Articles | Volume 10, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-161-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-161-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Characterization of dynamic stall of a wind turbine airfoil with a high Reynolds number
Hye Rim Kim
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Institute of Turbomachinery and Fluid Dynamics, Leibniz University Hannover, Garbsen, Germany
Jasson A. Printezis
Institute of Turbomachinery and Fluid Dynamics, Leibniz University Hannover, Garbsen, Germany
Jan Dominik Ahrens
Institute of Turbomachinery and Fluid Dynamics, Leibniz University Hannover, Garbsen, Germany
Joerg R. Seume
Institute of Turbomachinery and Fluid Dynamics, Leibniz University Hannover, Garbsen, Germany
Lars Wein
Institute of Turbomachinery and Fluid Dynamics, Leibniz University Hannover, Garbsen, Germany
Related authors
Hye Rim Kim and Lars Wein
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2026-155, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2026-155, 2026
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
Offshore wind turbines (10–15 MW) experience diverse flow conditions, beyond what smaller turbines face. This challenges the accuracy of low-order aerodynamic tools. As experimental validation is difficult, high-order methods such as Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation (DDES) are used. Here, DDES is validated for offshore conditions, enabling accurate prediction of unsteady, nonlinear flows for operational safety and power optimization.
Hye Rim Kim and Lars Wein
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2026-155, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2026-155, 2026
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
Offshore wind turbines (10–15 MW) experience diverse flow conditions, beyond what smaller turbines face. This challenges the accuracy of low-order aerodynamic tools. As experimental validation is difficult, high-order methods such as Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation (DDES) are used. Here, DDES is validated for offshore conditions, enabling accurate prediction of unsteady, nonlinear flows for operational safety and power optimization.
Philipp N. Wölk, Niklas Maroldt, and Joerg R. Seume
Wind Energ. Sci., 11, 2479–2494, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-11-2479-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-11-2479-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
This study experimentally investigates how passing rotor blades affect the aerodynamic load on the tower of a large modern wind turbine. The interaction between the rotor and the tower was analyzed using pressure measurements on the tower. Aerodynamic effects previously seen only in computer simulations could be verified by these measurements. The findings help to improve the understanding of how large wind turbines behave during operation and support better turbine design in the future.
Julia Gebauer, Felix Prigge, Dominik Ahrens, Lars Wein, and Claudio Balzani
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 679–694, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-679-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-679-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The amount of energy that can be extracted from wind depends primarily on the blade geometry, which can be affected by elastic deformations. This paper presents a first study analysing the influence of cross-sectional deformations of a 15 MW wind turbine blade on aero-elastic simulations. The results show that cross-sectional deformations have a minor influence on the internal loads of rotor blades in normal operation.
Jan Dominik Ahrens, Jasson A. Printezis, Ahmed G. Yosry, Joerg R. Seume, and Lars Wein
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-159, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-159, 2023
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Short summary
Dynamic stall introduces transient loads that excite blade vibrations, which contribute to mechanical fatigue and can lead to blade failure. In order to design wind turbine airfoils that are less prone to dynamic stall, the onset of dynamic stall has to be predicted. This work contributes to the development of reduced-order models that predict dynamic stall in a cost-efficient way. The models can be used in the design process of new airfoil geometries of future wind turbines.
Cited articles
Ahrens, J. D., Ziesse, M., Wein, L., and Seume, J. R.: A Novel And Costeffective Approach To Simulating Dynamic Stall On Rotating Wind Turbine Blades With A Changing Angle Of Attack, GPPS Chania, 2022. a
Andersen, P. B., Gaunaa, M., Bak, C., and Hansen, M. H.: A dynamic stall model for airfoils with deformable trailing edges, Wind Energy, 12, 734–751, 2009. a
Bangga, G., Weihing, P., Lutz, T., and Krämer, E.: Effect of computational grid on accurate prediction of a wind turbine rotor using delayed detached-eddy simulations, J. Mecha. Sci. Technol., 31, 2359–2364, 2017. a
Bangga, G., Lutz, T., and Arnold, M.: An improved second-order dynamic stall model for wind turbine airfoils, Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 1037–1058, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1037-2020, 2020. a
Bangga, G., Parkinson, S., and Collier, W.: Development and Validation of the IAG Dynamic Stall Model in State-Space Representation for Wind Turbine Airfoils, Energies, 16, 3994, https://doi.org/10.3390/en16103994, 2023. a
Björck, A.: Coordinates and Calculations for the FFA-W1-xxx,FFA-W2-xxx and FFA-W3-xxx Series of Airfoils for Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines, The Aeronautical Research Institute of Sweden, FFA TN 1990-15, Stockholm, 1990, https://books.google.de/books?id=alyC0AEACAAJ (last access: 7 January 2025), 1990. a
Branlard, E., Jonkman, B., Pirrung, G. R., Dixon, K., and Jonkman, J.: Dynamic inflow and unsteady aerodynamics models for modal and stability analyses in OpenFAST, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 2265, 032044, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2265/3/032044, 2022. a, b
Braud, C., Podvin, B., and Deparday, J.: Study of the wall pressure variations on the stall inception of a thick cambered profile at high Reynolds number, Physical Review Fluids, 9, 014605, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevfluids.9.014605, 2024. a
Brunner, C. E., Kiefer, J., Hansen, M. O., and Hultmark, M.: Study of Reynolds number effects on the aerodynamics of a moderately thick airfoil using a high-pressure wind tunnel, Exp. Fluids, 62, 1–17, 2021. a
Corke, T. C. and Thomas, F. O.: Dynamic stall in pitching airfoils: aerodynamic damping and compressibility effects, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 47, 479–505, 2015. a
Damiani, R. R. and Hayman, G.: The Unsteady Aerodynamics Module For FAST8, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, https://doi.org/10.2172/1576488, 2019. a
De Tavernier, D., Ferreira, C., Viré, A., LeBlanc, B., and Bernardy, S.: Controlling dynamic stall using vortex generators on a wind turbine airfoil, Renew. Energ., 172, 1194–1211, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.03.019, 2021. a
Deparday, J. and Mulleners, K.: Modeling the interplay between the shear layer and leading edge suction during dynamic stall, Phys. Fluids, 31, 107104, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5121312, 2019. a, b, c
Drela, M.: Xfoil 6.99, XFOIL [code], https://web.mit.edu/drela/Public/web/xfoil/, last access: 23 December 2013.
Du, Z. and Selig, M.: A 3-D stall-delay model for horizontal axis wind turbine performance prediction, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, AIAA-98-0021, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1998-21, 1998. a
Gerontakos, P. and Lee, T.: Dynamic stall flow control via a trailing-edge flap, AIAA J., 44, 469–480, 2006. a
Gupta, R. and Ansell, P. J.: Unsteady flow physics of airfoil dynamic stall, AIAA J., 57, 165–175, 2019. a
Gupta, S. and Leishman, J. G.: Dynamic stall modelling of the S809 aerofoil and comparison with experiments, Wind Energy, 9, 521–547, 2006. a
Hansen, M. H., Gaunaa, M., and Aagaard Madsen, H.: A Beddoes-Leishman type dynamic stall model in state-space and indicial formulations, Denmark. Forskningscenter Risoe. Risoe-R No. 1354(EN), 2004. a
Huang, X., Albers, M., Meysonnat, P., Meinke, M., and Schröder, W.: Analysis of the effect of freestream turbulence on dynamic stall of wind turbine blades, Int. J. Heat Fluid Fl., 85, 108668, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2020.108668, 2020. a
Issa, R. I.: Solution of the implicitly discretised fluid flow equations by operator-splitting, J. Comput. Phys., 62, 40–65, 1986. a
Jasak, H.: Dynamic Mesh Handling in OpenFOAM, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2009-341, 2009. a
Kang, S.-H., Ryu, K.-W., and Roh, S.-C.: Reynolds Number Extrapolation on High Thickness-Ratio Airfoil for Megawatt-Class Wind Turbine, Int. J. Aeronaut. Space, 19, 575–583, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-018-0074-7, 2018. a
Kiefer, J., Brunner, C. E., Hansen, M. O., and Hultmark, M.: Dynamic stall at high Reynolds numbers induced by ramp-type pitching motions, J. Fluid Mech., 938, https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2022.70, 2022. a, b, c, d
Konstadinopoulos, P., Thrasher, D., Mook, D., Nayfeh, A., and Watson, L.: A vortex-lattice method for general, unsteady aerodynamics, J. Aircraft, 22, 43–49, 1985. a
Leishman, G. J.: Principles of helicopter aerodynamics, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 9781107013353, 2006. a
Letzgus, J., Gardner, A. D., Schwermer, T., Keßler, M., and Krämer, E.: Numerical investigations of dynamic stall on a rotor with cyclic pitch control, J. Am. Helicopter Soc. 64, 1–14, 2019. a
Merz, C. B., Wolf, C., Richter, K., Kaufmann, K., Mielke, A., and Raffel, M.: Spanwise differences in static and dynamic stall on a pitching rotor blade tip model, J. Am. Helicopter Soc. 62, 1–11, 2017. a
Mulleners, K. and Raffel, M.: The onset of dynamic stall revisited, Exp. Fluids, 52, 779–793, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-011-1118-y, 2012. a
National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL): OpenFAST v8, GitHub [code], https://github.com/OpenFAST/openfast, last access: 7 January 2025.
OpenCFD Ltd.: OpenFOAM v2012, OpenFOAM [code], https://www.openfoam.com/news/main-news/openfoam-v20-12, last access: 23 December 2020.
Schwermer, T., Gardner, A. D., and Raffel, M.: A novel experiment to understand the dynamic stall phenomenon in rotor axial flight, J. Am. Helicopter Soc. 64, 1–11, 2019. a
Simms, D., Schreck, S., Hand, M., and Fingersh, L. J.: NREL unsteady aerodynamics experiment in the NASA-Ames wind tunnel: a comparison of predictions to measurements, Tech. rep., National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO, United States, 2001. a
Tangler, J. L.: The Nebulous Art of Using Wind-Turnnel Airfoil Data for Predicting Rotor Performance, Proceedings of the ASME 2002 Wind Energy Symposium, ASME 2002 Wind Energy Symposium, Reno, Nevada, USA, 14–17 January 2002, 190–196, ASME, https://doi.org/10.1115/WIND2002-40, 2002. a
Visbal, M. R. and Benton, S. I.: Exploration of high-frequency control of dynamic stall using large-eddy simulations, AIAA J., 56, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J056720, 2018. a
Short summary
The need for renewable energy, thus more efficient wind turbines, is ever increasing. Accurate prediction of the performance in the design stage is necessary. In particular, predicting the dynamic performance of a wind turbine in the region where it undergoes highly unsteady flow is very challenging. We investigated the dynamic performance of an airfoil, which is typical for megastructure wind farms, in support of the development of more efficient design tools in the future.
The need for renewable energy, thus more efficient wind turbines, is ever increasing. Accurate...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint