Articles | Volume 11, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-11-509-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Impact of atmospheric turbulence on performance and loads of wind turbines: knowledge gaps and research challenges
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 17 Feb 2026)
- Preprint (discussion started on 02 Apr 2025)
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor
| : Report abuse
-
CC1: 'Comment on wes-2025-42', Etienne Cheynet, 16 Apr 2025
- AC3: 'Reply on CC1', Branko Kosovic, 03 Oct 2025
-
CC2: 'Comment on wes-2025-42', Johan Arnqvist, 16 Apr 2025
- AC4: 'Reply on CC2', Branko Kosovic, 03 Oct 2025
-
RC1: 'Comment on wes-2025-42', Anonymous Referee #1, 06 May 2025
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Branko Kosovic, 03 Oct 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on wes-2025-42', Anonymous Referee #2, 05 Jul 2025
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Branko Kosovic, 03 Oct 2025
Peer review completion
AR – Author's response | RR – Referee report | ED – Editor decision | EF – Editorial file upload
AR by Branko Kosovic on behalf of the Authors (03 Oct 2025)
Author's response
Author's tracked changes
Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (25 Oct 2025) by Claudia Brunner
RR by Anonymous Referee #3 (26 Nov 2025)
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (10 Dec 2025) by Claudia Brunner
AR by Branko Kosovic on behalf of the Authors (18 Dec 2025)
Author's response
Author's tracked changes
Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (06 Jan 2026) by Claudia Brunner
ED: Publish as is (06 Jan 2026) by Jakob Mann (Chief editor)
AR by Branko Kosovic on behalf of the Authors (16 Jan 2026)
Dear Dr. Kosović and co-authors,
I am attaching a PDF version of my Community Comment (CC). It includes both general observations and specific suggestions intended to support the further development of your manuscript. I have aimed to provide constructive feedback, and I hope these comments prove helpful as you continue to refine your contribution.
Please note that the comment is somewhat extensive. This reflects the scope of the manuscript as well as my own interest in the topic. I fully recognise that many of the points raised may already be well known to you. They are offered in the spirit of open and constructive dialogue. I am also aware that submitting a lengthy, non-anonymous comment to such a distinguished group of co-authors might be bold, and perhaps not the safest career move, but I trust the scientific process (and your goodwill) will treat it kindly.
Best regards,
Etienne Cheynet