Articles | Volume 9, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1727-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1727-2024
Research article
 | 
19 Aug 2024
Research article |  | 19 Aug 2024

Underestimation of strong wind speeds offshore in ERA5: evidence, discussion and correction

Rémi Gandoin and Jorge Garza

Related subject area

Thematic area: Wind and the atmosphere | Topic: Wind and turbulence
Brief communication: A simple axial induction modification to the Weather Research and Forecasting Fitch wind farm parameterization
Lukas Vollmer, Balthazar Arnoldus Maria Sengers, and Martin Dörenkämper
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1689–1693, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1689-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1689-2024, 2024
Short summary
Impact of swell waves on atmospheric surface turbulence: wave–turbulence decomposition methods
Mostafa Bakhoday Paskyabi
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1631–1645, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1631-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1631-2024, 2024
Short summary
Machine-learning-based estimate of the wind speed over complex terrain using the long short-term memory (LSTM) recurrent neural network
Cássia Maria Leme Beu and Eduardo Landulfo
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1431–1450, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1431-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1431-2024, 2024
Short summary
Method to predict the minimum measurement and experiment durations needed to achieve converged and significant results in a wind energy field experiment
Daniel R. Houck, Nathaniel B. de Velder, David C. Maniaci, and Brent C. Houchens
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1189–1209, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1189-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1189-2024, 2024
Short summary
Experimental Evaluation of Wind Turbine Wake Turbulence Impacts on a General Aviation Aircraft
Jonathan Rogers
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-51,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-51, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for WES
Short summary

Cited articles

Alday, M., Accensi, M., Ardhuin, F., and Dodet, G.: A global wave parameter database for geophysical applications, Part 3: Improved forcing and spectral resolution, Ocean Model., 166, 101848–10167, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2021.101848, 2021. 
Araújo da Silva, M. P., Rocadenbosch, F., Farré-Guarné, J., Salcedo-Bosch, A., González-Marco, D., and Peña, A.: Assessing Obukhov Length and Friction Velocity from Floating Lidar Observations: A Data Screening and Sensitivity Computation Approach, Remote Sens., 14, 1394, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14061394, 2022. 
Ayet, A. and Chapron, B.: The dynamical coupling of wind-waves and atmospheric turbulence: a review of theoretical and phenomenological models, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 183, 1–33, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-021-00666-6, 2022. 
Bentamy, A., Grodsky, S. A., Cambon, G., Tandeo, P., Capet, X., Roy, C., Herbette, S., and Grouazel, A.: Twenty-Seven Years of Scatterometer Surface Wind Analysis over Eastern Boundary Upwelling Systems, Remote Sens., 13, 940, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13050940, 2021. 
Download
Short summary
ERA5 has become the workhorse of most wind resource assessment applications, as it compares better with in situ measurements than other reanalyses. However, for design purposes, ERA5 suffers from a drawback: it underestimates strong wind speeds offshore (approx. from 10 m s−1). This is not widely discussed in the scientific literature. We address this bias and proposes a simple, robust correction. This article supports the growing need for use-case-specific validations of reanalysis datasets.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint