Articles | Volume 6, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-555-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-555-2021
Research article
 | 
22 Apr 2021
Research article |  | 22 Apr 2021

The curled wake model: a three-dimensional and extremely fast steady-state wake solver for wind plant flows

Luis A. Martínez-Tossas, Jennifer King, Eliot Quon, Christopher J. Bay, Rafael Mudafort, Nicholas Hamilton, Michael F. Howland, and Paul A. Fleming

Related authors

Implementation of a Near-Wake Region within the Curled-Wake Model
Paul Hulsman, Luis A. Martínez-Tossas, Nicholas Hamilton, and Martin Kühn
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-112,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-112, 2023
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Evolution of eddy viscosity in the wake of a wind turbine
Ryan Scott, Luis Martínez-Tossas, Juliaan Bossuyt, Nicholas Hamilton, and Raúl B. Cal
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 449–463, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-449-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-449-2023, 2023
Short summary
Comparison of free vortex wake and blade element momentum results against large-eddy simulation results for highly flexible turbines under challenging inflow conditions
Kelsey Shaler, Benjamin Anderson, Luis A. Martínez-Tossas, Emmanuel Branlard, and Nick Johnson
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 383–399, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-383-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-383-2023, 2023
Short summary
FLOW Estimation and Rose Superposition (FLOWERS): an integral approach to engineering wake models
Michael J. LoCascio, Christopher J. Bay, Majid Bastankhah, Garrett E. Barter, Paul A. Fleming, and Luis A. Martínez-Tossas
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1137–1151, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1137-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1137-2022, 2022
Short summary
Control-oriented model for secondary effects of wake steering
Jennifer King, Paul Fleming, Ryan King, Luis A. Martínez-Tossas, Christopher J. Bay, Rafael Mudafort, and Eric Simley
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 701–714, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-701-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-701-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Aerodynamics and hydrodynamics
FLOW Estimation and Rose Superposition (FLOWERS): an integral approach to engineering wake models
Michael J. LoCascio, Christopher J. Bay, Majid Bastankhah, Garrett E. Barter, Paul A. Fleming, and Luis A. Martínez-Tossas
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1137–1151, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1137-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1137-2022, 2022
Short summary
High-Reynolds-number investigations on the ability of the full-scale e-TellTale sensor to detect flow separation on a wind turbine blade section
Antoine Soulier, Caroline Braud, Dimitri Voisin, and Frédéric Danbon
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1043–1052, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1043-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1043-2022, 2022
Short summary
Experimental investigation of mini Gurney flaps in combination with vortex generators for improved wind turbine blade performance
Jörg Alber, Marinos Manolesos, Guido Weinzierl-Dlugosch, Johannes Fischer, Alexander Schönmeier, Christian Navid Nayeri, Christian Oliver Paschereit, Joachim Twele, Jens Fortmann, Pier Francesco Melani, and Alessandro Bianchini
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 943–965, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-943-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-943-2022, 2022
Short summary
Parked and operating load analysis in the aerodynamic design of multi-megawatt-scale floating vertical-axis wind turbines
Mohammad Sadman Sakib and D. Todd Griffith
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 677–696, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-677-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-677-2022, 2022
Short summary
High-Reynolds-number wind turbine blade equipped with root spoilers – Part 1: Unsteady aerodynamic analysis using URANS simulations
Thomas Potentier, Emmanuel Guilmineau, Arthur Finez, Colin Le Bourdat, and Caroline Braud
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 647–657, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-647-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-647-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Adaramola, M. and Krogstad, P.-A.: Experimental investigation of wake effects on wind turbine performance, Renew. Energy, 36, 2078–2086, 2011. a
Ainslie, J.: Calculating the flowfield in the wake of wind turbines, J. Wind Eng. Indust. Aerodynam., 27, 213–224, https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(88)90037-2, 1988.  a
Allaerts, D. and Meyers, J.: Large eddy simulation of a large wind-turbine array in a conventionally neutral atmospheric boundary layer, Phys. Fluids, 27, 065108, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4922339, 2015. a
Annoni, J., Fleming, P., Scholbrock, A., Roadman, J., Dana, S., Adcock, C., Porte-Agel, F., Raach, S., Haizmann, F., and Schlipf, D.: Analysis of control-oriented wake modeling tools using lidar field results, Wind Energ. Sci., 3, 819–831, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-3-819-2018, 2018. a
Bartl, J., Mühle, F., Schottler, J., Saetran, L., Peinke, J., Adaramola, M., and Hölling, M.: Wind tunnel experiments on wind turbine wakes in yaw: effects of inflow turbulence and shear, Wind Ener. Sci., 3, 329–343, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-3-329-2018, 2018. a
Download
Short summary
In this paper a three-dimensional steady-state solver for flow through a wind farm is developed and validated. The computational cost of the solver is on the order of seconds for large wind farms. The model is validated using high-fidelity simulations and SCADA.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint