Please find my comments in the supplement document.

Hi Deepali,

Thank you for this very nice paper :-) The main points to address for the review are:

• Clarify the novelty with respect to your previous paper on Wind Energy Science. It seems that the only change is the database, while the methodology is the same.
• I'm not convinced by the testing set, since it's quite specific instead of random.
• The literature review is well done. Have you found any paper on Bayesian neural networks? Not necessarily from wind. I'm only aware of a report from the HIPERWIND project.
• I had troubles following the hyper-parameters tuning between the main text and the appendix. Some restructuring would be appreciated.
• Which library have you used to train the MDN?

You will find many more comments in the attached pdf. Most of them are just suggestions based on my own experience, while a few are meant to improve the paper. Don't hesitate to get in touch if you need any clarification.

Well done!

Best regards,

Riccardo