Articles | Volume 9, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-417-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-417-2024
Research article
 | 
21 Feb 2024
Research article |  | 21 Feb 2024

A novel techno-economical layout optimization tool for floating wind farm design

Amalia Ida Hietanen, Thor Heine Snedker, Katherine Dykes, and Ilmas Bayati

Related authors

Probabilistic lifetime extension assessment using mid-term data: Lillgrund wind farm case study
Shadan Mozafari, Jennifer Rinker, Paul Veers, and Katherine Dykes
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-68,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-68, 2024
Revised manuscript under review for WES
Short summary
Sensitivity of fatigue reliability in wind turbines: effects of design turbulence and the Wöhler exponent
Shadan Mozafari, Paul Veers, Jennifer Rinker, and Katherine Dykes
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 799–820, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-799-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-799-2024, 2024
Short summary
Grand Challenges in Social Aspects of Wind Energy Development
Lena Kitzing, David Rudolph, Sophie Nyborg, Helena Solman, Tom Cronin, Gundula Hübner, Elizabeth Gill, Katherine Dykes, Suzanne Tegen, and Julia Kirch Kirkegaard
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-174,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-174, 2024
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Offshore wind farm optimisation: a comparison of performance between regular and irregular wind turbine layouts
Maaike Sickler, Bart Ummels, Michiel Zaaijer, Roland Schmehl, and Katherine Dykes
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1225–1233, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1225-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1225-2023, 2023
Short summary
Grand Challenges: wind energy research needs for a global energy transition
Paul Veers, Katherine Dykes, Sukanta Basu, Alessandro Bianchini, Andrew Clifton, Peter Green, Hannele Holttinen, Lena Kitzing, Branko Kosovic, Julie K. Lundquist, Johan Meyers, Mark O'Malley, William J. Shaw, and Bethany Straw
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 2491–2496, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2491-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2491-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Thematic area: Wind technologies | Topic: Design concepts and methods for plants, turbines, and components
One-to-one aeroservoelastic validation of operational loads and performance of a 2.8 MW wind turbine model in OpenFAST
Kenneth Brown, Pietro Bortolotti, Emmanuel Branlard, Mayank Chetan, Scott Dana, Nathaniel deVelder, Paula Doubrawa, Nicholas Hamilton, Hristo Ivanov, Jason Jonkman, Christopher Kelley, and Daniel Zalkind
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1791–1810, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1791-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1791-2024, 2024
Short summary
Identification of electro-mechanical interactions in wind turbines
Fiona Dominique Lüdecke, Martin Schmid, and Po Wen Cheng
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1527–1545, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1527-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1527-2024, 2024
Short summary
Identification of operational deflection shapes of a wind turbine gearbox using fiber-optic strain sensors on a serial production end-of-line test bench
Unai Gutierrez Santiago, Aemilius van Vondelen, Alfredo Fernández Sisón, Henk Polinder, and Jan-Willem van Wingerden
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-83,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-83, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for WES
Short summary
A sensitivity-based estimation method for investigating control co-design relevance
Jenna Iori, Carlo Luigi Bottasso, and Michael Kenneth McWilliam
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1289–1304, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1289-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1289-2024, 2024
Short summary
Validation of aeroelastic dynamic model of active trailing edge flap system tested on a 4.3 MW wind turbine
Andrea Gamberini, Thanasis Barlas, Alejandro Gomez Gonzalez, and Helge Aagaard Madsen
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1229–1249, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1229-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1229-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Charhouni, N., Sallaou, M., and Mansouri, K.: Realistic wind farm design layout optimization with different wind turbines types, Int. J. Energ. Environ. Eng., 10, 307–318, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-019-0303-2, 2019. a, b
DTOcean: Deliverable 4.6: Framework for the prediction of the reliability, economic and environmental criteria and assessment methodologies for Moorings and Foundations, in: DTOcean – Optimal Design Tools for Ocean Energy Arrays, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308265985_Framework_for_the_prediction_of_the_reliability_economic_and_environmental_criteria_and_assessment_methodologies_for_Moorings_and_Foundations_Deliverable_46_of_the_DTOcean_project (last access: 19 February 2024), 2015. a
EMD: windPRO 3.6 User Manual: OPTIMIZE, EMD International A/S, https://help.emd.dk/knowledgebase/content/windPRO3.6/c8-UK_WindPRO3.6-OPTIMIZATION.pdf (last access: 19 February 2024), 2022. a
Feng, J. and Shen, W. Z.: Solving the wind farm layout optimization problem using random search algorithm, Renew. Energy, 78, 182–192, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.01.005, 2015. a
Froese, G., Ku, S. Y., Kheirabadi, A. C., and Nagamune, R.: Optimal layout design of floating offshore wind farms, Renew. Energy, 190, 94–102, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.104, 2022. a, b
Download
Short summary
The layout of a floating offshore wind farm was optimized to maximize the relative net present value (NPV). By modeling power generation, losses, inter-array cables, anchors and operational costs, an increase of EUR 34.5 million in relative NPV compared to grid-based layouts was achieved. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to examine the impact of economic factors, providing valuable insights. This study contributes to enhancing the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of floating wind farms.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint