Articles | Volume 11, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-11-1803-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-11-1803-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Impact of inflow conditions and turbine placement on the performance of offshore wind turbines exceeding 7 MW
Konstantinos Vratsinis
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Acoustics and Vibrations Research Group (AVRG), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, Ixelles, Brussels, 1050, Belgium
OWI-Lab, Pleinlaan 2, Brussels, 1050, Belgium
Rebeca Marini
Acoustics and Vibrations Research Group (AVRG), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, Ixelles, Brussels, 1050, Belgium
OWI-Lab, Pleinlaan 2, Brussels, 1050, Belgium
Pieter-Jan Daems
Acoustics and Vibrations Research Group (AVRG), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, Ixelles, Brussels, 1050, Belgium
OWI-Lab, Pleinlaan 2, Brussels, 1050, Belgium
Lukas Pauscher
Department of Sustainable Electrical Energy Systems, University of Kassel, Wilhelmshöher Allee 73, 34121 Kassel, Germany
Fraunhofer Institute for Energy Economics and Energy System Technology (IEE), Joseph-Beuys-Straße 8, 34117 Kassel, Germany
Acoustics and Vibrations Research Group (AVRG), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, Ixelles, Brussels, 1050, Belgium
Jeroen van Beeck
The von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics, Waterloosesteenweg 72, Sint-Genesius-Rode, 1640, Belgium
Acoustics and Vibrations Research Group (AVRG), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, Ixelles, Brussels, 1050, Belgium
Jan Helsen
Acoustics and Vibrations Research Group (AVRG), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, Ixelles, Brussels, 1050, Belgium
OWI-Lab, Pleinlaan 2, Brussels, 1050, Belgium
Flanders Make @ VUB, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
Related authors
Jakob Gebel, Ashkan Rezaei, Adithya Vemuri, Veronica Liverud Krathe, Pieter-Jan Daems, Jens Jo Matthys, Jonathan Sterckx, Konstantinos Vratsinis, Kayacan Kestel, Amir R. Nejad, and Jan Helsen
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-173, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-173, 2025
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
A simulation model of a deployed offshore wind turbine was developed using real-world measurement data. The method shows how to obtain, update and validate a simulation model and allows to improve the efficiency and longevity of offshore wind turbines and support operation and maintenance decisions. Simulations were conducted to analyze the effects of turbulence and wind patterns on turbine lifespan, providing insights to improve maintenance planning and reduce operational costs.
Rebeca Marini, Konstantinos Vratsinis, Kayacan Kestel, Jonathan Sterckx, Jens Matthys, Pieter-Jan Daems, Timothy Verstraeten, and Jan Helsen
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-9, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-9, 2025
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
This work evaluated the wind profile in a Belgian offshore zone. The estimated wind profile was made using measurements that allow for reconstruction at heights along the rotor area. The IEC standard defines these profiles as a 1/7th power law, which is proven not to occur 100 % of the time. It is also possible to infer that there will be differences when using different wind profiles for load assessment, as more realistic profiles can lead to a better assessment of the wind turbine's lifetime.
Matthias Stammler, Faras Jamil, Xinrun Liu, Jens Jo Matthys, Nikhil Sudhakaran, Cédric Peeters, Asger Bech Abrahamsen, and Jan Helsen
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2026-81, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2026-81, 2026
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
This study compares traditional and artificial intelligence supported methods for detecting damage in rotating machine parts. Bearings were tested under controlled conditions to see how well each method identified developing problems. The artificial intelligence supported method detected damage as early as, or earlier than, established techniques while needing far less expert attention. This supports automated monitoring of wind turbines, enabling earlier maintenance and lower operating costs.
Xavier Chesterman, Ann Nowé, and Jan Helsen
Wind Energ. Sci., 11, 1163–1183, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-11-1163-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-11-1163-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents a sensor-error-robust methodology for failure prediction in wind turbines. Sensor malfunctions pose a significant challenge for data-driven prognostic approaches. The proposed method employs a masked autoencoder that enables selective deactivation of signals. Evaluation is done using data from several operational offshore wind farms. Results demonstrate that the model effectively mitigates the impact of sensor errors while maintaining high accuracy in failure prediction.
Jakob Gebel, Pieter-Jan Daems, Diederik van Binsbergen, Veronica Liverud Krathe, Amir R. Nejad, and Jan Helsen
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2026-13, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2026-13, 2026
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
The study examines two critical turbine components: the blades and the main bearings. Computer simulations are used to model how turbines respond to disturbed wind from nearby turbines. The analysis is carried out in two stages: first, different turbine spacings and alignments are tested, and second, the method is applied to a real offshore wind farm in the Belgian North Sea.
Emmanuel Gillyns, Sophia Buckingham, Jeroen van Beeck, and Grégoire Winckelmans
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-242, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-242, 2025
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
This study evaluates the Actuator Line Method (ALM) for simulating wind turbine wakes by comparing it with wind tunnel tests on a small-scale turbine (TWIST). ALM accurately captured key wake features like velocity deficit in the wake and sharp transition with the undisturbed flow. Additionally, the deformation of the blades is also evaluated. The results confirming ALM as a reliable tool for aerodynamic and structural analysis in wind energy.
Ivo Vervlimmeren, Xavier Chesterman, Timothy Verstraeten, Ann Nowé, and Jan Helsen
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 2615–2637, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-2615-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-2615-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce a new method to refine failure prediction for wind turbines, leading to better and more efficient alarming. We do this by filtering detected anomalies based on the anomalies from the whole fleet. We compare submethods and find one that removes up to 65 % of detected anomalies while leaving the failure-predicting ones. We also detail how we trained the model that generated these anomalies and discuss the construction of the scalable pipeline that was used to deploy such models.
Alexandros Palatos-Plexidas, Simone Gremmo, Jeroen van Beeck, Lesley De Cruz, and Wim Munters
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-202, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-202, 2025
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we use advanced weather simulations, real-world measurements, and satellite images, showing that modeling wind farm effects improves accuracy, especially in areas influenced by turbine wakes. Focusing on a large wind farm cluster in the North Sea, we also investigate different atmospheric conditions. These findings help quantify the influence of large wind farm clusters, improve predictions, and support planning for future wind energy development.
Kayacan Kestel, Xavier Chesterman, Donatella Zappalá, Simon Watson, Mingxin Li, Edward Hart, James Carroll, Yolanda Vidal, Amir R. Nejad, Shawn Sheng, Yi Guo, Matthias Stammler, Florian Wirsing, Ahmed Saleh, Nico Gregarek, Thao Baszenski, Thomas Decker, Martin Knops, Georg Jacobs, Benjamin Lehmann, Florian König, Ines Pereira, Pieter-Jan Daems, Cédric Peeters, and Jan Helsen
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-168, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-168, 2025
Revised manuscript accepted for WES
Short summary
Short summary
Wind energy use has been rapidly expanding worldwide in recent years. Driven by global decarbonization goals and energy security concerns, this growth is expected to continue. To achieve these targets, production costs must decrease, with operation and maintenance being major contributors. This paper reviews current and emerging technologies for monitoring wind turbine drivetrains and highlights key academic and industrial challenges that may hinder progress.
Faras Jamil, Cédric Peeters, Timothy Verstraeten, and Jan Helsen
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 1963–1978, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1963-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1963-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
A hybrid fault detection method is proposed, which combines physical domain knowledge with machine learning models to automatically detect mechanical faults in wind turbine drivetrain components. It offers detailed insights for experts while giving operators a high-level overview of the machine's health to assist in planning effective maintenance strategies. It was validated on multiple years of wind farm data and the potential faults were accurately predicted, which was confirmed by experts.
Simon Daenens, Timothy Verstraeten, Pieter-Jan Daems, Ann Nowé, and Jan Helsen
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 1137–1152, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1137-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1137-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents a novel model for predicting wind turbine power output at a high temporal resolution in wind farms using a hybrid graph neural network (GNN) and long short-term memory (LSTM) architecture. By modeling the wind farm as a graph, the model captures both spatial and temporal dynamics, outperforming traditional power curve methods. Integrated with a normal behavior model (NBM) framework, the model effectively identifies and analyzes power loss events.
Stijn Ally, Timothy Verstraeten, Pieter-Jan Daems, Ann Nowé, and Jan Helsen
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 779–812, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-779-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-779-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Wind farms are crucial for a sustainable energy future. However, their power can fluctuate significantly due to changing weather conditions, which complexly affect their power generation. This paper presents a novel machine-learning-based method to enhance wind farm power predictions, enabling improved power scheduling, trading and grid balancing. This makes wind power more valuable and easier to integrate into the energy system.
Jakob Gebel, Ashkan Rezaei, Adithya Vemuri, Veronica Liverud Krathe, Pieter-Jan Daems, Jens Jo Matthys, Jonathan Sterckx, Konstantinos Vratsinis, Kayacan Kestel, Amir R. Nejad, and Jan Helsen
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-173, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-173, 2025
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
A simulation model of a deployed offshore wind turbine was developed using real-world measurement data. The method shows how to obtain, update and validate a simulation model and allows to improve the efficiency and longevity of offshore wind turbines and support operation and maintenance decisions. Simulations were conducted to analyze the effects of turbulence and wind patterns on turbine lifespan, providing insights to improve maintenance planning and reduce operational costs.
Rebeca Marini, Konstantinos Vratsinis, Kayacan Kestel, Jonathan Sterckx, Jens Matthys, Pieter-Jan Daems, Timothy Verstraeten, and Jan Helsen
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-9, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-9, 2025
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
This work evaluated the wind profile in a Belgian offshore zone. The estimated wind profile was made using measurements that allow for reconstruction at heights along the rotor area. The IEC standard defines these profiles as a 1/7th power law, which is proven not to occur 100 % of the time. It is also possible to infer that there will be differences when using different wind profiles for load assessment, as more realistic profiles can lead to a better assessment of the wind turbine's lifetime.
Tsvetelina Ivanova, Sara Porchetta, Sophia Buckingham, Gertjan Glabeke, Jeroen van Beeck, and Wim Munters
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 245–268, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-245-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-245-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study explores how wind and power predictions can be improved by introducing local forcing of measurement data in a numerical weather model while taking into account the presence of neighboring wind farms. Practical implications for the wind energy industry include insights for informed offshore wind farm planning and decision-making strategies using open-source models, even under adverse weather conditions.
Diederik van Binsbergen, Pieter-Jan Daems, Timothy Verstraeten, Amir R. Nejad, and Jan Helsen
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1507–1526, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1507-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1507-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Wind farm yield assessment often relies on analytical wake models. Calibrating these models can be challenging due to the stochastic nature of wind. We developed a calibration framework that performs a multi-phase optimization on the tuning parameters using time series SCADA data. This yields a parameter distribution that more accurately reflects reality than a single value. Results revealed notable variation in resultant parameter values, influenced by nearby wind farms and coastal effects.
Xavier Chesterman, Timothy Verstraeten, Pieter-Jan Daems, Ann Nowé, and Jan Helsen
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 893–924, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-893-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-893-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper reviews and implements several techniques that can be used for condition monitoring and failure prediction for wind turbines using SCADA data. The focus lies on techniques that respond to requirements of the industry, e.g., robustness, transparency, computational efficiency, and maintainability. The end result of this research is a pipeline that can accurately detect three types of failures, i.e., generator bearing failures, generator fan failures, and generator stator failures.
Adithya Vemuri, Sophia Buckingham, Wim Munters, Jan Helsen, and Jeroen van Beeck
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1869–1888, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1869-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1869-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The sensitivity of the WRF mesoscale modeling framework in accurately representing and predicting wind-farm-level environmental variables for three extreme weather events over the Belgian North Sea is investigated in this study. The overall results indicate highly sensitive simulation results to the type and combination of physics parameterizations and the type of the weather phenomena, with indications that scale-aware physics parameterizations better reproduce wind-related variables.
Amir R. Nejad, Jonathan Keller, Yi Guo, Shawn Sheng, Henk Polinder, Simon Watson, Jianning Dong, Zian Qin, Amir Ebrahimi, Ralf Schelenz, Francisco Gutiérrez Guzmán, Daniel Cornel, Reza Golafshan, Georg Jacobs, Bart Blockmans, Jelle Bosmans, Bert Pluymers, James Carroll, Sofia Koukoura, Edward Hart, Alasdair McDonald, Anand Natarajan, Jone Torsvik, Farid K. Moghadam, Pieter-Jan Daems, Timothy Verstraeten, Cédric Peeters, and Jan Helsen
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 387–411, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-387-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-387-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents the state-of-the-art technologies and development trends of wind turbine drivetrains – the energy conversion systems transferring the kinetic energy of the wind to electrical energy – in different stages of their life cycle: design, manufacturing, installation, operation, lifetime extension, decommissioning and recycling. The main aim of this article is to review the drivetrain technology development as well as to identify future challenges and research gaps.
Alexander Basse, Doron Callies, Anselm Grötzner, and Lukas Pauscher
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 1473–1490, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1473-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1473-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates systematic, seasonal biases in the long-term correction of short-term wind measurements (< 1 year). Two popular measure–correlate–predict (MCP) methods yield remarkably different results. Six reanalysis data sets serve as long-term data. Besides experimental results, theoretical findings are presented which link the mechanics of the methods and the properties of the reanalysis data sets to the observations. Finally, recommendations for wind park planners are derived.
Cited articles
Adaramola, M. and Krogstad, P.-A.: Experimental investigation of wake effects on wind turbine performance, Renewable Energy, 36, 2078–2086, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.01.024, 2011. a
Bardal, L. M. and Sætran, L. R.: Influence of turbulence intensity on wind turbine power curves, in: 14th Deep Sea Offshore Wind R&D Conference, EERA DeepWind'2017, 18-20 January 2017, Trondheim, Norway, Energy Procedia, 137, 553–558, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.10.384, 2017. a
Barthelmie, R. J., Frandsen, S. T., Nielsen, M. N., Pryor, S. C., Rethore, P.-E., and Jørgensen, H. E.: Modelling and measurements of power losses and turbulence intensity in wind turbine wakes at Middelgrunden offshore wind farm, Wind Energy, 10, 517–528, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.238, 2007. a
Bleeg, J., Purcell, M., Ruisi, R., and Traiger, E.: Wind farm blockage and the consequences of neglecting its impact on energy production, Energies, 11, 1609, https://doi.org/10.3390/en11061609, 2018. a
Chamorro, L. P., Lee, S.-J., Olsen, D., Milliren, C., Marr, J., Arndt, R., and Sotiropoulos, F.: Turbulence effects on a full-scale 2.5 MW horizontal-axis wind turbine under neutrally stratified conditions, Wind Energy, 18, 339–349, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1700, 2015. a
Cheynet, E., Diezel, J. M., Haakenstad, H., Breivik, Ø., Peña, A., and Reuder, J.: Tall wind profile validation of ERA5, NORA3, and NEWA datasets using lidar observations, Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 733–754, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-733-2025, 2025. a
Clifton, A. and Wagner, R.: Accounting for the effect of turbulence on wind turbine power curves, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 524, 012109, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/524/1/012109, 2014. a
Debnath, M., Doubrawa, P., Optis, M., Hawbecker, P., and Bodini, N.: Extreme wind shear events in US offshore wind energy areas and the role of induced stratification, Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 1043–1059, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1043-2021, 2021. a
Dimitrov, N., Natarajan, A., and Kelly, M.: Model of wind shear conditional on turbulence and its impact on wind turbine loads, Wind Energy, 18, 1917–1931, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1797, 2015. a
European Commission: REPowerEU Plan, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_22_3131 (last access: 6 September 2024), 2022. a
Gao, L., Li, B., and Hong, J.: Effect of wind veer on wind turbine power generation, Phys. Fluids, 33, 015101, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0033826, 2021. a
González-Longatt, F., Wall, P., and Terzija, V.: Wake effect in wind farm performance: Steady-state and dynamic behavior, Renewable Energy, 39, 329–338, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.08.053, 2012. a
Gottschall, J. and Peinke, J.: How to improve the estimation of power curves for wind turbines, Environ. Res. Lett., 3, 015005, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/3/1/015005, 2008. a
Haakenstad, H., Øyvind Breivik, Furevik, B. R., Reistad, M., Bohlinger, P., and Aarnes, O. J.: NORA3: A Nonhydrostatic High-Resolution Hindcast of the North Sea, the Norwegian Sea, and the Barents Sea, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 60, 1443–1464, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-21-0029.1, 2021. a
Haakenstad, H. and Breivik, Ø.: NORA3. Part II: Precipitation and Temperature Statistics in Complex Terrain Modeled with a Nonhydrostatic Model, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 61, 1549–1572, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-22-0005.1, 2022. a
Kelly, M. and van der Laan, M. P.: From shear to veer: theory, statistics, and practical application, Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 975–998, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-975-2023, 2023. a, b
Kim, D.-Y., Kim, Y.-H., and Kim, B.-S.: Changes in wind turbine power characteristics and annual energy production due to atmospheric stability, turbulence intensity, and wind shear, Energy, 214, 119051, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119051, 2021. a
Kumer, V.-M., Reuder, J., Dorninger, M., Zauner, R., and Grubišić, V.: Turbulent kinetic energy estimates from profiling wind LiDAR measurements and their potential for wind energy applications, Renewable Energy, 99, 898–910, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.07.014, 2016. a
Lee, J. C. Y., Stuart, P., Clifton, A., Fields, M. J., Perr-Sauer, J., Williams, L., Cameron, L., Geer, T., and Housley, P.: The Power Curve Working Group's assessment of wind turbine power performance prediction methods, Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 199–223, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-199-2020, 2020. a
Letizia, S., Brugger, P., Bodini, N., Krishnamurthy, R., Scholbrock, A., Simley, E., Porté-Agel, F., Hamilton, N., Doubrawa, P., and Moriarty, P.: Characterization of wind turbine flow through nacelle-mounted lidars: a review, Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering, 9, 1261017, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmech.2023.1261017, 2023. a
Martin, M., Pfaffel, S., te Heesen, H., and Rohrig, K.: Identification and prioritization of low performing wind turbines using a power curve health value approach, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 1669, 012030, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1669/1/012030, 2020. a
Mata, S. A., Pena Martínez, J. J., Bas Quesada, J., Palou Larrañaga, F., Yadav, N., Chawla, J. S., Sivaram, V., and Howland, M. F.: Modeling the effect of wind speed and direction shear on utility-scale wind turbine power production, Wind Energy, 27, 873–899, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2917, 2024. a
McCoy, A., Musial, W., Hammond, R., Mulas Hernando, D., Duffy, P., Beiter, P., Perez, P., Baranowski, R., Reber, G., and Spitsen, P.: Offshore Wind Market Report: 2024 Edition, Tech. rep., National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States), https://docs.nrel.gov/docs/fy24osti/90525.pdf (last access: 10 May 2026), 2024. a
McInnes, L., Healy, J., Astels, S.: hdbscan: Hierarchical density based clustering., J. Open Source Softw., 2, 205, https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00205, 2017. a
Murphy, P., Lundquist, J. K., and Fleming, P.: How wind speed shear and directional veer affect the power production of a megawatt-scale operational wind turbine, Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 1169–1190, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1169-2020, 2020. a, b
Ren, Z., Verma, A. S., Li, Y., Teuwen, J. J., and Jiang, Z.: Offshore wind turbine operations and maintenance: A state-of-the-art review, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 144, 110886, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110886, 2021. a
Rohrig, K., Berkhout, V., Callies, D., Durstewitz, M., Faulstich, S., Hahn, B., Jung, M., Pauscher, L., Seibel, A., Shan, M., Siefert, M., Steffen, J., Collmann, M., Czichon, S., Dörenkämper, M., Gottschall, J., Lange, B., Ruhle, A., Sayer, F., Stoevesandt, B., and Wenske, J.: Powering the 21st century by wind energy – Options, facts, figures, Appl. Phys. Rev., 6, 031303, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5089877, 2019. a
Saint-Drenan, Y.-M., Besseau, R., Jansen, M., Staffell, I., Troccoli, A., Dubus, L., Schmidt, J., Gruber, K., Simões, S. G., and Heier, S.: A parametric model for wind turbine power curves incorporating environmental conditions, Renewable Energy, 157, 754–768, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.04.123, 2020. a, b
Schneemann, J., Theuer, F., Rott, A., Dörenkämper, M., and Kühn, M.: Offshore wind farm global blockage measured with scanning lidar, Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 521–538, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-521-2021, 2021. a
Sebastiani, A., Peña, A., and Troldborg, N.: Numerical evaluation of multivariate power curves for wind turbines in wakes using nacelle lidars, Renewable Energy, 202, 419–431, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.11.081, 2023. a
Sebastiani, A., Angelou, N., and Peña, A.: Wind turbine power curve modelling under wake conditions using measurements from a spinner-mounted lidar, Applied Energy, 364, 122985, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122985, 2024. a
Seifert, J. K., Kraft, M., Kühn, M., and Lukassen, L. J.: Correlations of power output fluctuations in an offshore wind farm using high-resolution SCADA data, Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 997–1014, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-997-2021, 2021. a, b
Solbrekke, I. M., Sorteberg, A., and Haakenstad, H.: The 3 km Norwegian reanalysis (NORA3) – a validation of offshore wind resources in the North Sea and the Norwegian Sea, Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 1501–1519, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1501-2021, 2021. a
Sumner, J. and Masson, C.: Influence of Atmospheric Stability on Wind Turbine Power Performance Curves, Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 128, 531–538, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2347714, 2006. a
U.S. Congress: Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/5376 (last access: 6 September 2024), 2022. a
Van Sark, W. G., Van der Velde, H. C., Coelingh, J. P., and Bierbooms, W. A.: Do we really need rotor equivalent wind speed?, Wind Energy, 22, 745–763, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2319, 2019. a, b
Wagner, R., Antoniou, I., Pedersen, S. M., Courtney, M. S., and Jørgensen, H. E.: The influence of the wind speed profile on wind turbine performance measurements, Wind Energy, 12, 348–362, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.297, 2009. a
Wagner, R., Courtney, M., Gottschall, J., and Lindelöw-Marsden, P.: Accounting for the speed shear in wind turbine power performance measurement, Wind Energy, 14, 993–1004, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.509, 2011. a
Wiser, R., Millstein, D., Hoen, B., Bolinger, M., Gorman, W., Rand, J., Barbose, G., Cheyette, A., Darghouth, N., Jeong, S., Kemp, J. M., O'Shaughnessy, E., Paulos, B., and Seel, J.: Land-Based Wind Market Report: 2024 Edition, https://www.osti.gov/biblio/2434282 (last access: 20 January 2025), 2024. a
World Wind Energy Association: WWEA Annual Report 2024, https://wwindea.org/HYR2024 (last access: 27 January 2025), 2024. a
Short summary
Using data collected over 13 months at an offshore wind farm, our study shows that a wind turbine’s position within the farm influences its energy output at a given nacelle-measured wind speed. Front-row turbines respond differently to similar wind speeds and turbulence than those further back. This finding suggests that current methods for characterizing inflow conditions may not fully capture actual wind behavior, underscoring the need for improved performance analysis techniques.
Using data collected over 13 months at an offshore wind farm, our study shows that a wind...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint