Articles | Volume 7, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1367-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1367-2022
Research article
 | 
07 Jul 2022
Research article |  | 07 Jul 2022

Including realistic upper atmospheres in a wind-farm gravity-wave model

Koen Devesse, Luca Lanzilao, Sebastiaan Jamaer, Nicole van Lipzig, and Johan Meyers

Related authors

Dries Allaerts, 1989–2024
Majid Bastankhah, Marcus Becker, Matthew Churchfield, Caroline Draxl, Jay Prakash Goit, Mehtab Khan, Luis A. Martinez Tossas, Johan Meyers, Patrick Moriarty, Wim Munters, Asim Önder, Sara Porchetta, Eliot Quon, Ishaan Sood, Nicole van Lipzig, Jan-Willem van Wingerden, Paul Veers, and Simon Watson
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 2171–2174, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-2171-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-2171-2024, 2024
Short summary
A large-eddy simulation analysis of collective wind-farm axial-induction control in the presence of blockage
Théo Delvaux and Johan Meyers
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-110,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-110, 2024
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
A Bayesian method for predicting background radiation at environmental monitoring stations
Jens Peter K. W. Frankemölle, Johan Camps, Pieter De Meutter, and Johan Meyers
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-137,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-137, 2024
Preprint under review for GMD
Short summary
Mesoscale weather systems and associated potential wind power variations in a midlatitude sea strait (Kattegat)
Jérôme Neirynck, Jonas Van de Walle, Ruben Borgers, Sebastiaan Jamaer, Johan Meyers, Ad Stoffelen, and Nicole P. M. van Lipzig
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1695–1711, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1695-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1695-2024, 2024
Short summary
Turbine- and farm-scale power losses in wind farms: an alternative to wake and farm blockage losses
Andrew Kirby, Takafumi Nishino, Luca Lanzilao, Thomas D. Dunstan, and Johan Meyers
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-79,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-79, 2024
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary

Related subject area

Thematic area: Fluid mechanics | Topic: Wakes and wind farm aerodynamics
Hyperparameter tuning framework for calibrating analytical wake models using SCADA data of an offshore wind farm
Diederik van Binsbergen, Pieter-Jan Daems, Timothy Verstraeten, Amir R. Nejad, and Jan Helsen
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1507–1526, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1507-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1507-2024, 2024
Short summary
Synchronised WindScanner field measurements of the induction zone between two closely spaced wind turbines
Anantha Padmanabhan Kidambi Sekar, Paul Hulsman, Marijn Floris van Dooren, and Martin Kühn
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1483–1505, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1483-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1483-2024, 2024
Short summary
Wind farm structural response and wake dynamics for an evolving stable boundary layer: computational and experimental comparisons
Kelsey Shaler, Eliot Quon, Hristo Ivanov, and Jason Jonkman
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1451–1463, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1451-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1451-2024, 2024
Short summary
A Numerical Investigation of Multirotor Systems with Vortex-Generating Modes for Regenerative Wind Energy: Validation Against Experimental Data
Flavio Avila Correia Martins, Alexander van Zuijlen, and Carlos Simao Ferreira
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-72,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-72, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for WES
Short summary
Improvements to the dynamic wake meandering model by incorporating the turbulent Schmidt number
Peter Brugger, Corey D. Markfort, and Fernando Porté-Agel
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1363–1379, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1363-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1363-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Allaerts, D. and Meyers, J.: Boundary-layer development and gravity waves in conventionally neutral wind farms, J. Fluid Mech., 814, 95–130, https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2017.11, 2017. a
Allaerts, D. and Meyers, J.: Sensitivity and feedback of wind-farm-induced gravity waves, J. Fluid Mech., 862, 990–1028, https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2018.969, 2019. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p, q, r, s, t, u, v, w, x, y, z, aa, ab, ac, ad
Allaerts, D., Broucke, S. V., Van Lipzig, N., and Meyers, J.: Annual impact of wind-farm gravity waves on the Belgian-Dutch offshore wind-farm cluster, J. Phys.-Conf. Ser., 1037, 072006, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1037/7/072006, 2018. a, b, c, d
Baines, P. G.: Topographic effects in stratified flows, Cambridge monographs on mechanics, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-62923-3, 1998. a, b, c, d, e, f, g
Bastankhah, M. and Porté-Agel, F.: A new analytical model for wind-turbine wakes, Renew. Energ., 70, 116–123, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.01.002, 2014. a
Download
Short summary
Recent research suggests that offshore wind farms might form such a large obstacle to the wind that it already decelerates before reaching the first turbines. Part of this phenomenon could be explained by gravity waves. Research on these gravity waves triggered by mountains and hills has found that variations in the atmospheric state with altitude can have a large effect on how they behave. This paper is the first to take the impact of those vertical variations into account for wind farms.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint