Articles | Volume 7, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1069-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1069-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
24 May 2022
Research article |
| 24 May 2022
| 24 May 2022
Comparing and validating intra-farm and farm-to-farm wakes across different mesoscale and high-resolution wake models
Department of Wind and Energy Systems, Technical University of Denmark, Roskilde, Denmark
Kurt Schaldemose Hansen
Department of Wind and Energy Systems, Technical University of Denmark, Roskilde, Denmark
Xiaoli Guo Larsén
Department of Wind and Energy Systems, Technical University of Denmark, Roskilde, Denmark
Maarten Paul van der Laan
Department of Wind and Energy Systems, Technical University of Denmark, Roskilde, Denmark
Pierre-Elouan Réthoré
Department of Wind and Energy Systems, Technical University of Denmark, Roskilde, Denmark
Juan Pablo Murcia Leon
Department of Wind and Energy Systems, Technical University of Denmark, Roskilde, Denmark
Related authors
Sima Hamzeloo, Xiaoli Guo Larsén, Alfredo Peña, Jana Fischereit, and Oscar García-Santiago
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-267, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-267, 2026
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
We studied how winds and ocean waves affect each other during a North Sea storm. Using a multiscale approach that captures processes from kilometers down to meters, we linked wind and wave models and compared the results with real measurements. Our aim was to improve current simulation methods, and the findings show that this detailed approach provides more accurate storm predictions up to 100 m height.
Jana Fischereit, Bjarke T. E. Olsen, Marc Imberger, Henrik Vedel, Kristian H. Møller, Andrea N. Hahmann, and Xiaoli Guo Larsén
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5407, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5407, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
We evaluated how operating wind farms influence the atmosphere in numerical weather prediction using two wind farm parameterizations in the HARMONIE-AROME model, applied by over 10 European weather services. Accurate yield forecasts require including both onshore and offshore turbines. Wind turbines slightly alter near-surface temperature (<1 K on average). We also present an open-access European wind turbine dataset combining multiple data sources.
Jana Fischereit, Henrik Vedel, Xiaoli Guo Larsén, Natalie E. Theeuwes, Gregor Giebel, and Eigil Kaas
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2855–2875, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2855-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2855-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Wind farms impact local wind and turbulence. To incorporate these effects in weather forecasting, the explicit wake parameterization (EWP) is added to the forecasting model HARMONIE–AROME. We evaluate EWP using flight data above and downstream of wind farms, comparing it with an alternative wind farm parameterization and another weather model. Results affirm the correct implementation of EWP, emphasizing the necessity of accounting for wind farm effects in accurate weather forecasting.
Xiaoli G. Larsén and Jana Fischereit
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3141–3158, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3141-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3141-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
For the first time, turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) calculated from the explicit wake parameterization (EWP) in WRF is examined using high-frequency measurements over a wind farm and compared with that calculated using the Fitch et al. (2012) scheme. We examined the effect of farm-induced TKE advection in connection with the Fitch scheme. Through a case study with a low-level jet (LLJ), we analyzed the key features of LLJs and raised the issue of interaction between wind farms and LLJs.
Sima Hamzeloo, Xiaoli Guo Larsén, Alfredo Peña, Jana Fischereit, and Oscar García-Santiago
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-267, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-267, 2026
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
We studied how winds and ocean waves affect each other during a North Sea storm. Using a multiscale approach that captures processes from kilometers down to meters, we linked wind and wave models and compared the results with real measurements. Our aim was to improve current simulation methods, and the findings show that this detailed approach provides more accurate storm predictions up to 100 m height.
Keeta Chapman-Smith, Xiaoli Guo Larsén, and Mark Laier Brodersen
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-269, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-269, 2026
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents a method to estimate wind speeds which could occur in a 50-year period. The 50-year wind speed is calculated for three regions: Taiwan, Japan, and the east coast of the United States of America. The method performs well in Taiwan and Japan which can be attributed to the large dataset size located within a limited spatial area. The east coast of the United States performs less well due to the smaller dataset size and wider spatial region of which they cover.
Maarten Paul van der Laan, Alexander Meyer Forsting, and Pierre-Elouan Réthoré
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-287, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-287, 2026
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
Wind turbine interaction can lead to energy losses. This article introduces a fast open source wind turbine interaction model that can be used to design energy efficient wind farms including effects of atmospheric turbulence and temperature. The model can inherit the accuracy of a higher fidelity model while being about five orders of magnitude faster. However, the model is an order of magnitude slower than analytic wind turbine interaction models, and more research is needed to reduce it.
Jana Fischereit, Bjarke T. E. Olsen, Marc Imberger, Henrik Vedel, Kristian H. Møller, Andrea N. Hahmann, and Xiaoli Guo Larsén
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5407, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5407, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
We evaluated how operating wind farms influence the atmosphere in numerical weather prediction using two wind farm parameterizations in the HARMONIE-AROME model, applied by over 10 European weather services. Accurate yield forecasts require including both onshore and offshore turbines. Wind turbines slightly alter near-surface temperature (<1 K on average). We also present an open-access European wind turbine dataset combining multiple data sources.
Xiaoli Guo Larsén, Marc Imberger, and Rogier Floors
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-245, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-245, 2025
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
This study delivers a method and datasets for a global offshore atlas for turbulence intensity from height 10 m to 200 m. The method innovatively includes both two-dimensional and three-dimensional turbulence, stability, wave age and height. Results show satisfactory agreement with measurements and data from the literature.
Jens Peter Schøler, Frederik Peder Weilmann Rasmussen, Julian Quick, and Pierre-Eloaun Réthoré
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-261, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-261, 2025
Revised manuscript under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
We built a machine learning model that predicts how wind moves through an entire wind farm. It learns from many detailed simulations and uses the novel idea of graph learning to scale to larger farms. The model captures complex wake effects better than older methods and cuts computing costs, letting designers explore many layouts quickly without running expensive full simulations.
Nathalia Correa-Sánchez, Xiaoli Guo Larsén, Giorgia Fosser, Eleonora Dallan, Marco Borga, and Francesco Marra
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 2551–2561, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-2551-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-2551-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We examined the power spectra of wind speed in three convection-permitting models in central Europe and found that these models have a better representation of wind variability characteristics than standard wind datasets like the New European Wind Atlas, due to different simulation approaches, providing more reliable extreme wind predictions.
Nathalia Correa-Sánchez, Xiaoli Guo Larsén, Eleonora Dallan, Marco Borga, and Fracesco Marra
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-172, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-172, 2025
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
This research presents the first use of SMEV for wind extremes, extending it to wind energy applications. We use a categories framework combining climate, roughness, and topography for CPM evaluation. We find that model formulation drives inter-model uncertainties, rather than surface conditions. Also, there is a higher model agreement in winter (synoptic) and lower in summer (convective). CPM uncertainty analysis improves the reliability of extreme winds for design parameters.
Julia Steiner, Emily Louise Hodgson, Maarten Paul van der Laan, Leonardo Alcayaga, Mads Pedersen, Søren Juhl Andersen, Gunner Larsen, and Pierre-Elouan Réthoré
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-200, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-200, 2025
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
Wake steering is a promising strategy for wind farm optimization, but its success hinges on accurate wake models. We assess models of varying fidelity for the IEA 22 MW turbine, comparing single- and two-turbine cases against LES. All reproduced qualitative trends for power and if applicable loads, but quantitative agreement varied and in general the error increased with increasing yaw angle.
Thuy-Hai Nguyen, Julian Quick, Pierre-Elouan Réthoré, Jean-François Toubeau, Emmanuel De Jaeger, and François Vallée
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 1661–1680, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1661-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1661-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Current offshore wind farms have been designed to maximize their production of electricity at all times and not to keep a reserve of power in case of unexpected events on the grid. We present a new formulation for designing wind farms to maximize revenues from both energy and reserve markets. We apply it to a real-life wind farm and show that profits are expected to increase in a significant way for wind farms designed and operated for reserve, with less energy supplied.
Julian Quick, Edward Hart, Marcus Binder Nilsen, Rasmus Sode Lund, Jaime Liew, Piinshin Huang, Pierre-Elouan Rethore, Jonathan Keller, Wooyong Song, and Yi Guo
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-63, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-63, 2025
Revised manuscript accepted for WES
Short summary
Short summary
Wind turbine main bearings often fail prematurely, creating costly maintenance challenges. This study examined how wake effects – where upstream turbines create disturbed airflow that impacts downstream turbines – affect bearing lifespans. Using computer simulations, we found that wake effects reduce bearing life by 16% on average. The direction of wake impact matters significantly due to interactions between wind forces and gravity, informing better wind turbine and farm farm design strategies.
Branko Kosović, Sukanta Basu, Jacob Berg, Larry K. Berg, Sue E. Haupt, Xiaoli G. Larsén, Joachim Peinke, Richard J. A. M. Stevens, Paul Veers, and Simon Watson
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-42, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-42, 2025
Revised manuscript accepted for WES
Short summary
Short summary
Most human activity happens in the layer of the atmosphere which extends a few hundred meters to a couple of kilometers above the surface of the Earth. The flow in this layer is turbulent. Turbulence impacts wind power production and turbine lifespan. Optimizing wind turbine performance requires understanding how turbulence affects both wind turbine efficiency and reliability. This paper points to gaps in our knowledge that need to be addressed to effectively utilize wind resources.
Mads Baungaard, Takafumi Nishino, and Maarten Paul van der Laan
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-50, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-50, 2025
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Short summary
A systematic comparison between 2D and 3D Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulations of wind farm flows have been conducted. It is found that the 2D simulations are, at least, two orders of magnitude computationally cheaper than their corresponding 3D simulations, while the predicted farm power is within -30 % to 15 % for all cases considered. The large computational speed-ups and sensible results makes 2D simulations a promising option in the low- to mid-fidelity range.
Juan Felipe Céspedes Moreno, Juan Pablo Murcia León, and Søren Juhl Andersen
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 597–611, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-597-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-597-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Using a global base in a proper orthogonal decomposition provides a common base for analyzing flows, such as wind turbine wakes, across an entire parameter space. This can be used to compare flows with different conditions using the same physical interpretation. This work shows the convergence of the global base, its small error compared to the truncation error in the flow reconstruction, and the insensitivity to which datasets are included for generating the global base.
Charbel Assaad, Juan Pablo Murcia Leon, Julian Quick, Tuhfe Göçmen, Sami Ghazouani, and Kaushik Das
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 559–578, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-559-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-559-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This research develops a new method for assessing hybrid power plant (HPP) profitability, combining wind and battery systems. It addresses the need for an efficient, accurate, and comprehensive operational model by approximating a state-of-the-art energy management system (EMS) for spot market power bidding using machine learning. The approach significantly reduces computational demands while maintaining high accuracy. It thus opens new possibilities in terms of optimizing the design of HPPs.
Sara Müller, Xiaoli Guo Larsén, and Fei Hu
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-7, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-7, 2025
Revised manuscript under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
Wind farms are being developed in areas prone to tropical cyclones. However, it remains unclear whether turbulence models in current design standards, such as the Mann uniform shear model, are suitable for these conditions. For the first time the Mann model is assessed using high-frequency tropical cyclone measurements from four typhoons. Enhanced spectral energy is found at low wavenumbers, especially in the crosswind component during typhoon conditions.
Maarten Paul van der Laan, Mark Kelly, Mads Baungaard, Antariksh Dicholkar, and Emily Louise Hodgson
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1985–2000, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1985-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1985-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Wind turbines are increasing in size and operate more frequently above the atmospheric surface layer, which requires improved inflow models for numerical simulations of turbine interaction. In this work, a novel steady-state model of the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) is introduced. Numerical wind turbine flow simulations subjected to shallow and tall ABLs are conducted, and the proposed model shows improved performance compared to other state-of-the-art steady-state models.
Jens Visbech, Tuhfe Göçmen, Özge Sinem Özçakmak, Alexander Meyer Forsting, Ásta Hannesdóttir, and Pierre-Elouan Réthoré
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1811–1826, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1811-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1811-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Leading-edge erosion (LEE) can impact wind turbine aerodynamics and wind farm efficiency. This study couples LEE prediction, aerodynamic loss modeling, and wind farm flow modeling to show that LEE's effects on wake dynamics can affect overall energy production. Without preventive initiatives, the effects of LEE increase over time, resulting in significant annual energy production (AEP) loss.
Sara Müller, Xiaoli Guo Larsén, and David Robert Verelst
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1153–1171, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1153-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1153-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Tropical cyclone winds are challenging for wind turbines. We analyze a tropical cyclone before landfall in a mesoscale model. The simulated wind speeds and storm structure are sensitive to the boundary parametrization. However, independent of the boundary layer parametrization, the median change in wind speed and wind direction with height is small relative to wind turbine design standards. Strong spatial organization of wind shear and veer along the rainbands may increase wind turbine loads.
Jana Fischereit, Henrik Vedel, Xiaoli Guo Larsén, Natalie E. Theeuwes, Gregor Giebel, and Eigil Kaas
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2855–2875, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2855-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2855-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Wind farms impact local wind and turbulence. To incorporate these effects in weather forecasting, the explicit wake parameterization (EWP) is added to the forecasting model HARMONIE–AROME. We evaluate EWP using flight data above and downstream of wind farms, comparing it with an alternative wind farm parameterization and another weather model. Results affirm the correct implementation of EWP, emphasizing the necessity of accounting for wind farm effects in accurate weather forecasting.
Juan Pablo Murcia Leon, Hajar Habbou, Mikkel Friis-Møller, Megha Gupta, Rujie Zhu, and Kaushik Das
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 759–776, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-759-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-759-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A methodology for an early design of hybrid power plants (wind, solar, PV, and Li-ion battery storage) consisting of a nested optimization that sizes the components and internal operation optimization. Traditional designs that minimize the levelized cost of energy give worse business cases and do not include storage. Optimal operation balances the increasing revenues and faster battery degradation. Battery degradation and replacement costs are needed to estimate the viability of hybrid projects.
Javier Criado Risco, Rafael Valotta Rodrigues, Mikkel Friis-Møller, Julian Quick, Mads Mølgaard Pedersen, and Pierre-Elouan Réthoré
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 585–600, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-585-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-585-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Wind energy developers frequently have to face some spatial restrictions at the time of designing a new wind farm due to different reasons, such as the existence of protected natural areas around the wind farm location, fishing routes, and the presence of buildings. Wind farm design has to account for these restricted areas, but sometimes this is not straightforward to achieve. We have developed a methodology that allows for different inclusion and exclusion areas in the optimization framework.
Rafael Valotta Rodrigues, Mads Mølgaard Pedersen, Jens Peter Schøler, Julian Quick, and Pierre-Elouan Réthoré
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 321–341, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-321-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-321-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The use of wind energy has been growing over the last few decades, and further increase is predicted. As the wind energy industry is starting to consider larger wind farms, the existing numerical methods for analysis of small and medium wind farms need to be improved. In this article, we have explored different strategies to tackle the problem in a feasible and timely way. The final product is a set of recommendations when carrying out trade-off analysis on large wind farms.
Julian Quick, Pierre-Elouan Rethore, Mads Mølgaard Pedersen, Rafael Valotta Rodrigues, and Mikkel Friis-Møller
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1235–1250, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1235-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1235-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Wind turbine positions are often optimized to avoid wake losses. These losses depend on atmospheric conditions, such as the wind speed and direction. The typical optimization scheme involves discretizing the atmospheric inputs, then considering every possible set of these discretized inputs in every optimization iteration. This work presents stochastic gradient descent (SGD) as an alternative, which randomly samples the atmospheric conditions during every optimization iteration.
Mark Kelly and Maarten Paul van der Laan
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 975–998, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-975-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-975-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The turning of the wind with height, which is known as veer, can affect wind turbine performance. Thus far meteorology has only given idealized descriptions of veer, which has not yet been related in a way readily usable for wind energy. Here we derive equations for veer in terms of meteorological quantities and provide practically usable forms in terms of measurable shear (change in wind speed with height). Flow simulations and measurements at turbine heights support these developments.
Maarten Paul van der Laan, Oscar García-Santiago, Mark Kelly, Alexander Meyer Forsting, Camille Dubreuil-Boisclair, Knut Sponheim Seim, Marc Imberger, Alfredo Peña, Niels Nørmark Sørensen, and Pierre-Elouan Réthoré
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 819–848, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-819-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-819-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Offshore wind farms are more commonly installed in wind farm clusters, where wind farm interaction can lead to energy losses. In this work, an efficient numerical method is presented that can be used to estimate these energy losses. The novel method is verified with higher-fidelity numerical models and validated with measurements of an existing wind farm cluster.
Camilla Marie Nyborg, Andreas Fischer, Pierre-Elouan Réthoré, and Ju Feng
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 255–276, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-255-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-255-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Our article presents a way of optimizing the wind farm operation by keeping the emitted noise level below a defined limit while maximizing the power output. This is done by switching between noise reducing operational modes. The method has been developed by using two different noise models, one more advanced than the other, to study the advantages of each model. Furthermore, the optimization method is applied to different wind farm cases.
Maarten Paul van der Laan, Mads Baungaard, and Mark Kelly
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 247–254, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-247-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-247-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Understanding wind turbine wake recovery is important to mitigate energy losses in wind farms. Wake recovery is often assumed or explained to be dependent on the first-order derivative of velocity. In this work we show that wind turbine wakes recover mainly due to the second-order derivative of the velocity, which transport momentum from the freestream towards the wake center. The wake recovery mechanisms and results of a high-fidelity numerical simulation are illustrated using a simple model.
Xiaoli Guo Larsén, Marc Imberger, Ásta Hannesdóttir, and Andrea N. Hahmann
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2022-102, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2022-102, 2023
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
We study how climate change will impact extreme winds and choice of turbine class. We use data from 18 CMIP6 members from a historic and a future period to access the change in the extreme winds. The analysis shows an overall increase in the extreme winds in the North Sea and the southern Baltic Sea, but a decrease over the Scandinavian Peninsula and most of the Baltic Sea. The analysis is inconclusive to whether higher or lower classes of turbines will be installed in the future.
Xiaoli Guo Larsén and Søren Ott
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 2457–2468, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2457-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2457-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A method is developed for calculating the extreme wind in tropical-cyclone-affected water areas. The method is based on the spectral correction method that fills in the missing wind variability to the modeled time series, guided by best track data. The paper provides a detailed recipe for applying the method and the 50-year winds of equivalent 10 min temporal resolution from 10 to 150 m in several tropical-cyclone-affected regions.
Søren Juhl Andersen and Juan Pablo Murcia Leon
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 2117–2133, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2117-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2117-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Simulating the turbulent flow inside large wind farms is inherently complex and computationally expensive. A new and fast model is developed based on data from high-fidelity simulations. The model captures the flow dynamics with correct statistics for a wide range of flow conditions. The model framework provides physical insights and presents a generalization of high-fidelity simulation results beyond the case-specific scenarios, which has significant potential for future turbulence modeling.
Mads Baungaard, Stefan Wallin, Maarten Paul van der Laan, and Mark Kelly
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1975–2002, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1975-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1975-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Wind turbine wakes in the neutral atmospheric surface layer are simulated with Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) using an explicit algebraic Reynolds stress model. Contrary to standard two-equation turbulence models, it can predict turbulence anisotropy and complex physical phenomena like secondary motions. For the cases considered, it improves Reynolds stress, turbulence intensity, and velocity deficit predictions, although a more top-hat-shaped profile is observed for the latter.
Tuhfe Göçmen, Filippo Campagnolo, Thomas Duc, Irene Eguinoa, Søren Juhl Andersen, Vlaho Petrović, Lejla Imširović, Robert Braunbehrens, Jaime Liew, Mads Baungaard, Maarten Paul van der Laan, Guowei Qian, Maria Aparicio-Sanchez, Rubén González-Lope, Vinit V. Dighe, Marcus Becker, Maarten J. van den Broek, Jan-Willem van Wingerden, Adam Stock, Matthew Cole, Renzo Ruisi, Ervin Bossanyi, Niklas Requate, Simon Strnad, Jonas Schmidt, Lukas Vollmer, Ishaan Sood, and Johan Meyers
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1791–1825, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1791-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1791-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The FarmConners benchmark is the first of its kind to bring a wide variety of data sets, control settings, and model complexities for the (initial) assessment of wind farm flow control benefits. Here we present the first part of the benchmark results for three blind tests with large-scale rotors and 11 participating models in total, via direct power comparisons at the turbines as well as the observed or estimated power gain at the wind farm level under wake steering control strategy.
Mads Baungaard, Maarten Paul van der Laan, and Mark Kelly
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 783–800, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-783-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-783-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Wind turbine wakes are dependent on the atmospheric conditions, and it is therefore important to be able to simulate in various different atmospheric conditions. This paper concerns the specific case of an unstable atmospheric surface layer, which is the lower part of the typical daytime atmospheric boundary layer. A simple flow model is suggested and tested for a range of single-wake scenarios, and it shows promising results for velocity deficit predictions.
Anna Rutgersson, Erik Kjellström, Jari Haapala, Martin Stendel, Irina Danilovich, Martin Drews, Kirsti Jylhä, Pentti Kujala, Xiaoli Guo Larsén, Kirsten Halsnæs, Ilari Lehtonen, Anna Luomaranta, Erik Nilsson, Taru Olsson, Jani Särkkä, Laura Tuomi, and Norbert Wasmund
Earth Syst. Dynam., 13, 251–301, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-251-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-251-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A natural hazard is a naturally occurring extreme event with a negative effect on people, society, or the environment; major events in the study area include wind storms, extreme waves, high and low sea level, ice ridging, heavy precipitation, sea-effect snowfall, river floods, heat waves, ice seasons, and drought. In the future, an increase in sea level, extreme precipitation, heat waves, and phytoplankton blooms is expected, and a decrease in cold spells and severe ice winters is anticipated.
Marcus Reckermann, Anders Omstedt, Tarmo Soomere, Juris Aigars, Naveed Akhtar, Magdalena Bełdowska, Jacek Bełdowski, Tom Cronin, Michał Czub, Margit Eero, Kari Petri Hyytiäinen, Jukka-Pekka Jalkanen, Anders Kiessling, Erik Kjellström, Karol Kuliński, Xiaoli Guo Larsén, Michelle McCrackin, H. E. Markus Meier, Sonja Oberbeckmann, Kevin Parnell, Cristian Pons-Seres de Brauwer, Anneli Poska, Jarkko Saarinen, Beata Szymczycha, Emma Undeman, Anders Wörman, and Eduardo Zorita
Earth Syst. Dynam., 13, 1–80, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-1-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-1-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
As part of the Baltic Earth Assessment Reports (BEAR), we present an inventory and discussion of different human-induced factors and processes affecting the environment of the Baltic Sea region and their interrelations. Some are naturally occurring and modified by human activities, others are completely human-induced, and they are all interrelated to different degrees. The findings from this study can largely be transferred to other comparable marginal and coastal seas in the world.
Marc Imberger, Xiaoli Guo Larsén, and Neil Davis
Adv. Geosci., 56, 77–87, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-56-77-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-56-77-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Events like mid-latitude storms with their high winds have an impact on wind energy production and forecasting of such events is crucial. This study investigates the capabilities of a global weather prediction model MPAS and looks at how key parameters like storm intensity, arrival time and duration are represented compared to measurements and traditional methods. It is found that storm intensity is represented well while model drifts negatively influence estimation of arrival time and duration.
Xiaoli G. Larsén and Jana Fischereit
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3141–3158, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3141-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3141-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
For the first time, turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) calculated from the explicit wake parameterization (EWP) in WRF is examined using high-frequency measurements over a wind farm and compared with that calculated using the Fitch et al. (2012) scheme. We examined the effect of farm-induced TKE advection in connection with the Fitch scheme. Through a case study with a low-level jet (LLJ), we analyzed the key features of LLJs and raised the issue of interaction between wind farms and LLJs.
Maarten Paul van der Laan, Mark Kelly, and Mads Baungaard
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 777–790, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-777-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-777-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Wind farms operate in the atmospheric boundary layer, and their performance is strongly dependent on the atmospheric conditions. We propose a simple model of the atmospheric boundary layer that can be used as an inflow model for wind farm simulations for isolating a number of atmospheric effects – namely, the change in wind direction with height and atmospheric boundary layer depth. In addition, the simple model is shown to be consistent with two similarity theories.
Juan Pablo Murcia Leon, Matti Juhani Koivisto, Poul Sørensen, and Philippe Magnant
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 461–476, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-461-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-461-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Detailed wind generation simulations of the 2028 Belgian offshore fleet are performed in order to quantify the distribution and extremes of power fluctuations in several time windows. A model validation with respect to the operational data of the 2018 fleet shows that the methodology presented in this article is able to capture the distribution of wind power and its spatiotemporal characteristics. The results show that the standardized generation ramps are expected to be reduced in the future.
Cited articles
Apsley, D. D. and Castro, I. P.: A limited-length-scale K–ϵ model for the neutral and stably-stratified atmospheric boundary layer, Bound.-Lay.
Meteorol., 83, 75–98, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1000252210512, 1997. a, b
Archer, C. L., Wu, S., Ma, Y., and Jiménez, P. A.: Two corrections for
turbulent kinetic energy generated by wind farms in the WRF model, Mon.
Weather Rev., 148, 1–38, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-20-0097.1, 2020. a, b, c, d
Bastankhah, M. and Porté-Agel, F.: A new analytical model for wind-turbine wakes, Renew. Energy, 70, 116–123, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.01.002, 2014. a
Cañadillas, B., Foreman, R., Barth, V., Siedersleben, S., Lampert, A.,
Platis, A., Djath, B., Schulz‐Stellenfleth, J., Bange, J., Emeis, S., and
Neumann, T.: Offshore wind farm wake recovery: Airborne measurements and its
representation in engineering models, Wind Energy, 23, 1249–1265,
https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2484, 2020. a, b, c
Copernicus CMEMS: CMEMS Data Access Portal,
http://my.cmems-du.eu/motu-web/Motu (last access: 20 May 2022), 2022a. a
Copernicus CMEMS: TOPFARM, PyWake, Copernicus CMEMS [code],
https://gitlab.windenergy.dtu.dk/TOPFARM/PyWake (last access: 20 May 2022), 2022b. a
Dörenkämper, M., Olsen, B. T., Witha, B., Hahmann, A. N., Davis, N. N., Barcons, J., Ezber, Y., García-Bustamante, E., González-Rouco, J. F., Navarro, J., Sastre-Marugán, M., Sīle, T., Trei, W., Žagar, M., Badger, J., Gottschall, J., Sanz Rodrigo, J., and Mann, J.: The Making of the New European Wind Atlas – Part 2: Production and evaluation, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5079–5102, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5079-2020, 2020. a
Eriksson, O., Lindvall, J., Breton, S.-P., and Ivanell, S.: Wake downstream of the Lillgrund wind farm – A Comparison between LES using the actuator disc method and a Wind farm Parametrization in WRF, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 625, 012028, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/625/1/012028, 2015. a, b
Eriksson, O., Baltscheffsky, M., Breton, S.-P., Söderberg, S., and
Ivanell, S.: The Long distance wake behind Horns Rev I studied using large
eddy simulations and a wind turbine parameterization in WRF, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 854, 012012, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/854/1/012012, 2017. a, b
EWP: EWP, https://gitlab.windenergy.dtu.dk/WRF/EWP, last access: 20 May 2022. a
Fischereit, J., Hansen, K. S., Larsén, X. G., van der Laan, M. P.,
Réthoré, P.-E., and Murcia Leon, J. P.: WRF and PyWake
configuration files for publication “Comparing and validating intra-farm and
farm-to-farm wakes across different mesoscale and high-resolution wake
models”, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5570396, 2021. a
Gaumond, M., Réthoré, P.-E., Ott, S., Peña, A., Bechmann, A., and
Hansen, K. S.: Evaluation of the wind direction uncertainty and its impact on
wake modeling at the Horns Rev offshore wind farm, Wind Energy, 17, 1169,
https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1625, 2014. a, b
Göçmen, T., Laan, P. V. D., Réthoré, P. E., Diaz, A. P., Larsen, G. C., and Ott, S.: Wind turbine wake models developed at the
technical university of Denmark: A review, Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev., 60,
752–769, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.113, 2016. a
Hansen, K. S., Barthelmie, R. J., Jensen, L. E., and Sommer, A.: The impact of turbulence intensity and atmospheric stability on power deficits due to wind turbine wakes at Horns Rev wind farm, Wind Energy, 15, 183–196,
https://doi.org/10.1002/we.512, 2012. a
Hansen, K. S., Réthoré, P.-E., Palma, J., Hevia, B. G., Prospathopoulos, J., Peña, A., Ott, S., Schepers, G., Palomares, A.,
van der Laan, M. P., and Volker, P.: Simulation of wake effects between two
wind farms, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 625, 012008, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/625/1/012008, 2015. a, b, c, d, e
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Biavati, G., Horányi, A.,
Muñoz Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Rozum, I., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Dee, D., and Thépaut, J.-N.: ERA5
hourly data on single levels from 1979 to present, Copernicus Climate Change
Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS) [data set], https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.adbb2d47, 2018. a
Honnert, R., Efstathiou, G. A., Beare, R. J., Ito, J., Lock, A., Neggers, R.,
Plant, R. S., Shin, H. H., Tomassini, L., and Zhou, B.: The Atmospheric
Boundary Layer and the “Gray Zone” of Turbulence: A Critical Review, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD030317, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030317, 2020. a, b
Hoyer, S. and Hamman, J. J.: xarray: N-D labeled Arrays and Datasets in
Python, J. Open Res. Softw., 5, 10, https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.148, 2017. a
Hunter, J. D.: Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment, Comput. Sci. Eng., 9, 90–95, https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.55, 2007. a
Jensen, N. O.: A note on wind turbine interaction, Tech. rep., Technical
report Ris-M-2411, Risø National Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark,
https://backend.orbit.dtu.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/55857682/ris_m_2411.pdf (last access: 15 May 2022), 1983. a
Jiménez, P. A., Navarro, J., Palomares, A. M., and Dudhia, J.: Mesoscale
modeling of offshore wind turbine wakes at the wind farm resolving scale: a
composite-based analysis with the Weather Research and Forecasting model over
Horns Rev, Wind Energy, 18, 559–566, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1708, 2015. a, b
Lange, B., Larsen, S., Højstrup, J., and Barthelmie, R.: Importance of
thermal effects and sea surface roughness for offshore wind resource
assessment, J. Wind Eng. Indust. Aerodynam., 92, 959–988, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2004.05.005, 2004. a
Larsén, X., Volker, P., Imberger, M., Fischereit, J., Langor, E., Hahmann, A., Ahsbahs, T., Duin, M., Ott, S., Sørensen, P., Koivisto, M.,
Maule, P., Hawkins, S., Kishore, A., Du, J., Kanellas, P., Badger, J., and
Davis, N.: Linking calculation of wakes from offshore wind farm cluster to
the Danish power integration system, DTU,
https://orbit.dtu.dk/files/211172072/WinEuropeOffshore2019_Poster_PO160_Larsen.pdf
(last access: 15 May 2022), 2019. a
Larsén, X. G. and Fischereit, J.: A case study of wind farm effects using two wake parameterizations in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model (V3.7.1) in the presence of low-level jets, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3141–3158, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3141-2021, 2021. a
Lee, J. C. Y. and Lundquist, J. K.: Evaluation of the wind farm parameterization in the Weather Research and Forecasting model (version 3.8.1) with meteorological and turbine power data, Geosci. Model
Dev., 10, 4229–4244, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4229-2017, 2017. a
Lundquist, J. K., DuVivier, K. K., Kaffine, D., and Tomaszewski, J. M.: Costs
and consequences of wind turbine wake effects arising from uncoordinated wind
energy development, Nat. Energy, 4, 26–34, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0281-2, 2019. a, b
McKinney, W.: Data Structures for Statistical Computing in Python, in:
Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference, edited by: van der Walt,
S. and Millman, J., https://conference.scipy.org/proceedings/scipy2010/pdfs/mckinney.pdf (last access: 15 May 2022), 2010. a
Mehrens, A. R., Hahmann, A. N., Larsén, X. G., and von Bremen, L.:
Correlation and coherence of mesoscale wind speeds over the sea, Q. J. Roy.
Meteorol. Soc., 142, 3186–3194, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2900, 2016. a
Nygaard, N. G. and Hansen, S. D.: Wake effects between two neighbouring wind
farms, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 753, 032020, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/753/3/032020, 2016. a, b, c
Nygaard, N. G. and Newcombe, A. C.: Wake behind an offshore wind farm observed with dual-Doppler radars, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1037, 072008, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1037/7/072008, 2018. a
Nygaard, N. G., Steen, S. T., Poulsen, L., and Pedersen, J. G.: Modelling
cluster wakes and wind farm blockage, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1618, 062072, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1618/6/062072, 2020. a
Panofsky, H. A. and Dutton, J. A.: Atmospheric Turbulence, Wiley-interscience, ISBN 0471057142 9780471057147, 1984. a
Pedersen, M. M., van der Laan, P., Friis-Møller, M., Rinker, J., and
Réthoré, P.: DTUWindEnergy/PyWake: PyWake, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2562662, 2019. a, b, c, d
Porté-Agel, F., Bastankhah, M., and Shamsoddin, S.: Wind-Turbine and
Wind-Farm Flows: A Review, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 174, 1–59,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-019-00473-0, 2020. a, b
Poulsen, L.: 1.7_Poulsen: Validation of wind farm parametrisation in WRF
using wind farm data, Tech. rep., DTU, https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3637944, 2019. a
Réthoré, P.-E., van der Laan, P., Troldborg, N., Zahle, F., and
Sørensen, N. N.: Verification and validation of an actuator disc model,
Wind Energy, 17, 919–937, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1607, 2014. a
Schneemann, J., Theuer, F., Rott, A., Dörenkämper, M., and Kühn, M.: Offshore wind farm global blockage measured with scanning lidar, Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 521–538, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-521-2021, 2021. a, b
Shapiro, C. R., Gayme, D. F., and Meneveau, C.: Modelling yawed wind turbine
wakes: a lifting line approach, J. Fluid Mech., 841, R1–11, https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2018.75, 2018. a
Siedersleben, S. K., Platis, A., Lundquist, J. K., Djath, B., Lampert, A.,
Bärfuss, K., Cañadillas, B., Schulz-Stellenfleth, J., Bange, J.,
Neumann, T., and Emeis, S.: Turbulent kinetic energy over large offshore
wind farms observed and simulated by the mesoscale model WRF (3.8.1), Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 249–268, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-249-2020, 2020. a
Skamarock, W. C., Klemp, J. B., Dudhia, J., Gill, D. O., Liu, Z., Berner, J.,
Wang, W., Powers, J. G., Duda, M. G., Barker, D. M., and Huang, X. Y.: A
Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 4, Tech. rep., NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-556+STR, NCAR, https://doi.org/10.5065/1dfh-6p97, 2019. a
Sørensen, J. N., Nilsson, K., Ivanell, S., Asmuth, H., and Mikkelsen, R. F.: Analytical body forces in numerical actuator disc model of wind turbines, Renew. Energy, 147, 2259–2271, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.09.134, 2019. a
Sørensen, N. N., Bechmann, A., Johansen, J., Myllerup, L., Botha, P.,
Vinther, S., and Nielsen, B. S.: Identification of severe wind conditions
using a Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes solver, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 75, 012053, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/75/1/012053, 2007. a
Tennekes, H. and Lumley, J. L.: A first course in turbulence, MIT Press, Cambridge, ISBN 9780262200196, https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/first-course-turbulence (last access: 20 Mau 2022), 1972. a
Thompson, G., Field, P. R., Rasmussen, R. M., and Hall, W. D.: Explicit Forecasts of Winter Precipitation Using an Improved Bulk Microphysics Scheme. Part II: Implementation of a New Snow Parameterization, Mon. Weather Rev., 136, 5095–5115, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008MWR2387.1, 2008. a
Tomaszewski, J. M. and Lundquist, J. K.: Simulated wind farm wake sensitivity
to configuration choices in the Weather Research and Forecasting model
version 3.8.1, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2645–2662, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2645-2020, 2020. a
Troldborg, N. and Meyer Forsting, A. R.: A simple model of the wind turbine
induction zone derived from numerical simulations, Wind Energy, 20, 2011–2020, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2137, 2017. a
van der Laan, M. P. and Andersen, S. J.: The turbulence scales of a wind
turbine wake: A revisit of extended k-epsilon models, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1037, 072001, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1037/7/072001, 2018. a
van der Laan, M. P., Sørensen, N. N., Réthoré, P.-E., Mann, J.,
Kelly, M. C., Troldborg, N., Hansen, K. S., and Murcia, J. P.: The
k-ε-fP model applied to wind farms, Wind Energy, 18, 2065–2084, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1804, 2015a. a, b, c
van der Laan, M. P., Sørensen, N. N., Réthoré, P.-E., Mann, J.,
Kelly, M. C., Troldborg, N., Schepers, J. G., and Machefaux, E.: An improved
k-ϵ model applied to a wind turbine wake in atmospheric turbulence, Wind Energy, 18, 889–907, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1736, 2015b. a, b
van der Laan, M. P., Peña, A., Volker, P., Hansen, K. S., Sørensen, N. N., Ott, S., and Hasager, C. B.: Challenges in simulating coastal effects
on an offshore wind farm, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 854, 012046, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/854/1/012046, 2017. a
van der Laan, M. P., Baungaard, M., and Kelly, M.: Inflow modeling for wind
farm flows in RANS, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1934, 012012,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1934/1/012012, 2021a. a, b, c
van der Laan, M. P., Kelly, M., and Baungaard, M.: A pressure-driven
atmospheric boundary layer model satisfying Rossby and Reynolds number
similarity, Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 777–790, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-777-2021, 2021b. a
van der Walt, S., Colbert, S. C., and Varoquaux, G.: The NumPy Array: A
Structure for Efficient Numerical Computation, Comput. Sci. Eng., 13, 22–30, https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2011.37, 2011. a
Veers, P., Dykes, K., Lantz, E., Barth, S., Bottasso, C. L., Carlson, O.,
Clifton, A., Green, J., Green, P., Holttinen, H., Laird, D., Lehtomäki,
V., Lundquist, J. K., Manwell, J., Marquis, M., Meneveau, C., Moriarty, P.,
Munduate, X., Muskulus, M., Naughton, J., Pao, L., Paquette, J., Peinke, J.,
Robertson, A., Sanz Rodrigo, J., Sempreviva, A. M., Smith, J. C., Tuohy, A., and Wiser, R.: Grand challenges in the science of wind energy, Science, 366, eaau2027, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau2027, 2019. a
Vincent, C. L., Larsén, X. G., Larsen, S. E., and Sørensen, P.:
Cross-Spectra Over the Sea from Observations and Mesoscale Modelling,
Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 146, 297–318, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-012-9754-1, 2013. a
WRF: WRF Version 4.2.2, GitHub [code], https://github.com/wrf-model/WRF/releases/tag/v4.2.2 (last access: 20 May 2022), 2021.
a
Wyngaard, J. C.: Toward Numerical Modeling in the “Terra Incognita”, J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 1816–1826, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<1816:TNMITT>2.0.CO;2, 2004. a
Zong, H. and Porté-Agel, F.: A momentum-conserving wake superposition
method for wind farm power prediction, J. Fluid Mech., 889, 1–5, https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2020.77, 2020. a, b
Download
The requested paper has a corresponding corrigendum published. Please read the corrigendum first before downloading the article.
- Article
(8695 KB) - Full-text XML
Short summary
Wind turbines extract kinetic energy from the flow to create electricity. This induces a wake of reduced wind speed downstream of a turbine and consequently downstream of a wind farm. Different types of numerical models have been developed to calculate this effect. In this study, we compared models of different complexity, together with measurements over two wind farms. We found that higher-fidelity models perform better and the considered rapid models cannot fully capture the wake effect.
Wind turbines extract kinetic energy from the flow to create electricity. This induces a wake of...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint