Regarding the stability classification, please consider expanding the rational in the abstract and introduction. Also, can you integrate somehow your answers to the revewer's questions into the final version of the paper. Once these aspects will be treated properly, the paper will be ready for final publication

Good work to include the reviewer's comments in this version.
Thank you.

Only one small change proposed by one reviewer.

Congratulations with a good and interesting manuscript. In addition to the small change proposed by one of the reviewers, I have a few language corrections:
"dependency" should be "dependence" everywhere. "Dependency" is describing a slave's relation to his master, not one variable to another.
I think you need to go through the manuscript to improve the English here and there. Let me take "5 Conclusion" as an example:
l3: "at turbines" -> "for turbines"
l4: "intensity, to" -> "intensity to"
l5: "by (Ott and Nielsen, 2014)" -> "by Ott and Nielsen (2014)"
l8: "behaviour than" -> "behaviour than" -> "behaviour to that of"
l9: "in turbulences" -> "in turbulence"
l10: "rotor diameter" -> "rotor diameters" (and "dependency"!)
l16: "accurate" -> "accurately"
l17: This sentence could be formulated more clearly. Maybe changing "to fill" to "in order to fill" or add a comma somewhere.

Anyway, as I said, it is an interesting paper and I am happy that it is published in WES.
Best regards, Jakob Mann, Editor-in-Chief