Articles | Volume 9, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-2147-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-2147-2024
Research article
 | 
11 Nov 2024
Research article |  | 11 Nov 2024

Estimating the technical wind energy potential of Kansas that incorporates the effect of regional wind resource depletion by wind turbines

Jonathan Minz, Axel Kleidon, and Nsilulu T. Mbungu

Related authors

The new plant functional diversity model JeDi-BACH (version 1.0) in the ICON Earth System Model (version 1.0)
Pin-Hsin Hu, Christian H. Reick, Reiner Schnur, Axel Kleidon, and Martin Claussen
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-111,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-111, 2024
Preprint under review for GMD
Short summary
Understanding variations in downwelling longwave radiation using Brutsaert's equation
Yinglin Tian, Deyu Zhong, Sarosh Alam Ghausi, Guangqian Wang, and Axel Kleidon
Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 1363–1374, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-1363-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-1363-2023, 2023
Short summary
Working at the limit: a review of thermodynamics and optimality of the Earth system
Axel Kleidon
Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 861–896, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-861-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-861-2023, 2023
Short summary
Editorial: Global warming is due to an enhanced greenhouse effect, and anthropogenic heat emissions currently play a negligible role at the global scale
Axel Kleidon, Gabriele Messori, Somnath Baidya Roy, Ira Didenkulova, and Ning Zeng
Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 241–242, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-241-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-241-2023, 2023
Breakdown in precipitation–temperature scaling over India predominantly explained by cloud-driven cooling
Sarosh Alam Ghausi, Subimal Ghosh, and Axel Kleidon
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4431–4446, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4431-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4431-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Thematic area: Wind and the atmosphere | Topic: Atmospheric physics
Linking large-scale weather patterns to observed and modeled turbine hub-height winds offshore of the US West Coast
Ye Liu, Timothy W. Juliano, Raghavendra Krishnamurthy, Brian J. Gaudet, and Jungmin Lee
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 483–495, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-483-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-483-2025, 2025
Short summary
Improving wind and power predictions via four-dimensional data assimilation in the WRF model: case study of storms in February 2022 at Belgian offshore wind farms
Tsvetelina Ivanova, Sara Porchetta, Sophia Buckingham, Gertjan Glabeke, Jeroen van Beeck, and Wim Munters
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 245–268, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-245-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-245-2025, 2025
Short summary
Analyzing the performance of vertical wind profilers in rain events
Adriel J. Carvalho, Francisco Albuquerque Leite Neto, and Denisson Q. Oliveira
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-132,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-132, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for WES
Short summary
Large-eddy simulation of an atmospheric bore and associated gravity wave effects on wind farm performance in the Southern Great Plains
Adam S. Wise, Robert S. Arthur, Aliza Abraham, Sonia Wharton, Raghavendra Krishnamurthy, Rob Newsom, Brian Hirth, John Schroeder, Patrick Moriarty, and Fotini K. Chow
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-84,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-84, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for WES
Short summary
Mesoscale weather systems and associated potential wind power variations in a midlatitude sea strait (Kattegat)
Jérôme Neirynck, Jonas Van de Walle, Ruben Borgers, Sebastiaan Jamaer, Johan Meyers, Ad Stoffelen, and Nicole P. M. van Lipzig
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1695–1711, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1695-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1695-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Abkar, M., Sharifi, A., and Porté-Agel, F.: Large-eddy simulation of the diurnal variation of wake flows in a finite-size wind farm, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 625, 012031, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/625/1/012031, 2015. a
Abkar, M., Sharifi, A., and Porté-Agel, F.: Wake flow in a wind farm during a diurnal cycle, J. Turbul., 17, 420–441, https://doi.org/10.1080/14685248.2015.1127379, 2016. a, b, c
Adams, A. S. and Keith, D. W.: Are global wind power resource estimates overstated?, Environ. Res. Lett., 8, 015021, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/015021, 2013. a, b, c, d, e, f, g
Agora Energiewende, Agora Verkehrswende, Technical University of Denmark, and Max Planck Institute of Biogeochemistry: Making the Most of Offshore Wind: Re-Evaluating the Potential of Offshore Wind in the German North Sea, Tech. Rep. 176/01-S-2020/EN, Agora Energiewende, Agora Verkehrswende, Technical University of Denmark and Max-Planck-Institute for Biogeochemistry, https://static.agora-energiewende.de/fileadmin/Projekte/2019/Offshore_Potentials/176_A-EW_A-VW_Offshore-Potentials_Publication_WEB.pdf (last access: 10 September 2024), 2020. a, b, c
Ahsbahs, T., Nygaard, N., Newcombe, A., and Badger, M.: Wind Farm Wakes from SAR and Doppler Radar, Remote Sens.-Basel, 12, 462–484, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030462, 2020. a
Download
Short summary
Estimates of power output from regional wind turbine deployments in energy scenarios assume that the impact of the atmospheric feedback on them is minimal. But numerical models show that the impact is large at the proposed scales of future deployment. We show that this impact can be captured by accounting only for the kinetic energy removed by turbines from the atmosphere. This can be easily applied to energy scenarios and leads to more physically representative estimates.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint