Articles | Volume 10, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-347-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-347-2025
Research article
 | 
03 Feb 2025
Research article |  | 03 Feb 2025

Periods of constant wind speed: how long do they last in the turbulent atmospheric boundary layer?

Daniela Moreno, Jan Friedrich, Matthias Wächter, Jörg Schwarte, and Joachim Peinke

Related authors

Applying a random time mapping to Mann-modeled turbulence for the generation of intermittent wind fields
Khaled Yassin, Arne Helms, Daniela Moreno, Hassan Kassem, Leo Höning, and Laura J. Lukassen
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1133–1152, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1133-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1133-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Thematic area: Wind and the atmosphere | Topic: Wind and turbulence
Characterization of local wind profiles: a random forest approach for enhanced wind profile extrapolation
Farkhondeh (Hanie) Rouholahnejad and Julia Gottschall
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 143–159, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-143-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-143-2025, 2025
Short summary
Simulations suggest offshore wind farms modify low-level jets
Daphne Quint, Julie K. Lundquist, and David Rosencrans
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 117–142, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-117-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-117-2025, 2025
Short summary
On the lidar-turbulence paradox and possible countermeasures
Alfredo Peña, Ginka G. Yankova, and Vasiliki Mallini
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 83–102, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-83-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-83-2025, 2025
Short summary
The actuator farm model for large eddy simulation (LES) of wind-farm-induced atmospheric gravity waves and farm–farm interaction
Sebastiano Stipa, Arjun Ajay, and Joshua Brinkerhoff
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 2301–2332, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-2301-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-2301-2024, 2024
Short summary
Understanding the impact of data gaps on long-term offshore wind resource estimates
Martin Georg Jonietz Alvarez, Warren Watson, and Julia Gottschall
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 2217–2233, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-2217-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-2217-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Abhinav, K. A., Sørensen, J. D., Hammerum, K., and Nielsen, J. S.: Probabilistic Design Methods for Gust-Based Loads on Wind Turbines, Energies, 17, 1518, https://doi.org/10.3390/en17071518, 2024. a
Cava, D. and Katul, G.: The Effects of Thermal Stratification on Clustering Properties of Canopy Turbulence, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 130, 307–325, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-008-9342-6, 2009. a
Cava, D., Katul, G., Molini, A., and Elefante, C.: The role of surface characteristics on intermittency and zero-crossing properties of atmospheric turbulence, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D01104, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016167, 2012. a
Chamecki, M.: Persistence of velocity fluctuations in non-Gaussian turbulence within and above plant canopies, Phys. Fluids, 25, 115110, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4832955, 2013. a
Chowdhuri, S., Kalmár-Nagy, T., and Banerjee, T.: Persistence analysis of velocity and temperature fluctuations in convective surface layer turbulence, Phys. Fluids, 32, 076601, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0013911, 2020. a
Download
Short summary
Unexpected load events measured on operating wind turbines are not accurately predicted by numerical simulations. We introduce the periods of constant wind speed as a possible cause of such events. We measure and characterize their statistics from atmospheric data. Further comparisons to standard modelled data and experimental turbulence data suggest that such events are not intrinsic to small-scale turbulence and are not accurately described by current standard wind models.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint