Articles | Volume 10, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-941-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-941-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
19 May 2025
Research article |
| 19 May 2025
| 19 May 2025
Sensitivity analysis of numerical modeling input parameters on floating offshore wind turbine loads in extreme idling conditions
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 15013 Denver West Parkway, Golden, CO 80401, USA
Jason Jonkman
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 15013 Denver West Parkway, Golden, CO 80401, USA
Amy Robertson
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 15013 Denver West Parkway, Golden, CO 80401, USA
Related authors
Roger Bergua, Will Wiley, Amy Robertson, Jason Jonkman, Cédric Brun, Jean-Philippe Pineau, Quan Qian, Wen Maoshi, Alec Beardsell, Joshua Cutler, Fabio Pierella, Christian Anker Hansen, Wei Shi, Jie Fu, Lehan Hu, Prokopios Vlachogiannis, Christophe Peyrard, Christopher Simon Wright, Dallán Friel, Øyvind Waage Hanssen-Bauer, Carlos Renan dos Santos, Eelco Frickel, Hafizul Islam, Arjen Koop, Zhiqiang Hu, Jihuai Yang, Tristan Quideau, Violette Harnois, Kelsey Shaler, Stefan Netzband, Daniel Alarcón, Pau Trubat, Aengus Connolly, Seán B. Leen, and Oisín Conway
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1025–1051, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1025-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1025-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper provides a comparison for a floating offshore wind turbine between the motion and loading estimated by numerical models and measurements. The floating support structure is a novel design that includes a counterweight to provide floating stability to the system. The comparison between numerical models and the measurements includes system motion, tower loads, mooring line loads, and loading within the floating support structure.
Will Wiley, Jason Jonkman, Amy Robertson, and Kelsey Shaler
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1575–1595, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1575-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1575-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
A sensitivity analysis determined the modeling parameters for an operating floating offshore wind turbine with the biggest impact on the ultimate and fatigue loads. The loads were the most sensitive to the standard deviation of the wind speed. Ultimate and fatigue mooring loads were highly sensitive to the current speed; only the fatigue mooring loads were sensitive to wave parameters. The largest platform rotation was the most sensitive to the platform horizontal center of gravity.
Veronica Liverud Krathe, Jason Jonkman, and Erin Elizabeth Bachynski-Polić
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-92, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-92, 2025
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
This study looks into how changes in wind direction with height and drivetrain flexibility influence the behavior of large floating wind turbines. Using numerical simulations, it was found that these factors can significantly impact the lifetime of the turbines. These results suggest that standardized design methods may underestimate fatigue and that improved modeling could enhance turbine reliability as turbines continue to grow in size.
Regis Thedin, Garrett Barter, Jason Jonkman, Rafael Mudafort, Christopher J. Bay, Kelsey Shaler, and Jasper Kreeft
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 1033–1053, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1033-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1033-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate asymmetries in terms of power performance and fatigue loading on a five-turbine wind farm subject to wake steering strategies. Both the yaw misalignment angle and the wind direction were varied from negative to positive. We highlight conditions in which fatigue loading is lower while still maintaining good power gains and show that a partial wake is the source of the asymmetries observed. We provide recommendations in terms of yaw misalignment angles for a given wind direction.
Katarzyna Patryniak, Maurizio Collu, Jason Jonkman, Matthew Hall, Garrett Barter, Daniel Zalkind, and Andrea Coraddu
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-167, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-167, 2025
Revised manuscript accepted for WES
Short summary
Short summary
This paper studies the Instantaneous Centre of Rotation (ICR) of Floating Offshore Wind Turbines (FOWTs). We present a method for computing the ICR and examine the correlations between the external loading, design features, ICR statistics, motions, and loads. We demonstrate how to apply the new insights to successfully modify the designs of the spar and semisubmersible FOWTs to reduce the loads in the moorings, the tower, and the blades, improving the ultimate strength and fatigue properties.
Lucas Carmo, Jason Jonkman, and Regis Thedin
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1827–1847, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1827-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1827-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
As floating wind turbines progress to arrays with multiple units, it becomes important to understand how the wake of a floating turbine affects the performance of other units in the array. Due to the compliance of the floating substructure, the wake of a floating wind turbine may behave differently from that of a fixed turbine. In this work, we present an investigation of the mutual interaction between the motions of floating wind turbines and wakes.
Kenneth Brown, Pietro Bortolotti, Emmanuel Branlard, Mayank Chetan, Scott Dana, Nathaniel deVelder, Paula Doubrawa, Nicholas Hamilton, Hristo Ivanov, Jason Jonkman, Christopher Kelley, and Daniel Zalkind
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1791–1810, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1791-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1791-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents a study of the popular wind turbine design tool OpenFAST. We compare simulation results to measurements obtained from a 2.8 MW land-based wind turbine. Measured wind conditions were used to generate turbulent flow fields through several techniques. We show that successful validation of the tool is not strongly dependent on the inflow generation technique used for mean quantities of interest. The type of inflow assimilation method has a larger effect on fatigue quantities.
Kelsey Shaler, Eliot Quon, Hristo Ivanov, and Jason Jonkman
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1451–1463, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1451-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1451-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents a three-way verification and validation between an engineering-fidelity model, a high-fidelity model, and measured data for the wind farm structural response and wake dynamics during an evolving stable boundary layer of a small wind farm, generally with good agreement.
Francesco Papi, Jason Jonkman, Amy Robertson, and Alessandro Bianchini
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1069–1088, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1069-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1069-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Blade element momentum (BEM) theory is the backbone of many industry-standard aerodynamic models. However, the analysis of floating offshore wind turbines (FOWTs) introduces new challenges, which could put BEM models to the test. This study systematically compares four aerodynamic models, ranging from BEM to computational fluid dynamics, in an attempt to shed light on the unsteady aerodynamic phenomena that are at stake in FOWTs and whether BEM is able to model them appropriately.
Roger Bergua, Will Wiley, Amy Robertson, Jason Jonkman, Cédric Brun, Jean-Philippe Pineau, Quan Qian, Wen Maoshi, Alec Beardsell, Joshua Cutler, Fabio Pierella, Christian Anker Hansen, Wei Shi, Jie Fu, Lehan Hu, Prokopios Vlachogiannis, Christophe Peyrard, Christopher Simon Wright, Dallán Friel, Øyvind Waage Hanssen-Bauer, Carlos Renan dos Santos, Eelco Frickel, Hafizul Islam, Arjen Koop, Zhiqiang Hu, Jihuai Yang, Tristan Quideau, Violette Harnois, Kelsey Shaler, Stefan Netzband, Daniel Alarcón, Pau Trubat, Aengus Connolly, Seán B. Leen, and Oisín Conway
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1025–1051, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1025-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1025-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper provides a comparison for a floating offshore wind turbine between the motion and loading estimated by numerical models and measurements. The floating support structure is a novel design that includes a counterweight to provide floating stability to the system. The comparison between numerical models and the measurements includes system motion, tower loads, mooring line loads, and loading within the floating support structure.
Emmanuel Branlard, Jason Jonkman, Cameron Brown, and Jiatian Zhang
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1–24, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In this work, we implement, verify, and validate a physics-based digital twin solution applied to a floating offshore wind turbine. The article present methods to obtain reduced-order models of floating wind turbines. The models are used to form a digital twin which combines measurements from the TetraSpar prototype (a full-scale floating offshore wind turbine) to estimate signals that are not typically measured.
Stefano Cioni, Francesco Papi, Leonardo Pagamonci, Alessandro Bianchini, Néstor Ramos-García, Georg Pirrung, Rémi Corniglion, Anaïs Lovera, Josean Galván, Ronan Boisard, Alessandro Fontanella, Paolo Schito, Alberto Zasso, Marco Belloli, Andrea Sanvito, Giacomo Persico, Lijun Zhang, Ye Li, Yarong Zhou, Simone Mancini, Koen Boorsma, Ricardo Amaral, Axelle Viré, Christian W. Schulz, Stefan Netzband, Rodrigo Soto-Valle, David Marten, Raquel Martín-San-Román, Pau Trubat, Climent Molins, Roger Bergua, Emmanuel Branlard, Jason Jonkman, and Amy Robertson
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1659–1691, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1659-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1659-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Simulations of different fidelities made by the participants of the OC6 project Phase III are compared to wind tunnel wake measurements on a floating wind turbine. Results in the near wake confirm that simulations and experiments tend to diverge from the expected linearized quasi-steady behavior when the reduced frequency exceeds 0.5. In the far wake, the impact of platform motion is overestimated by simulations and even seems to be oriented to the generation of a wake less prone to dissipation.
Will Wiley, Jason Jonkman, Amy Robertson, and Kelsey Shaler
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1575–1595, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1575-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1575-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
A sensitivity analysis determined the modeling parameters for an operating floating offshore wind turbine with the biggest impact on the ultimate and fatigue loads. The loads were the most sensitive to the standard deviation of the wind speed. Ultimate and fatigue mooring loads were highly sensitive to the current speed; only the fatigue mooring loads were sensitive to wave parameters. The largest platform rotation was the most sensitive to the platform horizontal center of gravity.
Paula Doubrawa, Kelsey Shaler, and Jason Jonkman
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1475–1493, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1475-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1475-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Wind turbines are designed to withstand any wind conditions they might encounter. This includes high-turbulence flow fields found within wind farms due to the presence of the wind turbines themselves. The international standard allows for two ways to account for wind farm turbulence in the design process. We compared both ways and found large differences between them. To avoid overdesign and enable a site-specific design, we suggest moving towards validated, higher-fidelity simulation tools.
Paul Veers, Carlo L. Bottasso, Lance Manuel, Jonathan Naughton, Lucy Pao, Joshua Paquette, Amy Robertson, Michael Robinson, Shreyas Ananthan, Thanasis Barlas, Alessandro Bianchini, Henrik Bredmose, Sergio González Horcas, Jonathan Keller, Helge Aagaard Madsen, James Manwell, Patrick Moriarty, Stephen Nolet, and Jennifer Rinker
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1071–1131, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1071-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1071-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Critical unknowns in the design, manufacturing, and operation of future wind turbine and wind plant systems are articulated, and key research activities are recommended.
Roger Bergua, Amy Robertson, Jason Jonkman, Emmanuel Branlard, Alessandro Fontanella, Marco Belloli, Paolo Schito, Alberto Zasso, Giacomo Persico, Andrea Sanvito, Ervin Amet, Cédric Brun, Guillén Campaña-Alonso, Raquel Martín-San-Román, Ruolin Cai, Jifeng Cai, Quan Qian, Wen Maoshi, Alec Beardsell, Georg Pirrung, Néstor Ramos-García, Wei Shi, Jie Fu, Rémi Corniglion, Anaïs Lovera, Josean Galván, Tor Anders Nygaard, Carlos Renan dos Santos, Philippe Gilbert, Pierre-Antoine Joulin, Frédéric Blondel, Eelco Frickel, Peng Chen, Zhiqiang Hu, Ronan Boisard, Kutay Yilmazlar, Alessandro Croce, Violette Harnois, Lijun Zhang, Ye Li, Ander Aristondo, Iñigo Mendikoa Alonso, Simone Mancini, Koen Boorsma, Feike Savenije, David Marten, Rodrigo Soto-Valle, Christian W. Schulz, Stefan Netzband, Alessandro Bianchini, Francesco Papi, Stefano Cioni, Pau Trubat, Daniel Alarcon, Climent Molins, Marion Cormier, Konstantin Brüker, Thorsten Lutz, Qing Xiao, Zhongsheng Deng, Florence Haudin, and Akhilesh Goveas
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 465–485, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-465-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-465-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This work examines if the motion experienced by an offshore floating wind turbine can significantly affect the rotor performance. It was observed that the system motion results in variations in the load, but these variations are not critical, and the current simulation tools capture the physics properly. Interestingly, variations in the rotor speed or the blade pitch angle can have a larger impact than the system motion itself.
Koen Boorsma, Gerard Schepers, Helge Aagard Madsen, Georg Pirrung, Niels Sørensen, Galih Bangga, Manfred Imiela, Christian Grinderslev, Alexander Meyer Forsting, Wen Zhong Shen, Alessandro Croce, Stefano Cacciola, Alois Peter Schaffarczyk, Brandon Lobo, Frederic Blondel, Philippe Gilbert, Ronan Boisard, Leo Höning, Luca Greco, Claudio Testa, Emmanuel Branlard, Jason Jonkman, and Ganesh Vijayakumar
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 211–230, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-211-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-211-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Within the framework of the fourth phase of the International Energy Agency's (IEA) Wind Task 29, a large comparison exercise between measurements and aeroelastic simulations has been carried out. Results were obtained from more than 19 simulation tools of various fidelity, originating from 12 institutes and compared to state-of-the-art field measurements. The result is a unique insight into the current status and accuracy of rotor aerodynamic modeling.
Kelsey Shaler, Amy N. Robertson, and Jason Jonkman
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 25–40, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-25-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-25-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This work evaluates which wind-inflow- and wake-related parameters have the greatest influence on fatigue and ultimate loads for turbines in a small wind farm. Twenty-eight parameters were screened using an elementary effects approach to identify the parameters that lead to the largest variation in these loads of each turbine. The findings show the increased importance of non-streamwise wind components and wake parameters in fatigue and ultimate load sensitivity of downstream turbines.
Jason M. Jonkman, Emmanuel S. P. Branlard, and John P. Jasa
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 559–571, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-559-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-559-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper summarizes efforts done to understand the impact of design parameter variations in the physical system (e.g., mass, stiffness, geometry, aerodynamic, and hydrodynamic coefficients) on the linearized system using OpenFAST in support of the development of the WEIS toolset to enable controls co-design of floating offshore wind turbines.
Emmanuel Branlard, Ian Brownstein, Benjamin Strom, Jason Jonkman, Scott Dana, and Edward Ian Baring-Gould
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 455–467, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-455-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-455-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this work, we present an aerodynamic tool that can model an arbitrary collections of wings, blades, rotors, and towers. With these functionalities, the tool can be used to study and design advanced wind energy concepts, such as horizontal-axis wind turbines, vertical-axis wind turbines, kites, or multi-rotors. This article describes the key features of the tool and presents multiple applications. Field measurements of horizontal- and vertical-axis wind turbines are used for comparison.
Matthias Kretschmer, Jason Jonkman, Vasilis Pettas, and Po Wen Cheng
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 1247–1262, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1247-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1247-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We perform a validation of the new simulation tool FAST.Farm for the prediction of power output and structural loads in single wake conditions with respect to measurement data from the offshore wind farm alpha ventus. With a new wake-added turbulence functionality added to FAST.Farm, good agreement between simulations and measurements is achieved for the considered quantities. We hereby give insights into load characteristics of an offshore wind turbine subjected to single wake conditions.
Cited articles
ABS: Selecting Design Wave by Long Term Stochastic Method, https://ww2.eagle.org/content/dam/eagle/rules-and-guides/current/offshore/238_Guidance_Notes_on_Selecting_ Design_Wave_by_Long_Term_Stochastic_Method/Long_Term _Design_Wave_GN_e.pdf (last access: January 2024), 2016. a
Allen, C., Viselli, A., Dagher, H., Goupee, A., Gaertner, E., Abbas, N., Hall, M., and Barter, G.: Definition of the UMaine VolturnUS-S Reference Platform Developed for the IEA Wind 15-Megawatt Offshore Reference Wind Turbine, NREL/TP-5000-76773, https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy20osti/76773.pdf (last access: January 2024), 2020. a, b
ArcGIS: Global Tidal Range, https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=d5354dea41b14f0689860bf4b2cf5e8a (last access: January 2024), 2024. a
Bangga, G., Carrion, M., Collier, W., and Parkinson, S.: Technical modeling challenges for large idling wind turbines, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 2626, 012026, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2626/1/012026, 2023. a, b
Biglu, M., Hall, M., Lozon, E., and Housner, S.: Reference Site Conditions for Floating Wind Arrays in the United States, NREL/TP-5000-89897, https://doi.org/10.7799/2425969, 2024. a
Bodini, N., Redfern, S., Rybchuk, A., Pronk, V., Castagneri, S., Purkayastha, A., Draxl, C., Young, E., Roberts, B., Rosenlieb, E., Musial, W., Tai, S.-L., Berg, L., Rosencrans, D., Lundquist, J. K., and Optis, M.: NOW-23: The 2023 National Offshore Wind Data Set, NREL [data set], https://doi.org/10.2172/2274805, 2023. a, b
Bodini, N., Optis, M., Redfern, S., Rosencrans, D., Rybchuk, A., Lundquist, J. K., Pronk, V., Castagneri, S., Purkayastha, A., Draxl, C., Krishnamurthy, R., Young, E., Roberts, B., Rosenlieb, E., and Musial, W.: The 2023 National Offshore Wind data set (NOW-23), Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 1965–2006, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1965-2024, 2024. a
Chetan, M. and Bortolotti, P.: Edgewise Structural Damping of a 2.8-MW Land-Based Wind Turbine Rotor Blade, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 2767, 022069, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2767/2/022069, 2024. a
Cooperman, A., Duffy, P., Hall, M., Lozon, E., Shields, M., and Musial, W.: Assessment of Offshore Wind Energy Leasing Areas for Humboldt and Morro Bay Wind Energy Areas, California, NREL/TP-5000-82341, https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy22osti/82341.pdf (last access: January 2024), 2022. a
Eckert-Gallup, A., Sallaberry, C., Dallman, A., and Neary, V.: Application of principal component analysis (PCA) and improved joint probability distributions to the inverse first-order reliability method (I-FORM) for predicting extreme sea states, Ocean Eng., 112, 307–319, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.12.018, 2016. a
Fowler, M., Lenfest, E., Viselli, A., Goupee, A., Kimball, R., Bergua, R., Wang, L., Zalkind, D., Wright, A., and Robertson, A.: Wind/Wave Testing of a 1:70-Scale Performance-Matched Model of the IEA Wind 15 MW Reference Wind Turbine with Real-Time ROSCO Control and Floating Feedback, Machines, 11, 865, https://doi.org/10.3390/machines11090865, 2023. a
Fuchs, R., Musial, W., Zuckerman, G., Chetan, M., Marquis, M., Rese, L., Cooperman, A., Duffy, P., Green, R., Beiter, P., Hernando, D., Morris, J., Randall, A., Jossart, J., Mudd, L., and Vickery, P.: Assessment of Offshore Wind Energy Opportunities and Challenges in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, NREL/TP-5000-88195, https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy24osti/88195.pdf (last access: January 2024), 2023. a
Gaertner, E., Rinker, J., Sethuraman, L., Zahle, F., Anderson, B., Barter, G., Abbas, N., Meng, F., Bortolotti, P., Skrzypinski, W., Scott, G., Feil, R., Bredmose, H., Dykes, K., Shields, M., Allen, C., and Viselli, A.: Definition of the IEA Wind 15-Megawatt Offshore Reference Wind Turbine, NREL/TP-5000-75698, https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy20osti/75698.pdf (last access: January 2024), 2020. a
Klise, K., Pauly, R., Ruehl, K. M., Olson, S., Shippert, T., Morrell, Z., Bredin, S., Lansing, C., Macduff, M., Martin, T., Sivaraman, C., Gunawan, B., and Driscoll, F.: MHKiT (Marine and Hydrokinetic Toolkit) – Python, Zenodo [software], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3924683, 2020. a
Krieger, A., Ramachandran, G., Vita, L., Alonso, P., Almeria, G., Berque, J., and Aguirre, G.: LIFES50+: Qualification of innovative floating substructures for 10 MW wind turbines and water depths greater than 50 m, European Commission, https://doi.org/10.3030/640741, 2015. a
Krishnamurthy, R., García Medina, G., Gaudet, B., Gustafson Jr., W. I., Kassianov, E. I., Liu, J., Newsom, R. K., Sheridan, L. M., and Mahon, A. M.: Year-long buoy-based observations of the air–sea transition zone off the US west coast, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 5667–5699, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5667-2023, 2023. a
Lozon, E., Reddy Lekkala, M., Sirkis, L., and Hall, M.: Reference Mooring and Dynamic Cable Designs for Representative U.S. Floating Wind Farms, Ocean Eng., 322, 120473, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.120473, 2025. a, b, c
Morris, M.: Factorial Sampling Plans for Preliminary Computational Experiments, Technometrics, 33, 161–174, 1991. a
NOAA: National Data Buoy Center, https://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/publications/ (last access: January 2024), 2024. a
Petrone, G., Nicola, C., Quagliarella, D., Witteveen, J., and Iaccarino, G.: Wind Turbine Performance Analysis Under Uncertainty, in: AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Orlando, Florida, 4–7 January 2011, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2011-544, 2011. a
Reddy, L., Karystinou, D., Milano, D., Walker, J., and Virè, A.: Influence of wind-wave characteristics on floating wind turbine loads: A sensitivity analysis across different floating concepts, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 2767, 062030, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2767/6/062030, 2024. a
Robertson, A. N., Shaler, K., Sethuraman, L., and Jonkman, J.: Sensitivity analysis of the effect of wind characteristics and turbine properties on wind turbine loads, Wind Energ. Sci., 4, 479–513, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-4-479-2019, 2019. a, b
Sanchez Gomez, M., Lundquist, J., Deskos, G., Arwade, R., Myers, A., and Hajjar, J.: Wind Fields in Category 1–3 Tropical Cyclones Are Not Fully Represented in Wind Turbine Design Standards, J. Geophys. Res., 128, e2023JD039233, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD039233, 2023. a
Sandua-Fernandez, I., Vittori, F., Equinoa, I., and Cheng, P.: Impact of hydrodynamic drag coefficient uncertainty on 15 MW floating offshore wind turbine power and speed control, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 2362, 012037, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2362/1/012037, 2022. a
Shaler, K., Robertson, A. N., and Jonkman, J.: Sensitivity analysis of the effect of wind and wake characteristics on wind turbine loads in a small wind farm, Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 25–40, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-25-2023, 2023. a, b
Sobol, I.: On the distribution of points in a cube and the approximate evaluation of integrals, USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, 7, 86–112, 1967. a
Sørum, S., Katsikogiannis, G., Bachynski-Polić, E., Amdahl, J., Page, A., and Klinkvort, R.: Fatigue design sensitivities of large monopile offshore wind turbines, Wind Energy, 25, 1684–1709, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2755, 2022. a
Vanem, E.: Uncertainties in extreme value modelling of wave data in a climate change perspective, Journal of Ocean Engineering and Marine Energy, 1, 339–359, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40722-015-0025-3, 2015. a
Venugopal, V., Varyani, K., and Westlake, P.: Drag and inertia coefficients for horizontally submerged rectangular cylinders in waves and currents, P. I. Mech. Eng. M-J. Eng., 223, 121–136, https://doi.org/10.1243/14750902JEME124, 2008. a
Viselli, A., Faessler, N., and Filippelli, M.: Analysis of Wind Speed Shear and Turbulence LiDAR Measurements to Support Offshore Wind in the Northeast United States, in: Proceedings of the ASME 2018 1st International Offshore Wind Technical Conference. ASME 2018 1st International Offshore Wind Technical Conference, San Francisco, California, USA, 4–7 November 2018, V001T01A005, ASME, https://doi.org/10.1115/IOWTC2018-1003, 2018. a
Wiley, W., Jonkman, J., and Robertson, A.: File Sharing for: WES-2024-130 – Sensitivity analysis of numerical modeling input parameters on floating offshore wind turbine loads in extreme idling conditions, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14933850, 2025. a
Short summary
Numerical models, used to assess loads on floating offshore wind turbines, require many input parameters to describe air and water conditions, system properties, and load calculations. All parameters have some possible range, due to uncertainty and/or variations with time. The selected values can have important effects on the uncertainty in the resulting loads. This work identifies the input parameters that have the most impact on ultimate and fatigue loads for extreme storm load cases.
Numerical models, used to assess loads on floating offshore wind turbines, require many input...
Special issue
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint