Articles | Volume 7, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2351-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2351-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
A symbolic framework to obtain mid-fidelity models of flexible multibody systems with application to horizontal-axis wind turbines
Emmanuel Branlard
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO 80401, USA
Jens Geisler
Energy and Biotechnology, Flensburg University of Applied Sciences, 24943 Flensburg, Germany
Related authors
Kenneth Brown, Pietro Bortolotti, Emmanuel Branlard, Mayank Chetan, Scott Dana, Nathaniel deVelder, Paula Doubrawa, Nicholas Hamilton, Hristo Ivanov, Jason Jonkman, Christopher Kelley, and Daniel Zalkind
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1791–1810, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1791-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1791-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents a study of the popular wind turbine design tool OpenFAST. We compare simulation results to measurements obtained from a 2.8 MW land-based wind turbine. Measured wind conditions were used to generate turbulent flow fields through several techniques. We show that successful validation of the tool is not strongly dependent on the inflow generation technique used for mean quantities of interest. The type of inflow assimilation method has a larger effect on fatigue quantities.
Emmanuel Branlard, Jason Jonkman, Cameron Brown, and Jiatian Zhang
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1–24, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In this work, we implement, verify, and validate a physics-based digital twin solution applied to a floating offshore wind turbine. The article present methods to obtain reduced-order models of floating wind turbines. The models are used to form a digital twin which combines measurements from the TetraSpar prototype (a full-scale floating offshore wind turbine) to estimate signals that are not typically measured.
Stefano Cioni, Francesco Papi, Leonardo Pagamonci, Alessandro Bianchini, Néstor Ramos-García, Georg Pirrung, Rémi Corniglion, Anaïs Lovera, Josean Galván, Ronan Boisard, Alessandro Fontanella, Paolo Schito, Alberto Zasso, Marco Belloli, Andrea Sanvito, Giacomo Persico, Lijun Zhang, Ye Li, Yarong Zhou, Simone Mancini, Koen Boorsma, Ricardo Amaral, Axelle Viré, Christian W. Schulz, Stefan Netzband, Rodrigo Soto-Valle, David Marten, Raquel Martín-San-Román, Pau Trubat, Climent Molins, Roger Bergua, Emmanuel Branlard, Jason Jonkman, and Amy Robertson
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1659–1691, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1659-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1659-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Simulations of different fidelities made by the participants of the OC6 project Phase III are compared to wind tunnel wake measurements on a floating wind turbine. Results in the near wake confirm that simulations and experiments tend to diverge from the expected linearized quasi-steady behavior when the reduced frequency exceeds 0.5. In the far wake, the impact of platform motion is overestimated by simulations and even seems to be oriented to the generation of a wake less prone to dissipation.
Roger Bergua, Amy Robertson, Jason Jonkman, Emmanuel Branlard, Alessandro Fontanella, Marco Belloli, Paolo Schito, Alberto Zasso, Giacomo Persico, Andrea Sanvito, Ervin Amet, Cédric Brun, Guillén Campaña-Alonso, Raquel Martín-San-Román, Ruolin Cai, Jifeng Cai, Quan Qian, Wen Maoshi, Alec Beardsell, Georg Pirrung, Néstor Ramos-García, Wei Shi, Jie Fu, Rémi Corniglion, Anaïs Lovera, Josean Galván, Tor Anders Nygaard, Carlos Renan dos Santos, Philippe Gilbert, Pierre-Antoine Joulin, Frédéric Blondel, Eelco Frickel, Peng Chen, Zhiqiang Hu, Ronan Boisard, Kutay Yilmazlar, Alessandro Croce, Violette Harnois, Lijun Zhang, Ye Li, Ander Aristondo, Iñigo Mendikoa Alonso, Simone Mancini, Koen Boorsma, Feike Savenije, David Marten, Rodrigo Soto-Valle, Christian W. Schulz, Stefan Netzband, Alessandro Bianchini, Francesco Papi, Stefano Cioni, Pau Trubat, Daniel Alarcon, Climent Molins, Marion Cormier, Konstantin Brüker, Thorsten Lutz, Qing Xiao, Zhongsheng Deng, Florence Haudin, and Akhilesh Goveas
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 465–485, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-465-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-465-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This work examines if the motion experienced by an offshore floating wind turbine can significantly affect the rotor performance. It was observed that the system motion results in variations in the load, but these variations are not critical, and the current simulation tools capture the physics properly. Interestingly, variations in the rotor speed or the blade pitch angle can have a larger impact than the system motion itself.
Mac Gaunaa, Niels Troldborg, and Emmanuel Branlard
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 503–513, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-503-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-503-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We present an analytical vortex model. Despite its simplicity, the model is fully consistent with 1D momentum theory. It shows that the flow through a non-uniformly loaded rotor operating in non-uniform inflow behaves locally as predicted by 1D momentum theory. As a consequence, the local power coefficient (based on local inflow) of an ideal rotor is unaltered by the presence of shear. Finally, the model shows that there is no cross-shear deflection of the wake of a rotor in sheared inflow.
Kelsey Shaler, Benjamin Anderson, Luis A. Martínez-Tossas, Emmanuel Branlard, and Nick Johnson
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 383–399, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-383-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-383-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Free-vortex wake (OLAF) and low-fidelity blade-element momentum (BEM) structural results are compared to high-fidelity simulation results for a flexible downwind turbine for varying inflow conditions. Overall, OLAF results were more consistent than BEM results when compared to SOWFA results under challenging inflow conditions. Differences between OLAF and BEM results were dominated by yaw misalignment angle, with varying shear exponent and turbulence intensity causing more subtle differences.
Koen Boorsma, Gerard Schepers, Helge Aagard Madsen, Georg Pirrung, Niels Sørensen, Galih Bangga, Manfred Imiela, Christian Grinderslev, Alexander Meyer Forsting, Wen Zhong Shen, Alessandro Croce, Stefano Cacciola, Alois Peter Schaffarczyk, Brandon Lobo, Frederic Blondel, Philippe Gilbert, Ronan Boisard, Leo Höning, Luca Greco, Claudio Testa, Emmanuel Branlard, Jason Jonkman, and Ganesh Vijayakumar
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 211–230, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-211-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-211-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Within the framework of the fourth phase of the International Energy Agency's (IEA) Wind Task 29, a large comparison exercise between measurements and aeroelastic simulations has been carried out. Results were obtained from more than 19 simulation tools of various fidelity, originating from 12 institutes and compared to state-of-the-art field measurements. The result is a unique insight into the current status and accuracy of rotor aerodynamic modeling.
Jason M. Jonkman, Emmanuel S. P. Branlard, and John P. Jasa
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 559–571, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-559-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-559-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper summarizes efforts done to understand the impact of design parameter variations in the physical system (e.g., mass, stiffness, geometry, aerodynamic, and hydrodynamic coefficients) on the linearized system using OpenFAST in support of the development of the WEIS toolset to enable controls co-design of floating offshore wind turbines.
Emmanuel Branlard, Ian Brownstein, Benjamin Strom, Jason Jonkman, Scott Dana, and Edward Ian Baring-Gould
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 455–467, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-455-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-455-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this work, we present an aerodynamic tool that can model an arbitrary collections of wings, blades, rotors, and towers. With these functionalities, the tool can be used to study and design advanced wind energy concepts, such as horizontal-axis wind turbines, vertical-axis wind turbines, kites, or multi-rotors. This article describes the key features of the tool and presents multiple applications. Field measurements of horizontal- and vertical-axis wind turbines are used for comparison.
Emmanuel Branlard, Dylan Giardina, and Cameron S. D. Brown
Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 1155–1167, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1155-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1155-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The paper presents an application of the Kalman filtering technique to estimate loads on a wind turbine. The approach combines a mechanical model and a set of measurements to estimate signals that are not available in the measurements, such as wind speed, thrust, tower position, and tower loads. The model is severalfold faster than real time and is intended to be run online, for instance, to evaluate real-time fatigue life consumption of a field turbine using a digital twin.
Kenneth Brown, Pietro Bortolotti, Emmanuel Branlard, Mayank Chetan, Scott Dana, Nathaniel deVelder, Paula Doubrawa, Nicholas Hamilton, Hristo Ivanov, Jason Jonkman, Christopher Kelley, and Daniel Zalkind
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1791–1810, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1791-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1791-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents a study of the popular wind turbine design tool OpenFAST. We compare simulation results to measurements obtained from a 2.8 MW land-based wind turbine. Measured wind conditions were used to generate turbulent flow fields through several techniques. We show that successful validation of the tool is not strongly dependent on the inflow generation technique used for mean quantities of interest. The type of inflow assimilation method has a larger effect on fatigue quantities.
Emmanuel Branlard, Jason Jonkman, Cameron Brown, and Jiatian Zhang
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1–24, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In this work, we implement, verify, and validate a physics-based digital twin solution applied to a floating offshore wind turbine. The article present methods to obtain reduced-order models of floating wind turbines. The models are used to form a digital twin which combines measurements from the TetraSpar prototype (a full-scale floating offshore wind turbine) to estimate signals that are not typically measured.
Stefano Cioni, Francesco Papi, Leonardo Pagamonci, Alessandro Bianchini, Néstor Ramos-García, Georg Pirrung, Rémi Corniglion, Anaïs Lovera, Josean Galván, Ronan Boisard, Alessandro Fontanella, Paolo Schito, Alberto Zasso, Marco Belloli, Andrea Sanvito, Giacomo Persico, Lijun Zhang, Ye Li, Yarong Zhou, Simone Mancini, Koen Boorsma, Ricardo Amaral, Axelle Viré, Christian W. Schulz, Stefan Netzband, Rodrigo Soto-Valle, David Marten, Raquel Martín-San-Román, Pau Trubat, Climent Molins, Roger Bergua, Emmanuel Branlard, Jason Jonkman, and Amy Robertson
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1659–1691, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1659-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1659-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Simulations of different fidelities made by the participants of the OC6 project Phase III are compared to wind tunnel wake measurements on a floating wind turbine. Results in the near wake confirm that simulations and experiments tend to diverge from the expected linearized quasi-steady behavior when the reduced frequency exceeds 0.5. In the far wake, the impact of platform motion is overestimated by simulations and even seems to be oriented to the generation of a wake less prone to dissipation.
Roger Bergua, Amy Robertson, Jason Jonkman, Emmanuel Branlard, Alessandro Fontanella, Marco Belloli, Paolo Schito, Alberto Zasso, Giacomo Persico, Andrea Sanvito, Ervin Amet, Cédric Brun, Guillén Campaña-Alonso, Raquel Martín-San-Román, Ruolin Cai, Jifeng Cai, Quan Qian, Wen Maoshi, Alec Beardsell, Georg Pirrung, Néstor Ramos-García, Wei Shi, Jie Fu, Rémi Corniglion, Anaïs Lovera, Josean Galván, Tor Anders Nygaard, Carlos Renan dos Santos, Philippe Gilbert, Pierre-Antoine Joulin, Frédéric Blondel, Eelco Frickel, Peng Chen, Zhiqiang Hu, Ronan Boisard, Kutay Yilmazlar, Alessandro Croce, Violette Harnois, Lijun Zhang, Ye Li, Ander Aristondo, Iñigo Mendikoa Alonso, Simone Mancini, Koen Boorsma, Feike Savenije, David Marten, Rodrigo Soto-Valle, Christian W. Schulz, Stefan Netzband, Alessandro Bianchini, Francesco Papi, Stefano Cioni, Pau Trubat, Daniel Alarcon, Climent Molins, Marion Cormier, Konstantin Brüker, Thorsten Lutz, Qing Xiao, Zhongsheng Deng, Florence Haudin, and Akhilesh Goveas
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 465–485, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-465-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-465-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This work examines if the motion experienced by an offshore floating wind turbine can significantly affect the rotor performance. It was observed that the system motion results in variations in the load, but these variations are not critical, and the current simulation tools capture the physics properly. Interestingly, variations in the rotor speed or the blade pitch angle can have a larger impact than the system motion itself.
Mac Gaunaa, Niels Troldborg, and Emmanuel Branlard
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 503–513, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-503-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-503-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We present an analytical vortex model. Despite its simplicity, the model is fully consistent with 1D momentum theory. It shows that the flow through a non-uniformly loaded rotor operating in non-uniform inflow behaves locally as predicted by 1D momentum theory. As a consequence, the local power coefficient (based on local inflow) of an ideal rotor is unaltered by the presence of shear. Finally, the model shows that there is no cross-shear deflection of the wake of a rotor in sheared inflow.
Kelsey Shaler, Benjamin Anderson, Luis A. Martínez-Tossas, Emmanuel Branlard, and Nick Johnson
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 383–399, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-383-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-383-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Free-vortex wake (OLAF) and low-fidelity blade-element momentum (BEM) structural results are compared to high-fidelity simulation results for a flexible downwind turbine for varying inflow conditions. Overall, OLAF results were more consistent than BEM results when compared to SOWFA results under challenging inflow conditions. Differences between OLAF and BEM results were dominated by yaw misalignment angle, with varying shear exponent and turbulence intensity causing more subtle differences.
Koen Boorsma, Gerard Schepers, Helge Aagard Madsen, Georg Pirrung, Niels Sørensen, Galih Bangga, Manfred Imiela, Christian Grinderslev, Alexander Meyer Forsting, Wen Zhong Shen, Alessandro Croce, Stefano Cacciola, Alois Peter Schaffarczyk, Brandon Lobo, Frederic Blondel, Philippe Gilbert, Ronan Boisard, Leo Höning, Luca Greco, Claudio Testa, Emmanuel Branlard, Jason Jonkman, and Ganesh Vijayakumar
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 211–230, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-211-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-211-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Within the framework of the fourth phase of the International Energy Agency's (IEA) Wind Task 29, a large comparison exercise between measurements and aeroelastic simulations has been carried out. Results were obtained from more than 19 simulation tools of various fidelity, originating from 12 institutes and compared to state-of-the-art field measurements. The result is a unique insight into the current status and accuracy of rotor aerodynamic modeling.
Jason M. Jonkman, Emmanuel S. P. Branlard, and John P. Jasa
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 559–571, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-559-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-559-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper summarizes efforts done to understand the impact of design parameter variations in the physical system (e.g., mass, stiffness, geometry, aerodynamic, and hydrodynamic coefficients) on the linearized system using OpenFAST in support of the development of the WEIS toolset to enable controls co-design of floating offshore wind turbines.
Emmanuel Branlard, Ian Brownstein, Benjamin Strom, Jason Jonkman, Scott Dana, and Edward Ian Baring-Gould
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 455–467, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-455-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-455-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this work, we present an aerodynamic tool that can model an arbitrary collections of wings, blades, rotors, and towers. With these functionalities, the tool can be used to study and design advanced wind energy concepts, such as horizontal-axis wind turbines, vertical-axis wind turbines, kites, or multi-rotors. This article describes the key features of the tool and presents multiple applications. Field measurements of horizontal- and vertical-axis wind turbines are used for comparison.
Emmanuel Branlard, Dylan Giardina, and Cameron S. D. Brown
Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 1155–1167, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1155-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1155-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The paper presents an application of the Kalman filtering technique to estimate loads on a wind turbine. The approach combines a mechanical model and a set of measurements to estimate signals that are not available in the measurements, such as wind speed, thrust, tower position, and tower loads. The model is severalfold faster than real time and is intended to be run online, for instance, to evaluate real-time fatigue life consumption of a field turbine using a digital twin.
Cited articles
ANSYS:
https://www.ansys.com/ (last access: 19 March 2022), 2022. a
Bauchau, O. A.:
Flexible Multibody Dynamics, Solid Mechanics and Its Applications, Springer, Dordrecht, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0335-3, 2011. a
Benner, P., Gugercin, S., and Willcox, K.:
A Survey of Projection-Based Model Reduction Methods for Parametric Dynamical Systems, SIAM Rev., 57, 483–531, https://doi.org/10.1137/130932715, 2015. a
Bielawa, R.:
Rotary wing structural dynamics and aeroelasticity, AIAA education series, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1801 Alexander Bell Drive, Reston, VA 20191, 2006. a
Branlard, E.:
WELIB, Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7306075, 2022b. a
Branlard, E., Giardina, D., and Brown, C. S. D.:
Augmented Kalman filter with a reduced mechanical model to estimate tower loads on a land-based wind turbine: a step towards digital-twin simulations, Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 1155–1167, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1155-2020, 2020a. a
Branlard, E., Jonkman, J., Dana, S., and Doubrawa, P.:
A digital twin based on OpenFAST linearizations for real-time load and fatigue estimation of land-based turbines, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 1618, 022030, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1618/2/022030, 2020b. a
Docquier, N., Poncelet, A., and Fisette, P.:
ROBOTRAN: a powerful symbolic gnerator of multibody models, Mech. Sci., 4, 199–219, https://doi.org/10.5194/ms-4-199-2013, 2013. a
Gede, G., Peterson, D., Nanjangud, A., Moore, J., and Hubbard, M.:
Constrained Multibody Dynamics With Python: From Symbolic Equation Generation to Publication, in: Proceedings of the ASME 2013 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Portland, Oregon, USA, 4–7 August 2013, https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2013-13470, 2013. a, b, c
Geisler, J.:
CADynTub: Wind Turbine Model from OpenFAST Data using CADyn Equations of Motion, Github, https://github.com/jgeisler0303/CADynTurb (last access: November 2022), 2021. a
Géradin, M. and Cardona, A.:
Flexible Multibody Dynamics: A Finite Element Approach, Wiley, New York,
ISBN 978-0-471-48990-0, 2001. a
Jelenić, G. and Crisfield, M.:
Geometrically exact 3D beam theory: implementation of a strain-invariant finite element for statics and dynamics, Comput. Method. Appl. M., 171, 141–171, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(98)00249-7, 1999. a
Jonkman, B., Mudafort, R. M., Platt, A., Branlard, E., Sprague, M., Jonkman, J., Vijayakumar, G., Buhl, M., Ross, H., Bortolotti, P., Masciola, M., Ananthan, S., Schmidt, M. J., Rood, J., Damiani, R., Mendoza, N., Hall, M., and Corniglion, R.:
OpenFAST v3.1.0. Open-source wind turbine simulation tool, Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6324288, 2021. a, b, c, d, e
Jonkman, J., Butterfield, S., Musial, W., and Scott, G.:
Definition of a 5 MW Reference Wind Turbine for Offshore System Development, Tech. Rep. NREL/TP-500-38060, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, https://doi.org/10.2172/947422, 2009. a, b
Jonkman, J. M.:
Dynamics of offshore floating wind turbines–model development and verification, Wind Energy, 12, 459–492, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.347, 2009. a
Jonkman, J. M., Branlard, E. S. P., and Jasa, J. P.:
Influence of wind turbine design parameters on linearized physics-based models in OpenFAST, Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 559–571, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-559-2022, 2022. a, b
Kane, T. R. and Wang, C. F.:
On the Derivation of Equations of Motion, J. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math., 13, 487–492, https://doi.org/10.1137/0113030, 1965. a, b
Kurtz, T., Eberhard, P., Henninger, C., and Schiehlen, W.:
From Neweul to Neweul-M2: symbolical equations of motion for multibody system analysis and synthesis, Multibody Syst.Dyn., 24, 25–41, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-010-9187-x, 2010. a
Lange, C., Kövecses, J., and Gonthier, Y.:
Benchmarking of Multibody System Simulations: Points to Consider, in: CcToMM Symposium on Mechanisms, Machines, and Mechatronics, Saint-Hubert, Quebéc, 31 May–1 June 2007. a
MBDyn:
https://www.mbdyn.org/ (last access: 19 March 2022), 2022. a
Merz, K. O.:
STAS Aeroelastic 1.0 – Theory Manual., Tech. rep., SINTEF Energi AS., Trondheim, 2018. a
MotionGenesis: MotionGenesisTM Kane Tutorial, Tech. rep., Motion Genesis LLC, http://www.motiongenesis.com (last access: November 2022), 2016. a
Øye, S.:
Fix Dynamisk, aeroelastisk beregning af vindmøllevinger, Report AFM83-08, Fluid Mechanics, DTU, Lyngby, Denmark, 1983. a
Pöschke, F., Gauterin, E., Kühn, M., Fortmann, J., and Schulte, H.:
Load mitigation and power tracking capability for wind turbines using linear matrix inequality-based control design, Wind Energy, 23, 1792–1809, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2516, 2020. a
Reckdahl, K. and Mitiguy, P.:
Autolev Tutorial, Tech. rep., OnLine Dynamics Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, 1996. a
Simani, S.:
Advanced Issues of Wind Turbine Modelling and Control, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 659, 012001, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/659/1/012001, 2015. a
Simo, J.:
A finite strain beam formulation. The three-dimensional dynamic problem. Part I, Comput. Method. Appl. M., 49, 55–70, https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(85)90050-7, 1985. a
SIMPACK:
https://www.3ds.com/products-services/simulia/products/simpack/ (last access: 19 March 2022), 2022. a
Sønderby, I. and Hansen, M. H.:
Open-loop frequency response analysis of a wind turbine using a high-order linear aeroelastic model, Wind Energy, 17, 1147–1167, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1624, 2014. a
Steindl, A. and Troger, H.:
Methods for dimension reduction and their application in nonlinear dynamics, Int. J. Solids Struct., 38, 2131–2147, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(00)00157-8, 2001. a
Touzé, C., Vizzaccaro, A., and Thomas, O.:
Model order reduction methods for geometrically nonlinear structures: a review of nonlinear techniques, Nonlinear Dynam., 105, 1141–1190, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-021-06693-9, 2021. a
Verlinden, O., Kouroussis, G., and Conti, C.:
EasyDyn: a framework based on free symbolic and numerical tools for teaching multibody systems, in: Multibody Dynamics 2005, ECCOMAS Thematic Conference, Madrid, Spain, 21–24 June 2005. a
Wallrapp, O.:
Standard Input Data of Flexible Members in Multibody Systems, in: Advanced Multibody System Dynamics. Solid Mechanics and Its Applications, edited by: Schiehlen, W., vol. 20, pp. 445–450, Springer, Dordrecht, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0625-4_33, 1993. a
Wallrapp, O. and Schwertassek, R.:
Representation of geometric stiffening in multibody system simulation, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 32, 1833–1850, https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620320818, 10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0207, 1991. a
Short summary
The article presents a framework to obtain the linear and nonlinear equations of motion of a multibody system including rigid and flexible bodies. The method yields compact symbolic equations of motion. The applications are many, such as time-domain simulation, stability analyses, frequency domain analyses, advanced controller design, state observers, and digital twins.
The article presents a framework to obtain the linear and nonlinear equations of motion of a...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint