Articles | Volume 7, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1053-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1053-2022
Research article
 | 
24 May 2022
Research article |  | 24 May 2022

Very low frequency IEPE accelerometer calibration and application to a wind energy structure

Clemens Jonscher, Benedikt Hofmeister, Tanja Grießmann, and Raimund Rolfes

Related authors

A two-stage framework for identifying and characterizing wind turbine noise data and its validation by listening tests
Susanne Könecke, Clemens Jonscher, Tobias Bohne, and Raimund Rolfes
Wind Energ. Sci., 11, 1771–1789, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-11-1771-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-11-1771-2026, 2026
Short summary
Damage identification on a large-scale wind turbine rotor blade using sample-based deterministic model updating
Marlene Wolniak, Jasper Ragnitz, Clemens Jonscher, Benedikt Hofmeister, Helge Jauken, Clemens Hübler, and Raimund Rolfes
Wind Energ. Sci., 11, 1227–1249, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-11-1227-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-11-1227-2026, 2026
Short summary
Virtual sensing for strain estimation in wind turbine support structures based on a single accelerometer
Jonathan Thurn, Clemens Jonscher, Benedikt Hofmeister, Gianluca Zorzi, and Raimund Rolfes
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2026-5,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2026-5, 2026
Revised manuscript under review for WES
Short summary
Dynamic displacement measurement of a wind turbine tower using accelerometers: tilt error compensation and validation
Clemens Jonscher, Paula Helming, David Märtins, Andreas Fischer, David Bonilla, Benedikt Hofmeister, Tanja Grießmann, and Raimund Rolfes
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 193–205, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-193-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-193-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Anslow, R. and O'Sullivan, D.: Choosing the Best Vibration Sensor for Wind Turbine Condition Monitoring, in: Analog Dialogue, vol. 54, https://www.analog.com/media/en/analog-dialogue/volume-54/number-3/choosing-the-best-vibration-sensor-for-wind-turbine-condition (last access: 19 May 2022), 2020. a
Au, S.-K.: Uncertainty law in ambient modal identification – Part II: Implication and field verification, Mech. Syst. Sig. Process., 48, 34–48, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.07.017, 2014. a
Brincker, R. and Larsen, J. A.: Obtaining and estimating low noise floors in vibration sensors, in: Proceedings of the 25th SEM International Modal Analysis Conference, Orlando, 19–22 February 2007, Florida, USA, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264877634_Obtaining_and_Estimating_Low_Noise_Floors_in_Vibration_Sensors (last access: 19 May 2022), 2007. a
Bruns, T. and Volkers, H.: Efficient calibration and modelling of charge amplifiers for dynamic measurements, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1065, 222005, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1065/22/222005, 2018. a
D'Emilia, G., Gaspari, A., and Natale, E.: Amplitude–phase calibration of tri-axial accelerometers in the low-frequency range by a LDV, J. Sens. Sens. Syst., 8, 223–231, https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-8-223-2019, 2019. a, b
Download
Short summary
This work presents a method to use low-noise IEPE sensors in the low-frequency range down to 0.05 Hz. In order to achieve phase and amplitude accuracy with this type of sensor in the low-frequency range, a new calibration procedure for this frequency range was developed. The calibration enables the use of the low-noise IEPE sensors for large structures, such as wind turbines. The calibrated sensors can be used for wind turbine monitoring, such as fatigue monitoring.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint