Articles | Volume 5, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-721-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-721-2020
Research article
 | 
15 Jun 2020
Research article |  | 15 Jun 2020

Is the Blade Element Momentum theory overestimating wind turbine loads? – An aeroelastic comparison between OpenFAST's AeroDyn and QBlade's Lifting-Line Free Vortex Wake method

Sebastian Perez-Becker, Francesco Papi, Joseph Saverin, David Marten, Alessandro Bianchini, and Christian Oliver Paschereit

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Sebastian Perez-Becker on behalf of the Authors (07 Feb 2020)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (16 Feb 2020) by Katherine Dykes
RR by Emmanuel Branlard (18 Feb 2020)
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (12 Apr 2020) by Katherine Dykes
AR by Sebastian Perez-Becker on behalf of the Authors (21 Apr 2020)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (03 May 2020) by Katherine Dykes
ED: Publish as is (10 May 2020) by Joachim Peinke (Chief editor)
AR by Sebastian Perez-Becker on behalf of the Authors (11 May 2020)  Manuscript 
Download
Short summary
Aeroelastic design load calculations play a key role in determining the design loads of the different wind turbine components. This study compares load estimations from calculations using a Blade Element Momentum aerodynamic model with estimations from calculations using a higher-order Lifting-Line Free Vortex Wake aerodynamic model. The paper finds and explains the differences in fatigue and extreme turbine loads for power production simulations that cover a wide range of turbulent wind speeds.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint