Wind Energy Science
Wind Energy Science
WES
Articles | Volume 8, issue 2
Articles | Volume 8, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-193-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-193-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 8, issue 2
Review article
 | 
16 Feb 2023
Review article |  | 16 Feb 2023

A comparison of dynamic inflow models for the blade element momentum method

Simone Mancini, Koen Boorsma, Gerard Schepers, and Feike Savenije

Viewed

Total article views: 2,111 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,577 482 52 2,111 47 34
  • HTML: 1,577
  • PDF: 482
  • XML: 52
  • Total: 2,111
  • BibTeX: 47
  • EndNote: 34
Views and downloads (calculated since 25 Oct 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 25 Oct 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,111 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,041 with geography defined and 70 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 23 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
Modern wind turbines are subject to complex wind conditions that are far from the hypothesis of steady uniform inflow at the core of blade element momentum methods (the current industry standard for wind turbine design). Various corrections have been proposed to model this complexity. The present work focuses on modelling the unsteady evolution of wind turbine wakes (dynamic inflow), comparing the different corrections available and highlighting their effects on design load predictions.
Read more
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint