Articles | Volume 8, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1277-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1277-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Bayesian method for estimating Weibull parameters for wind resource assessment in a tropical region: a comparison between two-parameter and three-parameter Weibull distributions
Mohammad Golam Mostafa Khan
School of Information Technology, Engineering, Mathematics and Physics, The
University of the South Pacific, Laucala Campus, Suva, Fiji
Mohammed Rafiuddin Ahmed
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
School of Information Technology, Engineering, Mathematics and Physics, The
University of the South Pacific, Laucala Campus, Suva, Fiji
Related subject area
Thematic area: Wind and the atmosphere | Topic: Atmospheric physics
Mesoscale weather systems and associated potential wind power variations in a midlatitude sea strait (Kattegat)
A large-eddy simulation (LES) model for wind-farm-induced atmospheric gravity wave effects inside conventionally neutral boundary layers
Simulating low-frequency wind fluctuations
Tropical cyclone low-level wind speed, shear, and veer: sensitivity to the boundary layer parametrization in the Weather Research and Forecasting model
The multi-scale coupled model: a new framework capturing wind farm–atmosphere interaction and global blockage effects
Seasonal variability of wake impacts on US mid-Atlantic offshore wind plant power production
Lessons learned in coupling atmospheric models across scales for onshore and offshore wind energy
Investigating the physical mechanisms that modify wind plant blockage in stable boundary layers
Offshore wind energy forecasting sensitivity to sea surface temperature input in the Mid-Atlantic
Lifetime prediction of turbine blades using global precipitation products from satellites
Evaluation of low-level jets in the southern Baltic Sea: a comparison between ship-based lidar observational data and numerical models
Predicting power ramps from joint distributions of future wind speeds
Scientific challenges to characterizing the wind resource in the marine atmospheric boundary layer
Research challenges and needs for the deployment of wind energy in hilly and mountainous regions
Observer-based power forecast of individual and aggregated offshore wind turbines
Sensitivity analysis of mesoscale simulations to physics parameterizations over the Belgian North Sea using Weather Research and Forecasting – Advanced Research WRF (WRF-ARW)
Jérôme Neirynck, Jonas Van de Walle, Ruben Borgers, Sebastiaan Jamaer, Johan Meyers, Ad Stoffelen, and Nicole P. M. van Lipzig
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1695–1711, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1695-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1695-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In our study, we assess how mesoscale weather systems influence wind speed variations and their impact on offshore wind energy production fluctuations. We have observed, for instance, that weather systems originating over land lead to sea wind speed variations. Additionally, we noted that power fluctuations are typically more significant in summer, despite potentially larger winter wind speed variations. These findings are valuable for grid management and optimizing renewable energy deployment.
Sebastiano Stipa, Mehtab Ahmed Khan, Dries Allaerts, and Joshua Brinkerhoff
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1647–1668, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1647-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1647-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce a novel way to model the impact of atmospheric gravity waves (AGWs) on wind farms using high-fidelity simulations while significantly reducing computational costs. The proposed approach is validated across different atmospheric stability conditions, and implications of neglecting AGWs when predicting wind farm power are assessed. This work advances our understanding of the interaction of wind farms with the free atmosphere, ultimately facilitating cost-effective research.
Abdul Haseeb Syed and Jakob Mann
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1381–1391, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1381-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1381-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Wind flow consists of swirling patterns of air called eddies, some as big as many kilometers across, while others are as small as just a few meters. This paper introduces a method to simulate these large swirling patterns on a flat grid. Using these simulations we can better figure out how these large eddies affect big wind turbines in terms of loads and forces.
Sara Müller, Xiaoli Guo Larsén, and David Robert Verelst
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1153–1171, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1153-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1153-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Tropical cyclone winds are challenging for wind turbines. We analyze a tropical cyclone before landfall in a mesoscale model. The simulated wind speeds and storm structure are sensitive to the boundary parametrization. However, independent of the boundary layer parametrization, the median change in wind speed and wind direction with height is small relative to wind turbine design standards. Strong spatial organization of wind shear and veer along the rainbands may increase wind turbine loads.
Sebastiano Stipa, Arjun Ajay, Dries Allaerts, and Joshua Brinkerhoff
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1123–1152, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1123-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1123-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper introduces the multi-scale coupled (MSC) model, an engineering framework aimed at modeling turbine–wake and wind farm–gravity wave interactions, as well as local and global blockage effects. Comparisons against large eddy simulations show that the MSC model offers a valid contribution towards advancing our understanding of the coupled wind farm–atmosphere interaction, helping refining power estimation methodologies for existing and future wind farm sites.
David Rosencrans, Julie K. Lundquist, Mike Optis, Alex Rybchuk, Nicola Bodini, and Michael Rossol
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 555–583, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-555-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-555-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The US offshore wind industry is developing rapidly. Using yearlong simulations of wind plants in the US mid-Atlantic, we assess the impacts of wind turbine wakes. While wakes are the strongest and longest during summertime stably stratified conditions, when New England grid demand peaks, they are predictable and thus manageable. Over a year, wakes reduce power output by over 35 %. Wakes in a wind plant contribute the most to that reduction, while wakes between wind plants play a secondary role.
Sue Ellen Haupt, Branko Kosović, Larry K. Berg, Colleen M. Kaul, Matthew Churchfield, Jeffrey Mirocha, Dries Allaerts, Thomas Brummet, Shannon Davis, Amy DeCastro, Susan Dettling, Caroline Draxl, David John Gagne, Patrick Hawbecker, Pankaj Jha, Timothy Juliano, William Lassman, Eliot Quon, Raj K. Rai, Michael Robinson, William Shaw, and Regis Thedin
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1251–1275, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1251-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1251-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The Mesoscale to Microscale Coupling team, part of the U.S. Department of Energy Atmosphere to Electrons (A2e) initiative, has studied various important challenges related to coupling mesoscale models to microscale models. Lessons learned and discerned best practices are described in the context of the cases studied for the purpose of enabling further deployment of wind energy. It also points to code, assessment tools, and data for testing the methods.
Miguel Sanchez Gomez, Julie K. Lundquist, Jeffrey D. Mirocha, and Robert S. Arthur
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1049–1069, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1049-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1049-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The wind slows down as it approaches a wind plant; this phenomenon is called blockage. As a result, the turbines in the wind plant produce less power than initially anticipated. We investigate wind plant blockage for two atmospheric conditions. Blockage is larger for a wind plant compared to a stand-alone turbine. Also, blockage increases with atmospheric stability. Blockage is amplified by the vertical transport of horizontal momentum as the wind approaches the front-row turbines in the array.
Stephanie Redfern, Mike Optis, Geng Xia, and Caroline Draxl
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1–23, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
As wind farm developments expand offshore, accurate forecasting of winds above coastal waters is rising in importance. Weather models rely on various inputs to generate their forecasts, one of which is sea surface temperature (SST). In this study, we evaluate how the SST data set used in the Weather Research and Forecasting model may influence wind characterization and find meaningful differences between model output when different SST products are used.
Merete Badger, Haichen Zuo, Ásta Hannesdóttir, Abdalmenem Owda, and Charlotte Hasager
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 2497–2512, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2497-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2497-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
When wind turbine blades are exposed to strong winds and heavy rainfall, they may be damaged and their efficiency reduced. The problem is most pronounced offshore where turbines are tall and the climate is harsh. Satellites provide global half-hourly rain observations. We use these rain data as input to a model for blade lifetime prediction and find that the satellite-based predictions agree well with predictions based on observations from weather stations on the ground.
Hugo Rubio, Martin Kühn, and Julia Gottschall
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 2433–2455, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2433-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2433-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A proper development of offshore wind farms requires the accurate description of atmospheric phenomena like low-level jets. In this study, we evaluate the capabilities and limitations of numerical models to characterize the main jets' properties in the southern Baltic Sea. For this, a comparison against ship-mounted lidar measurements from the NEWA Ferry Lidar Experiment has been implemented, allowing the investigation of the model's capabilities under different temporal and spatial constraints.
Thomas Muschinski, Moritz N. Lang, Georg J. Mayr, Jakob W. Messner, Achim Zeileis, and Thorsten Simon
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 2393–2405, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2393-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2393-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The power generated by offshore wind farms can vary greatly within a couple of hours, and failing to anticipate these ramp events can lead to costly imbalances in the electrical grid. A novel multivariate Gaussian regression model helps us to forecast not just the means and variances of the next day's hourly wind speeds, but also their corresponding correlations. This information is used to generate more realistic scenarios of power production and accurate estimates for ramp probabilities.
William J. Shaw, Larry K. Berg, Mithu Debnath, Georgios Deskos, Caroline Draxl, Virendra P. Ghate, Charlotte B. Hasager, Rao Kotamarthi, Jeffrey D. Mirocha, Paytsar Muradyan, William J. Pringle, David D. Turner, and James M. Wilczak
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 2307–2334, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2307-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2307-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper provides a review of prominent scientific challenges to characterizing the offshore wind resource using as examples phenomena that occur in the rapidly developing wind energy areas off the United States. The paper also describes the current state of modeling and observations in the marine atmospheric boundary layer and provides specific recommendations for filling key current knowledge gaps.
Andrew Clifton, Sarah Barber, Alexander Stökl, Helmut Frank, and Timo Karlsson
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 2231–2254, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2231-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2231-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The transition to low-carbon sources of energy means that wind turbines will need to be built in hilly or mountainous regions or in places affected by icing. These locations are called
complexand are hard to develop. This paper sets out the research and development (R&D) needed to make it easier and cheaper to harness wind energy there. This includes collaborative R&D facilities, improved wind and weather models, frameworks for sharing data, and a clear definition of site complexity.
Frauke Theuer, Andreas Rott, Jörge Schneemann, Lueder von Bremen, and Martin Kühn
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 2099–2116, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2099-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2099-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Remote-sensing-based approaches have shown potential for minute-scale forecasting and need to be further developed towards an operational use. In this work we extend a lidar-based forecast to an observer-based probabilistic power forecast by combining it with a SCADA-based method. We further aggregate individual turbine power using a copula approach. We found that the observer-based forecast benefits from combining lidar and SCADA data and can outperform persistence for unstable stratification.
Adithya Vemuri, Sophia Buckingham, Wim Munters, Jan Helsen, and Jeroen van Beeck
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1869–1888, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1869-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1869-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The sensitivity of the WRF mesoscale modeling framework in accurately representing and predicting wind-farm-level environmental variables for three extreme weather events over the Belgian North Sea is investigated in this study. The overall results indicate highly sensitive simulation results to the type and combination of physics parameterizations and the type of the weather phenomena, with indications that scale-aware physics parameterizations better reproduce wind-related variables.
Cited articles
Ahmed, M. R.: Sample Data for Pentecost, Rakiraki and Rarotonga (Appendix 3), http://repository.usp.ac.fj/id/eprint/14126 (last access: 14 August 2023), 2016.
Aukitino, T., Khan, M. G. M, and Ahmed, M. R.: Wind energy resource
assessment for Kiribati with a comparison of different methods of
determining Weibull parameters, Energ. Convers. Manage., 151,
641–660, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.09.027, 2017.
Azad, A. K., Rasul, M. G., and Yusaf, T.: Statistical diagnosis of the Best
Weibull methods for wind power assessment for agricultural applications,
Energies, 7, 3056–3085, https://doi.org/10.3390/en7053056, 2014.
Carta, J. A., Ramirez, P., and Velazquez, S.: A review of wind speed
probability distributions used in wind energy analysis: Case studies in the
Canary Islands, Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 13, 933–955,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2008.05.005, 2009.
Casella, G. and Berger, R. L.: Statistical inference, 2nd edn., Cengage Learning,
ISBN 978-0-534-24312-8, 2020.
Chang, T. P.: Performance comparison of six numerical methods in estimating
Weibull parameters for wind energy application, Appl. Energ., 88, 272–282,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.06.018, 2011.
Chaurasiya, P. K., Ahmed, S., and Warudkar, V.: Comparative analysis of
Weibull parameters for wind data measured from met-mast and remote sensing
techniques, Renew. Energ., 115, 1153–1165,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.08.014, 2018.
Corotis, R. B., Sigl, A. B., and Klein, J.: Probability models of wind
velocity magnitude and persistence, Sol. Energy, 20, 483–493,
https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-092X(78)90065-8, 1978.
Cousineau, D. and Allan, T.: Likelihood and its use in parameter estimation
and model comparison, Mesure et évaluation en éducation, 37, 63–98,
https://doi.org/10.7202/1036328ar, 2015.
Gosai, A.: Wind Energy potential and electricity generation at Rokavukavu,
Rakiraki, MSc thesis, The University of the South Pacific, https://librarycat.usp.ac.fj/client/en_GB/search/asset/5045/0 (last access: 8 July 2022), 2014.
Guure, C. B., Ibrahim, N. A., and Ahmed, A. O. M.: Bayesian estimation of
two-parameter weibull distribution using extension of Jeffreys' prior
information with three loss functions, Math. Probl. Eng., 2012, 589640, https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/589640, 2012.
Hossain, A. and Zimmer, W.: Comparison of estimation methods for Weibull
parameters: complete and censored samples,
J. Stat. Comput. Sim., 73, 145–153, https://doi.org/10.1080/00949650215730, 2003.
Ibrahim, N. A. and Mohammed, A.: Bayesian survival estimator for Weibull
distribution with censored data, Journal of Applied Sciences, 11, 393–396,
https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2011.393.396, 2011.
IEA: Key world energy statistics, International Energy Agency, Paris, https://www.iea.org/reports/key-world-energy-statistics-2021 (last access: 22 February 2023), 2021.
IEC 61400-1: Wind turbines – Part 12-1: Power performance measurements of electricity producing wind turbines, https://www.iec.ch (last access: 10 April 2022), 2017.
Indhumathy, D., Seshaiah, C., and Sukkiramathi, K.: Estimation of Weibull
Parameters for Wind speed calculation at Kanyakumari in India,
International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, 3, 8340–8345, 2014.
Jain, P.: Wind Energy Engineering, 2nd edn., McGraw Hill, New York, ISBN 978-0-07-184385-0, 2016.
Kidmo, D. K., Danwe, R., Doka, S. Y., and Djongyang, N.: Statistical
analysis of wind speed distribution based on six weibull Methods for wind
power evaluation in Garoua, Cameroon, Journal of Renewable Energies, 18,
105–125, https://www.asjp.cerist.dz/en/downArticlepdf/401/18/1/121257 (last access: 17 March 2022), 2015.
Kutty, S. S., Khan, M. G., and Ahmed, M. R.: Estimation of different wind
characteristics parameters and accurate wind resource assessment for Kadavu,
Fiji, AIMS Energy, 7, 760–791, https://doi.org/10.3934/energy.2019.6.760,
2019.
Lawless, J. F.: Statistical models and methods for lifetime data, 2nd edn., John
Wiley & Sons, ISBN 0-471-37215-3, 2003.
Leahy, P. G. and McKeogh, E. J.: Persistence of low wind speed conditions
and implications for wind power variability, Wind Energy, 16, 575–586,
https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1509, 2013.
Luceño, A.: Maximum likelihood vs. maximum goodness of fit estimation of
the three-parameter Weibull distribution, J. Stat. Comput. Sim., 78, 941–949, https://doi.org/10.1080/00949650701467363,
2008.
Lye, L. M., Hapuarachchi, K., and Ryan, S.: Bayes estimation of the
extreme-value reliability function, IEEE T. Reliab., 42,
641–644, https://doi.org/10.1109/24.273598, 1993.
Manwell, J. F., McGowan, J. G., and Rogers, A. L.: Wind energy explained:
theory, design and application, 2nd edn., John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 978-0-470-01500-1, 2010.
Michalena, E., Kouloumpis, V., and Hills, J. M.: Challenges for Pacific
Small Island developing states in achieving their nationally determined
contributions (NDC), Energ. Policy, 114, 508–518,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.12.022, 2018.
Ministry Of Economy: Fiji NDC Implementation Roadmap 2017–2030,
https://gggi.org/report/fiji-ndc-implementation-roadmap/ (last access: 15
July 2022), 2017.
Pandey, B. N., Dwividi, N., and Pulastya, B.: Comparison between Bayesian
and maximum likelihood estimation of the scale parameter in Weibull
distribution with known shape under linex loss function,
Journal of Scientific Research, 55, 163–172, 2011.
Patlakas, P., Galanis, G., Diamantis, D., and Kallos, G.: Low wind speed
events: persistence and frequency, Wind Energy, 20, 1033–1047,
https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2078, 2017.
Plummer, M.: JAGS: A program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using
Gibbs sampling, in: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on
Distributed Statistical Computing (DSC 2003), 20–22 March 2003, Vienna, Austria, 2003.
PPA (Pacific Power Association): World Bank Provides Grant for Renewable Energy: http://www.ppa.org.fj/world-bank-provides-grant-for-renewable-energy/ (last access: 12 August 2021), 2015.
Ramachandran, K. M. and Tsokos, C. P.: Mathematical statistics with
applications in R, 3rd edn., Academic Press, ISBN 978-0-12-817815-7, 2021.
Renner, M., Garcia-Banos, C., and Khalid, A.: Renewable energy and jobs:
annual review 2022,
https://www.irena.org/publications/2022/Sep/Renewable-Energy-and-Jobs-Annual-Review-2022 (last access: 25 January 2023),
2022.
Robinson, S. A.: Climate change adaptation in SIDS: A systematic review of
the literature pre and post the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report, WIRES Clim. Change, 11, e653,
https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.653, 2020.
Rocha, P. A. C., de Sousa, R. C., de Andrade, C. F., and da Silva, M. E. V.:
Comparison of seven numerical methods for determining Weibull parameters for
wind energy generation in the northeast region of Brazil, Appl. Energ.,
89, 395–400, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.08.003, 2012.
Singh, K., Bule, L., Khan, M. G., and Ahmed, M. R.: Wind energy resource
assessment for Vanuatu with accurate estimation of Weibull parameters,
Energ. Explor. Exploit., 37, 1804–1832,
https://doi.org/10.1177/0144598719866897, 2019.
Singh, K. A., Khan, M., and Ahmed, M. R.: Wind Energy Resource Assessment
for Cook Islands With Accurate Estimation of Weibull Parameters Using
Frequentist and Bayesian Methods, IEEE Access, 10, 25935–25953, 2022.
Spiegelhalter, D. J., Best, N. G., Carlin, B. P., and Van Der Linde, A.:
Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit, J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B, 64, 583–639,
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00353, 2002.
Su, Y. and Yajima, M.: Using R to run “JAGS”, R package version 0.6-1, https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/R2jags (last access: 22 November 2021), 2020.
Sukkiramathi, K. and Seshaiah, C.: Analysis of wind power potential by the
three-parameter Weibull distribution to install a wind turbine, Energ. Explor. Exploit., 38, 158–174,
https://doi.org/10.1177/0144598719871628, 2020.
Teimouri, M. and Gupta, A. K.: On the three-parameter Weibull distribution
shape parameter estimation, Journal of Data Science, 11, 403–414,
https://doi.org/10.6339/JDS.2013.11(3).1110, 2013.
Tuller, S. E. and Brett, A. C.: The characteristics of wind velocity that
favor the fitting of a Weibull distribution in wind speed analysis, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 23, 124–134,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1984)023<0124:TCOWVT>2.0.CO;2, 1984.
Wais, P.: Two and three-parameter Weibull distribution in available wind
power analysis, Renew. Energ., 103, 15–29,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.10.041, 2017.
Wang, W., Chen, K., Bai, Y., Chen, Y., and Wang, J.: New estimation method
of wind power density with three-parameter Weibull distribution: A case on
Central Inner Mongolia suburbs, Wind Energy, 25, 368–386,
https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2677, 2022.
Weir, T.: Renewable energy in the Pacific Islands: Its role and status,
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 94, 762–771,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.069, 2018.
Short summary
A robust technique for wind resource assessment with a Bayesian approach for estimating Weibull parameters is proposed. Research conducted using seven sites' data in the tropical region from 1° N to 21° S revealed that the three-parameter (3-p) Weibull distribution with a non-zero shift parameter is a better fit for wind data that have a higher percentage of low wind speeds. Wind data with higher wind speeds are a special case of the 3-p distribution. This approach gives accurate results.
A robust technique for wind resource assessment with a Bayesian approach for estimating Weibull...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint