Wind energy is expanding into regions exposed to tropical cyclones, where extreme winds and waves can damage turbines and disrupt energy production. We reviewed observations, simulations, engineering standards, and risk quantification frameworks to identify the most important gaps. Today's design rules, originally built for milder storms, do not capture cyclone hazards. Closing these gaps requires better offshore measurements, improved models, and risk-informed design standards.

Wind turbines interact with the atmosphere and affect the performance of nearby turbines. Using a large dataset from a wind farm in northern Germany, we studied how inflow conditions shape the flow behind a turbine, called a wake. Higher turbulence reduces the wake's length and impact, while stable conditions make it stronger. Wind direction changes with height can shift and skew the wake’s position. These findings help improve turbine wake models by considering varying atmospheric conditions.

Wind farm flow control mitigates wake effects within a wind farm by adjusting the turbine settings to improve the overall farm performance. This study quantifies the value of a combined strategy in which each turbine can apply wake steering or the helix wake mixing method. The proposed method is simulated for a large-scale wind farm, for which such a combined strategy provides higher gains in annual energy production compared to the individual techniques.

Wind turbines create wakes, which reduce downstream power. Optimizing turbine placement requires accounting for these reductions. We compared a neural network trained on numerical simulations against engineering wake models across various farm sizes. The neural network predicted flow most accurately but was slower. Surprisingly, a simple TurbOPark model produced layouts with higher validated energy output, suggesting that accuracy is not the only important metric for such models.