Articles | Volume 8, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-999-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-999-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Vortex model of the aerodynamic wake of airborne wind energy systems
Filippo Trevisi
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Aerospace Science and Technology, Politecnico di Milano, Via La Masa 34, 20156 Milan, Italy
Carlo E. D. Riboldi
Department of Aerospace Science and Technology, Politecnico di Milano, Via La Masa 34, 20156 Milan, Italy
Alessandro Croce
Department of Aerospace Science and Technology, Politecnico di Milano, Via La Masa 34, 20156 Milan, Italy
Related authors
Filippo Trevisi, Gianni Cassoni, Mac Gaunaa, and Lorenzo Mario Fagiano
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-134, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-134, 2025
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
This paper investigates the optimal aerodynamic design of the wing and of the onboard turbines of the aircraft of fly-gen Airborne Wind Energy Systems, named windplane here, with a novel comprehensive engineering aerodynamic model and with the vortex particle method implemented in DUST. Placing the turbines at the wing tips, rotating them inboard down with low tip speed ratio and using conventional efficient airfoils for the wing is found to be optimal for windplanes.
Filippo Trevisi, Carlo E. D. Riboldi, and Alessandro Croce
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1639–1650, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1639-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1639-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The power equations of crosswind Ground-Gen and Fly-Gen airborne wind energy systems (AWESs) are refined to include the contribution from the aerodynamic wake. A novel power coefficient is defined by normalizing the aerodynamic power with the wind power passing through a disk with a radius equal to the AWES wingspan, allowing us to compare systems with different wingspans. Ground-Gen and Fly-Gen AWESs are compared in terms of their aerodynamic power potential.
Filippo Trevisi, Iván Castro-Fernández, Gregorio Pasquinelli, Carlo Emanuele Dionigi Riboldi, and Alessandro Croce
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 2039–2058, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2039-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2039-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The optimal control problem for the flight trajectories of Fly-Gen AWESs is expressed with a novel methodology in the frequency domain through a harmonic balance formulation. The solution gives the optimal trajectory and the optimal control inputs. Optimal trajectories have a circular shape squashed along the vertical direction, and the optimal control inputs can be modeled with only one or two harmonics. Analytical approximations for optimal trajectory characteristics are also given.
Sabrina Milani, Jessica Leoni, Stefano Cacciola, Alessandro Croce, and Mara Tanelli
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-153, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-153, 2025
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
This work introduces a novel method to detect and quantify uniform pitch misalignment in wind turbines. This fault, where all blades are equally misaligned, is hard to detect because it causes no immediate imbalance but reduces efficiency over time. By combining physics-based features with machine learning techniques, our approach reliably identifies and quantifies this fault under various wind regime conditions, improving turbine maintenance and energy production.
Filippo Trevisi, Gianni Cassoni, Mac Gaunaa, and Lorenzo Mario Fagiano
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-134, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-134, 2025
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
This paper investigates the optimal aerodynamic design of the wing and of the onboard turbines of the aircraft of fly-gen Airborne Wind Energy Systems, named windplane here, with a novel comprehensive engineering aerodynamic model and with the vortex particle method implemented in DUST. Placing the turbines at the wing tips, rotating them inboard down with low tip speed ratio and using conventional efficient airfoils for the wing is found to be optimal for windplanes.
Sabrina Milani, Jessica Leoni, Stefano Cacciola, Alessandro Croce, and Mara Tanelli
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 497–510, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-497-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-497-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, we propose a novel machine-learning framework for pitch misalignment detection in wind turbines. Using a minimal set of standard sensors, our method detects misalignments as small as 0.1° and localizes the affected blades. It combines signal processing with a hierarchical classification structure and linear regression for precise severity quantification. Evaluation results validate the approach, showing notable accuracy in misalignment classification, regression, and localization.
Alessandro Croce, Stefano Cacciola, and Federico Isella
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1211–1227, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1211-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1211-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
For a few years now, various techniques have been studied to maximize the energy production of a wind farm, that is, from a system consisting of several wind turbines. These wind farm controller techniques are often analyzed individually and can generate loads higher than the design ones on the individual wind turbine. In this paper we study the simultaneous use of two different techniques with the goal of finding the optimal combination that at the same time preserves the design loads.
Filippo Trevisi, Carlo E. D. Riboldi, and Alessandro Croce
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1639–1650, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1639-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1639-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The power equations of crosswind Ground-Gen and Fly-Gen airborne wind energy systems (AWESs) are refined to include the contribution from the aerodynamic wake. A novel power coefficient is defined by normalizing the aerodynamic power with the wind power passing through a disk with a radius equal to the AWES wingspan, allowing us to compare systems with different wingspans. Ground-Gen and Fly-Gen AWESs are compared in terms of their aerodynamic power potential.
Roger Bergua, Amy Robertson, Jason Jonkman, Emmanuel Branlard, Alessandro Fontanella, Marco Belloli, Paolo Schito, Alberto Zasso, Giacomo Persico, Andrea Sanvito, Ervin Amet, Cédric Brun, Guillén Campaña-Alonso, Raquel Martín-San-Román, Ruolin Cai, Jifeng Cai, Quan Qian, Wen Maoshi, Alec Beardsell, Georg Pirrung, Néstor Ramos-García, Wei Shi, Jie Fu, Rémi Corniglion, Anaïs Lovera, Josean Galván, Tor Anders Nygaard, Carlos Renan dos Santos, Philippe Gilbert, Pierre-Antoine Joulin, Frédéric Blondel, Eelco Frickel, Peng Chen, Zhiqiang Hu, Ronan Boisard, Kutay Yilmazlar, Alessandro Croce, Violette Harnois, Lijun Zhang, Ye Li, Ander Aristondo, Iñigo Mendikoa Alonso, Simone Mancini, Koen Boorsma, Feike Savenije, David Marten, Rodrigo Soto-Valle, Christian W. Schulz, Stefan Netzband, Alessandro Bianchini, Francesco Papi, Stefano Cioni, Pau Trubat, Daniel Alarcon, Climent Molins, Marion Cormier, Konstantin Brüker, Thorsten Lutz, Qing Xiao, Zhongsheng Deng, Florence Haudin, and Akhilesh Goveas
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 465–485, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-465-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-465-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This work examines if the motion experienced by an offshore floating wind turbine can significantly affect the rotor performance. It was observed that the system motion results in variations in the load, but these variations are not critical, and the current simulation tools capture the physics properly. Interestingly, variations in the rotor speed or the blade pitch angle can have a larger impact than the system motion itself.
Koen Boorsma, Gerard Schepers, Helge Aagard Madsen, Georg Pirrung, Niels Sørensen, Galih Bangga, Manfred Imiela, Christian Grinderslev, Alexander Meyer Forsting, Wen Zhong Shen, Alessandro Croce, Stefano Cacciola, Alois Peter Schaffarczyk, Brandon Lobo, Frederic Blondel, Philippe Gilbert, Ronan Boisard, Leo Höning, Luca Greco, Claudio Testa, Emmanuel Branlard, Jason Jonkman, and Ganesh Vijayakumar
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 211–230, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-211-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-211-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Within the framework of the fourth phase of the International Energy Agency's (IEA) Wind Task 29, a large comparison exercise between measurements and aeroelastic simulations has been carried out. Results were obtained from more than 19 simulation tools of various fidelity, originating from 12 institutes and compared to state-of-the-art field measurements. The result is a unique insight into the current status and accuracy of rotor aerodynamic modeling.
Filippo Trevisi, Iván Castro-Fernández, Gregorio Pasquinelli, Carlo Emanuele Dionigi Riboldi, and Alessandro Croce
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 2039–2058, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2039-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2039-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The optimal control problem for the flight trajectories of Fly-Gen AWESs is expressed with a novel methodology in the frequency domain through a harmonic balance formulation. The solution gives the optimal trajectory and the optimal control inputs. Optimal trajectories have a circular shape squashed along the vertical direction, and the optimal control inputs can be modeled with only one or two harmonics. Analytical approximations for optimal trajectory characteristics are also given.
Alessandro Bianchini, Galih Bangga, Ian Baring-Gould, Alessandro Croce, José Ignacio Cruz, Rick Damiani, Gareth Erfort, Carlos Simao Ferreira, David Infield, Christian Navid Nayeri, George Pechlivanoglou, Mark Runacres, Gerard Schepers, Brent Summerville, David Wood, and Alice Orrell
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 2003–2037, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2003-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2003-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The paper is part of the Grand Challenges Papers for Wind Energy. It provides a status of small wind turbine technology in terms of technical maturity, diffusion, and cost. Then, five grand challenges that are thought to be key to fostering the development of the technology are proposed. To tackle these challenges, a series of unknowns and gaps are first identified and discussed. Improvement areas are highlighted, within which 10 key enabling actions are finally proposed to the wind community.
Alessandro Croce, Stefano Cacciola, and Luca Sartori
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1–17, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In recent years, research has focused on the development of wind farm controllers with the aim of minimizing interactions between machines and thus improving the production of the wind farm.
In this work we have analyzed the effects of these recent technologies on a single wind turbine, with the aim of understanding the impact of these controllers on the design of the machine itself.
The analyses have shown there are non-negligible effects on some components of the wind turbine.
Cited articles
Akberali, A. F. K., Kheiri, M., and Bourgault, F.: Generalized aerodynamic
models for crosswind kite power systems, J. Wind Eng. Indust. Aerodyn., 215, 104664, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2021.104664, 2021. a
Anderson, J.: Fundamentals of Aerodynamics, in: 6th Edn., McGraw-Hill Education, ISBN 9781259129919, 2017. a
Archer, C. L.: An Introduction to Meteorology for Airborne Wind Energy, in:
Airborne Wind Energy, edited by: Ahrens, U., Diehl, M., and Schmehl, R.,
Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 81–94, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39965-7_5, 2013. a
Bauer, F., Kennel, R. M., Hackl, C. M., Campagnolo, F., Patt, M., and Schmehl, R.: Drag power kite with very high lift coefficient, Renew. Energy, 118, 290–305, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.10.073, 2018. a, b
Branlard, E.: Wind Turbine Aerodynamics and Vorticity-Based Methods, Springer
Cham, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55164-7, 2017. a, b, c
Branlard, E., Brownstein, I., Strom, B., Jonkman, J., Dana, S., and
Baring-Gould, E. I.: A multipurpose lifting-line flow solver for arbitrary
wind energy concepts, Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 455–467,
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-455-2022, 2022. a
Castro-Fernández, I., Borobia-Moreno, R., Cavallaro, R., and Sánchez-Arriaga,
G.: Three-Dimensional Unsteady Aerodynamic Analysis of a Rigid-Framed Delta
Kite Applied to Airborne Wind Energy, Energies, 14, 8080, https://doi.org/10.3390/en14238080, 2021. a
Costello, S., Costello, C., François, G., and Bonvin, D.: Analysis of the maximum efficiency of kite-power systems, J. Renew. Sustain. Energ., 7, 053108, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4931111, 2015. a
Damiani, R., Wendt, F. F., Jonkman, J. M., and Sicard, J.: A Vortex Step Method for Nonlinear Airfoil Polar Data as Implemented in KiteAeroDyn, in: AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum, 7–11 January 2019, San Diego, California, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2019-0804, 2019. a, b
De Lellis, M., Reginatto, R., Saraiva, R., and Trofino, A.: The Betz limit
applied to Airborne Wind Energy, Renew. Energy, 127, 32–40,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.04.034, 2018. a, b
de Vaal, J. B., Hansen, M. O. L., and Moan, T.: Validation of a vortex ring
wake model suited for aeroelastic simulations of floating wind turbines, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 555, 012025, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/555/1/012025, 2014. a
Haas, T. and Meyers, J.: Comparison study between wind turbine and power kite
wakes, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 854, 012019, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/854/1/012019, 2017. a
Haas, T., Schutter, J. D., Diehl, M., and Meyers, J.: Wake characteristics of
pumping mode airborne wind energy systems, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1256, 012016, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1256/1/012016, 2019. a
Karakouzian, M. M., Kheiri, M., and Bourgault, F.: A survey of two analytical
wake models for crosswind kite power systems, Phys.f Fluids, 34, 097111, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0102388, 2022. a
Kaufman-Martin, S., Naclerio, N., May, P., and Luzzatto-Fegiz, P.: An
entrainment-based model for annular wakes, with applications to airborne wind
energy, Wind Energy, 25, 419–431, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2679, 2021. a, b
Kheiri, M., Bourgault, F., Saberi Nasrabad, V., and Victor, S.: On the
aerodynamic performance of crosswind kite power systems, J. Wind Eng. Indust. Aerodynam., 181, 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2018.08.006, 2018. a, b, c
Kheiri, M., Saberi Nasrabad, V., and Bourgault, F.: A new perspective on the
aerodynamic performance and power limit of crosswind kite systems, J. Wind Eng. Indust. Aerodynam., 190, 190–199, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2019.04.010, 2019. a
Kheiri, M., Victor, S., Rangriz, S., Karakouzian, M. M., and Bourgault, F.:
Aerodynamic Performance and Wake Flow of Crosswind Kite Power Systems,
Energies, 15, 2449, https://doi.org/10.3390/en15072449, 2022. a
Leuthold, R., Crawford, C., Gros, S., and Diehl, M.: Engineering Wake Induction Model For Axisymmetric Multi-Kite Systems, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1256, 012009, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1256/1/012009, 2019. a
Marten, D., Lennie, M., Pechlivanoglou, G., Nayeri, C. N., and Paschereit, C. O.: Implementation, Optimization, and Validation of a Nonlinear Lifting Line-Free Vortex Wake Module Within the Wind Turbine Simulation Code QBLADE, J. Eng. Gas Turb. Power, 138, 072601, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4031872, 2015. a
Mehr, J. A., Alvarez, E. J., and Ning, A.: Unsteady Aerodynamic Analysis of
Wind Harvesting Aircraft, in: AIAA Aviation 2020 Forum, 15–19 June 2020, virtual, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2020-2761, 2020. a
Phillips, W. F., Anderson, E. A., Jenkins, J. C., and Sunouchi, S.: Estimating the Low-Speed Downwash Angle on an Aft Tail, J. Aircraft, 39,
600–608, https://doi.org/10.2514/2.2998, 2002. a, b, c
Trevisi, F., Gaunaa, M., and Mcwilliam, M.: The Influence of Tether Sag on
Airborne Wind Energy Generation, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1618, 032006, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1618/3/032006, 2020a. a, b
Trevisi, F., Gaunaa, M., and Mcwilliam, M.: Unified engineering models for the performance and cost of Ground-Gen and Fly-Gen crosswind Airborne Wind Energy Systems, Renew. Energy, 162, 893–907, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.07.129, 2020b. a
Trevisi, F., Croce, A., and Riboldi, C. E. D.: Flight Stability of Rigid Wing Airborne Wind Energy Systems, Energies, 14, 7704, https://doi.org/10.3390/en14227704, 2021a. a, b, c
Trevisi, F., McWilliam, M., and Gaunaa, M.: Configuration optimization and
global sensitivity analysis of Ground-Gen and Fly-Gen Airborne Wind Energy
Systems, Renew. Energy, 178, 385–402, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.06.011,
2021b. a
Trevisi, F., Castro-Fernández, I., Pasquinelli, G., Riboldi, C. E. D., and Croce, A.: Flight trajectory optimization of Fly-Gen airborne wind energy
systems through a harmonic balance method, Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 2039–2058, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2039-2022, 2022a.
a, b
Trevisi, F., Riboldi, C. E. D., and Croce, A.: Sensitivity analysis of a
Ground-Gen Airborne Wind Energy System design, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 2265, 042067, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2265/4/042067, 2022b. a
Trevisi, F., Riboldi, C. E. D., and Croce, A.: Figures: Vortex model of the aerodynamic wake of airborne wind energy systems, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8027915, 2023. a
TU Berlin: QBlade next generation wind turbine design and simulation,
https://qblade.org/ (last access: 10 December 2022), 2022. a
Vermillion, C., Cobb, M., Fagiano, L., Leuthold, R., Diehl, M., Smith, R. S.,
Wood, T. A., Rapp, S., Schmehl, R., Olinger, D., and Demetriou, M.:
Electricity in the air: Insights from two decades of advanced control
research and experimental flight testing of airborne wind energy systems,
Annu. Rev. Control, 52, 330–357, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2021.03.002, 2021. a
Viré, A., Demkowicz, P., Folkersma, M., Roullier, A., and Schmehl, R.:
Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulations of the flow past a leading edge inflatable wing for airborne wind energy applications, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1618, 032007, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1618/3/032007, 2020. a
Download
The requested paper has a corresponding corrigendum published. Please read the corrigendum first before downloading the article.
- Article
(5986 KB) - Full-text XML
Short summary
Modeling the aerodynamic wake of airborne wind energy systems (AWESs) is crucial to properly estimating power production and to designing such systems. The velocities induced at the AWES from its own wake are studied with a model for the near wake and one for the far wake, using vortex methods. The model is validated with the lifting-line free-vortex wake method implemented in QBlade.
Modeling the aerodynamic wake of airborne wind energy systems (AWESs) is crucial to properly...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint