Articles | Volume 5, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1731-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1731-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
A simple methodology to detect and quantify wind power ramps
Bedassa R. Cheneka
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Wind Energy Section, Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
Simon J. Watson
Wind Energy Section, Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
Sukanta Basu
Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
Related authors
No articles found.
Mehtab Ahmed Khan, Dries Allaerts, Simon J. Watson, and Matthew J. Churchfield
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-138, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-138, 2024
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
To guide realistic atmospheric gravity wave simulations, we conduct an LES study of flow over a 2D hill and through a wind farm canopy, examining optimal domain size and Rayleigh damping layer setup. Wave properties based on a Froude number determine optimal domain and damping parameters. Reasonably accurate solutions require the domain length exceed the effective horizontal wavelength, height and damping thickness equal a vertical wavelength, and normalized-damping coefficient between 1–10.
Majid Bastankhah, Marcus Becker, Matthew Churchfield, Caroline Draxl, Jay Prakash Goit, Mehtab Khan, Luis A. Martinez Tossas, Johan Meyers, Patrick Moriarty, Wim Munters, Asim Önder, Sara Porchetta, Eliot Quon, Ishaan Sood, Nicole van Lipzig, Jan-Willem van Wingerden, Paul Veers, and Simon Watson
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 2171–2174, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-2171-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-2171-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Dries Allaerts was born on 19 May 1989 and passed away at his home in Wezemaal, Belgium, on 10 October 2024 after battling cancer. Dries started his wind energy career in 2012 and had a profound impact afterward on the community, in terms of both his scientific realizations and his many friendships and collaborations in the field. His scientific acumen, open spirit of collaboration, positive attitude towards life, and playful and often cheeky sense of humor will be deeply missed by many.
Harish Baki, Sukanta Basu, and George Lavidas
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-99, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-99, 2024
Revised manuscript under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
Our study explores how frontal low-level jets (FLLJs) impact wind power production by causing ramp-down events. Using the Weather Research and Forecasting model, we analyzed various modeling configurations and found that initial and boundary conditions, domain configuration, and wind farm parameterization significantly influence simulations. Our findings show such extreme events can be forecasted one day in advance, helping manage wind power more efficiently for a stable, reliable energy supply.
Livia Brandetti, Sebastiaan Paul Mulders, Roberto Merino-Martinez, Simon Watson, and Jan-Willem van Wingerden
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 471–493, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-471-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-471-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This research presents a multi-objective optimisation approach to balance vertical-axis wind turbine (VAWT) performance and noise, comparing the combined wind speed estimator and tip-speed ratio (WSE–TSR) tracking controller with a baseline. Psychoacoustic annoyance is used as a novel metric for human perception of wind turbine noise. Results showcase the WSE–TSR tracking controller’s potential in trading off the considered objectives, thereby fostering the deployment of VAWTs in urban areas.
Livia Brandetti, Sebastiaan Paul Mulders, Yichao Liu, Simon Watson, and Jan-Willem van Wingerden
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1553–1573, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1553-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1553-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This research presents the additional benefits of applying an advanced combined wind speed estimator and tip-speed ratio tracking (WSE–TSR) controller compared to the baseline Kω2. Using a frequency-domain framework and an optimal calibration procedure, the WSE–TSR tracking control scheme shows a more flexible trade-off between conflicting objectives: power maximisation and load minimisation. Therefore, implementing this controller on large-scale wind turbines will facilitate their operation.
Serkan Kartal, Sukanta Basu, and Simon J. Watson
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1533–1551, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1533-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1533-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Peak wind gust is a crucial meteorological variable for wind farm planning and operations. Unfortunately, many wind farms do not have on-site measurements of it. In this paper, we propose a machine-learning approach (called INTRIGUE, decIsioN-TRee-based wInd GUst Estimation) that utilizes numerous inputs from a public-domain reanalysis dataset, generating long-term, site-specific peak wind gust series.
Sarah J. Ollier and Simon J. Watson
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1179–1200, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1179-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1179-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This modelling study shows that topographic trapped lee waves (TLWs) modify flow behaviour and power output in offshore wind farms. We demonstrate that TLWs can substantially alter the wind speeds at individual wind turbines and effect the power output of the turbine and whole wind farm. The impact on wind speeds and power is dependent on which part of the TLW wave cycle interacts with the wind turbines and wind farm. Positive and negative impacts of TLWs on power output are observed.
Paul Veers, Katherine Dykes, Sukanta Basu, Alessandro Bianchini, Andrew Clifton, Peter Green, Hannele Holttinen, Lena Kitzing, Branko Kosovic, Julie K. Lundquist, Johan Meyers, Mark O'Malley, William J. Shaw, and Bethany Straw
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 2491–2496, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2491-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2491-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Wind energy will play a central role in the transition of our energy system to a carbon-free future. However, many underlying scientific issues remain to be resolved before wind can be deployed in the locations and applications needed for such large-scale ambitions. The Grand Challenges are the gaps in the science left behind during the rapid growth of wind energy. This article explains the breadth of the unfinished business and introduces 10 articles that detail the research needs.
Amir R. Nejad, Jonathan Keller, Yi Guo, Shawn Sheng, Henk Polinder, Simon Watson, Jianning Dong, Zian Qin, Amir Ebrahimi, Ralf Schelenz, Francisco Gutiérrez Guzmán, Daniel Cornel, Reza Golafshan, Georg Jacobs, Bart Blockmans, Jelle Bosmans, Bert Pluymers, James Carroll, Sofia Koukoura, Edward Hart, Alasdair McDonald, Anand Natarajan, Jone Torsvik, Farid K. Moghadam, Pieter-Jan Daems, Timothy Verstraeten, Cédric Peeters, and Jan Helsen
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 387–411, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-387-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-387-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents the state-of-the-art technologies and development trends of wind turbine drivetrains – the energy conversion systems transferring the kinetic energy of the wind to electrical energy – in different stages of their life cycle: design, manufacturing, installation, operation, lifetime extension, decommissioning and recycling. The main aim of this article is to review the drivetrain technology development as well as to identify future challenges and research gaps.
Mark Schelbergen, Peter C. Kalverla, Roland Schmehl, and Simon J. Watson
Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 1097–1120, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1097-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1097-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We have presented a methodology for including multiple wind profile shapes in a wind resource description that are identified using a data-driven approach. These shapes go beyond the height range for which conventional wind profile relationships are developed. Moreover, they include non-monotonic shapes such as low-level jets. We demonstrated this methodology for an on- and offshore reference location using DOWA data and efficiently estimated the annual energy production of a pumping AWE system.
Patrick Hawbecker, Sukanta Basu, and Lance Manuel
Wind Energ. Sci., 3, 203–219, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-3-203-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-3-203-2018, 2018
Cian J. Desmond, Simon J. Watson, Christiane Montavon, and Jimmy Murphy
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2017-34, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2017-34, 2017
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
The flow over densely forested terrain under neutral and non-neutral conditions is considered using commercially available Computational Fluid Dynamics software. Results are validated against data from a site in North-Eastern France. It is shown that the effects of both neutral and stable atmospheric stratifications can be modelled numerically using state of the art methodologies whilst unstable stratifications remain elusive.
Related subject area
Environmental and socio-economic aspects
Detecting and characterizing simulated sea breezes over the US northeastern coast with implications for offshore wind energy
Artificial hard-substrate colonisation in the offshore Hywind Scotland Pilot Park
Experimental investigation of aerodynamic characteristics of bat carcasses after collision with a wind turbine
Geng Xia, Caroline Draxl, Michael Optis, and Stephanie Redfern
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 815–829, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-815-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-815-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we propose a new method to detect sea breeze events from the Weather Research and Forecasting simulation. Our results suggest that the method can identify the three different types of sea breezes in the model simulation. In addition, the coastal impact, seasonal distribution and offshore wind potential associated with each type of sea breeze differ significantly, highlighting the importance of identifying the correct type of sea breeze in numerical weather/wind energy forecasting.
Rikard Karlsson, Malin Tivefälth, Iris Duranović, Svante Martinsson, Ane Kjølhamar, and Kari Mette Murvoll
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 801–814, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-801-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-801-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Distinct zonations with their own fauna and flora were observed. Algae and blue mussels dominated the structures from the surface down to 20 m, with tube-building fan worms and plumose anemones as the main colonisers found below. The park is in its "intermediate stage" and moving towards the "climax stage", with anemones covering most of the structures. The study was conducted to investigate if a floating wind park has the same fauna and zonations observed on traditional non-floating wind parks.
Shivendra Prakash and Corey D. Markfort
Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 745–758, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-745-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-745-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Bat carcass surveys guided by likely fall zone distributions require accurate descriptions of carcass aerodynamics. This research introduces a new methodology resulting in the first direct measurements of bat carcass drag coefficients. The drag coefficient for three carcasses of three different species was found to be within a range of 0.70–1.23, with a terminal velocity between 6.63 and 17.57 m s−1. This information is useful for assessing the impact of wind farm projects on wildlife.
Cited articles
Borgnat, P. and Flandrin, P.: Stationarization via surrogates, J.
Stat. Mech.: Theory and Experiment, 2009, P01001, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2009/01/p01001, 2009. a
Borgnat, P., Flandrin, P., Honeine, P., Richard, C., and Xiao, J.: Testing
stationarity with surrogates: A time-frequency approach, IEEE Transactions on
Signal Processing, 58, 3459–3470, 2010. a
Coughlin, K., Murthi, A., and Eto, J.: Multi-scale analysis of wind power and
load time series data, Renew. Energ., 68, 494–504, 2014. a
Cutler, N., Kay, M., Jacka, K., and Nielsen, T. S.: Detecting, categorizing and
forecasting large ramps in wind farm power output using meteorological
observations and WPPT, Wind Energy: An International Journal for Progress and
Applications in Wind Power Conversion Technology, 10, 453–470, 2007. a
Davy, M. and Godsill, S.: Detection of abrupt spectral changes using support
vector machines an application to audio signal segmentation, 2002 IEEE International Conference on
Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing , Orlando, FL, 2002, II-1313-II-1316, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2002.5744044,
2002. a
DeMarco, A. and Basu, S.: On the tails of the wind ramp distributions, Wind
Energ., 21, 892–905, 2018. a
Drew, D. R., Barlow, J. F., and Coker, P. J.: Identifying and characterising
large ramps in power output of offshore wind farms, Renew. Energ., 127,
195–203, 2018. a
Dunyak, J., Gilliam, X., Peterson, R., and Smith, D.: Coherent gust detection
by wavelet transform, J. Wind Eng. Ind.
Aerod., 77, 467–478, 1998. a
Ferreira, C., Gama, J., Matias, L., Botterud, A., and Wang, J.: A Survey on Wind
Power RAMP Forecasting, Tech. rep., Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), USA,
2011. a
Gallego, C., Cuerva, A., and Costa, A.: Detecting and characterising ramp
events in wind power time series, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 555, 012040,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/555/1/012040, 2014. a, b
Gallego-Castillo, C., Cuerva-Tejero, A., and Lopez-Garcia, O.: A review on the
recent history of wind power ramp forecasting, Renewable and Sustainable
Energy Reviews, 52, 1148–1157, 2015. a
Gilliam, X., Dunyak, J., Doggett, A., and Smith, D.: Coherent structure
detection using wavelet analysis in long time-series, J. Wind
Eng. Ind. Aerod., 88, 183–195, 2000. a
Guarin, D., Orozco, A., and Delgado, E.: A new surrogate data method for
nonstationary time series, arXiv [preprint], arXiv:1008.1804, 2010. a
Hannesdóttir, Á. and Kelly, M.: Detection and characterization of extreme wind speed ramps, Wind Energ. Sci., 4, 385–396, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-4-385-2019, 2019. a, b
Ji, F., Cai, X., and Zhang, J.: Wind power prediction interval estimation
method using wavelet-transform neuro-fuzzy network, Journal of Intelligent &
Fuzzy Systems, 29, 2439–2445, 2015. a
Kalverla, P. C., Duncan Jr., J. B., Steeneveld, G.-J., and Holtslag, A. A. M.: Low-level jets over the North Sea based on ERA5 and observations: together they do better, Wind Energ. Sci., 4, 193–209, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-4-193-2019, 2019. a, b
Kiviluoma, J., Holttinen, H., Scharff, R., Weir, D. E., Cutululis, N.,
Litong-Palima, M., and Milligan, M.: Index for wind power variability, in:
The 13th Wind Integration Workshop, edited
by: Betancourt, U. and Ackermann, T., 11–14 November 2014, Berlin, 2014. a
Kiviluoma, J., Holttinen, H., Weir, D., Scharff, R., Söder, L., Menemenlis,
N., Cutululis, N. A., Danti Lopez, I., Lannoye, E., Estanqueiro, A., Gomez-Lazaro, E., Zhang, Q., Bai, J.,
Wan, Y.-H., and Milligan, M.:
Variability in large-scale wind power generation, Wind Energ., 19,
1649–1665, 2016. a
Laurent, H. and Doncarli, C.: Stationarity index for abrupt changes detection
in the time-frequency plane, IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 5, 43–45, 1998. a
Mallat, S.: A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing. A Wavelet Tour of Signal
Processing, Academic Press, ISBN 13 978-0-12-374370-1, 2009. a
Marquis, M., Wilczak, J., Ahlstrom, M., Sharp, J., Stern, A., Smith, J. C., and
Calvert, S.: Forecasting the wind to reach significant penetration levels of
wind energy, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 92, 1159–1171,
2011. a
Nunalee, C. and Basu, S.: Mesoscale Modeling of Low-Level Jets over the North
Sea, in: Wind Energy – Impact of Turbulence, edited by: Hölling, M.,
Peinke, J., and Ivanell, S., pp. 197–202, Springer Berlin Heidelberg,
Berlin, Heidelberg, 2014. a
SCB: Energy prices and switching of suppliers, 3rd quarter 2017, Tech. Rep.
Technical Report EN 24 SM 1704, Swedish Energy Agency, 2017. a
Steele, C., Dorling, S., von Glasow, R., and Bacon, J.: Modelling sea-breeze
climatologies and interactions on coasts in the southern North Sea:
implications for offshore wind energy, Q. J. Roy.
Meteorol. Soc., 141, 1821–1835, 2015. a
Theiler, J., Eubank, S., Longtin, A., Galdrikian, B., and Farmer, J. D.:
Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data,
Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 58, 77–94, 1992. a
Short summary
Wind power ramps have important characteristics for the planning and integration of wind power production into electricity. We present a new and simple algorithm that detects wind power ramp characteristics. The algorithm classifies wind power production into ramp-ups, ramp-downs, and no-ramps; and it can detect wind power ramp characteristics that show a temporal increasing (decreasing) power capacity.
Wind power ramps have important characteristics for the planning and integration of wind power...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint