved. However, the quality of presentation of this work still needs to be improved further. Below is a concise summary:

- Several equations and statements are wrong and need to be corrected.
- In many cases, the wording is not quite fitting and should be adjusted.
- In some places, it is not really clear what the authors mean. This should be reworked.
- Typos need to be corrected

I have prepared an annotated PDF of the manuscript with a lot of details that can be used as guidance.

Dear authors,
We have received three independent reviews for your manuscript. One reviewer recommended accepting the paper subject to minor revisions, two reviewers recommended reconsidering the manuscript after major revisions. All reviewers have provided valuable feedback which you can use to improve the quality of the manuscript.
I am well aware that this manuscript has already undergone reviewing and revision iterations, however, the quality is not yet at the level to publish.
Best regards,
Roland Schmehl

Dear authors,

Thank you for implementing the requested changes in the earlier submission of the manuscript. The two anonymous reviewers still added a few points, but nothing serious. Note that only one reviewer added a report as PDF.

Best regards,
Roland Schmehl

Roland,

It looks like a long process, but an improved MSS has resulted. Thanks for shepherding this through the process.

I still struggle with finding things in this system, so thanks for your patience with me as well.

Paul