Bodini, N., Lundquist, J. K., and Kirincich, A.:
US East Coast lidar measurements show offshore wind turbines will encounter very low atmospheric turbulence, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 5582–5591,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082636, 2019.
a
Bodini, N., Optis, M., Rossol, M., Rybchuk, A., and Redfern, S.: US Offshore Wind Resource data for 2000–2020, OEDI [data set],
https://doi.org/10.25984/1821404, 2020.
a,
b
Bodini, N., Hu, W., Optis, M., Cervone, G., and Alessandrini, S.: Assessing boundary condition and parametric uncertainty in numerical-weather-prediction-modeled, long-term offshore wind speed through machine learning and analog ensemble, Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 1363–1377,
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1363-2021, 2021.
a
Buizza, R., Leutbecher, M., and Isaksen, L.:
Potential use of an ensemble of analyses in the ECMWF Ensemble Prediction System, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 134, 2051–2066,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.346, 2008.
a
Carvalho, D., Rocha, A., Gómez-Gesteira, M., and Santos, C. S.:
Sensitivity of the WRF model wind simulation and wind energy production estimates to planetary boundary layer parameterizations for onshore and offshore areas in the Iberian Peninsula, Appl. Energ., 135, 234–246,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.08.082, 2014a.
a
Carvalho, D., Rocha, A., Gómez-Gesteira, M., and Silva Santos, C.:
WRF wind simulation and wind energy production estimates forced by different reanalyses: Comparison with observed data for Portugal, Appl. Energ., 117, 116–126,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.12.001, 2014b.
a
Donlon, C. J., Martin, M., Stark, J., Roberts-Jones, J., Fiedler, E., and Wimmer, W.:
The operational sea surface temperature and sea ice analysis (OSTIA) system, Remote Sens. Environ., 116, 140–158,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.10.017, 2012.
a,
b
Dörenkämper, M., Olsen, B. T., Witha, B., Hahmann, A. N., Davis, N. N., Barcons, J., Ezber, Y., García-Bustamante, E., González-Rouco, J. F., Navarro, J., Sastre-Marugán, M., Sīle, T., Trei, W., Žagar, M., Badger, J., Gottschall, J., Sanz Rodrigo, J., and Mann, J.:
The Making of the New European Wind Atlas – Part 2: Production and evaluation, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5079–5102,
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5079-2020, 2020.
a
Draxl, C., Clifton, A., Hodge, B.-M., and McCaa, J.:
The Wind Integration National Dataset (WIND) Toolkit, Appl. Energ., 151, 355–366,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.03.121, 2015.
a,
b
Ek, M., Mitchell, K., Lin, Y., Rogers, E., Grunmann, P., Koren, V., Gayno, G., and Tarpley, J.: Implementation of Noah land surface model advances in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction operational mesoscale Eta model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 8851,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003296, 2003.
a
Gelaro, R., McCarty, W., Suárez, M. J., Todling, R., Molod, A., Takacs, L., Randles, C. A., Darmenov, A., Bosilovich, M. G., Reichle, R., Wargan, K., Coy, L., Cullather, R., Draper, C., Akella, S., Buchard, V., Conaty, A., da Silva, A. M., Gu, W., Kim, G.-K., Koster, R., Lucchesi, R., Merkova, D., Nielsen, J. E., Partyka, G., Pawson, S., Putman, W., Rienecker, M., Schubert, S. D., Sienkiewicz, M., and Zhao, B.: The modern-era retrospective analysis for research and applications, version 2 (MERRA-2), J. Climate, 30, 5419–5454,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1, 2017.
a
Grumbine, R.: NCEP Products Inventory Sea Surface Temperature (SST) Models, NOAA,
https://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/products/sst/ (last access: 26 April 2023), 2020. a
Hahmann, A. N., Vincent, C. L., Peña, A., Lange, J., and Hasager, C. B.:
Wind climate estimation using WRF model output: method and model sensitivities over the sea, Int. J. Climatol., 35, 3422–3439,
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4217, 2015.
a,
b,
c
Hahmann, A. N., Sīle, T., Witha, B., Davis, N. N., Dörenkämper, M., Ezber, Y., García-Bustamante, E., González-Rouco, J. F., Navarro, J., Olsen, B. T., and Söderberg, S.: The making of the New European Wind Atlas – Part 1: Model sensitivity, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5053–5078,
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5053-2020, 2020.
a
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Friedman, J., and Franklin, J.:
The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference and prediction, Math. Intell., 27, 83–85, 2005. a
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.-N.: The ERA5 global reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1999–2049,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803, 2020.
a,
b
Holstag, E.: Improved Bankability, The Ecofys position on Lidar Use, Ecofys report,
https://www.nrgsystems.com/assets/resources/Ecofys-2013-position-paper-on-lidar-use-Whitepapers.pdf (last access: 26 April 2023), 2013. a
Hong, S.-Y., Noh, Y., and Dudhia, J.:
A new vertical diffusion package with an explicit treatment of entrainment processes, Mon. Weather Rev., 134, 2318–2341,
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3199.1, 2006.
a
JCGM 100:2008: Evaluation of measurement data – Supplement 1 to the “Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement”, Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology,
https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/2071204/JCGM_101_2008_E.pdf (last access: 26 April 2023), 2008a. a
JCGM 100:2008: Evaluation of measurement data – Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, 50, 134,
https://www.bipm.org/utils/common/documents/jcgm/JCGM_100_2008_E.pdf (last access: 26 April 2023), 2008b.
a,
b
Johnson, C., White, E., and Jones, S.:
Summary of Actual vs. Predicted Wind Farm Performance: Recap of WINDPOWER 2008, in: AWEA Wind Resource and Project Energy Assessment Workshop, Portland, OR, USA,
http://www.enecafe.com/interdomain/idlidar/paper/2008/AWEA%20workshop%202008%20Johnson_Clint.pdf (last access: 26 April 2023), 2008. a
Justice, C., Townshend, J., Vermote, E., Masuoka, E., Wolfe, R., Saleous, N., Roy, D., and Morisette, J.:
An overview of MODIS Land data processing and product status, Remote Sens. Environ., 83, 3–15,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00084-6, 2002.
a
Kain, J. S. and Fritsch, J. M.: Convective parameterization for mesoscale models: The Kain–Fritsch scheme, in: The representation of cumulus convection in numerical models, Springer, 165–170,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-935704-13-3_16, 1993.
a
MARACOOS: Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind, ASOW-4, Winds Profile, MARACOOS [data set],
https://erddap.maracoos.org/erddap/tabledap/AtlanticShores_ASOW-4_wind.html
(last access: 26 April 2023), 2023a. a
MARACOOS: Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind, ASOW-6, Winds Profile, MARACOOS [data set],
https://erddap.maracoos.org/erddap/tabledap/AtlanticShores_ASOW-6_wind.html
(last access: 26 April 2023), 2023b. a
Mlawer, E. J., Taubman, S. J., Brown, P. D., Iacono, M. J., and Clough, S. A.:
Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 102, 16663–16682,
https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD00237, 1997.
a
Monin, A. S. and Obukhov, A. M.: Basic laws of turbulent mixing in the surface layer of the atmosphere, Contrib. Geophys. Inst. Acad. Sci. USSR, 24, 163–187, 1954. a
Musial, W., Heimiller, D., Beiter, P., Scott, G., and Draxl, C.:
Offshore wind energy resource assessment for the United States, Tech. rep., National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (US),
https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy16osti/66599.pdf (last access: 26 April 2023), 2016. a
Musial, W., Spitsen, P., Duffy, P., Beiter, P., Marquis, M., Hammond, R., and Shields, M.:
Offshore Wind Market Report: 2022 Edition, Tech. rep., National Renewable Energy Lab.(NREL), Golden, CO (US), 2022. a
Nakanishi, M. and Niino, H.:
Development of an improved turbulence closure model for the atmospheric boundary layer, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn.. Ser. II, 87, 895–912,
https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.87.895, 2009.
a,
b
Niu, G.-Y., Yang, Z.-L., Mitchell, K. E., Chen, F., Ek, M. B., Barlage, M., Kumar, A., Manning, K., Niyogi, D., Rosero, E., Tewari, M., and Xia, Y.: The community Noah land surface model with multiparameterization options (Noah-MP): 1. Model description and evaluation with local-scale measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D12109,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015139, 2011.
a
OceanTech Services/DNV GL: NYSERDA Floating Lidar Buoy Data,
https://oswbuoysny.resourcepanorama.dnvgl.com (last access: 26 April 2023), 2020.
a,
b,
c,
d
Olsen, B. T., Hahmann, A. N., Sempreviva, A. M., Badger, J., and Jørgensen, H. E.:
An intercomparison of mesoscale models at simple sites for wind energy applications, Wind Energ. Sci., 2, 211–228,
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2-211-2017, 2017.
a,
b
Optis, M., Bodini, N., Debnath, M., and Doubrawa, P.:
New methods to improve the vertical extrapolation of near-surface offshore wind speeds, Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 935–948,
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-935-2021, 2021.
a
Pronk, V., Bodini, N., Optis, M., Lundquist, J. K., Moriarty, P., Draxl, C., Purkayastha, A., and Young, E.:
Can reanalysis products outperform mesoscale numerical weather prediction models in modeling the wind resource in simple terrain?, Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 487–504,
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-487-2022, 2022.
a,
b,
c
Ruiz, J. J., Saulo, C., and Nogués-Paegle, J.:
WRF Model Sensitivity to Choice of Parameterization over South America: Validation against Surface Variables, Mon. Weather Rev., 138, 3342–3355,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2010MWR3358.1, 2010.
a
Siuta, D., West, G., and Stull, R.:
WRF Hub-Height Wind Forecast Sensitivity to PBL Scheme, Grid Length, and Initial Condition Choice in Complex Terrain, Weather Forecast., 32, 493–509,
https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-16-0120.1, 2017.
a
Skamarock, W. C., Klemp, J. B., Dudhia, J., Gill, D. O., Liu, Z., Berner, J., Wang, W., Powers, J. G., Duda, M. G., Barker, D. M., and Huang, X.-Y.: A description of the advanced research WRF model version 4, National Center for Atmospheric Research: Boulder, CO, USA, 145, 550, 2019. a
Ulazia, A., Saenz, J., and Ibarra-Berastegui, G.:
Sensitivity to the use of 3DVAR data assimilation in a mesoscale model for estimating offshore wind energy potential. A case study of the Iberian northern coastline, Appl. Energ., 180, 617–627,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.08.033, 2016.
a
Vassallo, D., Krishnamurthy, R., and Fernando, H. J. S.:
Decreasing wind speed extrapolation error via domain-specific feature extraction and selection, Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 959–975,
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-959-2020, 2020.
a
White, E.: Continuing Work on Improving Plant Performance Estimates, in: AWEA Wind Resource and Project Energy Assessment Workshop, Portland, OR, USA, 2008. a
Yan, J., Möhrlen, C., Göçmen, T., Kelly, M., Wessel, A., and Giebel, G.:
Uncovering wind power forecasting uncertainty sources and their propagation through the whole modelling chain, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 165, 112519,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112519, 2022.
a
