Please see the second review referee report and address the comments.

see non-public comments

thank you for addressing the reviewer and editorial comments

Dear Authors,
I suggest you make some final, technical improvements to your manuscript before publication.
1) Units should be in roman, not italic.
2) In the abstract you define abbreviations, even CFD which I think is good because if increases readability. Please also define BEM. Many people only or at least start to read the abstract and the conclusion. Therefore, please also define the abbreviations in the conclusion, again to increase readability.
3) Figure 2 seems not to add much to the manuscript. It is hard to see the coordinate systems attached to the blade and also difficult to under the point of showing it. Could it be improved or removed?
4) Various smaller things: References in parenthesis should be (Schepers, 2016), not (Schepers (2016)). Use \citep or \parencite if you use LaTeX. On figure 3 why are the same thing (?) called both F_x and F_N? Figure 8: is Fx the same as F_x? Please be consistent. Additional formulations here and there could be improved, but the publisher will also help with that.
Sincerely, Jakob Mann