Both reviewers assess the results to be publishable, but also that the way of presenting them and the English language need to be improved. You may consult an expert to aid in improving the language.

Both reviewer's suggest the paper to be published, but I recommend that you again take a critical look at the English grammar and spelling before uploading the final version.

Dear Authors,
With minor amendments the paper is accepted. I would like you to improve some of the figures. Fig 7, and maybe also 4 and 5 appear too pixelated. Please improve resolution. Inn Figures 6+8 it is difficult to read off the numbers. As I understand them you have Norm velocity on the vertical axis and you color according to the same. That makes Norm vel easy to read, but it is very difficult to read camber ratio and thickness ratio in the "horizontal plane". Wouldn't it be better to make just a 2D plane (camber-thickness) and color the dots according to norm velocity? Alternatively, you could maintain the three-dimensional plots but then draw vertical lines under each point going down into the camber-thickness plane on which you would make a grid to ease reading off values. I hope you understand the problem and I'm confident that you can improve.
Sincerely, Jakob Mann, Editor-in-Chief.