Articles | Volume 9, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1727-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1727-2024
Research article
 | 
19 Aug 2024
Research article |  | 19 Aug 2024

Underestimation of strong wind speeds offshore in ERA5: evidence, discussion and correction

Rémi Gandoin and Jorge Garza

Viewed

Total article views: 2,877 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,331 503 43 2,877 30 32
  • HTML: 2,331
  • PDF: 503
  • XML: 43
  • Total: 2,877
  • BibTeX: 30
  • EndNote: 32
Views and downloads (calculated since 13 Mar 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 13 Mar 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,877 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,794 with geography defined and 83 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 13 Mar 2025
Download

The requested paper has a corresponding corrigendum published. Please read the corrigendum first before downloading the article.

Short summary
ERA5 has become the workhorse of most wind resource assessment applications, as it compares better with in situ measurements than other reanalyses. However, for design purposes, ERA5 suffers from a drawback: it underestimates strong wind speeds offshore (approx. from 10 m s−1). This is not widely discussed in the scientific literature. We address this bias and proposes a simple, robust correction. This article supports the growing need for use-case-specific validations of reanalysis datasets.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint