Articles | Volume 11, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-11-3107-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-11-3107-2026
Research article
 | 
27 Aug 2026
Research article |  | 27 Aug 2026

The AWAKEN wind farm benchmark – Part 2: Modeling results

Nicola Bodini, Patrick Moriarty, Regis Thedin, Paula Doubrawa, Cristina Archer, Myra Blaylock, Carlo Bottasso, Bruno Carmo, Lawrence Cheung, Camille Dubreuil, Rogier Floors, Thomas Herges, Daniel Houck, Ali Kanjari, Colleen M. Kaul, Christopher Kelley, Ru Li, Julie K. Lundquist, Desirae Major, Anh Kiet Nguyen, Mike Optis, Luan R. C. Parada, Alfredo Peña, Julian Quick, David Ricarte, William C. Radünz, Raj K. Rai, Oscar García-Santiago, Jonas Schulte, Knut S. Seim, M. Paul van der Laan, Kisorthman Vimalakanthan, and Adam Wise

Data sets

AWAKEN wind farm wake benchmark inputs Nicola Bodini https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15623845

Download
Short summary
Predicting wind farm energy production is challenging because wind patterns are complex. We tested 16 different models against real data from a major field experiment to see which worked best. Surprisingly, the most expensive and detailed models were not always more accurate than simpler ones. We found that feeding models better weather data was the most effective way to improve accuracy. These results help the industry choose the right tools for designing more-efficient wind farms.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint