Articles | Volume 11, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-11-1267-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-11-1267-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Introduction of the virtual center of wind pressure for correlating large-scale turbulent structures and wind turbine loads
Carsten Schubert
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
ICM – Institute for Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany
Daniela Moreno
ForWind – Institute of Physics, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
Jörg Schwarte
Nordex Energy SE & Co. KG, Rostock, Germany
Jan Friedrich
ForWind – Institute of Physics, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
Matthias Wächter
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
ForWind – Institute of Physics, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
Gritt Pokriefke
Nordex Energy SE & Co. KG, Rostock, Germany
Günter Radons
ICM – Institute for Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany
Institute of Physics, Chemnitz University of Technology, Chemnitz, Germany
deceased, 20 July 2024
Joachim Peinke
ForWind – Institute of Physics, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
Related authors
Daniela Moreno, Jan Friedrich, Carsten Schubert, Matthias Wächter, Jörg Schwarte, Gritt Pokriefke, Günter Radons, and Joachim Peinke
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 2729–2754, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-2729-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-2729-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Increased sizes of modern turbines require extended descriptions of the atmospheric wind and its correlation to loads. Here, a surrogate stochastic method for estimating the bending moments at the main shaft is proposed. Based on the center of wind pressure dynamics, an advantage is the possibility of stochastically reconstructing large amounts of load data. Atmospheric measurements and modeled data demonstrate the validity of this method.
Jannis Maus, Joachim Peinke, and Michael Hölling
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2026-48, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2026-48, 2026
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
Among wind energy research, wind turbines with more than one rotor have recently gained a lot of attraction. Apart from promised lower maintenance- or construction costs, an increase in power generation per area, a better control over their wake (wind shadow/turbulence from turbines) makes these turbines highly attractive for large scale usage. This study shows experimentally, how the wake in a dual rotor can be steered and why this is highly promising for increasing windfarm efficiencies.
Branko Kosović, Sukanta Basu, Jacob Berg, Larry K. Berg, Sue E. Haupt, Xiaoli G. Larsén, Joachim Peinke, Richard J. A. M. Stevens, Paul Veers, and Simon Watson
Wind Energ. Sci., 11, 509–555, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-11-509-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-11-509-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Most human activity happens in the layer of the atmosphere which extends a few hundred meters to a couple of kilometers above the surface of the Earth. The flow in this layer is turbulent. Turbulence impacts wind power production and turbine lifespan. Optimizing wind turbine performance requires understanding how turbulence affects both wind turbine efficiency and reliability. This paper points to gaps in our knowledge that need to be addressed to effectively utilize wind resources.
Astrid Lampert, Beatriz Cañadillas, Thomas Rausch, Lea Schmitt, Bughsin' Djath, Johannes Schulz-Stellenfleth, Andreas Platis, Kjell zum Berge, Ines Schäfer, Jens Bange, Thomas Neumann, Martin Dörenkämper, Bernhard Stoevesandt, Julia Gottschall, Lukas Vollmer, Stefan Emeis, Mares Barekzai, Simon Siedersleben, Martin Kühn, Gerald Steinfeld, Detlev Heinemann, Joachim Peinke, Hendrik Heißelmann, Jörge Schneemann, Gabriele Centurelli, Philipp Waldmann, and Konrad Bärfuss
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-277, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-277, 2026
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
Two major aircraft measurement campaigns above the North Sea provide insights into modifications of the wind field and sea surface induced by wind farms: The aircraft performed transects at hub height upstream and downstream of wind farm clusters, and identified different effects, e.g., how long it takes for the wind speed to recover after the wind farm, how changes across the coastline interact with wind energy, and if wind farms are well represented in numerical simulations.
Marcel Bock, Daniela Moreno, and Joachim Peinke
Wind Energ. Sci., 11, 103–126, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-11-103-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-11-103-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Various simulation tools exist to provide load forecasts in the wind energy field (engineering models and numerical simulations). A newly introduced concept is the center of wind pressure, a quantity extracted from a wind field. In previous works, similar behaviour, then the main shaft bending moments, was shown. However, a clear relationship is missing. In this work, this gap is filled through the introduction of a calibration parameter.
Leo Höning, Iván Herráez, Bernhard Stoevesandt, and Joachim Peinke
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-281, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-281, 2025
Revised manuscript accepted for WES
Short summary
Short summary
High-fidelity fluid-structure coupled simulations of the IEA 15 MW rotor under storm and yaw misalignment shows that certain misalignments trigger strong edgewise vibrations. Growth surges when effective power turns positive near −35° and fades near −43° yaw. Single-blade analysis finds lock-in at −37° with large tip motion and stability at −60° due to off-resonant Strouhal shedding. It is concluded that aeroelastic response is inflow-specific and operational mitigation strategies are needed.
Daniela Moreno, Jan Friedrich, Carsten Schubert, Matthias Wächter, Jörg Schwarte, Gritt Pokriefke, Günter Radons, and Joachim Peinke
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 2729–2754, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-2729-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-2729-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Increased sizes of modern turbines require extended descriptions of the atmospheric wind and its correlation to loads. Here, a surrogate stochastic method for estimating the bending moments at the main shaft is proposed. Based on the center of wind pressure dynamics, an advantage is the possibility of stochastically reconstructing large amounts of load data. Atmospheric measurements and modeled data demonstrate the validity of this method.
Christian Wiedemann, Henrik Bette, Matthias Wächter, Jan A. Freund, Thomas Guhr, and Joachim Peinke
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 2489–2497, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-2489-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-2489-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study utilizes a method to analyze power conversion dynamics across different operational states, addressing non-stationarity with a correlation matrix algorithm. Findings reveal distinct dynamics for each state, emphasizing their impact on system behavior and offering a solution for hysteresis effects in power conversion dynamics.
Daniela Moreno, Jan Friedrich, Matthias Wächter, Jörg Schwarte, and Joachim Peinke
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 347–360, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-347-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-347-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Unexpected load events measured on operating wind turbines are not accurately predicted by numerical simulations. We introduce the periods of constant wind speed as a possible cause of such events. We measure and characterize their statistics from atmospheric data. Further comparisons to standard modelled data and experimental turbulence data suggest that such events are not intrinsic to small-scale turbulence and are not accurately described by current standard wind models.
Khaled Yassin, Arne Helms, Daniela Moreno, Hassan Kassem, Leo Höning, and Laura J. Lukassen
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1133–1152, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1133-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1133-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The current turbulent wind field models stated in the IEC 61400-1 standard underestimate the probability of extreme changes in wind velocity. This underestimation can lead to the false calculation of extreme and fatigue loads on the turbine. In this work, we are trying to apply a random time-mapping technique to one of the standard turbulence models to adapt to such extreme changes. The turbulent fields generated are compared with a standard wind field to show the effects of this new mapping.
Ingrid Neunaber, Joachim Peinke, and Martin Obligado
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 201–219, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-201-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-201-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Wind turbines are often clustered within wind farms. A consequence is that some wind turbines may be exposed to the wakes of other turbines, which reduces their lifetime due to the wake turbulence. Knowledge of the wake is thus important, and we carried out wind tunnel experiments to investigate the wakes. We show how models that describe wakes of bluff bodies can help to improve the understanding of wind turbine wakes and wind turbine wake models, particularly by including a virtual origin.
Cited articles
Bierbooms, W. and Veldkamp, D.: Probabilistic treatment of IEC 61400-1 standard based extreme wind events, Wind Energy, 27, 1319–1339, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2914, 2024. a
Bock, M., Moreno, D., and Peinke, J.: Comparison of different simulation methods regarding loads, considering the centre of wind pressure, Wind Energ. Sci., 11, 103–126, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-11-103-2026, 2026. a
Brüls, O., Cardona, A., and Arnold, M.: Lie group generalized-α time integration of constrained flexible multibody systems, Mechanism and Machine Theory, 48, 121–137, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2011.07.017, 2012. a
Burton, T., Jenkins, N., Sharpe, D., and Bossanyi, E.: Further Aerodynamic Topics for Wind Turbines, in: Wind Energy Handbook, edited by: Burton, T., Jenkins, N., Sharpe, D., and Bossanyi, E., https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119992714.ch4, 2011. a
Butterworth, S.: On the Theory of Filter Amplifiers, Experimental Wireless and the Wireless Engineer, 7, 536–541, 1930. a
Coquelet, M., Lejeune, M., Bricteux, L., van Vondelen, A. A. W., van Wingerden, J.-W., and Chatelain, P.: On the robustness of a blade-load-based wind speed estimator to dynamic pitch control strategies, Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1923–1940, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1923-2024, 2024. a
Davenport, A. G.: The application of statistical concepts to the wind loading of structures, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 19, 449–472, https://doi.org/10.1680/iicep.1961.11304, 1961 a, b
Dimitrov, N. and Natarajan, A.: Application of simulated lidar scanning patterns to constrained Gaussian turbulence fields for load validation, Wind Energy, 20, 79–95, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1992, 2017. a
FINO: FINO1-Research Platform, https://www.fino1.de/en (last access: 12 February 2025), 2025. a
Friedrich, J., Peinke, J., Pumir, A., and Grauer, R.: Explicit construction of joint multipoint statistics in complex systems, Journal of Physics: Complexity, 2, 045006, https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-072X/ac2cda, 2021. a, b
Friedrich, J., Moreno, D., Sinhuber, M., Wächter, M., and Peinke, J.: Superstatistical wind fields from pointwise atmospheric turbulence measurements, PRX Energy, 1, 023006, https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXEnergy.1.023006, 2022. a, b
Glauert, H.: Airplane propellers, in: Aerodynamic Theory, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 169–360, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-91487-4_3, 1935. a
Gualtieri, G.: Atmospheric stability varying wind shear coefficients to improve wind resource extrapolation: A temporal analysis, Renewable Energy, 1, 376–390, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.10.034, 2016. a
Guilloré, A., Campagnolo, F., and Bottasso, C. L.: A control-oriented load surrogate model based on sector-averaged inflow quantities: capturing damage for unwaked, waked, wake-steering and curtailed wind turbines, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 2767, 032019, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2767/3/032019, 2024. a
Hach, O., Verdonck, H., Polman, J. D., Balzani, C., Müller, S., Rieke, J., and Hennings, H.: Wind turbine stability: Comparison of state-of-the-art aeroelastic simulation tools, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 1618, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1618/5/052048, 2020. a
Hansen, M. O. L.: Aerodynamics of Wind Turbines, 2nd edition, Earthscan, London, ISBN 1-84407-438-2, 2008. a
Hu, W., Letson, F., Barthelmie, R. J., and Pryor, S. C.: Wind gust characterization at wind turbine relevant heights in moderately complex terrain, J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 57, 1459–1476, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-18-0040.1, 2018. a
Kaimal, J. C., Wyngaard, J. C., Izumi, Y., and Coté, O. R., Spectral characteristics of surface-layer turbulence, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 98, 563–589, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49709841707, 1972. a, b
Koerber F., Besel G., and Reinhold H.: 3 MW GROWIAN wind turbine test program, Final report, Messprogramm an der 3 MW-Windkraftanlage GROWIAN, GROWIAN/BMFT, https://doi.org/10.2314/GBV:516935887, 1988. a, b, c
Lavely, A.: Effects of Daytime Atmospheric Boundary Layer Turbulence on The Generation of Nonsteady Wind Turbine Loadings and Predictive Accuracy of Lower Order Models, PhD Thesis, Pennsylvania State University, https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/files/final_submissions/15433 (last access: 29 March 2026), 2017. a
Lengyel, J., Roux, S. G., Abry, P., Sémécurbe, F., and Jaffard, S.: Local multifractality in urban systems – the case study of housing prices in the greater Paris region, Journal of Physics: Complexity, 3, 045005, https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-072X/ac9772, 2022. a
Lengyel, J., Roux, S. G., Abry, P., Wildmann, N., Menken, J., Bonin, O., and Friedrich, J.: The spatial organization of wind turbine wakes, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.14804, 2025. a
Liew, J. and Larsen, G. C.: How does the quantity, resolution, and scaling of turbulence boxes affect aeroelastic simulation convergence?, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 2265, 032049, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2265/3/032049, 2022. a, b
Liew, J., Riva, R., and Göçmen, T: Efficient Mann turbulence generation for offshore wind farms with applications in fatigue load surrogate modelling, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 2626, 012050, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2626/1/012050, 2023. a
Mann, J.: Wind field simulation, Probabilistic Eng. Mech., 13, 269–282, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-8920(97)00036-2, 1998. a, b, c, d
Miner, M. A.: Cumulative Damage in Fatigue, ASME J. Appl. Mech., 12, A159–A164, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4009458, 1945. a
Monin, A. S. and Yaglom, A. M.: Statistical fluid mechanics, volume II: mechanics of turbulence, Vol. 2, Courier Corporation, ISBN 978-0486318141, 2013. a
Moreno, D., Schubert, C., Friedrich, J., Wächter, M., Schwarte, J., Pokriefke, G., Radons, G., and Peinke, J.: Dynamics of the virtual center of wind pressure: An approach for the estimation of wind turbine loads, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 2767, 022-028, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2767/2/022028, 2024. a
Moreno, D., Friedrich, J., Wächter, M., Schwarte, J., and Peinke, J.: Periods of constant wind speed: how long do they last in the turbulent atmospheric boundary layer?, Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 347–360, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-347-2025, 2025 a
Moreno, D., Friedrich, J., Schubert, C., Wächter, M., Schwarte, J., Pokriefke, G., Radons, G., and Peinke, J.: From the center of wind pressure to loads on the wind turbine: a stochastic approach for the reconstruction of load signals, Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 2729–2754, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-2729-2025, 2025. a
Mukherjee, S., Murugan, S. D., Mukherjee, R., and Ray, S. S.: Turbulent flows are not uniformly multifractal, Physical Review Letters, 132, 184002, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.184002, 2024. a
Nybø, A., Nielsen, F. G., Reuder, J., Churchfield, M. J., and Godvik, M.: Evaluation of different wind fields for the investigation of the dynamic response of offshore wind turbines, Wind Energy, 23, 1810–1830, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2518, 2020. a
Orowan, E.: Theory of the fatigue of metals, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 171, 79–106, 1939. a
Rinker, J. M.: PyConTurb: an open-source constrained turbulence generator. In J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 1037, 062032, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1037/6/062032, 2018. a
Schubert, C., Jungnickel, U., Pokriefke, G., Bauer, T., and Rieke, J.: Usage of nonlinear finite beam elements in rotor blade models for load calculations of wind turbines, DEWEK 2017, 13th German Wind Energy Conference, Bremen, Germany, Zenodo [conference proceeding], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19468196, 2017. a
Sørensen, J. N.: Aerodynamic Analysis of Wind Turbines in Comprehensive Renewable Energy, Elsevier, 225–241, ISBN 9780080878737, 2012. a
Sutherland, H. J.: On the fatigue analysis of wind turbines, Technical Report SAND99-0089, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, USA, https://doi.org/10.2172/9460, 1999. a, b
Syed, A. H. and Mann, J.: A model for low-frequency, anisotropic wind fluctuations and coherences in the marine atmosphere, Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 190, 1, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-023-00850-w, 2024. a
Thedin, R., Quon, E., Churchfield, M., and Veers, P.: Investigations of correlation and coherence in turbulence from a large-eddy simulation, Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 487–502, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-487-2023, 2023. a, b
van Kuik, G. A. M., Peinke, J., Nijssen, R., Lekou, D., Mann, J., Sørensen, J. N., Ferreira, C., van Wingerden, J. W., Schlipf, D., Gebraad, P., Polinder, H., Abrahamsen, A., van Bussel, G. J. W., Sørensen, J. D., Tavner, P., Bottasso, C. L., Muskulus, M., Matha, D., Lindeboom, H. J., Degraer, S., Kramer, O., Lehnhoff, S., Sonnenschein, M., Sørensen, P. E., Künneke, R. W., Morthorst, P. E., and Skytte, K.: Long-term research challenges in wind energy – a research agenda by the European Academy of Wind Energy, Wind Energ. Sci., 1, 1–39, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-1-1-2016, 2016. a
Veers, P. S.: Three-Dimensional Wind Simulation, SANDIA Report 0152, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236362291_Three-Dimensional_Wind_Simulation (last access: 29 March 2026), 1988. a
Veers, P., Dykes, K., Lantz, E., Barth, S., Bottasso, C. L., Carlson, O., Clifton, A., Green, J., Green, P., Holttinen, H., Laird, D., Lehtomäki, V., Lundquist, J. K., Manwell, J., Marquis, M., Meneveau, C., Moriarty, P., Munduate, X., Muskulus, M., Naughton, J., Pao, L., Paquette, J., Peinke, J., Robertson, A., Sanz Rodrigo, J., Sempreviva, A. M., Smith, J. C., Tuohy, A., and Wiser, R.: Grand challenges in the science of wind energy, Science, 366, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau2027, 2019. a, b
Veers, P., Bottasso, C. L., Manuel, L., Naughton, J., Pao, L., Paquette, J., Robertson, A., Robinson, M., Ananthan, S., Barlas, T., Bianchini, A., Bredmose, H., Horcas, S. G., Keller, J., Madsen, H. A., Manwell, J., Moriarty, P., Nolet, S., and Rinker, J.: Grand challenges in the design, manufacture, and operation of future wind turbine systems, Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1071–1131, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1071-2023, 2023. a
Wagner, R.: Accounting for the speed shear in wind turbine power performance measurement, Risoe National Laboratory for Sustainable Energy, Risoe-PhD No. 58(EN), ISBN 978-87-550-3816-5, 2010. a
Wagner, R., Courtney, M., Gottschall, J., and Lindelöw-Marsden, P.: Accounting for the speed shear in wind turbine power performance measurement, Wind Energy, 14, 993–1004, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.509, 2011. a
WiValdi: Research wind farm, https://windenergy-researchfarm.com/, last access: 27 January 2026. a
Yassin, K., Helms, A., Moreno, D., Kassem, H., Höning, L., and Lukassen, L. J.: Applying a random time mapping to Mann-modeled turbulence for the generation of intermittent wind fields, Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1133–1152, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1133-2023, 2023. a
Zierath, J., Rachholz, R., and Woernle, C.: Field test validation of Flex5, MSC.Adams, alaska/Wind and SIMPACK for load calculations on wind turbines, Wind Energy, 19, 1201–1222, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1892, 2016. a
Short summary
For modern wind turbines, the effects of inflow wind fluctuations on loads are becoming increasingly critical. Based on field measurements and simulations, we identify “bump” events responsible for high damage equivalent loads. In this article, we introduce a new characteristic of a wind field: the virtual center of wind pressure, which highly correlates to the identified load events observed in the operational measured data.
For modern wind turbines, the effects of inflow wind fluctuations on loads are becoming...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint