Brodtkorb, P. A., Johannesson, P., Lindgren, G., Rychlik, I., Rydén, J.,
and Sjö, E.: WAFO-a Matlab toolbox for analysis of random waves and loads, in: vol. 3, Proc. 10'th Int. Offshore and Polar Eng. Conf., ISOPE, Seattle, USA, 343–350, 2000. a
Caruana, R., Lawrence, S., and Giles, L.: Overfitting in neural nets:
Backpropagation, conjugate gradient, and early stopping, Adv. Neural Inform. Process. Syst., 13, 402–408, 2001. a
Chollet, F.: Deep Learning with Python, Manning Publications, ISBN 9781617294433, 2017. a
Dirlik, T.: Application of computers in fatigue analysis, PhD thesis,
University of Warwick, Warwick,
http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/2949/ (last access: 7 February 2022), 1985. a
d N Santos, F., Noppe, N., Weijtjens, W., and Devriendt, C.: SCADA-based neural network thrust load model for fatigue assessment: cross validation with in-situ measurements, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1618, 022020,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1618/2/022020, 2020a.
a
d N Santos, F., Noppe, N., Weijtjens, W., and Devriendt, C.: Input parameter
selection for full load damage neural network model on offshore wind
structures, in: Proceedings of 16th EAWE PhD Seminar on Wind Energy,
https://phd2020.eawe.eu/site-phd2020/assets/files/Book_of_Proceedings.pdf
(last access: 7 February 2022), 2020b.
a,
b
Glorot, X., Bordes, A., and Bengio, Y.: Deep sparse rectifier neural networks, in: Proceedings of the fourteenth international conference on artificial intelligence and statistics, JMLR Workshop and Conference
Proceedings, 315–323,
http://proceedings.mlr.press/v15/glorot11a/glorot11a.pdf (last access: 7 February 2022), 2011. a
Goldberger, J., Hinton, G. E., Roweis, S., and Salakhutdinov, R. R.:
Neighbourhood components analysis, Adv. Neural Inform. Process. Syst., 17, 513–520, 2004.
a,
b
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., and Friedman, J.: The elements of statistical
learning: data mining, inference, and prediction, Springer Science & Business Media, ISBN 978-0-387-95284-0, 2009. a
Helsen, J., Devriendt, C., Weijtjens, W., and Guillaume, P.: Condition
monitoring by means of scada analysis, in: Proceedings of European Wind
Energy Association International Conference Paris,
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jan-Helsen/publication/286450713_SCADA_analysis_for_condition_monitoring/links/56af1b4c08ae19a385171e29/SCADA-analysis-for-condition-monitoring.pdf
(last access: 7 February 2022), 2015. a
Hendriks, H. and Bulder, B.: Fatigue Equivalent Load Cycle Method,
https://www.osti.gov/etdeweb/biblio/191445 (last access: 7 February 2022), 1995. a
Hübler, C., Weijtjens, W., Rolfes, R., and Devriendt, C.: Reliability
analysis of fatigue damage extrapolations of wind turbines using offshore
strain measurements, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1037, 032035,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1037/3/032035, 2018.
a
Iliopoulos, A., Weijtjens, W., Van Hemelrijck, D., and Devriendt, C.: Fatigue
assessment of offshore wind turbines on monopile foundations using multi-band
modal expansion, Wind Energy, 20, 1463–1479, 2017. a
Jarrett, K., Kavukcuoglu, K., Ranzato, M., and LeCun, Y.: What is the best
multi-stage architecture for object recognition?, in: 2009 IEEE 12th international conference on computer vision, 2146–2153,
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/5459469?casa_token=LLzGYo0GPLsAAAAA:91xUkzT7AfYSZIJwPFg_2OsbYcoP6tfocA4jOewgAvq37heQFXDYEv7-kO73vS30N_HAKKgs7jtOZw
(last access: 7 February 2022), 2009. a
Leray, P. and Gallinari, P.: Feature selection with neural networks,
Behaviormetrika, 26, 145–166, 1999.
a,
b
Liano, K.: Robust error measure for supervised neural network learning with
outliers, IEEE T. Neural Netw., 7, 246–250, 1996. a
Link, M. and Weiland, M.: Structural health monitoring of the monopile
foundation structure of an offshore wind turbine, in: International
Conference on Structural Dynamics, 3565–3572,
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264612841_Structural_health_monitoring_of_the_monopile_foundation_structure_of_an_offshore_wind_turbine
(last access: 7 February 2022), 2014. a
Loraux, C. and Brühwiler, E.: The use of long term monitoring data for the extension of the service duration of existing wind turbine support
structures, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 753, 072023,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/753/7/072023, 2016.
a
Maes, K., Iliopoulos, A., Weijtjens, W., Devriendt, C., and Lombaert, G.:
Dynamic strain estimation for fatigue assessment of an offshore monopile wind
turbine using filtering and modal expansion algorithms, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 76, 592–611, 2016. a
Marsh, G., Wignall, C., Thies, P. R., Barltrop, N., Incecik, A., Venugopal, V., and Johanning, L.: Review and application of Rainflow residue processing
techniques for accurate fatigue damage estimation, Int. J. Fatigue, 82, 757–765, 2016. a
Martinez-Luengo, M. and Shafiee, M.: Guidelines and cost-benefit analysis of
the structural health monitoring implementation in offshore wind turbine
support structures, Energies, 12, 1176,
https://doi.org/10.3390/en12061176, 2019.
a
Marugán, A. P., Márquez, F. P. G., Perez, J. M. P., and
Ruiz-Hernández, D.: A survey of artificial neural network in wind energy
systems, Appl. Energy, 228, 1822–1836, 2018. a
Movsessian, A., Schedat, M., and Faber, T.: Feature selection techniques for modelling tower fatigue loads of a wind turbine with neural networks, Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 539–554,
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-539-2021, 2021.
a
Mylonas, C., Abdallah, I., and Chatzi, E.: Deep unsupervised learning for
condition monitoring and prediction of high dimensional data with application
on windfarm scada data, in: Model Validation and Uncertainty Quantification,
Vol. 3, Springer, 189–196,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12075-7_21, 2020.
a,
b
Mylonas, C., Abdallah, I., and Chatzi, E.: Conditional variational autoencoders for probabilistic wind turbine blade fatigue estimation using Supervisory, Control, and Data Acquisition data, Wind Energy, 24, 1122–1139,
https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2621, 2021.
a
Noppe, N.: Performance monitoring and lifetime assessment of offshore wind
farms based on SCADA data, PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, 2019. a
Noppe, N., Tatsis, K., Chatzi, E., Devriendt, C., and Weijtjens, W.: Fatigue
stress estimation of offshore wind turbine using a kalman filter in
combination with accelerometers, in: Proceedings of ISMA, 4847–4855,
https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000346296, 2018a.
a
Noppe, N., Weijtjens, W., and Devriendt, C.: Modeling of quasi-static thrust load of wind turbines based on 1 s SCADA data, Wind Energ. Sci., 3, 139–147,
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-3-139-2018, 2018b.
a,
b,
c
Novak, R., Bahri, Y., Abolafia, D. A., Pennington, J., and Sohl-Dickstein, J.: Sensitivity and generalization in neural networks: an empirical study, arXiv preprint: arXiv:1802.08760, 2018. a
Schedat, M., Faber, T., and Sivanesan, A.: Structural health monitoring concept to predict the remaining lifetime of the wind turbine structure, in: 2016 International Conference on the Domestic Use of Energy (DUE), 1–5,
https://doi.org/10.1109/DUE.2016.7466723, 2016.
a
Schröder, L.: Towards digital twin technology: Wind farm operation analysis and optimization using model-supported data analytics, PhD thesis, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet,
https://doi.org/10.11581/DTU:00000100, 2020.
a,
b,
c
Schröder, L., Dimitrov, N. K., Verelst, D. R., and Sørensen, J. A.: Wind turbine site-specific load estimation using artificial neural networks
calibrated by means of high-fidelity load simulations, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1037, 062027,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1037/6/062027, 2018.
a
Schröder, L., Dimitrov, N. K., and Sørensen, J. A.: Uncertainty
propagation and sensitivity analysis of an artificial neural network used as
wind turbine load surrogate model, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1618, 042040,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1618/4/042040, 2020.
a
Seidel, M., Voormeeren, S., and van der Steen, J.-B.: State-of-the-art design
processes for offshore wind turbine support structures: Practical approaches
and pitfalls during different stages in the design process, Stahlbau, 85,
583–590, 2016.
a,
b
Smolka, U. and Cheng, P. W.: On the design of measurement campaigns for fatigue life monitoring of offshore wind
turbines, in: The Twenty-third International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers,
https://onepetro.org/ISOPEIOPEC/proceedings-abstract/ISOPE13/All-ISOPE13/ISOPE-I-13-041/13609
(last access: 7 February 2022), 2013. a
Stetco, A., Dinmohammadi, F., Zhao, X., Robu, V., Flynn, D., Barnes, M., Keane, J., and Nenadic, G.: Machine learning methods for wind turbine condition monitoring: A review, Renew. Energy, 133, 620–635, 2019. a
van Kuik, G. A. M., Peinke, J., Nijssen, R., Lekou, D., Mann, J., Sørensen, J. N., Ferreira, C., van Wingerden, J. W., Schlipf, D., Gebraad, P., Polinder, H., Abrahamsen, A., van Bussel, G. J. W., Sørensen, J. D., Tavner, P., Bottasso, C. L., Muskulus, M., Matha, D., Lindeboom, H. J., Degraer, S., Kramer, O., Lehnhoff, S., Sonnenschein, M., Sørensen, P. E., Künneke, R. W., Morthorst, P. E., and Skytte, K.: Long-term research challenges in wind energy – a research agenda by the European Academy of Wind Energy, Wind Energ. Sci., 1, 1–39,
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-1-1-2016, 2016.
a
Veldkamp, D.: A probabilistic evaluation of wind turbine fatigue design rules, Wind Energy, 11, 655–672, 2008. a
Vera-Tudela, L. and Kühn, M.: On the selection of input variables for a
wind turbine load monitoring system, Proced. Technol., 15, 726–736, 2014.
a,
b,
c
Vera-Tudela, L. and Kühn, M.: Analysing wind turbine fatigue load prediction: The impact of wind farm flow conditions, Renew. Energy, 107,
352–360, 2017. a
Vorpahl, F., Schwarze, H., Fischer, T., Seidel, M., and Jonkman, J.: Offshore
wind turbine environment, loads, simulation, and design, Wiley
Interdisciplin. Rev.: Energ. Environ., 2, 548–570, 2013. a
Wilkinson, M., Darnell, B., Van Delft, T., and Harman, K.: Comparison of
methods for wind turbine condition monitoring with SCADA data, IET Renew.
Power Generat., 8, 390–397, 2014. a
Worden, K., Bull, L. A., Gardner, P., Gosliga, J., Rogers, T. J., Cross, E. J., Papatheou, E., Lin, W., and Dervilis, N.: A brief introduction to recent
developments in population-based structural health monitoring,
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2020.00146, 2020.
a
Zeiler, M. D.: Adadelta: an adaptive learning rate method, arXiv preprint:
arXiv:1212.5701, 2012. a
Ziegler, L. and Muskulus, M.: Comparing a fracture mechanics model to the
SN-curve approach for jacket-supported offshore wind turbines: Challenges and
opportunities for lifetime prediction, in: International Conference on
Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, vol. 49972, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, p. V006T09A054,
https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2016-54915, 2016.
a
Ziegler, L., Smolka, U., Cosack, N., and Muskulus, M.: Brief communication: Structural monitoring for lifetime extension of offshore wind monopiles: can strain measurements at one level tell us everything?, Wind Energ. Sci., 2, 469–476,
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2-469-2017, 2017.
a
