Belgian Offshore Platform News: Stormy February drives offshore energy production to new record,
https://www.belgianoffshoreplatform.be/en/news/stormy-february-drives-offshore-energy-production-to-new-record/ (last access: 23 August 2023), 2022. a
Cheng, W. Y., Liu, Y., Bourgeois, A. J., Wu, Y., and Haupt, S. E.: Short-term wind forecast of a data assimilation/weather forecasting system with wind turbine anemometer measurement assimilation, Renew. Energy, 107, 340–351,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.02.014, 2017.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f
Community developed code: WRF Version 4.5.1 (Bug-fix Release), GitHub [code],
https://github.com/wrf-model/WRF/releases/tag/v4.5.1 (last access: 21 January 2025), 2023. a
Dörenkämper, M., Olsen, B. T., Witha, B., Hahmann, A. N., Davis, N. N., Barcons, J., Ezber, Y., Garciá-Bustamante, E., González-Rouco, J. F., Navarro, J., Sastre-Marugán, M., Sile, T., Trei, W., Žagar, M., Badger, J., Gottschall, J., Rodrigo, J. S., and Mann, J.: The Making of the New European Wind Atlas – Part 2: Production and evaluation, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5079–5102,
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5079-2020, 2020.
a
Ek, M. B., Mitchell, K. E., Lin, Y., Rogers, E., Grunmann, P., Koren, V., Gayno, G., and Tarpley, J. D.: Implementation of Noah land surface model advances in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction operational mesoscale Eta model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 8851,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd003296, 2003.
a
Eriksson, O., Baltscheffsky, M., Breton, S.-P., Söderberg, S., and Ivanell, S.: The Long distance wake behind Horns Rev I studied using large eddy simulations and a wind turbine parameterization in WRF, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 854, 012012,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/854/1/012012, 2017.
a
Fischereit, J., Brown, R., Larsén, X. G., Badger, J., and Hawkes, G.: Review of Mesoscale Wind-Farm Parametrizations and Their Applications, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 182, 175–224,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-021-00652-y, 2022a.
a,
b
Fischereit, J., Hansen, K. S., Larsén, X. G., van der Laan, M. P., Réthoré, P.-E., and Leon, J. P. M.: Comparing and validating intra-farm and farm-to-farm wakes across different mesoscale and high-resolution wake models, Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1069–1091,
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1069-2022, 2022b.
a
Fitch, A. C., Olson, J. B., Lundquist, J. K., Dudhia, J., Gupta, A. K., Michalakes, J., and Barstad, I.: Local and mesoscale impacts of wind farms as parameterized in a mesoscale NWP model, Mon. Weather Rev., 140, 3017–3038,
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00352.1, 2012.
a,
b,
c,
d
Glabeke, G., Buckingham, S., De Mulder, T., and van Beeck, J.: Anomalous wind events over the Belgian North Sea at heights relevant to wind energy, Wind Energy Science Conference 2023 Mini-Symposium 1.5 IEA Wind Task 52: Replacing met masts and Accelerating offshore wind deployment, Submission Number 438,
https://zenodo.org/record/8034397 (last access: 21 January 2025), 2023.
a,
b,
c,
d
Grell, G., Dudhia, J., and Stauffer, D.: A description of the fifth-generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5), UCAR/NCAR,
https://doi.org/10.5065/D60Z716B, 1994.
a
Hahmann, A. N., Sile, T., Witha, B., Davis, N. N., Dörenkämper, M., Ezber, Y., Garciá-Bustamante, E., González-Rouco, J. F., Navarro, J., Olsen, B. T., and Söderberg, S.: The making of the New European Wind Atlas – Part 1: Model sensitivity, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5053–5078,
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5053-2020, 2020.
a
Hoeser, T., Feuerstein, S., and Kuenzer, C.: DeepOWT: a global offshore wind turbine data set derived with deep learning from Sentinel-1 data, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 4251–4270,
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4251-2022, 2022.
a,
b,
c,
d
Huang, X.-Y., Xiao, Q., Barker, D. M., Zhang, X., Michalakes, J., Huang, W., Henderson, T., Bray, J., Chen, Y., Ma, Z., Dudhia, J., Guo, Y., Zhang, X., Won, D.-J., Lin, H.-C., and Kuo, Y.-H.: Four-Dimensional Variational Data Assimilation for WRF: Formulation and Preliminary Results, Mon. Weather Rev., 137, 299–314,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2008mwr2577.1, 2009.
a
Iacono, M. J., Delamere, J. S., Mlawer, E. J., Shephard, M. W., Clough, S. A., and Collins, W. D.: Radiative forcing by long-lived greenhouse gases: Calculations with the AER radiative transfer models, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D13103,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd009944, 2008.
a
Kosovic, B., Haupt, S. E., Adriaansen, D., Alessandrini, S., Wiener, G., Monache, L. D., Liu, Y., Linden, S., Jensen, T., Cheng, W., Politovich, M., and Prestopnik, P.: A Comprehensive Wind Power Forecasting System Integrating Artificial Intelligence and Numerical Weather Prediction, Energies, 13, 1372,
https://doi.org/10.3390/en13061372, 2020.
a
Larsén, X. G. and Fischereit, J.: A case study of wind farm effects using two wake parameterizations in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model (V3.7.1) in the presence of low-level jets, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3141–3158,
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3141-2021, 2021.
a
Larsén, X. G., Du, J., Bolaños, R., Imberger, M., Kelly, M. C., Badger, M., and Larsen, S.: Estimation of offshore extreme wind from wind-wave coupled modeling, Wind Energy, 22, 1043–1057,
https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2339, 2019.
a
Lee, J. C. Y. and Lundquist, J. K.: Evaluation of the wind farm parameterization in the Weather Research and Forecasting model (version 3.8.1) with meteorological and turbine power data, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4229–4244,
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4229-2017, 2017.
a,
b,
c
Liu, Y., Warner, T. T., Bowers, J. F., Carson, L. P., Chen, F., Clough, C. A., Davis, C. A., Egeland, C. H., Halvorson, S. F., Huck, T. W., Lachapelle, L., Malone, R. E., Rife, D. L., Sheu, R.-S., Swerdlin, S. P., and Weingarten, D. S.: The Operational Mesogamma-Scale Analysis and Forecast System of the U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command. Part I: Overview of the Modeling System, the Forecast Products, and How the Products Are Used, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 47, 1077–1092,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2007jamc1653.1, 2008.
a
Lydia, M., Kumar, S. S., Selvakumar, A. I., and Kumar, G. E. P.: A comprehensive review on wind turbine power curve modeling techniques, Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev., 30, 452–460,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.10.030, 2014.
a
Mylonas, M., Barbouchi, S., Herrmann, H., and Nastos, P.: Sensitivity analysis of observational nudging methodology to reduce error in wind resource assessment (WRA) in the North Sea, Renew. Energy, 120, 446–456,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.12.088, 2018.
a
Nakanishi, M. and Niino, H.: An Improved Mellor–Yamada Level-3 Model: Its Numerical Stability and Application to a Regional Prediction of Advection Fog, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 119, 397–407,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-005-9030-8, 2006.
a
National Centers for Environmental Prediction, National Weather Service, NOAA, and US Department of Commerce: NCEP GFS 0.25 Degree Global Forecast Grids Historical Archive, Research Data Archive at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, Computational and Information Systems Laboratory [data set],
https://doi.org/10.5065/D65D8PWK, 2015.
a,
b
Peña, A., Mirocha, J. D., and van der Laan, M. P.: Evaluation of the Fitch Wind-Farm Wake Parameterization with Large-Eddy Simulations of Wakes Using the Weather Research and Forecasting Model, Mon. Weather Rev., 150, 3051–3064,
https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr-d-22-0118.1, 2022.
a
Porchetta, S., Muñoz-Esparza, D., Munters, W., van Beeck, J., and van Lipzig, N.: Impact of ocean waves on offshore wind farm power production, Renew. Energy, 180, 1179–1193,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.08.111, 2021.
a
Reen, B.: A brief guide to observation nudging in WRF,
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wrf-model/obsgrid/master/obsnudgingguide.pdf (last access: 21 January 2025), 2016.
a,
b
Sethunadh, J., Letson, F. W., Barthelmie, R. J., and Pryor, S. C.: Assessing the impact of global warming on windstorms in the northeastern United States using the pseudo-global-warming method, Nat. Hazards, 117, 2807–2834,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-05968-1, 2023.
a
Skamarock, W. C. and Klemp, J. B.: A time-split nonhydrostatic atmospheric model for weather research and forecasting applications, J. Comput. Phys., 227, 3465–3485,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2007.01.037, 2008.
a
Skamarock, W. C., Klemp, J. B., Dudhia, J., Gill, D. O., Liu, Z., Berner, J., Wang, W., Powers, J. G., Duda, M. G., Barker, D. M., and Huang, X.-Y.: A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Model Version 4.3, NSF [code],
https://doi.org/10.5065/1DFH-6P97, 2019.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e
Sun, W., Liu, Z., Song, G., Zhao, Y., Guo, S., Shen, F., and Sun, X.: Improving Wind Speed Forecasts at Wind Turbine Locations over Northern China through Assimilating Nacelle Winds with WRFDA, Weather Forecast., 37, 545–562,
https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-21-0041.1, 2022.
a
Thompson, G., Field, P. R., Rasmussen, R. M., and Hall, W. D.: Explicit Forecasts of Winter Precipitation Using an Improved Bulk Microphysics Scheme. Part II: Implementation of a New Snow Parameterization, Mon. Weather Rev., 136, 5095–5115,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2008mwr2387.1, 2008.
a
TNO Wind Energy Research Group: TNO Measurement Program, TNO Energy Transition, LiDAR measurements at Lichteiland Goeree (LEG) and at Europlatform (EPL),
https://nimbus.windopzee.net/ (last access: 21 January 2025), 2023.
a,
b,
c,
d
Vemuri, A., Buckingham, S., Munters, W., Helsen, J., and van Beeck, J.: Sensitivity analysis of mesoscale simulations to physics parameterizations over the Belgian North Sea using Weather Research and Forecasting – Advanced Research WRF (WRF-ARW), Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1869–1888,
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1869-2022, 2022.
a
Wang, Y., Hu, Q., Li, L., Foley, A. M., and Srinivasan, D.: Approaches to wind power curve modeling: A review and discussion, Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev., 116, 109422,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109422, 2019.
a
Xu, M., Liu, Y., Davis, C. A., and Warner, T. T.: Sensitivity study on nudging parameters for a mesoscale FDDA system, in: vol. 19, AMS, Conference on weather analysis and forecasting, 13 August 2002, Texas, 127–130,
https://ams.confex.com/ams/SLS_WAF_NWP/techprogram/paper_47401.htm (last access: 21 January 2025), 2002.
a,
b
Yang, B., Zhong, L., Wang, J., Shu, H., Zhang, X., Yu, T., and Sun, L.: State-of-the-art one-stop handbook on wind forecasting technologies: An overview of classifications, methodologies, and analysis, J. Clean. Product., 283, 124628,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124628, 2021.
a,
b
ZephIR: ZephIR Lidar 2018 WALTZ – a user's guide, version 2.2,
https://s.campbellsci.com/documents/au/product-brochures/zephir_premium.pdf (last access: 21 January 2025), 2018. a
Zhang, X., Huang, X.-Y., and Pan, N.: Development of the Upgraded Tangent Linear and Adjoint of the Weather Research and Forecasting WRF) Model, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 30, 1180–1188,
https://doi.org/10.1175/jtech-d-12-00213.1, 2013.
a
Zhang, X., Huang, X.-Y., Liu, J., Poterjoy, J., Weng, Y., Zhang, F., and Wang, H.: Development of an Efficient Regional Four-Dimensional Variational Data Assimilation System for WRF, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 31, 2777–2794,
https://doi.org/10.1175/jtech-d-13-00076.1, 2014.
a
Zhao, X., Wang, S., and Li, T.: Review of Evaluation Criteria and Main Methods of Wind Power Forecasting, Energ. Proced., 12, 761–769,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.10.102, 2011.
a
