Articles | Volume 5, issue 2
Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 601–621, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-601-2020

Special issue: Wind Energy Science Conference 2019

Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 601–621, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-601-2020

Research article 26 May 2020

Research article | 26 May 2020

Analysing uncertainties in offshore wind farm power output using measure–correlate–predict methodologies

Michael Denis Mifsud et al.

Related subject area

Offshore technology
Revealing system variability in offshore service operations through systemic hazard analysis
Romanas Puisa, Victor Bolbot, Andrew Newman, and Dracos Vassalos
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 273–286, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-273-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-273-2021, 2021
Short summary
Characterization of the unsteady aerodynamic response of a floating offshore wind turbine to surge motion
Simone Mancini, Koen Boorsma, Marco Caboni, Marion Cormier, Thorsten Lutz, Paolo Schito, and Alberto Zasso
Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 1713–1730, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1713-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1713-2020, 2020
Short summary
Characterisation of the offshore precipitation environment to help combat leading edge erosion of wind turbine blades
Robbie Herring, Kirsten Dyer, Paul Howkins, and Carwyn Ward
Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 1399–1409, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1399-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1399-2020, 2020
Short summary
US East Coast synthetic aperture radar wind atlas for offshore wind energy
Tobias Ahsbahs, Galen Maclaurin, Caroline Draxl, Christopher R. Jackson, Frank Monaldo, and Merete Badger
Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 1191–1210, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1191-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1191-2020, 2020
Short summary
Brief communication: Nowcasting of precipitation for leading-edge-erosion-safe mode
Anna-Maria Tilg, Charlotte Bay Hasager, Hans-Jürgen Kirtzel, and Poul Hummelshøj
Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 977–981, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-977-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-977-2020, 2020
Short summary

Cited articles

Ainslie, J.: Calculating the Flowfield in the Wake of Turbines, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 27, 216–224, 1985. 
Alpaydin, E.: Introduction to Machine Learning, 2nd Edn., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, chap. 9, 185–207, 2010. 
Barthelmie, R., Folkrts, G., Larsen, G., Rados, K., Pryor, S., Frandsen, S., Lange, B., and Schepers, G.: Comparison of Wake Model Sumulations with Offshore Wind Turbine Wake Profiles Measured by Sodar, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 23, 888–901, 2006. 
Bechrakis, D., Deane, J., and MCKeogh, E.: Wind Resource Assessment of an Area using Short-Term Data Correlated to a Long-Term Data-Set, Sol. Energ., 76, 724–32, 2004. 
Bilgili, M., Sahlin, B., and Yasar, A.: Application of Artificial Neural Networks for the Wind Speed Prediction of Target Station Using Artificial Intelligent Methods, Renew. Energ., 32, 2350–2360, 2007. 
Download
Short summary
In offshore wind, it is important to have an accurate wind resource assessment. Measure–correlate–predict (MCP) is a statistical method used in the assessment of the wind resource at a candidate site. Being a statistical method, it is subject to uncertainty, resulting in an uncertainty in the power output from the wind farm. This study involves the use of wind data from the island of Malta and uses a hypothetical wind farm to establish the best MCP methodology for the wind resource assessment.