Articles | Volume 9, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-417-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-417-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
A novel techno-economical layout optimization tool for floating wind farm design
Amalia Ida Hietanen
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
PEAK Wind, Jens Baggesensvej 90K st, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
Thor Heine Snedker
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
PEAK Wind, Jens Baggesensvej 90K st, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
DTU, Frederiksborgvej 399, 115, S20, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark
Ilmas Bayati
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
PEAK Wind, Jens Baggesensvej 90K st, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
Related authors
No articles found.
Azélice Ludot, Thor Heine Snedker, Athanasios Kolios, and Ilmas Bayati
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-162, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-162, 2025
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents a methodology to develop machine learning models designed to predict, in real-time, hourly fatigue damage accumulation in the mooring lines of floating wind turbines, from measurements of five environmental variables: wind speed, wind direction, wave height, wave period, and wind-wave misalignment. The proposed tool is intended for predictive maintenance applications, which has been identified as a key area for cost reduction in floating wind.
Shadan Mozafari, Jennifer Rinker, Paul Veers, and Katherine Dykes
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-68, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-68, 2024
Revised manuscript under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
The study clarifies the use of probabilistic extrapolation of short/mid-term data for long-term site-specific fatigue assessments. In addition, it assesses the accountability of the Frandsen model in the Lillgrund wind farm as an example of compact layout.
Shadan Mozafari, Paul Veers, Jennifer Rinker, and Katherine Dykes
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 799–820, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-799-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-799-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Turbulence is one of the main drivers of fatigue in wind turbines. There is some debate on how to model the turbulence in normal wind conditions in the design phase. To address such debates, we study the fatigue load distribution and reliability following different models of the International Electrotechnical Commission 61400-1 standard. The results show the lesser importance of load uncertainty due to turbulence distribution compared to the uncertainty of material resistance and Miner’s rule.
Lena Kitzing, David Rudolph, Sophie Nyborg, Helena Solman, Tom Cronin, Gundula Hübner, Elizabeth Gill, Katherine Dykes, Suzanne Tegen, and Julia Kirch Kirkegaard
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-174, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-174, 2024
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Short summary
Social aspects are gaining traction in wind energy. A recent publication by Kirkegaard et al. lays out social grand challenges. We discuss them for a more technologically focused audience. We describe the role of social sciences in wind energy research, showing insights, topics, and value-added for public engagement and planning, just ownership and value-based design. We reflect how social and technical sciences can jointly advance wind energy research into a new interdisciplinary era.
Maaike Sickler, Bart Ummels, Michiel Zaaijer, Roland Schmehl, and Katherine Dykes
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1225–1233, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1225-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1225-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper investigates the effect of wind farm layout on the performance of offshore wind farms. A regular farm layout is compared to optimised irregular layouts. The irregular layouts have higher annual energy production, and the power production is less sensitive to wind direction. However, turbine towers require thicker walls to counteract increased fatigue due to increased turbulence levels in the farm. The study shows that layout optimisation can be used to maintain high-yield performance.
Paul Veers, Katherine Dykes, Sukanta Basu, Alessandro Bianchini, Andrew Clifton, Peter Green, Hannele Holttinen, Lena Kitzing, Branko Kosovic, Julie K. Lundquist, Johan Meyers, Mark O'Malley, William J. Shaw, and Bethany Straw
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 2491–2496, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2491-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2491-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Wind energy will play a central role in the transition of our energy system to a carbon-free future. However, many underlying scientific issues remain to be resolved before wind can be deployed in the locations and applications needed for such large-scale ambitions. The Grand Challenges are the gaps in the science left behind during the rapid growth of wind energy. This article explains the breadth of the unfinished business and introduces 10 articles that detail the research needs.
Johan Meyers, Carlo Bottasso, Katherine Dykes, Paul Fleming, Pieter Gebraad, Gregor Giebel, Tuhfe Göçmen, and Jan-Willem van Wingerden
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 2271–2306, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2271-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2271-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We provide a comprehensive overview of the state of the art and the outstanding challenges in wind farm flow control, thus identifying the key research areas that could further enable commercial uptake and success. To this end, we have structured the discussion on challenges and opportunities into four main areas: (1) insight into control flow physics, (2) algorithms and AI, (3) validation and industry implementation, and (4) integrating control with system design
(co-design).
Cited articles
Charhouni, N., Sallaou, M., and Mansouri, K.: Realistic wind farm design layout optimization with different wind turbines types, Int. J. Energ. Environ. Eng., 10, 307–318, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-019-0303-2, 2019. a, b
DTOcean: Deliverable 4.6: Framework for the prediction of the reliability, economic and environmental criteria and assessment methodologies for Moorings and Foundations, in: DTOcean – Optimal Design Tools for Ocean Energy Arrays, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308265985_Framework_for_the_prediction_of_the_reliability_economic_and_environmental_criteria_and_assessment_methodologies_for_Moorings_and_Foundations_Deliverable_46_of_the_DTOcean_project (last access: 19 February 2024), 2015. a
EMD: windPRO 3.6 User Manual: OPTIMIZE, EMD International A/S, https://help.emd.dk/knowledgebase/content/windPRO3.6/c8-UK_WindPRO3.6-OPTIMIZATION.pdf (last access: 19 February 2024), 2022. a
Feng, J. and Shen, W. Z.: Solving the wind farm layout optimization problem using random search algorithm, Renew. Energy, 78, 182–192, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.01.005, 2015. a
Froese, G., Ku, S. Y., Kheirabadi, A. C., and Nagamune, R.: Optimal layout design of floating offshore wind farms, Renew. Energy, 190, 94–102, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.104, 2022. a, b
GEBCO: GEBCO Gridded Bathymetry Data Download, https://download.gebco.net/ (last access: 19 February 2024), 2024. a
Lackner, M. A. and Elkinton, C. N.: An Analytical Framework for Offshore Wind Farm Layout Optimization, Wind Eng., 31, 17–31, 2007. a
Lerch, M., De-Prada-Gil, M., and Molins, C.: A metaheuristic optimization model for the inter-array layout planning of floating offshore wind farms, Int. J. Elect. Power Energ. Syst., 131, 107128, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2021.107128, 2021. a, b
Lieng, J. T., Sturm, H., and Hasselø, K. K.: Dynamically installed anchors for floating offshore wind turbines, Ocean Eng., 266, 112789, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112789, 2022. a
Mahfouz, M. Y., Hall, M., and Cheng, P. W.: A parametric study of the mooring system design parameters to reduce wake losses in a floating wind farm, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 2265, 042004, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2265/4/042004, 2022. a
Maienza, C., Avossa, A., Ricciardelli, F., Coiro, D., Troise, G., and Georgakis, C.: A life cycle cost model for floating offshore wind farms, Appl. Energy, 266, 114716, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114716, 2020. a
Marcus, M. M.: Briefing: ScotWind Leasing for offshore wind, https://www.crownestatescotland.com/sites/default/files/2023-08/scotwind-briefing-november-2022.pdf (last access: 19 February 2024), 2022. a
Mosetti, G., Poloni, C., and Diviacco, B.: Optimization of wind turbine positioning in large windfarms by means of a genetic algorithm, J. Wind Eng. Indust. Aerodynam., 51, 105–116, https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(94)90080-9, 1994. a
Pedersen, M. M., Forsting, A. M., van der Laan, P., Riva, R., Romàn, L. A. A., Risco, J. C., Friis-Møller, M., Quick, J., Christiansen, J. P. S., Rodrigues, R. V., Olsen, B. T., and Réthoré, P.-E.: PyWake 2.5.0: An open-source wind farm simulation tool, https://gitlab.windenergy.dtu.dk/TOPFARM/PyWake (last access: 19 February 2024), 2023. a
Pillai, A. C., Chick, J., Khorasanchi, M., Barbouchi, S., and Johanning, L.: Application of an offshore wind farm layout optimization methodology at Middelgrunden wind farm, Ocean Eng., 139, 287–297, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.04.049, 2017. a
Ramírez, L., Fraile, D., and Brindley, G.: Offshore Wind in Europe, Tech. rep., Wind Europe, https://windeurope.org/intelligence-platform/product/offshore-wind-in-europe-key-trends-and-statistics-2020/ (last access: 19 February 2024), 2020. a
Rentschler, M. U.: Design optimization of dynamic inter-array cable systems for floating offshore wind turbines, Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev., 111, 622–635, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.05.024, 2019. a, b
Rentschler, M. U. T.: Parametric study of dynamic inter-array cable systems for floating offshore wind turbines, Mar. Syst. Ocean Technol., 15, 16–25, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40868-020-00071-7, 2020. a
Riva, R., Liew, J. Y., Friis-Møller, M., Krasimirov Dimitrov, N., Barlas, E., Réthoré, P.-E., and Pedersen, M. M.: Welcome to TOPFARM, https://topfarm.pages.windenergy.dtu.dk/TopFarm2/index.html (last access: 19 February 2024), 2024. a
Ros, M. and James, R.: Floating Offshore Wind – Market & Technology Review, Tech. rep., Carbon Trust, https://www.carbontrust.com/our-work-and-impact/guides-reports-and-tools/floating-offshore-wind-market-technology-review (last access: 19 February 2024), 2015. a
Souza de Alencar, M.: Optimization heuristics for offshore wind power plant collection systems design, Optimeringsheuristik til design af opsamlingssystemer til offshore vindkraft, MS thesis, DTU Department of Wind and Energy Systems, https://github.com/mdealencar/interarray/blob/main/README.md (last access: 19 February 2024), 2022. a, b
Zhang, Q., Wang, X., Du, W., Zhang, H., and Li, X.: Reliability Model of Submarine Cable Based on Time-varying Failure Rate, IEEE Xplore, 10, 711–715, https://doi.org/10.1109/APAP47170.2019.9224914, 2019. a
Short summary
The layout of a floating offshore wind farm was optimized to maximize the relative net present value (NPV). By modeling power generation, losses, inter-array cables, anchors and operational costs, an increase of EUR 34.5 million in relative NPV compared to grid-based layouts was achieved. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to examine the impact of economic factors, providing valuable insights. This study contributes to enhancing the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of floating wind farms.
The layout of a floating offshore wind farm was optimized to maximize the relative net present...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint