Articles | Volume 8, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-725-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-725-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Comparison of optimal power production and operation of unmoored floating offshore wind turbines and energy ships
Institute for Integrated Energy Systems, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
Pacific Institute for Climate Solutions, Victoria, BC, Canada
Curran Crawford
Institute for Integrated Energy Systems, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
Pacific Institute for Climate Solutions, Victoria, BC, Canada
Related authors
No articles found.
Rad Haghi and Curran Crawford
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 2039–2062, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-2039-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-2039-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This journal paper focuses on developing surrogate models for predicting the damage equivalent load (DEL) on wind turbines without needing extensive aeroelastic simulations. The study emphasizes the development of a sequential machine learning architecture for this purpose. The study also explores implementing simplified wake models and transfer learning to enhance the models' prediction capabilities in various wind conditions.
Markus Sommerfeld, Martin Dörenkämper, Jochem De Schutter, and Curran Crawford
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1153–1178, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1153-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1153-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates the performance of pumping-mode ground-generation airborne wind energy systems by determining power-optimal flight trajectories based on realistic, k-means clustered, vertical wind velocity profiles. These profiles, derived from mesoscale weather simulations at an offshore and an onshore site in Europe, are incorporated into an optimal control model that maximizes average cycle power by optimizing the kite's trajectory.
Markus Sommerfeld, Martin Dörenkämper, Jochem De Schutter, and Curran Crawford
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1847–1868, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1847-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1847-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This research explores the ground-generation airborne wind energy system (AWES) design space and investigates scaling effects by varying design parameters such as aircraft wing size, aerodynamic efficiency and mass. Therefore, representative simulated onshore and offshore wind data are implemented into an AWES trajectory optimization model. We estimate optimal annual energy production and capacity factors as well as a minimal operational lift-to-weight ratio.
Rad Haghi and Curran Crawford
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1289–1304, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1289-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1289-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Based on the IEC standards, a limited number of simulations is sufficient to calculate the extreme and fatigue loads on a wind turbine. However, this means inaccuracy in the output statistics. This paper aims to build a surrogate model on blade element momentum aerodynamic model simulation output employing non-intrusive polynomial chaos expansion. The surrogate model is then used in a large number of Monte Carlo simulations to provide an accurate statistical estimate of the loads.
Kamran Shirzadeh, Horia Hangan, Curran Crawford, and Pooyan Hashemi Tari
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 477–489, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-477-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-477-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Wind energy systems work coherently in atmospheric flows which are gusty. This causes highly variable power productions and high fatigue loads on the system, which together hold back further growth of the wind energy market. This study demonstrates an alternative experimental procedure to investigate some extreme wind condition effects on wind turbines based on the IEC standard. This experiment can be improved upon and used to develop new control concepts, mitigating the effect of gusts.
Kamran Shirzadeh, Horia Hangan, and Curran Crawford
Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 1755–1770, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1755-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1755-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The main goal of this study is to develop a physical simulation of some extreme wind conditions that are defined by the IEC standard. This has been performed by a hybrid numerical–experimental approach with a relevant scaling. Being able to simulate these dynamic flow fields can generate decisive results for future scholars working in the wind energy sector to make these wind energy systems more reliable and finally helps to accelerate the reduction of the cost of electricity.
Rad Haghi and Curran Crawford
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2020-24, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2020-24, 2020
Revised manuscript not accepted
Markus Sommerfeld, Martin Dörenkämper, Gerald Steinfeld, and Curran Crawford
Wind Energ. Sci., 4, 563–580, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-4-563-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-4-563-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Airborne wind energy systems aim to operate at altitudes above conventional wind turbines where reliable high-resolution wind data are scarce. Wind measurements and computational simulations both have advantages and disadvantages when assessing the wind resource at such heights. This article investigates whether assimilating measurements into the model generates a more accurate wind data set up to 1100 m. These wind data sets are used to estimate optimal AWES operating altitudes and power.
Manuel Fluck and Curran Crawford
Wind Energ. Sci., 2, 507–520, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2-507-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2-507-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
We present an engineering model of 3-D turbulent wind inflow which reduces the number of random variables required from tens of thousands to ~ 20. This new model is a vital step towards stochastic modelling of wind turbines. Such models can quickly assess turbine lifetime loads and fluctuating power output and thus can be used to design better turbines. However, stochastic models are only viable when the input is expressed with very few random variables, hence the new wind model presented here.
Related subject area
Thematic area: Wind technologies | Topic: Offshore technology
Gaussian Mixture autoencoder for uncertainty-aware damage identification in a Floating Offshore Wind Turbine
Sensitivity analysis of numerical modeling input parameters on floating offshore wind turbine loads in extreme idling conditions
Dynamic performance of a passively self-adjusting floating wind farm layout to increase the annual energy production
OC6 project Phase IV: validation of numerical models for novel floating offshore wind support structures
Quantifying the impact of modeling fidelity on different substructure concepts for floating offshore wind turbines – Part 1: Validation of the hydrodynamic module QBlade-Ocean
A new methodology for upscaling semi-submersible platforms for floating offshore wind turbines
Sensitivity analysis of numerical modeling input parameters on floating offshore wind turbine loads
Design optimization of offshore wind jacket piles by assessing support structure orientation relative to metocean conditions
Ana Fernandez-Navamuel, Nicolas Gorostidi, David Pardo, Vincenzo Nava, and Eleni Chatzi
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-160, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-160, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for WES
Short summary
Short summary
This work employs Deep Neural Networks to identify damage in the mooring system of a Floating Offshore Wind Turbine (FOWT) using measurements from the platform response. We account for the effect of uncertainty in the assessment estimates caused by the existence of multiple solutions (different damage scenarios can cause the observed data). We describe the damage condition features using a distributional model based on a Gaussian Mixture, which captures the uncertainty in the predictions.
Will Wiley, Jason Jonkman, and Amy Robertson
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-130, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-130, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for WES
Short summary
Short summary
Numerical models, used to assess loads on floating offshore wind turbines, require many input parameters to describe air and water conditions, system properties, and load calculations. All parameters have some possible range, due to uncertainty and/or variations with time. The selected values can have important effects on the uncertainty in the resulting loads. This work identifies the input parameters that have the most impact on ultimate and fatigue loads for extreme storm load cases.
Mohammad Youssef Mahfouz, Ericka Lozon, Matthew Hall, and Po Wen Cheng
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1595–1615, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1595-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1595-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
As climate change increasingly impacts our daily lives, a transition towards cleaner energy is needed. With all the growth in floating offshore wind and the planned floating wind farms (FWFs) in the next few years, we urgently need new techniques and methodologies to accommodate the differences between the fixed bottom and FWFs. This paper presents a novel methodology to decrease aerodynamic losses inside an FWF by passively relocating the downwind floating wind turbines out of the wakes.
Roger Bergua, Will Wiley, Amy Robertson, Jason Jonkman, Cédric Brun, Jean-Philippe Pineau, Quan Qian, Wen Maoshi, Alec Beardsell, Joshua Cutler, Fabio Pierella, Christian Anker Hansen, Wei Shi, Jie Fu, Lehan Hu, Prokopios Vlachogiannis, Christophe Peyrard, Christopher Simon Wright, Dallán Friel, Øyvind Waage Hanssen-Bauer, Carlos Renan dos Santos, Eelco Frickel, Hafizul Islam, Arjen Koop, Zhiqiang Hu, Jihuai Yang, Tristan Quideau, Violette Harnois, Kelsey Shaler, Stefan Netzband, Daniel Alarcón, Pau Trubat, Aengus Connolly, Seán B. Leen, and Oisín Conway
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1025–1051, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1025-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1025-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper provides a comparison for a floating offshore wind turbine between the motion and loading estimated by numerical models and measurements. The floating support structure is a novel design that includes a counterweight to provide floating stability to the system. The comparison between numerical models and the measurements includes system motion, tower loads, mooring line loads, and loading within the floating support structure.
Robert Behrens de Luna, Sebastian Perez-Becker, Joseph Saverin, David Marten, Francesco Papi, Marie-Laure Ducasse, Félicien Bonnefoy, Alessandro Bianchini, and Christian-Oliver Paschereit
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 623–649, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-623-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-623-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A novel hydrodynamic module of QBlade is validated on three floating offshore wind turbine concepts with experiments and two widely used simulation tools. Further, a recently proposed method to enhance the prediction of slowly varying drift forces is adopted and tested in varying met-ocean conditions. The hydrodynamic capability of QBlade matches the current state of the art and demonstrates significant improvement regarding the prediction of slowly varying drift forces with the enhanced model.
Kaylie L. Roach, Matthew A. Lackner, and James F. Manwell
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1873–1891, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1873-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1873-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents an upscaling methodology for floating offshore wind turbine platforms using two case studies. The offshore wind turbine industry is trending towards fewer, larger offshore wind turbines within a farm, which is motivated by the per unit cost of a wind farm (including installation, interconnection, and maintenance costs). The results show the platform steel mass to be favorable with upscaling.
Will Wiley, Jason Jonkman, Amy Robertson, and Kelsey Shaler
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1575–1595, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1575-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1575-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
A sensitivity analysis determined the modeling parameters for an operating floating offshore wind turbine with the biggest impact on the ultimate and fatigue loads. The loads were the most sensitive to the standard deviation of the wind speed. Ultimate and fatigue mooring loads were highly sensitive to the current speed; only the fatigue mooring loads were sensitive to wave parameters. The largest platform rotation was the most sensitive to the platform horizontal center of gravity.
Maciej M. Mroczek, Sanjay Raja Arwade, and Matthew A. Lackner
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 807–817, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-807-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-807-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Benefits of orientating a three-legged offshore wind jacket relative to the metocean conditions for pile design are assessed considering the International Energy Agency 15 MW reference turbine and a reference site off the coast of Massachusetts. Results, based on the considered conditions, show that the pile design can be optimized by orientating the jacket relative to the dominant wave direction. This design optimization can be used on offshore wind projects to provide cost and risk reductions.
Cited articles
Abd Jamil, R., Chaigneau, A., Gilloteaux, J.-C., Lelong, P., and Babarit, A.:
Comparison of the capacity factor of stationary wind turbines and
weather-routed energy ships in the far-offshore, J. Phys.-Conf. Ser., 1356, 012001, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1356/1/012001,
2019. a, b, c
Abd Jamil, R., Gilloteaux, J., Lelong, P., and Babarit, A.: Investigation of the Capacity Factor of Weather-Routed Energy Ships Deployed in the Near-Shore, in: Proceedings of the ASME 2021 3rd International Offshore Wind Technical Conference, ASME 2021 3rd International Offshore Wind Technical Conference, Virtual, Online, 16–17 February, 2021, V001T01A003 https://doi.org/10.1115/IOWTC2021-3545, 2021. a
Allen, C., Viscelli, A., Dagher, H., Goupee, A., Gaertner, E., Abbas, N., Hall,
M., and Barter, G.: Definition of the UMaine VolturnUS-S Reference
Platform Developed for the IEA Wind 15-Megawatt Offshore
Reference Wind Turbine, Tech. Rep. NREL/TP-5000-76773, 1660012,
MainId:9434, https://doi.org/10.2172/1660012, 2020. a, b, c, d, e, f
Alwan, R., Babarit, A., and Gilloteaux, J. C.: Investigation of a dynamically
positioned floating offshore wind turbine concept, J. Phys.-Conf. Ser., 2018, 012001, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2018/1/012001,
2021. a, b, c, d
Annan, A. M., Lackner, M. A., and Manwell, J. F.: Wind Trawler: operation of
a wind energy system in the far offshore environment, J. Phys.-Conf. Ser., 1452, 012031, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1452/1/012031,
2020. a, b
Baba, E.: Wave resistance of ships in low speeds, Tech. rep., Nagasaki
Technical Institute, https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid:8fb1f3f7-fe76-4548-9597-28bd5e07e2bb/datastream/OBJ/download (last access: 6 March 2023), 1976. a
Babarit, A., Gilloteaux, J.-C., Clodic, G., Duchet, M., Platzer, M. F., and
Simoneau, A.: Techno-economic feasibility of fleets of far offshore
hydrogen-producing wind energy converters, Int. J. Hydrogen
Energ., 43, 7266–7289, https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01766205 (last access: 10 November 2020),
2018. a
Babarit, A., Clodic, G., Delvoye, S., and Gilloteaux, J.-C.: Exploitation of the far-offshore wind energy resource by fleets of energy ships – Part 1: Energy ship design and performance, Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 839–853, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-839-2020, 2020a. a
Babarit, A., Clodic, G., Delvoye, S., and Gilloteaux, J.-C.: Exploitation of the far-offshore wind energy resource by fleets of energy ships – Part 1: Energy ship design and performance, Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 839–853, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-839-2020, 2020b. a, b, c
Babarit, A., Abdul Ghani, N., Brouillette, E., Delvoye, S., Weber, M., Merrien,
A., Michou, M., and Gilloteaux, J. C.: Experimental validation of the energy
ship concept for far-offshore wind energy conversion, Ocean Eng., 239,
109830, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109830, 2021a. a
Babarit, A., Gorintin, F., de Belizal, P., Neau, A., Bordogna, G., and Gilloteaux, J.-C.: Exploitation of the far-offshore wind energy resource by fleets of energy ships – Part 2: Updated ship design and cost of energy estimate, Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 1191–1204, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1191-2021, 2021b. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o
Bernitsas, M. M., Ray, D., and Kinley, P.: Kt, Kq, and Effficiency Curves
for the Wageningen B-Series Propellers, Tech. Rep. 237, University of
Michigan, Departmenet of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering,
University of Michi, https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/91702 (last access: 14 January 2022), 1981. a, b, c, d, e
Burton, T., Jenkins, N., Sharpe, D., and Bossanyi, E.: Aerodynamics of
Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines, in: Wind Energy Handbook,
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 39–136, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119992714.ch3,
2011a. a
Burton, T., Jenkins, N., Sharpe, D., and Bossanyi, E.: The Wind Resource,
in: Wind Energy Handbook, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 9–38,
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119992714.ch2,
2011b. a
Carlton, J. S.: Marine Propellers and Propulsion, Elsevier, 2nd edn.,
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780750681506X50001 (last access: 5 February 2021),
2007. a
Clodic, G., Babarit, A., and Gilloteaux, J.-C.: Wind Propulsion Options for
Energy Ships, American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital
Collection, https://doi.org/10.1115/IOWTC2018-1056, 2018. a
DNVGL: Load and site conditions for wind turbines, Standard DNVGL-ST-0437,
https://www.dnv.com/energy/standards-guidelines/dnv-st-0437-loads-and-site-conditions-for-wind-turbines.html (last access: 5 May 2023), 2016. a
Duarte, T. M., Sarmento, A. J., and Jonkman, J. M.: Effects of Second-Order
Hydrodynamic Forces on Floating Offshore Wind Turbines, in: 32nd
ASME Wind Energy Symposium, American Institute of Aeronautics and
Astronautics, National Harbor, Maryland, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2014-0361, 2014. a, b
Enge, S., Fjøsna, E., and Sigurbjarnarson, Ã.: Regenerative
Hybrid-Electric Propulsion, Tech. Rep. 1, Bellona, North Sailing,
https://bellona.no/assets/Hybrid-report_2013_v4_web.pdf (last access: 8 March 2022),
2013. a
Gaertner, E., Rinker, J., Sethuraman, L., Zahle, F., Anderson, B., Barter, G.,
Abbas, N., Meng, F., Bortolotti, P., Skrzypinksi, W., Scott, G., Feil, R.,
Bredmose, H., Dykes, K., Shields, M., Allen, C., and Viselli, A. M.: IEA
Wind TCP Task 37: Definition of the IEA 15-Megawatt Offshore
Reference Wind Turbine, Technical Report NREL/TP-5000-75698, NREL,
https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy20osti/75698.pdf (last access: 20 September 2021), 2020. a, b, c, d, e
Gaunaa, M., Øye, S., and Mikkelsen, R.: Theory and design of flow driven
vehicles using rotors for energy conversion, in: EWEC Proceedings, https://backend.orbit.dtu.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/3748519/2009_28.pdf (last access: 2 May 2023),
2009. a
Grujicic, M., Arakere, G., Pandurangan, B., Sellappan, V., Vallejo, A., and
Ozen, M.: Multidisciplinary Design Optimization for Glass-Fiber
Epoxy-Matrix Composite 5 MW Horizontal-Axis Wind-Turbine
Blades, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 19, 1116–1127,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-010-9596-2, 2010. a
Gunnarsson, G., Skúlason, J. B., Sigurbjarnarson, Á., and Enge, S.:
Regenerative electric/hybrid drive train for ships, Tech. Rep. 2, Nordic
Innovation, Oslo, Norway,
https://norden.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1294665/FULLTEXT01.pdf (last access: 2 May 2023),
2016. a
Hasselmann, K., Barnett, T. P., Bouws, E., Carlson, H., Cartwright, D. E.,
Enke, K., Ewing, J. A., Gienapp, H., Hasselmann, D. E., Kruseman, P.,
Meerburg, A., Müller, P., Olbers, D. J., Richter, K., Sell, W., and Walden,
H.: Measurements of wind-wave growth and swell decay during the Joint
North Sea Wave Project (JONSWAP), Ergänzungsheft 8–12,
http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:f204e188-13b9-49d8-a6dc-4fb7c20562fc (last access: 2 May 2023),
1973. a
Itoh, Y. and Satoh, A.: Measurement of Propeller Characteristics at a
Negative Advance Ratio Using a Whirling Arm Facility, in: The
Proceedings of the 2018 Asia-Pacific International Symposium on
Aerospace Technology (APISAT 2018), edited by: Zhang, X., Lecture
Notes in Electrical Engineering, Springer, Singapore, 1169–1188,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3305-7_93, 2019. a
Jacobi, G., Thomas, G., Davis, M. R., and Davidson, G.: An insight into the
slamming behaviour of large high-speed catamarans through full-scale
measurements, J. Mar. Sci. Technol., 19, 15–32,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-013-0229-y, 2014. a, b, c
Karimi, M., Hall, M., Buckham, B., and Crawford, C.: A multi-objective design
optimization approach for floating offshore wind turbine support structures,
Journal of Ocean Engineering and Marine Energy, 3, 69–87,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40722-016-0072-4, 2017. a
Lele, A. and Rao, K. V. S.: Net power generated by flettner rotor for different
values of wind speed and ship speed, in: 2017 International Conference on
Circuit, Power and Computing Technologies (ICCPCT), 1–6,
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCPCT.2017.8074170, 2017. a
Lewandowski, E. M.: The dynamics of marine craft: maneuvering and seakeeping,
no. v. 22 in Advanced series on ocean engineering, World Scientific, New
Jersey, https://doi.org/10.1142/4815, 2004. a, b
Liu, W. T., Tang, W., and Xie, X.: Wind power distribution over the ocean,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L13808, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034172, 2008. a
Mao, W., Rychlik, I., Wallin, J., and Storhaug, G.: Statistical models for the
speed prediction of a container ship, Ocean Eng., 126, 152–162,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.08.033, 2016. a
Martínez Beseler, X.: Innovative Autonomously-Driven Offshore Wind
Turbines: a prefeasibility analysis,
https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/142936 (last access: 1 February 2021), 2020. a
Pearson, D.: The use of Flettner rotors in efficient ship design, RINA, Royal
Institution of Naval Architects – Influence of EEDI on Ship Design 2014,
162–169, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287081987_The_use_of_Flettner_rotors_in_efficient_ship_design (last access: 19 January 2021), 2014. a
Rojon, I. and Dieperink, C.: Blowin' in the wind? Drivers and barriers for
the uptake of wind propulsion in international shipping, Energ. Policy, 67,
394–402, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.12.014, 2014. a
Sandua-Fernández, I., Vittori, F., Martín-San-Román, R., Eguinoa, I., and Azcona-Armendáriz, J.: Platform yaw drift in upwind floating wind turbines with single-point-mooring system and its mitigation by individual pitch control, Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 277–288, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-277-2023, 2023. a
Scholtens, F.: Electric Aircraft Design Including an In-the-loop
Propeller Design Model with Regenerative Mode, Master's thesis, TU
Delft, Delft University of Technology,
https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid:692d9915-7aca-4094-8065-b336db3e1f91 (last access: 4 March 2022),
2021. a
Stewart, R. H.: Introduction To Physical Oceanography, in:
Ocean waves, Texas A&M University, Department of Oceanography, 273–292,
https://open.umn.edu/opentextbooks/textbooks/20
(last access: 2 May 2023),
2008. a
Sutter, D., van der Spek, M., and Mazzotti, M.: Evaluation of CO2-Based
and CO2-Free Synthetic Fuel Systems Using a Net-Zero
CO2-Emission Framework, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research,
58, 19958–19972, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b00880, 2019. a
Thomas, G., Winkler, S., Davis, M., Holloway, D., Matsubara, S., Lavroff, J.,
and French, B.: Slam events of high-speed catamarans in irregular waves,
J. Mar. Sci. Technol., 16, 8–21,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-010-0105-y, 2011. a
Tillig, F. and Ringsberg, J. W.: Design, operation and analysis of
wind-assisted cargo ships, Ocean Eng., 211, 107603,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107603, 2020. a, b, c, d
Traut, M., Gilbert, P., Walsh, C., Bows, A., Filippone, A., Stansby, P., and
Wood, R.: Propulsive power contribution of a kite and a Flettner rotor on
selected shipping routes, Appl. Energ., 113, 362–372,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.07.026, 2014. a
Wang, H., Mao, W., and Eriksson, L.: A Three-Dimensional Dijkstra's
algorithm for multi-objective ship voyage optimization, Ocean Eng.,
186, 106131, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106131, 2019. a, b
Willeke, L.: Concept study of a sailing offshore wind turbine,
Research Thesis,
University of Stuttgart,
Stuttgart Wind Energy (SWE) Institute of Aircraft Design,
https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-11435,
2021. a
Yokota, K., Fujimoto, H., and Hori, Y.: Basic Study on Regenerative Air
Brake Using Observer-based Thrust Control for Electric
Airplane, in: 2020 IEEE 16th International Workshop on Advanced
Motion Control (AMC), Kristiansand, Norway, 14–16 September 2020, 34–39, https://doi.org/10.1109/AMC44022.2020.9244329,
2020. a
Yoong, M., Gan, Y., Gan, G., Leong, C., Phuan, Z., Cheah, B., and Chew, K.:
Studies of regenerative braking in electric vehicle, in: 2010 IEEE
Conference on Sustainable Utilization and Development in
Engineering and Technology, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 20–21 November 2010, 40–45,
https://doi.org/10.1109/STUDENT.2010.5686984, 2010. a
Short summary
Mobile offshore wind energy systems are a potential way of producing green fuels from the untapped wind resource that lies far offshore. Herein, computational models of two such systems were developed and verified. The models are able to predict the power output of each system based on wind condition inputs. Results show that both systems have merits and that, contrary to existing results, unmoored floating wind turbines may produce as much power as fixed ones, given the right conditions.
Mobile offshore wind energy systems are a potential way of producing green fuels from the...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint