Articles | Volume 9, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-623-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-623-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
14 Mar 2024
Research article |
| 14 Mar 2024
| 14 Mar 2024
Quantifying the impact of modeling fidelity on different substructure concepts for floating offshore wind turbines – Part 1: Validation of the hydrodynamic module QBlade-Ocean
Robert Behrens de Luna
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Chair of Fluid Dynamics, Hermann Föttinger Institute, Technische Universität Berlin, Müller-Breslau-Straße 8, 10623 Berlin, Germany
Sebastian Perez-Becker
Chair of Fluid Dynamics, Hermann Föttinger Institute, Technische Universität Berlin, Müller-Breslau-Straße 8, 10623 Berlin, Germany
Joseph Saverin
Chair of Fluid Dynamics, Hermann Föttinger Institute, Technische Universität Berlin, Müller-Breslau-Straße 8, 10623 Berlin, Germany
David Marten
Chair of Fluid Dynamics, Hermann Föttinger Institute, Technische Universität Berlin, Müller-Breslau-Straße 8, 10623 Berlin, Germany
Francesco Papi
Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Florence, via di Santa Marta 3, 50139 Firenze, Italy
Marie-Laure Ducasse
Saipem, 7 Av. de San Fernando, 78180 Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France
Félicien Bonnefoy
CNRS – École Centrale Nantes, 1 rue de la Noë, 44321 Nantes CEDEX 3, France
Alessandro Bianchini
Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Florence, via di Santa Marta 3, 50139 Firenze, Italy
Christian-Oliver Paschereit
Chair of Fluid Dynamics, Hermann Föttinger Institute, Technische Universität Berlin, Müller-Breslau-Straße 8, 10623 Berlin, Germany
Related authors
Francesco Papi, Giancarlo Troise, Robert Behrens de Luna, Joseph Saverin, Sebastian Perez-Becker, David Marten, Marie-Laure Ducasse, and Alessandro Bianchini
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 981–1004, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-981-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-981-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Wind turbines need to be simulated for thousands of hours to estimate design loads. Mid-fidelity numerical models are typically used for this task to strike a balance between computational cost and accuracy. The considerable displacements of floating wind turbines may be a challenge for some of these models. This paper enhances comprehension of how modeling theories affect floating wind turbine loads by comparing three codes across three turbines, simulated in a real environment.
Francesco Papi, Jason Jonkman, Amy Robertson, and Alessandro Bianchini
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1069–1088, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1069-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1069-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Blade element momentum (BEM) theory is the backbone of many industry-standard aerodynamic models. However, the analysis of floating offshore wind turbines (FOWTs) introduces new challenges, which could put BEM models to the test. This study systematically compares four aerodynamic models, ranging from BEM to computational fluid dynamics, in an attempt to shed light on the unsteady aerodynamic phenomena that are at stake in FOWTs and whether BEM is able to model them appropriately.
Francesco Papi, Giancarlo Troise, Robert Behrens de Luna, Joseph Saverin, Sebastian Perez-Becker, David Marten, Marie-Laure Ducasse, and Alessandro Bianchini
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 981–1004, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-981-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-981-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Wind turbines need to be simulated for thousands of hours to estimate design loads. Mid-fidelity numerical models are typically used for this task to strike a balance between computational cost and accuracy. The considerable displacements of floating wind turbines may be a challenge for some of these models. This paper enhances comprehension of how modeling theories affect floating wind turbine loads by comparing three codes across three turbines, simulated in a real environment.
Pier Francesco Melani, Omar Sherif Mohamed, Stefano Cioni, Francesco Balduzzi, and Alessandro Bianchini
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 601–622, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-601-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-601-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The actuator line method (ALM) is a powerful tool for wind turbine simulation but struggles to resolve tip effects. The reason is still unclear. To investigate this, we use advanced angle of attack sampling and vortex tracking techniques to analyze the flow around a NACA0018 finite wing, simulated with ALM and blade-resolved computational fluid dynamics. Results show that the ALM can account for tip effects if the correct angle of attack sampling and force projection strategies are adopted.
Amr Hegazy, Peter Naaijen, Vincent Leroy, Félicien Bonnefoy, Yves Pérignon, and Jan-Willem van Wingerden
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-180, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-180, 2024
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
Successful wave tank experiments were conducted to evaluate the feedforward control strategy benefits in terms of the structural loads and the power quality of the floating wind turbine components. In short, the wave feedforward control strategy is effective when it comes to alleviating the effects of the wave forces on the FOWT, whereas, wave FF control requires significant amount of actuation to minimise the platform pitch motion, which makes such a technology unfavourable for that objective.
Stefano Cioni, Francesco Papi, Leonardo Pagamonci, Alessandro Bianchini, Néstor Ramos-García, Georg Pirrung, Rémi Corniglion, Anaïs Lovera, Josean Galván, Ronan Boisard, Alessandro Fontanella, Paolo Schito, Alberto Zasso, Marco Belloli, Andrea Sanvito, Giacomo Persico, Lijun Zhang, Ye Li, Yarong Zhou, Simone Mancini, Koen Boorsma, Ricardo Amaral, Axelle Viré, Christian W. Schulz, Stefan Netzband, Rodrigo Soto-Valle, David Marten, Raquel Martín-San-Román, Pau Trubat, Climent Molins, Roger Bergua, Emmanuel Branlard, Jason Jonkman, and Amy Robertson
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1659–1691, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1659-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1659-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Simulations of different fidelities made by the participants of the OC6 project Phase III are compared to wind tunnel wake measurements on a floating wind turbine. Results in the near wake confirm that simulations and experiments tend to diverge from the expected linearized quasi-steady behavior when the reduced frequency exceeds 0.5. In the far wake, the impact of platform motion is overestimated by simulations and even seems to be oriented to the generation of a wake less prone to dissipation.
Paul Veers, Carlo L. Bottasso, Lance Manuel, Jonathan Naughton, Lucy Pao, Joshua Paquette, Amy Robertson, Michael Robinson, Shreyas Ananthan, Thanasis Barlas, Alessandro Bianchini, Henrik Bredmose, Sergio González Horcas, Jonathan Keller, Helge Aagaard Madsen, James Manwell, Patrick Moriarty, Stephen Nolet, and Jennifer Rinker
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1071–1131, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1071-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1071-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Critical unknowns in the design, manufacturing, and operation of future wind turbine and wind plant systems are articulated, and key research activities are recommended.
Roger Bergua, Amy Robertson, Jason Jonkman, Emmanuel Branlard, Alessandro Fontanella, Marco Belloli, Paolo Schito, Alberto Zasso, Giacomo Persico, Andrea Sanvito, Ervin Amet, Cédric Brun, Guillén Campaña-Alonso, Raquel Martín-San-Román, Ruolin Cai, Jifeng Cai, Quan Qian, Wen Maoshi, Alec Beardsell, Georg Pirrung, Néstor Ramos-García, Wei Shi, Jie Fu, Rémi Corniglion, Anaïs Lovera, Josean Galván, Tor Anders Nygaard, Carlos Renan dos Santos, Philippe Gilbert, Pierre-Antoine Joulin, Frédéric Blondel, Eelco Frickel, Peng Chen, Zhiqiang Hu, Ronan Boisard, Kutay Yilmazlar, Alessandro Croce, Violette Harnois, Lijun Zhang, Ye Li, Ander Aristondo, Iñigo Mendikoa Alonso, Simone Mancini, Koen Boorsma, Feike Savenije, David Marten, Rodrigo Soto-Valle, Christian W. Schulz, Stefan Netzband, Alessandro Bianchini, Francesco Papi, Stefano Cioni, Pau Trubat, Daniel Alarcon, Climent Molins, Marion Cormier, Konstantin Brüker, Thorsten Lutz, Qing Xiao, Zhongsheng Deng, Florence Haudin, and Akhilesh Goveas
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 465–485, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-465-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-465-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This work examines if the motion experienced by an offshore floating wind turbine can significantly affect the rotor performance. It was observed that the system motion results in variations in the load, but these variations are not critical, and the current simulation tools capture the physics properly. Interestingly, variations in the rotor speed or the blade pitch angle can have a larger impact than the system motion itself.
Paul Veers, Katherine Dykes, Sukanta Basu, Alessandro Bianchini, Andrew Clifton, Peter Green, Hannele Holttinen, Lena Kitzing, Branko Kosovic, Julie K. Lundquist, Johan Meyers, Mark O'Malley, William J. Shaw, and Bethany Straw
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 2491–2496, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2491-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2491-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Wind energy will play a central role in the transition of our energy system to a carbon-free future. However, many underlying scientific issues remain to be resolved before wind can be deployed in the locations and applications needed for such large-scale ambitions. The Grand Challenges are the gaps in the science left behind during the rapid growth of wind energy. This article explains the breadth of the unfinished business and introduces 10 articles that detail the research needs.
Alessandro Bianchini, Galih Bangga, Ian Baring-Gould, Alessandro Croce, José Ignacio Cruz, Rick Damiani, Gareth Erfort, Carlos Simao Ferreira, David Infield, Christian Navid Nayeri, George Pechlivanoglou, Mark Runacres, Gerard Schepers, Brent Summerville, David Wood, and Alice Orrell
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 2003–2037, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2003-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2003-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The paper is part of the Grand Challenges Papers for Wind Energy. It provides a status of small wind turbine technology in terms of technical maturity, diffusion, and cost. Then, five grand challenges that are thought to be key to fostering the development of the technology are proposed. To tackle these challenges, a series of unknowns and gaps are first identified and discussed. Improvement areas are highlighted, within which 10 key enabling actions are finally proposed to the wind community.
Jörg Alber, Marinos Manolesos, Guido Weinzierl-Dlugosch, Johannes Fischer, Alexander Schönmeier, Christian Navid Nayeri, Christian Oliver Paschereit, Joachim Twele, Jens Fortmann, Pier Francesco Melani, and Alessandro Bianchini
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 943–965, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-943-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-943-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper investigates the potentials and the limitations of mini Gurney flaps and their combination with vortex generators for improved rotor blade performance of wind turbines. These small passive add-ons are installed in order to increase the annual energy production by mitigating the effects of both early separation toward the root region and surface erosion toward the tip region of the blade. As such, this study contributes to the reliable and long-term generation of renewable energy.
Rodrigo Soto-Valle, Stefano Cioni, Sirko Bartholomay, Marinos Manolesos, Christian Navid Nayeri, Alessandro Bianchini, and Christian Oliver Paschereit
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 585–602, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-585-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-585-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper compares different vortex identification methods to evaluate their suitability to study the tip vortices of a wind turbine. The assessment is done through experimental data from the wake of a wind turbine model. Results show comparability in some aspects as well as significant differences, providing evidence to justify further comparisons. Therefore, this study proves that the selection of the most suitable postprocessing methods of tip vortex data is pivotal to ensure robust results.
Sebastian Perez-Becker, David Marten, and Christian Oliver Paschereit
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 791–814, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-791-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-791-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Active trailing edge flaps can potentially enable further increases in wind turbine sizes without the disproportionate increase in loads, thus reducing the cost of wind energy even further. Extreme loads and critical deflections of the turbine blade are design-driving issues that can effectively be reduced by flaps. This paper considers the flap hinge moment as an input sensor for a flap controller that reduces extreme loads and critical deflections of the blade in turbulent wind conditions.
Sirko Bartholomay, Tom T. B. Wester, Sebastian Perez-Becker, Simon Konze, Christian Menzel, Michael Hölling, Axel Spickenheuer, Joachim Peinke, Christian N. Nayeri, Christian Oliver Paschereit, and Kilian Oberleithner
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 221–245, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-221-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-221-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents two methods on how to estimate the lift force that is created by a wing. These methods were experimentally assessed in a wind tunnel. Furthermore, an active trailing-edge flap, as seen on airplanes for example, is used to alleviate fluctuating loads that are created within the employed wind tunnel. Thereby, an active flow control device that can potentially serve on wind turbines to lower fatigue or lower the material used for the blades is examined.
Rodrigo Soto-Valle, Sirko Bartholomay, Jörg Alber, Marinos Manolesos, Christian Navid Nayeri, and Christian Oliver Paschereit
Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 1771–1792, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1771-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1771-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, a method to determine the angle of attack on a wind turbine rotor blade using a chordwise pressure distribution measurement was applied. The approach used a reduced number of pressure tap data located close to the blade leading edge. The results were compared with the measurements from three external probes mounted on the blade at different radial positions and with analytical calculations.
Jörg Alber, Rodrigo Soto-Valle, Marinos Manolesos, Sirko Bartholomay, Christian Navid Nayeri, Marvin Schönlau, Christian Menzel, Christian Oliver Paschereit, Joachim Twele, and Jens Fortmann
Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 1645–1662, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1645-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1645-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The aerodynamic impact of Gurney flaps is investigated on the rotor blades of the Berlin Research Turbine. The findings of this research project contribute to performance improvements of different-size rotor blades. Gurney flaps are considered a worthwhile passive flow-control device in order to alleviate the adverse effects of both early separation in the inner blade region and leading-edge erosion throughout large parts of the blade span.
Matthew Lennie, Johannes Steenbuck, Bernd R. Noack, and Christian Oliver Paschereit
Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 819–838, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-819-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-819-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents a marriage of unsteady aerodynamics and machine learning. When airfoils are subjected to high inflow angles, the flow no longer follows the surface and the flow is said to be separated. In this flow regime, the forces experienced by the airfoil are highly unsteady. This study uses a range of machine learning techniques to extract infomation from test data to help us understand the flow regime and makes recomendations on how to model it.
Sebastian Perez-Becker, Francesco Papi, Joseph Saverin, David Marten, Alessandro Bianchini, and Christian Oliver Paschereit
Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 721–743, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-721-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-721-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Aeroelastic design load calculations play a key role in determining the design loads of the different wind turbine components. This study compares load estimations from calculations using a Blade Element Momentum aerodynamic model with estimations from calculations using a higher-order Lifting-Line Free Vortex Wake aerodynamic model. The paper finds and explains the differences in fatigue and extreme turbine loads for power production simulations that cover a wide range of turbulent wind speeds.
Annette Claudia Klein, Sirko Bartholomay, David Marten, Thorsten Lutz, George Pechlivanoglou, Christian Navid Nayeri, Christian Oliver Paschereit, and Ewald Krämer
Wind Energ. Sci., 3, 439–460, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-3-439-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-3-439-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The paper describes the experimental and numerical investigation of a model wind turbine with a diameter of 3.0 m in a narrow wind tunnel. The objectives of the study are the provision of validation data, the comparison and evaluation of methods of different fidelity, and the assessment of the influence of wind tunnel walls. It turned out that the accordance between the experimental and numerical results is good, but the wind tunnel walls have to be taken into account for the present setup.
Matthew Lennie, David Marten, George Pechlivanoglou, Christian Navid Nayeri, and Christian Oliver Paschereit
Wind Energ. Sci., 2, 671–683, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2-671-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2-671-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Floating platform wind turbines present a challenge for engineers to simulate. This paper explores some better methods for simulating the aerodynamics of wind turbines as they move about on a floating platform. We also derived a new way of investigating whether the aerodynamics of the wind turbine rotor help it stay stable.
Related subject area
Thematic area: Wind technologies | Topic: Offshore technology
OC6 project Phase IV: validation of numerical models for novel floating offshore wind support structures
A new methodology for upscaling semi-submersible platforms for floating offshore wind turbines
Sensitivity analysis of numerical modeling input parameters on floating offshore wind turbine loads
Dynamic performance of a passively self-adjusting floating wind farm layout to increase the annual energy production
Design optimization of offshore wind jacket piles by assessing support structure orientation relative to metocean conditions
Comparison of optimal power production and operation of unmoored floating offshore wind turbines and energy ships
Roger Bergua, Will Wiley, Amy Robertson, Jason Jonkman, Cédric Brun, Jean-Philippe Pineau, Quan Qian, Wen Maoshi, Alec Beardsell, Joshua Cutler, Fabio Pierella, Christian Anker Hansen, Wei Shi, Jie Fu, Lehan Hu, Prokopios Vlachogiannis, Christophe Peyrard, Christopher Simon Wright, Dallán Friel, Øyvind Waage Hanssen-Bauer, Carlos Renan dos Santos, Eelco Frickel, Hafizul Islam, Arjen Koop, Zhiqiang Hu, Jihuai Yang, Tristan Quideau, Violette Harnois, Kelsey Shaler, Stefan Netzband, Daniel Alarcón, Pau Trubat, Aengus Connolly, Seán B. Leen, and Oisín Conway
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1025–1051, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1025-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1025-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper provides a comparison for a floating offshore wind turbine between the motion and loading estimated by numerical models and measurements. The floating support structure is a novel design that includes a counterweight to provide floating stability to the system. The comparison between numerical models and the measurements includes system motion, tower loads, mooring line loads, and loading within the floating support structure.
Kaylie L. Roach, Matthew A. Lackner, and James F. Manwell
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1873–1891, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1873-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1873-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents an upscaling methodology for floating offshore wind turbine platforms using two case studies. The offshore wind turbine industry is trending towards fewer, larger offshore wind turbines within a farm, which is motivated by the per unit cost of a wind farm (including installation, interconnection, and maintenance costs). The results show the platform steel mass to be favorable with upscaling.
Will Wiley, Jason Jonkman, Amy Robertson, and Kelsey Shaler
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1575–1595, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1575-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1575-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
A sensitivity analysis determined the modeling parameters for an operating floating offshore wind turbine with the biggest impact on the ultimate and fatigue loads. The loads were the most sensitive to the standard deviation of the wind speed. Ultimate and fatigue mooring loads were highly sensitive to the current speed; only the fatigue mooring loads were sensitive to wave parameters. The largest platform rotation was the most sensitive to the platform horizontal center of gravity.
Mohammad Youssef Mahfouz, Ericka Lozon, Matthew Hall, and Po Wen Cheng
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-135, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-135, 2023
Revised manuscript under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
As climate change increasingly impacts our daily lives, there is a pressing need for transition towards cleaner energy. With all the growth in floating offshore wind and the planned FWFs in the next few years, we urgently need new techniques and methodologies to accommodate the differences between fixed bottom and FWFs. This paper presents a novel methodology to decrease aerodynamic losses inside a FWF by passively relocating the downwind floating wind turbines out of the wakes.
Maciej M. Mroczek, Sanjay Raja Arwade, and Matthew A. Lackner
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 807–817, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-807-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-807-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Benefits of orientating a three-legged offshore wind jacket relative to the metocean conditions for pile design are assessed considering the International Energy Agency 15 MW reference turbine and a reference site off the coast of Massachusetts. Results, based on the considered conditions, show that the pile design can be optimized by orientating the jacket relative to the dominant wave direction. This design optimization can be used on offshore wind projects to provide cost and risk reductions.
Patrick Connolly and Curran Crawford
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 725–746, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-725-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-725-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Mobile offshore wind energy systems are a potential way of producing green fuels from the untapped wind resource that lies far offshore. Herein, computational models of two such systems were developed and verified. The models are able to predict the power output of each system based on wind condition inputs. Results show that both systems have merits and that, contrary to existing results, unmoored floating wind turbines may produce as much power as fixed ones, given the right conditions.
Cited articles
Azcona, J., Bouchotrouch, F., and Vittori, F.: Low-frequency dynamics of a floating wind turbine in wave tank–scaled experiments with SiL hybrid method, Wind Energy, 22, 1402–1413, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2377, 2019. a
Babarit, A. and Delhommeau, G.: Theoretical and numerical aspects of the open source BEM solver NEMOH, in: 11th European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference (EWTEC2015), Nantes, France, https://hal.science/hal-01198800 (last access: 13 March 2024), 2015. a
Bak, C., Zahle, F., Bitsche, R., Kim, T., Yde, A., Henriksen, L., Natarajan, A., and Hansen, M.: Description of the DTU 10 MW Reference Wind Turbine, DTU Wind Energy Report-I-0092, DTU Wind Energy, https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/the-dtu-10-mw-reference-wind-turbine (last access: 13 March 2024), 2013. a, b, c
Behrens de Luna, R.: Deliverable 2.1 Aero-hydro-elastic model definition – OC5 5 MW MSWT, version 5.0.0, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10634206, 2024. a
Behrens de Luna, R., Marten, D., Barlas, T., Horcas, S. G., Ramos-García, N., Li, A., and Paschereit, C. O.: Comparison of different fidelity aerodynamic solvers on the IEA 10 MW turbine including novel tip extension geometries, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 2265, 032002, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2265/3/032002, 2022. a
Böhm, M., Robertson, A., Hübler, C., Rolfes, R., and Schaumann, P.: Optimization-based calibration of hydrodynamic drag coefficients for a semisubmersible platform using experimental data of an irregular sea state, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1669, 012023, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1669/1/012023, 2020. a
Chopra, A. K.: Dynamics of Structures Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, Pearson Education Limited, UK, ISBN 978-0-273-77426-6, 2014. a
Clement, C.: Investigation of Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Hydrodynamics with Computational Fluid Dynamics, PhD thesis, Normandie Université, http://www.theses.fr/2021NORMR028/document (last access: 13 March 2024), 2021. a
Deperrois, A.: XFLR5 Website, http://www.xflr5.tech/xflr5.htm (last access: 14 August 2023), 2023. a
Drela, M.: XFOIL: An Analysis and Design System for Low Reynolds Number Airfoils, in: vol. 54, Springer, ISBN 978-3-540-51884-6, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-84010-4_1, 1989. a
ElastoDyn: Online documentation, https://openfast.readthedocs.io/en/dev/source/user/elastodyn/index.html (last access: 14 August 2023), 2023. a
FLOATECH: Project Website, https://www.floatech-project.com/ (last access: 23 August 2023), 2020. a
Goupee, A., Kimball, R., Ridder, E.-J., Helder, J., Robertson, A., and Jonkman, J.: A calibrated blade-element/momentum theory aerodynamic model of the MARIN stock wind turbine, 584–592, https://onepetro.org/ISOPEIOPEC/proceedings-abstract/ISOPE15/All-ISOPE15/ISOPE-I-15-104/14454 (last access: 13 March 2024), 2015. a, b, c
Gueydon, S., Duarte, T., and Jonkman, J.: Comparison of Second-Order Loads on a Semisubmersible Floating Wind Turbine, V09AT09A024, American Society Of Mechanical Engineers, https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2014-23398, 2014. a
Hall, M. and Goupee, A.: Validation of a lumped-mass mooring line model with DeepCwind semisubmersible model test data, Ocean Eng., 104, 590–603, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.05.035, 2015. a
HydroDyn: Online documentation, https://openfast.readthedocs.io/en/dev/source/user/hydrodyn/index.html (last access: 14 August 2023), 2023. a
Jeon, M., Lee, S., and Lee, S.: Unsteady aerodynamics of offshore floating wind turbines in platform pitching motion using vortex lattice method, Renew. Energy, 65, 207–212, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.09.009, 2014. a
Jonkman, J.: Definition of the Floating System for Phase IV of OC3, NREL technical report, NREL, https://doi.org/10.2172/979456, 2010. a
Jonkman, J. M. and Buhl Jr., M. L.: FAST User's Guide – Updated August 2005, OSTI.GOV, https://doi.org/10.2172/15020796, 2005. a
Kurnia, R. and Ducrozet, G.: NEMOH: Open-source boundary element solver for computation of first- and second-order hydrodynamic loads in the frequency domain, Comput. Phys. Commun., 292, 108885, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2023.108885, 2023. a
Larsen, T. and Hansen, A.: How 2 HAWC2, the user's manual, no. 1597(ver. 3-1)(EN) in Denmark, Forskningscenter Risoe. Risoe-R, Risø National Laboratory, ISBN 978-87-550-3583-6, 2007. a
Lemmer, F., Yu, W., and Cheng, P. W.: Iterative Frequency-Domain Response of Floating Offshore Wind Turbines with Parametric Drag, J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 6, 118, https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse6040118, 2018. a
Li, A., Pirrung, G. R., Gaunaa, M., Madsen, H. A., and Horcas, S. G.: A computationally efficient engineering aerodynamic model for swept wind turbine blades, Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 129–160, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-129-2022, 2022. a, b
Li, H. and Bachynski-Polić, E. E.: Analysis of difference-frequency wave loads and quadratic transfer functions on a restrained semi-submersible floating wind turbine, Ocean Eng., 232, 109165, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109165, 2021. a
Madsen, H. A., Larsen, T. J., Pirrung, G. R., Li, A., and Zahle, F.: Implementation of the blade element momentum model on a polar grid and its aeroelastic load impact, Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 1–27, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1-2020, 2020. a
Mancini, S., Boorsma, K., Schepers, G., and Savenije, F.: A comparison of dynamic inflow models for the blade element momentum method, Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 193–210, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-193-2023, 2023. a
Marten, D.: QBlade: A Modern Tool for the Aeroelastic Simulation of Wind Turbines, PhD thesis, TUB, https://doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-10646, 2020. a, b, c
Morison, J., Johnson, J., and Schaaf, S.: The Force Exerted by Surface Waves on Piles, J. Petrol. Technol., 2, 149–154, https://doi.org/10.2118/950149-G, 1950. a
Murray, R., Hayman, G., Jonkman, J., and Damiani, R.: AeroDyn V15.04: Design Tool for Wind and MHK Turbines, Tech. rep., MHK, https://doi.org/10.15473/1415580, 2017. a, b
Newman, J. N.: Second-order, slowly-varying Forces on Vessels in Irregular Waves, https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:125961342 (last access: 13 March 2024), 1974. a
NREL: ROSCO. Version 2.4.1, https://github.com/NREL/ROSCO (last access: 6 September 2023), 2021. a
OpenFAST Documentation: https://openfast.readthedocs.io/en/dev/index.html (last access: 7 September 2023), 2023. a
Papi, F., Troise, G., Behrens de Luna, R., Saverin, J., Perez-Becker, S., Marten, D., Ducasse, M.-L., and Bianchini, A.: A Code-to-Code Comparison for Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Simulation in Realistic Environmental Conditions: Quantifying the Impact of Modeling Fidelity on Different Substructure Concepts, Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-107, in review, 2023. a, b
Pegalajar Jurado, A. and Bredmose, H.: Reproduction of slow-drift motions of a floating wind turbine using second-order hydrodynamics and Operational Modal Analysis, Mar. Struct., 66, 178–196, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2019.02.008, 2019. a
Perdrizet, T., Gilloteaux, J.-C., Teixeira, D., Ferrer, G., Piriou, L., Cadiou, D., Heurtier, J.-M., and Le Cunff, C.: Fully Coupled Floating Wind Turbine Simulator Based on Nonlinear Finite Element Method: Part II – Validation Results, in: Volume 8: Ocean Renewable Energy of International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Nantes, France, V008T09A052, https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2013-10785, 2013. a, b
Perez-Becker, S. and Behrens de Luna, R.: Aero-Hydro-Elastic Model Definition in QBlade-Ocean, Tech. rep., Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6958204, 2022. a, b
Perez-Becker, S. and Behrens de Luna, R.: Deliverable 2.1 Aero-hydro-elastic model definition – DTU 10 MW RWT Hexafloat, version 4.0.0, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10634616, 2024. a
Perez-Becker, S., Papi, F., Saverin, J., Marten, D., Bianchini, A., and Paschereit, C. O.: Is the Blade Element Momentum theory overestimating wind turbine loads? – An aeroelastic comparison between OpenFAST's AeroDyn and QBlade's Lifting-Line Free Vortex Wake method, Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 721–743, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-721-2020, 2020. a, b, c
Perez-Becker, S., Saverin, J., Behrens de Luna, R., Papi, F., Combreau, C., Ducasse, M.-L., Marten, D., and Bianchini, A.: Validation Report of QBlade-Ocean, Tech. rep., Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7817605, 2022. a, b, c
Perez-Becker, S., Behrens de Luna, R., and Saverin, J.: Deliverable 2.1 Aero-hydro-elastic model definition – SOFTWIND 10 MW FOWT (wave-tank SIL version), version 3.3.0, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10634540, 2024. a
Ramos‐García, N., Kontos, S., Pegalajar‐Jurado, A., González Horcas, S., and Bredmose, H.: Investigation of the floating IEA Wind 15 MW RWT using vortex methods Part I: Flow regimes and wake recovery, Wind Energy, 25, 468–504, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2682, 2022. a
Rinker, J., Gaertner, E., Zahle, F., Skrzypiński, W., Abbas, N., Bredmose, H., Barter, G., and Dykes, K.: Comparison of loads from HAWC2 and OpenFAST for the IEA Wind 15 MW Reference Wind Turbine, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1618, 052052, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1618/5/052052, 2020. a
Roald, L., Jonkman, J., Robertson, A., and Chokani, N.: The Effect of Second-order Hydrodynamics on Floating Offshore Wind Turbines, Energy Proced., 35, 253–264, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.07.178, 2013. a
Robertson, A.: Uncertainty Analysis of OC5-DeepCwind Floating Semisubmersible Offshore Wind Test Campaign, https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1416717 (last access: 13 March 2024), 2017. a
Robertson, A.: IEA Wind TCP Task 30 (OC6), https://iea-wind.org/task30/ (last access: 25 August 2023), 2019. a
Robertson, A., Jonkman, J., Wendt, F., Goupee, A., and Dagher, H.: Definition of the OC5 DeepCwind Semisubmersible Floating System, https://a2e.energy.gov/api/datasets/oc5/oc5.phase2/files/oc5.phase2.model.definition-semisubmersible-floating-system-phase2-oc5-ver15.pdf (last access: 13 March 2024), 2014. a, b, c, d
Robertson, A., Wendt, F., Jonkman, J., Popko, W., Dagher, H., Gueydon, S., Qvist, J., Vittori, F., Azcona, J., Uzunoglu, E., Guedes Soares, C., Harries, R., Yde, A., Galinos, C., Hermans, K., Bernardus de Vaal, J., Bozonnet, P., Bouy, L., Bayati, I., Bergua, R., Galvan, J., Mendikoa, I., Barrera Sanchez, C., Shin, H., Oh, S., Molins, C., and Debruyne, Y.: OC5 Project Phase II: Validation of Global Loads of the DeepCwind Floating Semisubmersible Wind Turbine, Energy Proced., 137, 38–57, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.10.333, 2017. a, b, c, d, e, f
Robertson, A., Gueydon, S., Bachynski, E., Wang, L., Jonkman, J., Alarcón, D., Amet, E., Beardsell, A., Bonnet, P., Boudet, B., Brun, C., Chen, Z., Féron, M., Forbush, D., Galinos, C., Galvan, J., Gilbert, P., Gómez, J., Harnois, V., Haudin, F., Hu, Z., Dreff, J. L., Leimeister, M., Lemmer, F., Li, H., Mckinnon, G., Mendikoa, I., Moghtadaei, A., Netzband, S., Oh, S., Pegalajar-Jurado, A., Nguyen, M. Q., Ruehl, K., Schünemann, P., Shi, W., Shin, H., Si, Y., Surmont, F., Trubat, P., Qwist, J., and Wohlfahrt-Laymann, S.: OC6 Phase I: Investigating the underprediction of low-frequency hydrodynamic loads and responses of a floating wind turbine, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1618, 032033, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1618/3/032033, 2020. a
Saverin, J., Perez-Becker, S., Behrens de Luna, R., Marten, D., Gilloteaux, J.-C., and Kurnia, R.: Higher Order Hydroelastic Module, Tech. rep., Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6958081, 2021. a
Shaler, K., Branlard, E., and Platt, A.: OLAF User's Guide and Theory Manual, Tech. Rep. NREL/TP-5000-75959, 1659853, MainId:6799, NREL, https://doi.org/10.2172/1659853, 2020. a, b
Souza do Carmo, L., Mello, P., Malta, E., Franzini, G., Simos, A., Gonçalves, R., and Suzuki, H.: Analysis of a FOWT Model in Bichromatic Waves: An Investigation on the Effect of Combined Wave-Frequency and Slow Motions on the Calibration of Drag and Inertial Force Coefficients, American Society Of Mechanical Engineers, https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2020-18239, 2020. a
Tasora, A., Serban, R., Mazhar, H., Pazouki, A., Melanz, D., Fleischmann, J., Taylor, M., Sugiyama, H., and Negrut, D.: Chrono: An Open Source Multi-physics Dynamics Engine, in: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer International Publishing, 19–49, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40361-8_2, 2016. a
van Garrel, A.: Development of a Wind Turbine Aerodynamics Simulation Module, Tech. rep., ResearchGate, https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2773.8000, 2003. a
Veers, P., Dykes, K., Lantz, E., Barth, S., Bottasso, C. L., Carlson, O., Clifton, A., Green, J., Green, P., Holttinen, H., Laird, D., Lehtomäki, V., Lundquist, J. K., Manwell, J., Marquis, M., Meneveau, C., Moriarty, P., Munduate, X., Muskulus, M., Naughton, J., Pao, L., Paquette, J., Peinke, J., Robertson, A., Sanz Rodrigo, J., Sempreviva, A. M., Smith, J. C., Tuohy, A., and Wiser, R.: Grand challenges in the science of wind energy, Science, 366, eaau2027, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau2027, 2019. a
WAMIT Inc.: Wamit User Manual, Version 7.4, Chestnut Hill, USA, https://www.wamit.com/manual7.x/html/wamit_v75manual.html (last access: 13 March 2024), 2024. a
Wang, L., Robertson, A., Jonkman, J., and Yu, Y.-H.: OC6 phase I: Improvements to the OpenFAST predictions of nonlinear, low-frequency responses of a floating offshore wind turbine platform, Renew. Energy, 187, 282–301, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.01.053, 2022. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k
Wendt, F., Robertson, A., Jonkman, J., and Andersen, M. T.: Verification and Validation of the New Dynamic Mooring Modules Available in FAST v8: Preprint, OSTI.GOV, https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1295390 (last access: 13 March 2024) 2016. a
Yu, W., Müller, K., and Lemmer, F.: Qualification of innovative floating substructures for 10 MW wind turbines and water depths greater than 50 m, Tech. rep., LIFES50+, https://lifes50plus.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/GA_640741_LIFES50_D4.2.pdf (last access: 13 March 2024), 2018. a
Short summary
A novel hydrodynamic module of QBlade is validated on three floating offshore wind turbine concepts with experiments and two widely used simulation tools. Further, a recently proposed method to enhance the prediction of slowly varying drift forces is adopted and tested in varying met-ocean conditions. The hydrodynamic capability of QBlade matches the current state of the art and demonstrates significant improvement regarding the prediction of slowly varying drift forces with the enhanced model.
A novel hydrodynamic module of QBlade is validated on three floating offshore wind turbine...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint