Articles | Volume 8, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-433-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-433-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
29 Mar 2023
Research article |
| 29 Mar 2023
| 29 Mar 2023
Validation of turbulence intensity as simulated by the Weather Research and Forecasting model off the US northeast coast
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, USA
Larry K. Berg
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, USA
Raghavendra Krishnamurthy
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, USA
Rob Newsom
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, USA
Anthony Kirincich
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Falmouth, MA 02543, USA
Related authors
Sheng-Lun Tai, Zhao Yang, Brian Gaudet, Koichi Sakaguchi, Larry Berg, Colleen Kaul, Yun Qian, Ye Liu, and Jerome Fast
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-599, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-599, 2025
Revised manuscript accepted for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
Our study created a high-resolution soil moisture dataset for the eastern U.S. by integrating satellite data with a land surface model and advanced algorithms, achieving 1-km scale analyses. Validated against multiple networks and datasets, it demonstrated superior accuracy. This dataset is vital for understanding soil moisture dynamics, especially during droughts, and highlights the need for improved modeling of clay soils to refine future predictions.
Po-Lun Ma, Bryce E. Harrop, Vincent E. Larson, Richard B. Neale, Andrew Gettelman, Hugh Morrison, Hailong Wang, Kai Zhang, Stephen A. Klein, Mark D. Zelinka, Yuying Zhang, Yun Qian, Jin-Ho Yoon, Christopher R. Jones, Meng Huang, Sheng-Lun Tai, Balwinder Singh, Peter A. Bogenschutz, Xue Zheng, Wuyin Lin, Johannes Quaas, Hélène Chepfer, Michael A. Brunke, Xubin Zeng, Johannes Mülmenstädt, Samson Hagos, Zhibo Zhang, Hua Song, Xiaohong Liu, Michael S. Pritchard, Hui Wan, Jingyu Wang, Qi Tang, Peter M. Caldwell, Jiwen Fan, Larry K. Berg, Jerome D. Fast, Mark A. Taylor, Jean-Christophe Golaz, Shaocheng Xie, Philip J. Rasch, and L. Ruby Leung
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2881–2916, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2881-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2881-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
An alternative set of parameters for E3SM Atmospheric Model version 1 has been developed based on a tuning strategy that focuses on clouds. When clouds in every regime are improved, other aspects of the model are also improved, even though they are not the direct targets for calibration. The recalibrated model shows a lower sensitivity to anthropogenic aerosols and surface warming, suggesting potential improvements to the simulated climate in the past and future.
Aliza Abraham, Matteo Puccioni, Arianna Jordan, Emina Maric, Nicola Bodini, Nicholas Hamilton, Stefano Letizia, Petra M. Klein, Elizabeth N. Smith, Sonia Wharton, Jonathan Gero, Jamey D. Jacob, Raghavendra Krishnamurthy, Rob K. Newsom, Mikhail Pekour, William Radünz, and Patrick Moriarty
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 1681–1705, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1681-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1681-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study is the first to use real-world atmospheric measurements to show that large wind plants can increase the height of the planetary boundary layer, the part of the atmosphere near the surface where life takes place. The planetary boundary layer height governs processes like pollutant transport and cloud formation and is a key parameter for modeling the atmosphere. The results of this study provide important insights into interactions between wind plants and their local environment.
Lindsay M. Sheridan, Jiali Wang, Caroline Draxl, Nicola Bodini, Caleb Phillips, Dmitry Duplyakin, Heidi Tinnesand, Raj K. Rai, Julia E. Flaherty, Larry K. Berg, Chunyong Jung, Ethan Young, and Rao Kotamarthi
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 1551–1574, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1551-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1551-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Three recent wind resource datasets are assessed for their skills in representing annual average wind speeds and seasonal, diurnal, and interannual trends in the wind resource in coastal locations to support customers interested in small and midsize wind energy.
Damao Zhang, Jennifer Comstock, Chitra Sivaraman, Kefei Mo, Raghavendra Krishnamurthy, Jingjing Tian, Tianning Su, Zhanqing Li, and Natalia Roldán-Henao
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 3453–3475, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3453-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3453-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Planetary boundary layer height (PBLHT) is an important parameter in atmospheric process studies and numerical model simulations. We use machine learning methods to produce a best-estimate planetary boundary layer height (PBLHT-BE-ML) by integrating four PBLHT estimates derived from remote sensing measurements. We demonstrated that PBLHT-BE-ML greatly improved the comparisons against sounding-derived PBLHT.
Lindsay M. Sheridan, Dmitry Duplyakin, Caleb Phillips, Heidi Tinnesand, Raj K. Rai, Julia E. Flaherty, and Larry K. Berg
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 1451–1470, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1451-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1451-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
A total of 12 months of onsite wind measurement is standard for correcting model-based long-term wind speed estimates for utility-scale wind farms; however, the time and capital investment involved in gathering onsite measurements must be reconciled with the energy needs and funding opportunities for distributed wind projects. This study aims to answer the question of how short you can go in terms of the observational time period needed to make impactful improvements to long-term wind speed estimates.
Jungmin Lee, Virendra P. Ghate, Arka Mitra, Lee M. Miller, Raghavendra Krishnamurthy, and Ulrike Egerer
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-108, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-108, 2025
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
This study compares weather model predictions to real-world measurements of wind and clouds off California's coast, where offshore wind farms are planned. It finds the model often underestimates wind speeds in cloudy conditions and shows larger errors in clear skies. These results highlight when and where the model is most accurate, helping improve wind forecasts and support better planning for offshore wind energy projects.
Macy Frost Chang, Raghavendra Krishnamurthy, and Fotini Katopodes Chow
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-85, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-85, 2025
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
The development of offshore wind energy sites hinges on accurate prediction of hub-height wind speeds. This paper compares three machine learning (ML) algorithms to a standard log-law wind extrapolation at two offshore buoy sites. The ML methods demonstrate new capabilities for providing accurate and adaptable predictions of offshore wind characteristics in comparison to conventional approaches. These ML techniques can help inform the development of offshore wind energy projects.
Adam S. Wise, Robert S. Arthur, Aliza Abraham, Sonia Wharton, Raghavendra Krishnamurthy, Rob Newsom, Brian Hirth, John Schroeder, Patrick Moriarty, and Fotini K. Chow
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 1007–1032, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1007-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1007-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Wind farms can be subject to rapidly changing weather events. In the United States Great Plains, some of these weather events can result in waves in the atmosphere that ultimately affect how much power a wind farm can produce. We modeled a specific event of waves observed in Oklahoma. We determined how to accurately model the event and analyzed how it affected a wind farm’s power production, finding that the waves both decreased power and made it more variable.
Arka Mitra, Virendra Ghate, and Raghavendra Krishnamurthy
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-55, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-55, 2025
Revised manuscript under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
This study introduces a new metric to quantify the spatiotemporal variability of wind resources and a novel numerical technique to locate the optimal wind resource within a large wind farm. The new metric and the novel optimization technique are applied to assist in the pre-construction wind resource assessments of two Californian offshore wind energy areas. This optimization is stable for a diverse choice of wind turbines and is easily scalable and adaptable to any other offshore location.
Branko Kosović, Sukanta Basu, Jacob Berg, Larry K. Berg, Sue E. Haupt, Xiaoli G. Larsén, Joachim Peinke, Richard J. A. M. Stevens, Paul Veers, and Simon Watson
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-42, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-42, 2025
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
Most human activity happens in the layer of the atmosphere which extends a few hundred meters to a couple of kilometers above the surface of the Earth. The flow in this layer is turbulent. Turbulence impacts wind power production and turbine lifespan. Optimizing wind turbine performance requires understanding how turbulence affects both wind turbine efficiency and reliability. This paper points to gaps in our knowledge that need to be addressed to effectively utilize wind resources.
Ye Liu, Timothy W. Juliano, Raghavendra Krishnamurthy, Brian J. Gaudet, and Jungmin Lee
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 483–495, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-483-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-483-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Our study reveals how different weather patterns influence wind conditions off the US West Coast. We identified key weather patterns affecting wind speeds at potential wind farm sites using advanced machine learning. This research helps improve weather prediction models, making wind energy production more reliable and efficient.
Raghavendra Krishnamurthy, Rob K. Newsom, Colleen M. Kaul, Stefano Letizia, Mikhail Pekour, Nicholas Hamilton, Duli Chand, Donna Flynn, Nicola Bodini, and Patrick Moriarty
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 361–380, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-361-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-361-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study examines how atmospheric phenomena affect the recovery of wind farm wake – the disturbed air behind turbines. In regions like Oklahoma, where wind farms are often clustered, understanding wake recovery is crucial. We found that wind farms can alter phenomena like low-level jets, which are common in Oklahoma, by deflecting them above the wind farm. As a result, the impact of wakes can be observed up to 1–2 km above ground level.
Sheng-Lun Tai, Zhao Yang, Brian Gaudet, Koichi Sakaguchi, Larry Berg, Colleen Kaul, Yun Qian, Ye Liu, and Jerome Fast
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-599, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-599, 2025
Revised manuscript accepted for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
Our study created a high-resolution soil moisture dataset for the eastern U.S. by integrating satellite data with a land surface model and advanced algorithms, achieving 1-km scale analyses. Validated against multiple networks and datasets, it demonstrated superior accuracy. This dataset is vital for understanding soil moisture dynamics, especially during droughts, and highlights the need for improved modeling of clay soils to refine future predictions.
Ye Liu, Yun Qian, Larry K. Berg, Zhe Feng, Jianfeng Li, Jingyi Chen, and Zhao Yang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 8165–8181, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-8165-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-8165-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Deep convection under various large-scale meteorological patterns (LSMPs) shows distinct precipitation features. In southeastern Texas, mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) contribute significantly to precipitation year-round, while isolated deep convection (IDC) is prominent in summer and fall. Self-organizing maps (SOMs) reveal convection can occur without large-scale lifting or moisture convergence. MCSs and IDC events have distinct life cycles influenced by specific LSMPs.
Nicola Bodini, Mike Optis, Stephanie Redfern, David Rosencrans, Alex Rybchuk, Julie K. Lundquist, Vincent Pronk, Simon Castagneri, Avi Purkayastha, Caroline Draxl, Raghavendra Krishnamurthy, Ethan Young, Billy Roberts, Evan Rosenlieb, and Walter Musial
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 1965–2006, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1965-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1965-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This article presents the 2023 National Offshore Wind data set (NOW-23), an updated resource for offshore wind information in the US. It replaces the Wind Integration National Dataset (WIND) Toolkit, offering improved accuracy through advanced weather prediction models. The data underwent regional tuning and validation and can be accessed at no cost.
Lindsay M. Sheridan, Raghavendra Krishnamurthy, William I. Gustafson Jr., Ye Liu, Brian J. Gaudet, Nicola Bodini, Rob K. Newsom, and Mikhail Pekour
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 741–758, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-741-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-741-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In 2020, lidar-mounted buoys owned by the US Department of Energy (DOE) were deployed off the California coast in two wind energy lease areas and provided valuable year-long analyses of offshore low-level jet (LLJ) characteristics at heights relevant to wind turbines. In addition to the LLJ climatology, this work provides validation of LLJ representation in atmospheric models that are essential for assessing the potential energy yield of offshore wind farms.
Raghavendra Krishnamurthy, Gabriel García Medina, Brian Gaudet, William I. Gustafson Jr., Evgueni I. Kassianov, Jinliang Liu, Rob K. Newsom, Lindsay M. Sheridan, and Alicia M. Mahon
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 5667–5699, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5667-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5667-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Our understanding and ability to observe and model air–sea processes has been identified as a principal limitation to our ability to predict future weather. Few observations exist offshore along the coast of California. To improve our understanding of the air–sea transition zone and support the wind energy industry, two buoys with state-of-the-art equipment were deployed for 1 year. In this article, we present details of the post-processing, algorithms, and analyses.
Sue Ellen Haupt, Branko Kosović, Larry K. Berg, Colleen M. Kaul, Matthew Churchfield, Jeffrey Mirocha, Dries Allaerts, Thomas Brummet, Shannon Davis, Amy DeCastro, Susan Dettling, Caroline Draxl, David John Gagne, Patrick Hawbecker, Pankaj Jha, Timothy Juliano, William Lassman, Eliot Quon, Raj K. Rai, Michael Robinson, William Shaw, and Regis Thedin
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1251–1275, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1251-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1251-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The Mesoscale to Microscale Coupling team, part of the U.S. Department of Energy Atmosphere to Electrons (A2e) initiative, has studied various important challenges related to coupling mesoscale models to microscale models. Lessons learned and discerned best practices are described in the context of the cases studied for the purpose of enabling further deployment of wind energy. It also points to code, assessment tools, and data for testing the methods.
William J. Shaw, Larry K. Berg, Mithu Debnath, Georgios Deskos, Caroline Draxl, Virendra P. Ghate, Charlotte B. Hasager, Rao Kotamarthi, Jeffrey D. Mirocha, Paytsar Muradyan, William J. Pringle, David D. Turner, and James M. Wilczak
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 2307–2334, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2307-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2307-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper provides a review of prominent scientific challenges to characterizing the offshore wind resource using as examples phenomena that occur in the rapidly developing wind energy areas off the United States. The paper also describes the current state of modeling and observations in the marine atmospheric boundary layer and provides specific recommendations for filling key current knowledge gaps.
Lindsay M. Sheridan, Raghu Krishnamurthy, Gabriel García Medina, Brian J. Gaudet, William I. Gustafson Jr., Alicia M. Mahon, William J. Shaw, Rob K. Newsom, Mikhail Pekour, and Zhaoqing Yang
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 2059–2084, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2059-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2059-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Using observations from lidar buoys, five reanalysis and analysis models that support the wind energy community are validated offshore and at rotor-level heights along the California Pacific coast. The models are found to underestimate the observed wind resource. Occasions of large model error occur in conjunction with stable atmospheric conditions, wind speeds associated with peak turbine power production, and mischaracterization of the diurnal wind speed cycle in summer months.
Fan Mei, Mikhail S. Pekour, Darielle Dexheimer, Gijs de Boer, RaeAnn Cook, Jason Tomlinson, Beat Schmid, Lexie A. Goldberger, Rob Newsom, and Jerome D. Fast
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 3423–3438, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-3423-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-3423-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This work focuses on an expanding number of data sets observed using ARM TBS (133 flights) and UAS (seven flights) platforms by the Department of Energy (DOE) Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility. These data streams provide new perspectives on spatial variability of atmospheric and surface parameters, helping to address critical science questions in Earth system science research, such as the aerosol–cloud interaction in the boundary layer.
Po-Lun Ma, Bryce E. Harrop, Vincent E. Larson, Richard B. Neale, Andrew Gettelman, Hugh Morrison, Hailong Wang, Kai Zhang, Stephen A. Klein, Mark D. Zelinka, Yuying Zhang, Yun Qian, Jin-Ho Yoon, Christopher R. Jones, Meng Huang, Sheng-Lun Tai, Balwinder Singh, Peter A. Bogenschutz, Xue Zheng, Wuyin Lin, Johannes Quaas, Hélène Chepfer, Michael A. Brunke, Xubin Zeng, Johannes Mülmenstädt, Samson Hagos, Zhibo Zhang, Hua Song, Xiaohong Liu, Michael S. Pritchard, Hui Wan, Jingyu Wang, Qi Tang, Peter M. Caldwell, Jiwen Fan, Larry K. Berg, Jerome D. Fast, Mark A. Taylor, Jean-Christophe Golaz, Shaocheng Xie, Philip J. Rasch, and L. Ruby Leung
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2881–2916, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2881-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2881-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
An alternative set of parameters for E3SM Atmospheric Model version 1 has been developed based on a tuning strategy that focuses on clouds. When clouds in every regime are improved, other aspects of the model are also improved, even though they are not the direct targets for calibration. The recalibrated model shows a lower sensitivity to anthropogenic aerosols and surface warming, suggesting potential improvements to the simulated climate in the past and future.
Lindsay M. Sheridan, Caleb Phillips, Alice C. Orrell, Larry K. Berg, Heidi Tinnesand, Raj K. Rai, Sagi Zisman, Dmitry Duplyakin, and Julia E. Flaherty
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 659–676, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-659-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-659-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The small wind community relies on simplified wind models and energy production simulation tools to obtain energy generation expectations. We gathered actual wind speed and turbine production data across the US to test the accuracy of models and tools for small wind turbines. This study provides small wind installers and owners with the error metrics and sources of error associated with using models and tools to make performance estimates, empowering them to adjust expectations accordingly.
Ye Liu, Yun Qian, and Larry K. Berg
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 37–51, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-37-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-37-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Uncertainties in initial conditions (ICs) decrease the accuracy of wind speed forecasts. We find that IC uncertainties can alter wind speed by modulating the weather system. IC uncertainties in local thermal gradient and large-scale circulation jointly contribute to wind speed forecast uncertainties. Wind forecast accuracy in the Columbia River Basin is confined by initial uncertainties in a few specific regions, providing useful information for more intense measurement and modeling studies.
Raghavendra Krishnamurthy, Rob K. Newsom, Larry K. Berg, Heng Xiao, Po-Lun Ma, and David D. Turner
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 4403–4424, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4403-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4403-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Planetary boundary layer (PBL) height is a critical parameter in atmospheric models. Continuous PBL height measurements from remote sensing measurements are important to understand various boundary layer mechanisms, especially during daytime and evening transition periods. Due to several limitations in existing methodologies to detect PBL height from a Doppler lidar, in this study, a machine learning (ML) approach is tested. The ML model is observed to improve the accuracy by over 50 %.
Daniel Vassallo, Raghavendra Krishnamurthy, and Harindra J. S. Fernando
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 295–309, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-295-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-295-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Machine learning is quickly becoming a commonly used technique for wind speed and power forecasting and is especially useful when combined with other forecasting techniques. This study utilizes a popular machine learning algorithm, random forest, in an attempt to predict the forecasting error of a statistical forecasting model. Various atmospheric characteristics are used as random forest inputs in an effort to discern the most useful atmospheric information for this purpose.
Caroline Draxl, Rochelle P. Worsnop, Geng Xia, Yelena Pichugina, Duli Chand, Julie K. Lundquist, Justin Sharp, Garrett Wedam, James M. Wilczak, and Larry K. Berg
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 45–60, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-45-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-45-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Mountain waves can create oscillations in low-level wind speeds and subsequently in the power output of wind plants. We document such oscillations by analyzing sodar and lidar observations, nacelle wind speeds, power observations, and Weather Research and Forecasting model simulations. This research describes how mountain waves form in the Columbia River basin and affect wind energy production and their impact on operational forecasting, wind plant layout, and integration of power into the grid.
Cited articles
Arthur, R. S., Juliano, T. W., Adler, B., Krishnamurthy, R., Lundquist, J.
K., Kosović, B., and Jiménez, P. A.: Improved Representation of
Horizontal Variability and Turbulence in Mesoscale Simulations of an Extended Cold-Air Pool Event, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 61, 685–707, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-21-0138.1, 2022.
Austin T. C., Edson, J. B., McGillis, W. R., von Alt, C., Purcell, M. J.,
Petitt, R., McElroy, M. K., Ware, J., and Stokey, R.: The Martha's Vineyard Coastal Observatory: A long term facility for monitoring air-sea processes, in: Proc. MTS/IEEE OCEANS, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/882223 (last access: 28 March 2023), 1937–1941, 2000.
Bardal, L. M. and Sætran, L. R.: Influence of turbulence intensity on wind turbine power curves, Energ. Proced., 137, 553–558,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.10.384, 2017.
Bardal, L. M., Onstad, A. E., Sætran, L. R., and Lund, J. A.: Evaluation
of methods for estimating atmospheric stability at two coastal sites, Wind
Eng., 42, 561–575, https://doi.org/10.1177/0309524X18780378, 2018.
Barthelmie, R. J., Frandsen, S. T., Nielsen, M. N., Pryor, S. C., Rethore,
P.-E., and Jørgensen, H. E.: Modelling and measurements of power losses
and turbulence intensity in wind turbine wakes at Middelgrunden offshore
wind farm, Wind Energy, 10, 517–528, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.238, 2007.
Benjamin, S. G., Weygandt, S. S., Brown, J. M., Hu, M., Alexander, C. R.,
Smirnova, T. G., Olson, J. B., James, E. P., Dowell, D. C., Grell, G. A.,
Lin, H., Peckham, S. E., Smith, T. L., Moninger, W. R., Kenyon, J. S., and
Manikin, G. S.: A North American Hourly Assimilation and Model Forecast
Cycle: The Rapid Refresh, Mon. Weather Rev., 144, 1669–1694,
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0242.1, 2016.
Berg, L. K., Liu, Y., Yang, B., Qian, Y., Olson, J., Pekour, M., Ma, P.-L.,
and Hou, Z.: Sensitivity of Turbine-Height Wind Speeds to Parameters in the
Planetary Boundary-Layer Parametrization Used in the Weather Research and
Forecasting Model: Extension to Wintertime Conditions, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 170, 507–518, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-018-0406-y, 2019.
Bodini, N., Lundquist, J. K., and Kirincich, A.: Offshore Wind Turbines Will
Encounter Very Low Atmospheric Turbulence, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1452, 012023, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1452/1/012023, 2020.
Bodini, N., Hu, W., Optis, M., Cervone, G., and Alessandrini, S.: Assessing
boundary condition and parametric uncertainty in numerical-weather-prediction-modeled, long-term offshore wind speed through
machine learning and analog ensemble, Wind Energy Sci., 6, 1363–1377,
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1363-2021, 2021.
Brand, A. J., Peinke, J., and Mann, J.: Turbulence and wind turbines, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 318, 072005, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/318/7/072005, 2011.
Chang, R., Zhu, R., Badger, M., Hasager, C. B., Xing, X., and Jiang, Y.:
Offshore Wind Resources Assessment from Multiple Satellite Data and WRF
Modeling over South China Sea, Remote Sens., 7, 467–487, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70100467, 2015.
Chen, F. and Dudhia, J.: Coupling an Advanced Land Surface–Hydrology Model
with the Penn State–NCAR MM5 Modeling System. Part I: Model Implementation
and Sensitivity, Mon. Weather Rev., 129, 569–585,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<0569:CAALSH>2.0.CO;2, 2001.
Chin, T. M., Vazquez-Cuervo, J., and Armstrong, E. M.: A multi-scale
high-resolution analysis of global sea surface temperature, Remote Sens.
Environ., 200, 154–169, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.07.029, 2017.
Clifton, A. and Wagner, R.: Accounting for the effect of turbulence on wind
turbine power curves, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 524, 012109,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/524/1/012109, 2014.
Donlon, C. J., Martin, M., Stark, J., Roberts-Jones, J., Fiedler, E., and
Wimmer, W.: The Operational Sea Surface Temperature and Sea Ice Analysis (OSTIA) system, Remote Sens. Environ., 116, 140–158,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.10.017, 2012.
Garratt, J.: Review: the atmospheric boundary layer, Earth-Sci. Rev., 37,
89–134, https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-8252(94)90026-4, 1994.
Gaudet, B. J., Medina, G. G., Krishnamurthy, R., Shaw, W. J., Sheridan, L.
M., Yang, Z., Newsom, R. K., and Pekour, M.: Evaluation of Coupled Wind–Wave Model Simulations of Offshore Winds in the Mid-Atlantic Bight Using Lidar-Equipped Buoys, Mon. Weather Rev., 150, 1377–1395, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-21-0166.1, 2022.
Gorton, A. M. and Shaw, W. J.: Advancing Offshore Wind Resource Characterization Using Buoy-Based Observations, Mar. Technol. Soc. J., 54,
37–43, https://doi.org/10.4031/MTSJ.54.6.5, 2020.
Gottschall, J., Gribben, B., Stein, D., and Würth, I.: Floating lidar as
an advanced offshore wind speed measurement technique: current technology
status and gap analysis in regard to full maturity, WIREs Energ. Environ.,
6, e250, https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.250, 2017.
Grumbine, R.: Description of NCEP High Res, SST Analysis, https://polar.ncep.noaa.gov/sst/ophi/description.shtml (last access: 15 March 2023), 2020.
Hahmann, A. N., Vincent, C. L., Peña, A., Lange, J., and Hasager, C. B.:
Wind climate estimation using WRF model output: method and model
sensitivities over the sea, Int. J. Climatol., 35, 3422–3439,
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4217, 2015.
Hansen, K. S., Barthelmie, R. J., Jensen, L. E., and Sommer, A.: The impact
of turbulence intensity and atmospheric stability on power deficits due to
wind turbine wakes at Horns Rev wind farm, Wind Energy, 15, 183–196,
https://doi.org/10.1002/we.512, 2012.
Hong, S.-Y., Noh, Y., and Dudhia, J.: A new vertical diffusion package with an explicit treatment of entrainment processes, Mon. Weather Rev., 134, 2318–2341, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3199.1, 2006.
Howland, M. F., González, C. M., Martínez, J. J. P., Quesada, J. B., Larrañaga, F. P., Yadav, N. K., Chawla, J. S., and Dabiri, J. O.: Influence of atmospheric conditions on the power production of utility-scale
wind turbines in yaw misalignment, J. Renew. Sustain. Energ., 12, 063307,
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0023746, 2020.
Hsu, S. A.: The relationship between the Monin-Obukhov stability parameter
and the bulk Richardson number at sea, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 94, 8053–8054, https://doi.org/10.1029/JC094iC06p08053, 1989.
Iacono, M. J., Delamere, J. S., Mlawer, E. J., Shephard, M. W., Clough, S. A., and Collins, W. D.: Radiative forcing by long-lived greenhouse gases:
Calculations with the AER radiative transfer models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D13103, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009944, 2008.
Kaimal, J. C. and Finnigan, J. J.: Title Pages, in: Atmospheric Boundary Layer Flows: Their Structure and Measurement, edited by: Kaimal, J. C. and
Finnigan, J. J., Oxford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195062397.001.0001, 1994.
Kaiser, K., Langreder, W., Hohlen, H., and Højstrup, J.: Turbulence
Correction for Power Curves, in: Wind Energy, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 159–162, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-33866-6_28, 2007.
Kelberlau, F., Neshaug, V., Lønseth, L., Bracchi, T., and Mann, J.: Taking the Motion out of Floating Lidar: Turbulence Intensity Estimates with a Continuous-Wave Wind Lidar, Remote Sens., 12, 898, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12050898, 2020.
Krishnamurthy, R., Garcia-Medina, G., Gaudet, B., Mahon, A., Newsom, R.,
Shaw, W., and Sheridan, L.: Potential of Offshore Wind Energy off the Coast
of California, in: OCEANS 2021: San Diego – Porto, 20–23 September 2021, San Diego, CA, USA, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.23919/OCEANS44145.2021.9705976, 2021.
Larsén, X. G.: Calculating Turbulence Intensity from mesoscale modeled
Turbulence Kinetic Energy, https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/calculating-turbulence-intensity-from-mesoscale-modeled (last access: 3 January 2023), 2022.
Lundquist, J. and Clifton, A.: How turbulence can impact power performance,
https://www.wind-watch.org/documents/how-turbulence-can-impact-power-performance/
(last access: 15 March 2023), 2012.
Mücke, T., Kleinhans, D., and Peinke, J.: Atmospheric turbulence and its
influence on the alternating loads on wind turbines, Wind Energy, 14, 301–316, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.422, 2011.
Musial, W., Spitsen, P., Beiter, P., Duffy, P., Marquis, M., Cooperman, A.,
Hammond, R., and Shields, M.: Offshore Wind Market Report: 2021 Edition,
https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2021-08/Offshore Wind Market Report 2021 Edition_Final.pdf (last access: 27 December 2022), 2021.
Nakanishi, M. and Niino, H.: Development of an Improved Turbulence Closure
Model for the Atmospheric Boundary Layer, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn. Ser. II, 87,
895–912, https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.87.895, 2009.
Optis, M., Rybchuk, O., Bodini, N., Rossol, M., and Musial, W.: Offshore Wind Resource Assessment for the California Pacific Outer Continental Shelf,
NREL – National Renewable Energy Laboratory, https://doi.org/10.2172/1677466, 2020.
Optis, M., Kumler, A., Brodie, J., and Miles, T.: Quantifying sensitivity in
numerical weather prediction-modeled offshore wind speeds through an ensemble modeling approach, Wind Energy, 24, 957–973, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2611, 2021.
Porté-Agel, F., Bastankhah, M., and Shamsoddin, S.: Wind-Turbine and
Wind-Farm Flows: A Review, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 174, 1–59,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-019-00473-0, 2020.
Redfern, S., Optis, M., Xia, G., and Draxl, C.: Offshore wind energy forecasting sensitivity to sea surface temperature input in the Mid-Atlantic, Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1–23, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1-2023, 2023.
Rodrigo, J. S., Cantero, E., García, B., Borbón, F., Irigoyen, U.,
Lozano, S., Fernande, P. M., and Chávez, R. A.: Atmospheric stability
assessment for the characterization of offshore wind conditions, J. Phys.:
Conf. Ser., 625, 012044, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/625/1/012044, 2015.
Saint-Drenan, Y.-M., Besseau, R., Jansen, M., Staffell, I., Troccoli, A.,
Dubus, L., Schmidt, J., Gruber, K., Simões, S. G., and Heier, S.: A
parametric model for wind turbine power curves incorporating environmental
conditions, Renew. Energy, 157, 754–768, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.04.123, 2020.
Sathe, A., Banta, R., Pauscher, L., Vogstad, K., Schlipf, D., and Wylie, S.: Estimating Turbulence Statistics and Parameters from Ground- and Nacelle-Based Lidar Measurements, IEA Wind Task 32 Expert Report, ISBN 978-87-93278-35-6, 2015.
Shaw, R. H., Den Hartog, G., King, K. M., and Thurtell, G. W.: Measurements
of mean wind flow and three-dimensional turbulence intensity within a mature
corn canopy, Agric. Meteorol., 13, 419–425, https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-1571(74)90082-X, 1974.
Sheridan, L. M., Krishnamurthy, R., García Medina, G., Gaudet, B. J., Gustafson Jr., W. I., Mahon, A. M., Shaw, W. J., Newsom, R. K., Pekour, M., and Yang, Z.: Offshore reanalysis wind speed assessment across the wind turbine rotor layer off the United States Pacific coast, Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 2059–2084, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2059-2022, 2022.
Siedersleben, S. K., Platis, A., Lundquist, J. K., Djath, B., Lampert, A.,
Bärfuss, K., Cañadillas, B., Schulz-Stellenfleth, J., Bange, J.,
Neumann, T., and Emeis, S.: Turbulent kinetic energy over large offshore
wind farms observed and simulated by the mesoscale model WRF (3.8.1), Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 249–268, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-249-2020, 2020.
St. Martin, C. M., Lundquist, J. K., Clifton, A., Poulos, G. S., and Schreck,
S. J.: Wind turbine power production and annual energy production depend on
atmospheric stability and turbulence, Wind Energy Sci., 1, 221–236,
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-1-221-2016, 2016.
Sward, J. A., Ault, T. R., and Zhang, K. M.: Spatial biases revealed by LiDAR in a multiphysics WRF ensemble designed for offshore wind, Energy, 262, 125346, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.125346, 2023.
Tai, S.-L., Fast, J. D., Gustafson, W. I., Chand, D., Gaudet, B., Feng, Z.,
and Newsom, R.: Simulation of Continental Shallow Cumulus Populations Using
an Observation-Constrained Cloud-System Resolving Model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 12, e2020MS002091, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002091, 2020.
Tai, S.-L., Feng, Z., Ma, P.-L., Schumacher, C., and Fast, J. D.: Representations of Precipitation Diurnal Cycle in the Amazon as Simulated by
Observationally Constrained Cloud-System Resolving and Global Climate Models, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 13, e2021MS002586, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002586, 2021.
Vanderwende, B. J. and Lundquist, J. K.: The modification of wind turbine
performance by statistically distinct atmospheric regimes, Environ. Res. Lett., 7, 034035, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/3/034035, 2012.
Wharton, S. and Lundquist, J. K.: Atmospheric stability affects wind turbine
power collection, Environ. Res. Lett., 7, 014005, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/1/014005, 2012.
Wu, Y.-T. and Porté-Agel, F.: Atmospheric Turbulence Effects on Wind-Turbine Wakes: An LES Study, Energies, 5, 5340–5362, https://doi.org/10.3390/en5125340, 2012.
Yang, B., Qian, Y., Berg, L. K., Ma, P.-L., Wharton, S., Bulaevskaya, V., Yan, H., Hou, Z., and Shaw, W. J.: Sensitivity of Turbine-Height Wind Speeds to Parameters in Planetary Boundary-Layer and Surface-Layer Schemes in the
Weather Research and Forecasting Model, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 162, 117–142, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-016-0185-2, 2017.
Zoumakis, N. M. and Kelessis, A. G.: The dependence of the bulk Richardson
number on stability in the surface layer, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 57, 407–414, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00120057, 1991.
Short summary
Turbulence intensity is critical for wind turbine design and operation as it affects wind power generation efficiency. Turbulence measurements in the marine environment are limited. We use a model to derive turbulence intensity and test how sea surface temperature data may impact the simulated turbulence intensity and atmospheric stability. The model slightly underestimates turbulence, and improved sea surface temperature data reduce the bias. Error with unrealistic mesoscale flow is identified.
Turbulence intensity is critical for wind turbine design and operation as it affects wind power...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint