Articles | Volume 7, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-387-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-387-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Review article
| 
21 Feb 2022
Review article |
| 21 Feb 2022
| 21 Feb 2022
Wind turbine drivetrains: state-of-the-art technologies and future development trends
Marine Technology Department, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway
Jonathan Keller
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO 80401, USA
Yi Guo
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO 80401, USA
Shawn Sheng
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO 80401, USA
Henk Polinder
Technische Universiteit Delft, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD Delft, the Netherlands
Simon Watson
Technische Universiteit Delft, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD Delft, the Netherlands
Jianning Dong
Technische Universiteit Delft, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD Delft, the Netherlands
Zian Qin
Technische Universiteit Delft, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD Delft, the Netherlands
Amir Ebrahimi
Institute for Drive Systems and Power Electronics, Leibniz University Hannover, Postfach 6009, 30060 Hannover, Germany
Ralf Schelenz
Center for Wind Power Drives (CWD), RWTH Aachen University, Campus-Boulevard 61, 52074 Aachen, Germany
Francisco Gutiérrez Guzmán
Institute for Machine Elements and Systems Engineering (MSE), RWTH Aachen University, Schinkelstrasse 10, 52062 Aachen, Germany
Daniel Cornel
Institute for Machine Elements and Systems Engineering (MSE), RWTH Aachen University, Schinkelstrasse 10, 52062 Aachen, Germany
Reza Golafshan
Institute for Machine Elements and Systems Engineering (MSE), RWTH Aachen University, Schinkelstrasse 10, 52062 Aachen, Germany
Georg Jacobs
Institute for Machine Elements and Systems Engineering (MSE), RWTH Aachen University, Schinkelstrasse 10, 52062 Aachen, Germany
Bart Blockmans
LMSD Division, Mechanical Engineering Department, KU Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium
Core Lab Dynamics of Mechanical and Mechatronic Systems, Flanders Make, Heverlee, Belgium
Jelle Bosmans
LMSD Division, Mechanical Engineering Department, KU Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium
Core Lab Dynamics of Mechanical and Mechatronic Systems, Flanders Make, Heverlee, Belgium
Bert Pluymers
LMSD Division, Mechanical Engineering Department, KU Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium
Core Lab Dynamics of Mechanical and Mechatronic Systems, Flanders Make, Heverlee, Belgium
James Carroll
Wind Energy and Control Centre, Electronic And Electrical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, 16 Richmond St, Glasgow G1 1XQ, United Kingdom
Sofia Koukoura
Wind Energy and Control Centre, Electronic And Electrical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, 16 Richmond St, Glasgow G1 1XQ, United Kingdom
Edward Hart
Wind Energy and Control Centre, Electronic And Electrical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, 16 Richmond St, Glasgow G1 1XQ, United Kingdom
Alasdair McDonald
Institute for Energy Systems, School of Engineering, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Anand Natarajan
DTU Wind Energy, Frederiksborgvej 399, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark
Jone Torsvik
Equinor ASA, Sandslivegen 90, 5254 Sandsli, Norway
Farid K. Moghadam
Marine Technology Department, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway
Pieter-Jan Daems
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, OWI-Lab, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
Timothy Verstraeten
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, OWI-Lab, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
Cédric Peeters
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, OWI-Lab, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
Jan Helsen
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, OWI-Lab, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
Related authors
Ali Dibaj, Mostafa Valavi, and Amir R. Nejad
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-26, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-26, 2024
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
This study emphasizes the need for effective condition monitoring in permanent magnet offshore wind generators to tackle issues like demagnetization and eccentricity. Utilizing a machine learning model and high-resolution measurements, we explore early fault detection methods. Our findings indicate that flux monitoring with affordable, easy-to-install stray flux sensors with frequency information offers a promising fault detection strategy for large MW offshore wind generators.
Felix Christian Mehlan and Amir R. Nejad
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-28, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-28, 2024
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
A Digital Twin is a virtual representation that mirrors the wind turbine's real behavior through simulation models and sensor measurements and can assist in making key decisions such as planning the replacement of parts. These models and measurements are, of course, not perfect and only give an incomplete picture of the real behavior. This study investigates how large the uncertainty of such models and measurements is and to what extent it affects the decision-making process.
Diederik van Binsbergen, Pieter-Jan Daems, Timothy Verstraeten, Amir Nejad, and Jan Helsen
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-98, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-98, 2023
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
Wind farm yield assessment often relies on analytical wake models. Calibrating these models can be challenging, due to the stochastic nature of wind. We developed a calibration framework that performs a multi-phase optimization on the tuning parameters using time series data. This yields a parameter distribution that more accurately reflects reality than a single value. Results revealed notable variation in resultant parameter values, influenced by nearby wind farms and coastal effects.
Laurence Boyd Morgan, Abbas Kazemi Amiri, William Leithead, and James Carroll
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-42, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-42, 2024
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents a systematic study into the effect of blade inclination angle, chord distribution, and blade length on vertical axis wind turbine performance. It is shown that for rotors of identical power production, both blade volume and rotor torque can be significantly reduced through the use of aerodynamically optimised inclined rotor blades. This demonstrates the potential of V-Rotors to reduce the cost of energy for offshore wind when compared to H-Rotors.
Scott Dallas, Adam Stock, and Edward Hart
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 841–867, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-841-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-841-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This review presents the current understanding of wind direction variability in the context of control-oriented modelling of wind turbines and wind farms in a manner suitable to a wide audience. Motivation comes from the significant and commonly seen yaw error of horizontal axis wind turbines, which carries substantial negative impacts on annual energy production and the levellised cost of wind energy. Gaps in the literature are identified, and the critical challenges in this area are discussed.
Ali Dibaj, Mostafa Valavi, and Amir R. Nejad
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-26, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-26, 2024
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
This study emphasizes the need for effective condition monitoring in permanent magnet offshore wind generators to tackle issues like demagnetization and eccentricity. Utilizing a machine learning model and high-resolution measurements, we explore early fault detection methods. Our findings indicate that flux monitoring with affordable, easy-to-install stray flux sensors with frequency information offers a promising fault detection strategy for large MW offshore wind generators.
Felix Christian Mehlan and Amir R. Nejad
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-28, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-28, 2024
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
A Digital Twin is a virtual representation that mirrors the wind turbine's real behavior through simulation models and sensor measurements and can assist in making key decisions such as planning the replacement of parts. These models and measurements are, of course, not perfect and only give an incomplete picture of the real behavior. This study investigates how large the uncertainty of such models and measurements is and to what extent it affects the decision-making process.
Livia Brandetti, Sebastiaan Paul Mulders, Roberto Merino-Martinez, Simon Watson, and Jan-Willem van Wingerden
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 471–493, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-471-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-471-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This research presents a multi-objective optimisation approach to balance vertical-axis wind turbine (VAWT) performance and noise, comparing the combined wind speed estimator and tip-speed ratio (WSE–TSR) tracking controller with a baseline. Psychoacoustic annoyance is used as a novel metric for human perception of wind turbine noise. Results showcase the WSE–TSR tracking controller’s potential in trading off the considered objectives, thereby fostering the deployment of VAWTs in urban areas.
Thorsten Reichartz, Georg Jacobs, Tom Rathmes, Lucas Blickwedel, and Ralf Schelenz
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 281–295, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-281-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-281-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The production of green hydrogen from wind power is a promising approach to store energy from renewable energy sources. This work proposes a method to optimize the design of wind–hydrogen systems for onshore wind farms in order to achieve the lowest hydrogen cost. Therefore, the electrolyzer position and the optimal hydrogen transport mode are calculated specifically for a wind farm site. This results in a reduction of up to 10 % of the hydrogen production cost.
Orla Donnelly, Fraser Anderson, and James Carroll
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-156, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-156, 2023
Revised manuscript under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
We collate the latest reliability data in operations and maintenance (O&M) for offshore wind turbines, specifically large turbines of 15 MW. We use this data to model O&M of an offshore wind farm at 3 different sites. We compare two industry dominant drive train configurations in terms of O&M cost for 15 MW turbines and determine if previous results for smaller turbines still holds true. Comparisons between drive trains is topical within industry and here, we produce cost comparisons for them.
Livia Brandetti, Sebastiaan Paul Mulders, Yichao Liu, Simon Watson, and Jan-Willem van Wingerden
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1553–1573, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1553-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1553-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This research presents the additional benefits of applying an advanced combined wind speed estimator and tip-speed ratio tracking (WSE–TSR) controller compared to the baseline Kω2. Using a frequency-domain framework and an optimal calibration procedure, the WSE–TSR tracking control scheme shows a more flexible trade-off between conflicting objectives: power maximisation and load minimisation. Therefore, implementing this controller on large-scale wind turbines will facilitate their operation.
Serkan Kartal, Sukanta Basu, and Simon J. Watson
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1533–1551, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1533-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1533-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Peak wind gust is a crucial meteorological variable for wind farm planning and operations. Unfortunately, many wind farms do not have on-site measurements of it. In this paper, we propose a machine-learning approach (called INTRIGUE, decIsioN-TRee-based wInd GUst Estimation) that utilizes numerous inputs from a public-domain reanalysis dataset, generating long-term, site-specific peak wind gust series.
Diederik van Binsbergen, Pieter-Jan Daems, Timothy Verstraeten, Amir Nejad, and Jan Helsen
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-98, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-98, 2023
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
Wind farm yield assessment often relies on analytical wake models. Calibrating these models can be challenging, due to the stochastic nature of wind. We developed a calibration framework that performs a multi-phase optimization on the tuning parameters using time series data. This yields a parameter distribution that more accurately reflects reality than a single value. Results revealed notable variation in resultant parameter values, influenced by nearby wind farms and coastal effects.
Sarah J. Ollier and Simon J. Watson
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1179–1200, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1179-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1179-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This modelling study shows that topographic trapped lee waves (TLWs) modify flow behaviour and power output in offshore wind farms. We demonstrate that TLWs can substantially alter the wind speeds at individual wind turbines and effect the power output of the turbine and whole wind farm. The impact on wind speeds and power is dependent on which part of the TLW wave cycle interacts with the wind turbines and wind farm. Positive and negative impacts of TLWs on power output are observed.
Paul Veers, Carlo L. Bottasso, Lance Manuel, Jonathan Naughton, Lucy Pao, Joshua Paquette, Amy Robertson, Michael Robinson, Shreyas Ananthan, Thanasis Barlas, Alessandro Bianchini, Henrik Bredmose, Sergio González Horcas, Jonathan Keller, Helge Aagaard Madsen, James Manwell, Patrick Moriarty, Stephen Nolet, and Jennifer Rinker
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1071–1131, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1071-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1071-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Critical unknowns in the design, manufacturing, and operation of future wind turbine and wind plant systems are articulated, and key research activities are recommended.
Xavier Chesterman, Timothy Verstraeten, Pieter-Jan Daems, Ann Nowé, and Jan Helsen
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 893–924, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-893-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-893-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper reviews and implements several techniques that can be used for condition monitoring and failure prediction for wind turbines using SCADA data. The focus lies on techniques that respond to requirements of the industry, e.g., robustness, transparency, computational efficiency, and maintainability. The end result of this research is a pipeline that can accurately detect three types of failures, i.e., generator bearing failures, generator fan failures, and generator stator failures.
Amin Loriemi, Georg Jacobs, Vitali Züch, Timm Jakobs, and Dennis Bosse
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2022-75, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2022-75, 2023
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Short summary
In the last decades, the size of wind turbines has continuously increased. The increasing rotor diameter results in higher loads acting on the main bearings of wind turbines. In this study, it is discussed how these loads can be estimated using accessible sensor signals and regression models. Therefore, measurement data has been acquired on a full-scale wind turbine test bench. It is shown that linear regression using displacement signals provides good accuracy in estimating main bearing loads.
Ishaan Sood, Elliot Simon, Athanasios Vitsas, Bart Blockmans, Gunner C. Larsen, and Johan Meyers
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 2469–2489, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2469-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2469-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this work, we conduct a validation study to compare a numerical solver against measurements obtained from the offshore Lillgrund wind farm. By reusing a previously developed inflow turbulent dataset, the atmospheric conditions at the wind farm were recreated, and the general performance trends of the turbines were captured well. The work increases the reliability of numerical wind farm solvers while highlighting the challenges of accurately representing large wind farms using such solvers.
Adithya Vemuri, Sophia Buckingham, Wim Munters, Jan Helsen, and Jeroen van Beeck
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1869–1888, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1869-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1869-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The sensitivity of the WRF mesoscale modeling framework in accurately representing and predicting wind-farm-level environmental variables for three extreme weather events over the Belgian North Sea is investigated in this study. The overall results indicate highly sensitive simulation results to the type and combination of physics parameterizations and the type of the weather phenomena, with indications that scale-aware physics parameterizations better reproduce wind-related variables.
Edward Hart, Elisha de Mello, and Rob Dwyer-Joyce
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1533–1550, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1533-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1533-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper is the second in a two-part study on lubrication in wind turbine main bearings. Investigations are conducted concerning lubrication in the double-row spherical roller main bearing of a 1.5 MW wind turbine. This includes effects relating to temperature, starvation, grease-thickener interactions and possible non-steady EHL effects. Results predict that the modelled main bearing would be expected to operate under mixed lubrication conditions for a non-negligible proportion of its life.
Edward Hart, Adam Stock, George Elderfield, Robin Elliott, James Brasseur, Jonathan Keller, Yi Guo, and Wooyong Song
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1209–1226, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1209-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1209-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We consider characteristics and drivers of loads experienced by wind turbine main bearings using simplified models of hub and main-bearing configurations. Influences of deterministic wind characteristics are investigated for 5, 7.5, and 10 MW turbine models. Load response to gusts and wind direction changes are also considered. Cubic load scaling is observed, veer is identified as an important driver of load fluctuations, and strong links between control and main-bearing load response are shown.
Edward Hart, Elisha de Mello, and Rob Dwyer-Joyce
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1021–1042, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1021-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1021-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This work provides an accessible introduction to elastohydrodynamic lubrication theory as a precursor to analysis of lubrication in a wind turbine main bearing. Fundamental concepts, derivations and formulas are presented, followed by the more advanced topics of starvation, non-steady effects, surface roughness interactions and grease lubrication.
Unai Gutierrez Santiago, Alfredo Fernández Sisón, Henk Polinder, and Jan-Willem van Wingerden
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 505–521, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-505-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-505-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The gearbox is one of the main contributors to the overall cost of wind energy, and it is acknowledged that we still do not fully understand its loading. The study presented in this paper develops a new alternative method to measure input rotor torque in wind turbine gearboxes, overcoming the drawbacks related to measuring on a rotating shaft. The method presented in this paper could make measuring gearbox torque more cost-effective, which would facilitate its adoption in serial wind turbines.
W. Dheelibun Remigius and Anand Natarajan
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 1401–1412, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1401-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1401-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
A novel inverse-problem-based methodology estimates drivetrain main-shaft torsional stiffness and displacement by using high-frequency SCADA (supervisory control and data acquisition) measurements without an aeroelastic design basis. It involves Tikhonov regularisation for regularising the measurement data and the collage method for system identification. The estimated quantities can be further used to identify the site-specific torsional loads and the damage-equivalent load of the main shaft.
Freia Harzendorf, Ralf Schelenz, and Georg Jacobs
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 571–584, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-571-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-571-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Making wind turbines more reliable over their lifetime is an important goal for improving wind turbine technology. The wind turbine drivetrain has a major influence on turbine reliability. This paper presents an approach that will help to identify holistically better drivetrain concepts in an early product design phase from an operational perspective as it is able to estimate and assess drivetrain-concept-specific inherent risks in the operational phase.
Christian Ingenhorst, Georg Jacobs, Laura Stößel, Ralf Schelenz, and Björn Juretzki
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 427–440, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-427-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-427-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Wind farm sites in complex terrain are subject to local wind phenomena, which are difficult to quantify but have a huge impact on a wind turbine's annual energy production. Therefore, a wind sensor was applied on an unmanned aerial vehicle and validated against stationary wind sensors with good agreement. A measurement over complex terrain showed local deviations from the mean wind speed of approx. ± 30 %, indicating the importance of an extensive site evaluation to reduce investment risk.
Daniel Cornel, Francisco Gutiérrez Guzmán, Georg Jacobs, and Stephan Neumann
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 367–376, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-367-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-367-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Roller bearing failures in wind turbines' gearboxes lead to long downtimes and high repair costs. This paper should form a basis for the implementation of a predictive maintenance system. Therefore an acoustic-emission-based condition monitoring system is applied to roller bearing test rigs. The system has shown that a damaged surface can be detected at least ~ 4 % (8 h, regarding the time to failure) and possibly up to ~ 50 % (130 h) earlier than by using the vibration-based system.
Lucas Blickwedel, Freia Harzendorf, Ralf Schelenz, and Georg Jacobs
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 177–190, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-177-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-177-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Revenues from the operation of wind turbines in Germany will be insecure in the future due to the expiration of federal support. Alternative ways of selling electricity are usually based on exchange prices. Therefore, the long-term revenue potential of wind turbines is assessed based on levelized revenue of energy (LROE), using a new forecasting model and open-source data. Results show how different expansion scenarios and emission prices may affect profitability of future plants.
James Stirling, Edward Hart, and Abbas Kazemi Amiri
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 15–31, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-15-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-15-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper considers the modelling of wind turbine main bearings using analytical models. The validity of simplified analytical representations is explored by comparing main-bearing force reactions with those obtained from higher-fidelity 3D finite-element models. Results indicate that good agreement can be achieved between the analytical and 3D models in the case of both non-moment-reacting (such as for a spherical roller bearing) and moment-reacting (such as a tapered roller bearing) set-ups.
Bedassa R. Cheneka, Simon J. Watson, and Sukanta Basu
Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 1731–1741, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1731-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1731-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Wind power ramps have important characteristics for the planning and integration of wind power production into electricity. We present a new and simple algorithm that detects wind power ramp characteristics. The algorithm classifies wind power production into ramp-ups, ramp-downs, and no-ramps; and it can detect wind power ramp characteristics that show a temporal increasing (decreasing) power capacity.
Mark Schelbergen, Peter C. Kalverla, Roland Schmehl, and Simon J. Watson
Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 1097–1120, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1097-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1097-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We have presented a methodology for including multiple wind profile shapes in a wind resource description that are identified using a data-driven approach. These shapes go beyond the height range for which conventional wind profile relationships are developed. Moreover, they include non-monotonic shapes such as low-level jets. We demonstrated this methodology for an on- and offshore reference location using DOWA data and efficiently estimated the annual energy production of a pumping AWE system.
Yasir Shkara, Martin Cardaun, Ralf Schelenz, and Georg Jacobs
Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 141–154, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-141-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-141-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
A computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solver is coupled with a structure solver to predict the dynamic response of a horizontal axis wind turbine structure. CFD provides much more accurate and more realistic aerodynamic loads that cannot be achieved by traditional methods such as blade element momentum theory. As a result, the aeroelastic response of the wind turbine structure, taking into account blade–tower interactions, is described in more detail.
Edward Hart, Benjamin Clarke, Gary Nicholas, Abbas Kazemi Amiri, James Stirling, James Carroll, Rob Dwyer-Joyce, Alasdair McDonald, and Hui Long
Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 105–124, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-105-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-105-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents a review of existing theory and practice relating to main bearings for wind turbines. Topics covered include wind conditions and resulting rotor loads, main-bearing models, damage mechanisms and fault detection procedures.
Laura Stößel, Esther Kohl, Björn Roscher, Ralf Schelenz, and Georg Jacobs
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2019-79, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2019-79, 2019
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Short summary
The potential of power generation from biomass to cover the offset between local power demand and supply by solar and wind power is investigated. A model is introduced to simulate power production time series in 15-minute resolution from wind, PV and biomass. The analysis is conducted on the example of five exemplary rural municipalities, each representing one category of rural municipalities in Germany.
Jonathan Keller, Yi Guo, Zhiwei Zhang, and Doug Lucas
Wind Energ. Sci., 3, 947–960, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-3-947-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-3-947-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The US Department of Energy's National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) and industry partners successfully demonstrated a new gearbox design using preloaded tapered roller bearings in the planetary section. The new gearbox design demonstrated improved planetary load-sharing characteristics in the presence of rotor pitch and yaw moments, resulting in a predicted gearbox lifetime that is 3.5 times greater than the previous conventional design with cylindrical roller bearings.
Cian J. Desmond, Simon J. Watson, Christiane Montavon, and Jimmy Murphy
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2017-34, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2017-34, 2017
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
The flow over densely forested terrain under neutral and non-neutral conditions is considered using commercially available Computational Fluid Dynamics software. Results are validated against data from a site in North-Eastern France. It is shown that the effects of both neutral and stable atmospheric stratifications can be modelled numerically using state of the art methodologies whilst unstable stratifications remain elusive.
G. A. M. van Kuik, J. Peinke, R. Nijssen, D. Lekou, J. Mann, J. N. Sørensen, C. Ferreira, J. W. van Wingerden, D. Schlipf, P. Gebraad, H. Polinder, A. Abrahamsen, G. J. W. van Bussel, J. D. Sørensen, P. Tavner, C. L. Bottasso, M. Muskulus, D. Matha, H. J. Lindeboom, S. Degraer, O. Kramer, S. Lehnhoff, M. Sonnenschein, P. E. Sørensen, R. W. Künneke, P. E. Morthorst, and K. Skytte
Wind Energ. Sci., 1, 1–39, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-1-1-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-1-1-2016, 2016
Related subject area
Operation, condition monitoring, and maintenance
Floating wind turbines: marine operations challenges and opportunities
Analysing the effectiveness of different offshore maintenance base options for floating wind farms
Data-driven farm-wide fatigue estimation on jacket-foundation OWTs for multiple SHM setups
Identification of wind turbine main-shaft torsional loads from high-frequency SCADA (supervisory control and data acquisition) measurements using an inverse-problem approach
On sensor optimisation for structural health monitoring robust to environmental variations
Effect of individual blade pitch angle misalignment on the remaining useful life of wind turbines
Rahul Chitteth Ramachandran, Cian Desmond, Frances Judge, Jorrit-Jan Serraris, and Jimmy Murphy
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 903–924, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-903-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-903-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Marine operations represent a significant proportion of costs involved in the installation, operation, maintenance and decommissioning phases of a floating wind farm. The floating-wind industry is reaching array-scale deployments, and it is very important to optimize the various marine operations involved in each of these phases. This paper analyses the various challenges in the path and opportunities for encountering them by the transfer of technical know-how from similar offshore sectors.
Nadezda Avanessova, Anthony Gray, Iraklis Lazakis, R. Camilla Thomson, and Giovanni Rinaldi
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 887–901, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-887-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-887-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This study analyses two logistical strategies that could be considered for operation and maintenance of floating wind farms. The results show that the OPEX for the strategy with an offshore maintenance base (OMB) is 5 %–8 % lower than with a service operation vessel. When CAPEX and the net present value are taken into account, then the fixed costs associated with building the OMB have a significant impact on selecting a preferred strategy.
Francisco d N Santos, Nymfa Noppe, Wout Weijtjens, and Christof Devriendt
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 299–321, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-299-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-299-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The estimation of fatigue in offshore wind turbine is highly relevant, as it can help extend the lifetime of these assets. This article attempts to answer this issue by developing a methodology based on artificial intelligence and data collected by sensors installed in real-world turbines. Good results are obtained, and this methodology is further used to learn the value of eight different sensor setups and employed in a real-world wind farm with 48 wind turbines.
W. Dheelibun Remigius and Anand Natarajan
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 1401–1412, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1401-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1401-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
A novel inverse-problem-based methodology estimates drivetrain main-shaft torsional stiffness and displacement by using high-frequency SCADA (supervisory control and data acquisition) measurements without an aeroelastic design basis. It involves Tikhonov regularisation for regularising the measurement data and the collage method for system identification. The estimated quantities can be further used to identify the site-specific torsional loads and the damage-equivalent load of the main shaft.
Tingna Wang, David J. Wagg, Keith Worden, and Robert J. Barthorpe
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 1107–1116, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1107-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1107-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper illustrates two sensor placement optimisation techniques designed for damage detection while taking into account temperature effects. A case study of a glider wing shows that, compared to the normalised method using the temperature label, the linear method that did not require temperature labels provided features that were less sensitive to damage. However, it is cheaper and more convenient to extract temperature-robust features in practical engineering.
Matthias Saathoff, Malo Rosemeier, Thorsten Kleinselbeck, and Bente Rathmann
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 1079–1087, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1079-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1079-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Wind turbine blade misalignments were measured. About 38 % of the turbines measured have been operating outside the accepted misalignment range. This research quantifies the effect of the measured misalignment on the turbine lifetime by means of simulations. The lifetimes of the main frame at the tower top and the tower base were affected most by a blade misalignment. To avoid a lifetime reduction, blade misalignments should be identified and corrected as early as possible during the lifetime.
Cited articles
ABB: Generators for wind turbines – Generators | ABB,
https://new.abb.com/motors-generators/generators/generators-for-wind-turbines (last access: 15 September 2021),
2020. a
Abboud, D., Antoni, J., Sieg-Zieba, S., and Eltabach, M.: Deterministic-random
separation in nonstationary regime, J. Sound Vib., 362,
305–326, 2016. a
Abboud, D., Antoni, J., Sieg-Zieba, S., and Eltabach, M.: Envelope analysis of
rotating machine vibrations in variable speed conditions: A comprehensive
treatment, Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 84, 200–226, 2017. a
Akhmatov, V., Nielsen, A. H., Pedersen, J. K., and Nymann, O.: Variable-speed
wind turbines with multi-pole synchronous permanent magnet generators. Part
I: Modelling in dynamic simulation tools, Wind Engineering, 27, 531–548,
2003. a
Ali, J. B., Saidi, L., Harrath, S., Bechhoefer, E., and Benbouzid, M.: Online
automatic diagnosis of wind turbine bearings progressive degradations under
real experimental conditions based on unsupervised machine learning, Appl. Acoust., 132, 167–181, 2018. a
An, J., Zou, Z., Chen, G., Sun, Y., Liu, R., and Zheng, L.: An IoT-Based Life
Cycle Assessment Platform of Wind Turbines, Sensors, 21, 1233, https://doi.org/10.3390/s21041233, 2021. a
Andersson, A. and Vedmar, L.: A dynamic model to determine vibrations in
involute helical gears, J. Sound Vib., 260, 195–212, 2003. a
Andersson, L. E. and Imsland, L.: Real-time optimization of wind farms using modifier adaptation and machine learning, Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 885–896, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-885-2020, 2020. a
Andersson, L. E., Anaya-Lara, O., Tande, J. O., Merz, K. O., and Imsland, L.:
Wind farm control – Part I: A review on control system concepts and
structures, IET Renewable Power Generation, 15, 2085–2108,
https://doi.org/10.1049/RPG2.12160, 2021. a
André, H., Leclere, Q., Anastasio, D., Benaïcha, Y., Billon, K.,
Birem, M., Bonnardot, F., Chin, Z., Combet, F., Daems, P. J.,
Daga, A. P., De Geest, R., Elyousfi, B., Griffaton, J., Gryllias, K., Hawwari, Y., Helsen, J., Lacaze, F., Laroche, L., Li, X., Liu, C., Mauricio, A., Melot, A., Ompusunggu, A., Paillot, G., Passos, S., Peeters, C., Perez, M., Qi, J., Sierra-Alonso, E. F., Smith, W. A., and Thomas, X.: Using a
smartphone camera to analyse rotating and vibrating systems: Feedback on the
SURVISHNO 2019 contest, Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 154,
107553, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107553, 2021. a
Antoni, J. and Randall, R.: Unsupervised noise cancellation for vibration
signals: part I evaluation of adaptive algorithms, Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 18, 89–101, 2004a. a
Antoni, J. and Randall, R.: Unsupervised noise cancellation for vibration
signals: part II a novel frequency domain algorithm, Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 18, 103–117, 2004b. a
Arabian-Hoseynabadi, H., Tavner, P., and Oraee, H.: Reliability comparison of
direct-drive and geared-drive wind turbine concepts, Wind Energy: An
International Journal for Progress and Applications in Wind Power Conversion
Technology, 13, 62–73, 2010. a
Ashuri, T., Martins, J. R., Zaaijer, M. B., van Kuik, G. A., and van Bussel,
G. J.: Aeroservoelastic design definition of a 20 MW common research wind
turbine model, Wind Energy, 19, 2071–2087, 2016. a
Bartl, J. and Sætran, L.: Experimental testing of axial induction based
control strategies for wake control and wind farm optimization, J.
Phys.: Conference Series, 753, 032035, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/753/3/032035, 2016. a
Bedrosian, E.: A product theorem for Hilbert transforms, Proc.
IEEE, 51, 868–869, 1963. a
Bergen, A., Andersen, R., Bauer, M., Boy, H., Brake, M. T., Brutsaert, P.,
Bührer, C., Dhallé, M., Hansen, J., ten Kate, H., Kellers, J., Krause, J.,
Krooshoop, E., Kruse, C., Kylling, H., Pilas, M., Pütz, H., Rebsdorf, A.,
Reckhard, M., Seitz, E., Springer, H., Song, X., Tzabar, N., Wessel, S.,
Wiezoreck, J., Winkler, T., and Yagotyntsev, K.: Design and in-field testing
of the world's first ReBCO rotor for a 3.6 MW wind generator, Superconductor
Sci. Technol., 32, 125006+12, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/ab48d6, 2019. a
Bhuiyan, N. A. and McDonald, A.: Optimization of offshore direct drive wind
turbine generators with consideration of permanent magnet grade and
temperature, IEEE T. Energy Conver., 34, 1105–1114, 2018. a
Blaabjerg, F. and Ma, K.: Future on power electronics for wind turbine systems,
IEEE J. Em. Sel. Top. P., 1,
139–152, 2013. a
Blaabjerg, F., Liserre, M., and Ma, K.: Power electronics converters for wind
turbine systems, IEEE T. Ind. Appl., 48, 708–719,
2011. a
Blockmans, B., Helsen, J., Vanhollebeke, F., and Desmet, W.: Dynamic response
of a multi-megawatt wind turbine drivetrain under voltage dips using a
coupled flexible multibody approach, in: International Design Engineering
Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering
Conference, vol. 55928, p. V005T11A045, American Society of Mechanical
Engineers, 2013. a
Blockmans, B., Tamarozzi, T., Naets, F., and Desmet, W.: A nonlinear parametric
model reduction method for efficient gear contact simulations, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 102, 1162–1191, 2015. a
Bosmans, J., Vanommeslaeghe, Y., Geens, L., Fiszer, J., Croes, J., Kirchner,
M., Denil, J., De Meulenaere, P., and Desmet, W.: Development and embedded
deployment of a virtual load sensor for wind turbine gearboxes, in: Journal
of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1618, p. 022011, IOP Publishing, 2020. a
Bozchalooi, I. S. and Liang, M.: A smoothness index-guided approach to wavelet
parameter selection in signal de-noising and fault detection, J. Sound Vib., 308, 246–267, 2007. a
Breteler, D., Kaidis, C., Tinga, T., and Loendersloot, R.: Physics based
methodology for wind turbine failure detection, diagnostics & prognostics,
EWEA 2015 Annual Event, 2015. a
Bruce, T., Long, H., and Dwyer-Joyce, R. S.: Dynamic modelling of wind turbine
gearbox bearing loading during transient events,
IET Renew. Power Gen., 9, 821–830, 2015. a
Cai, Y. and Hayashi, T.: The linear approximated equation of vibration of a
pair of spur gears (theory and experiment), J. Mech. Design,
116, 558–564, 1994. a
Carroll, J.: Cost of energy modelling and reduction opportunities for offshore
wind turbines, Ph.D. thesis, University of Strathclyde, 2016. a
Carroll, J., McDonald, A., and McMillan, D.: Reliability comparison of wind
turbines with DFIG and PMG drive trains,
IEEE T. Energy Conver., 30, 663–670, 2014. a
Carroll, J., McDonald, A., Dinwoodie, I., McMillan, D., Revie, M., and Lazakis,
I.: Availability, operation and maintenance costs of offshore wind turbines
with different drive train configurations, Wind Energy, 20, 361–378, 2017. a
Chen, B., Tavner, P. J., Feng, Y., Song, W. W., and Qiu, Y.: Bayesian network
for wind turbine fault diagnosis, EWEA Annual Conf, vol 2012, Copenhagen, Denmark, 16–19 April 2012, 2012. a
Chen, X., Xu, W., Liu, Y., and Islam, M. R.: Bearing Corrosion Failure
Diagnosis of Doubly Fed Induction Generator in Wind Turbines Based on Stator
Current Analysis, IEEE T. Ind. Electron., 67,
3419–3430, https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2019.2917418, 2020. a
Chovan, C. and Fierro, A. J.: Improving Bearing Life in Wind Turbine Main
Shafts and Gearboxes, Tech. rep., Timken,
https://www.timken.com/resources/timken-tdi-bearings-white-paper-improving-bearing-life-in-wind-turbine-main-shafts-and-gearboxes/
(last access: 10 September 2021),
2021. a
Cockerill, A., Clarke, A., Pullin, R., Bradshaw, T., Cole, P., and Holford, K.:
Determination of rolling element bearing condition via acoustic emission,
P. I. Mech. Eng. J.-J. Eng., 230, 1377–1388, 2016. a
Cornel, D., Guzmán, F. G., Jacobs, G., and Neumann, S.: Acoustic response
of roller bearings under critical operating conditions, Tech. rep., World
Congress on Engineering Asset Management, Stavanger, 2018. a
Cornel, D., Guzmán, F. G., Jacobs, G., and Neumann, S.: Acoustic response
of roller bearings under critical operating conditions, in: Engineering
Assets and Public Infrastructures in the Age of Digitalization, pp. 740–749,
Springer, ISBN 978-3-030-48021-9, 2020. a
Cornel, D., Gutiérrez Guzmán, F., Jacobs, G., and Neumann, S.: Condition monitoring of roller bearings using acoustic emission, Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 367–376, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-367-2021, 2021. a
Couturier, J. and Mba, D.: Operational bearing parameters and acoustic emission
generation, J. Vib. Acoust., 130, 024502, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2776339, 2008. a
Craig Jr., R. R. and Ni, Z.: Component mode synthesis for model order reduction
of nonclassicallydamped systems,
J. Guid. Control Dynam.,
12, 577–584, 1989. a
Cross, P. and Ma, X.: Model-based and fuzzy logic approaches to condition
monitoring of operational wind turbines,
International Journal of Automation and Computing, 12, 25–34, 2015. a
Dabrowski, D. and Natarajan, A.: Identification of loading conditions resulting
in roller slippage in gearbox bearings of large wind turbines, Wind Energy,
20, 1365–1387, 2017. a
Damiani, R., Dana, S., Annoni, J., Fleming, P., Roadman, J., van Dam, J., and Dykes, K.: Assessment of wind turbine component loads under yaw-offset conditions, Wind Energ. Sci., 3, 173–189, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-3-173-2018, 2018. a
Daners, D. and Nickel, V.: More torque is better than torque: Higher torque
density for gearboxes, in: Conference for Wind Power Drives 2021: Conference
Proceedings, 9–11 March 2021, Aachen, Germany, 2021. a
De Mul, J., Vree, J., and Maas, D.: Equilibrium and associated load
distribution in ball and roller bearings loaded in five degrees of freedom
while neglecting friction – Part I: general theory and application to ball
bearings, J. Tribol., 111, 142–148, 1989a. a
De Mul, J., Vree, J., and Maas, D.: Equilibrium and associated load
distribution in ball and roller bearings loaded in five degrees of freedom
while neglecting friction – Part II: application to roller bearings and
experimental verification, J. Tribol., 111, 149–155,
1989b. a
Decker, H. J., Handschuh, R. F., and Zakrajsek, J. J.: An enhancement to the
NA4 gear vibration diagnostic parameter, NASA Technical Report ARL-TR-389
Prepared for the 18th Annual Meeting sponsored by the Vibration Institute,
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 20–23 June 1994, US, 1994. a
D'Elia, G., Cocconcelli, M., Rubini, R., and Dalpiaz, G.: Evolution of gear
condition indicators for diagnostics of planetary gearboxes, in: The
International Conference Surveillance 8, FRA, 2015. a
Demtröder, J., Kjaer, P., and Hansen, A.: Balancing Incremental Development
and Disruptive Innovation in the Design of a Modularized, Scalable Powertrain
for the Modular Windturbine Product System EnVentus, in: Dresdner
Maschi-nenelemente Kolloquium, Technische Universität Dresden, ISBN 13 978-3-96548-055-1,
2019. a
Desmedt, M., Dong, J., Wani, F., Bauer, P., and Polinder, H.: Electromechanical
dynamics analysis of pole-piece rotors in pseudo direct-drive wind turbine
generators, in: 2020 International Conference on Electrical Machines (ICEM),
vol. 1, pp. 1889–1895, IEEE, 2020. a
Dhanola, A. and Garg, H.: Tribological challenges and advancements in wind
turbine bearings: A review, Eng. Fail. Anal., 118, 1861–1863,
2020. a
Ding, F., Tian, Z., Zhao, F., and Xu, H.: An integrated approach for wind
turbine gearbox fatigue life prediction considering instantaneously varying
load conditions, Renew. Energ., 129, 260–270, 2018. a
DOE: Wind Vision: A New Era for Wind Power in the United States, Tech. Rep.
DOE/GO-102015-4557, U.S. Department of Energy, 2015. a
Doner, S.: LCOE optimization in wind farms: How the digital gearbox can
increase reliability and predict remaining useful lifetime for wind turbine
drive trains, in: Drivetrain Reliability Collaborative Meeting, 19 February 2020, Golden, Colorado, US, 2020. a
Dong, W., Nejad, A. R., Moan, T., and Gao, Z.: Structural reliability analysis
of contact fatigue design of gears in wind turbine drivetrains,
J. Loss Prevent. Proc., 65, 104115, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104115, 2020. a
Dragomiretskiy, K. and Zosso, D.: Variational mode decomposition,
IEEE T. Signal Proces., 62, 531–544, 2013. a
Duan, G., Wang, H., Guo, H., and Gu, G.: Direct drive permanent magnet wind
generator design and electromagnetic field finite element analysis,
IEEE T. Appl. Supercon., 20, 1883–1887, 2010. a
Ekanayake, J. B., Holdsworth, L., Wu, X., and Jenkins, N.: Dynamic modeling of
doubly fed induction generator wind turbines,
IEEE T. Power Syst., 18, 803–809, 2003. a
Erdman, W., Keller, J., Grider, D., and VanBrunt, E.: A 2.3-MW Medium-Voltage,
Three-Level Wind Energy Inverter Applying a Unique Bus Structure and 4.5-kV
Si/SiC Hybrid Isolated Power Modules, in: 2015 IEEE Applied Power Electronics
Conference, 15–19 March 2015, Charlotte, NC, USA, https://doi.org/10.1109/APEC.2015.7104513, 2015. a
Eritenel, T. and Parker, R. G.: Three-dimensional nonlinear vibration of gear
pairs, J. Sound Vib., 331, 3628–3648, 2012. a
EU: EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIGITAL STRATEGY, A digitally transformed,
user-focused and data-driven Commission, https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/file_import/digitally-transformed_user-focused_data-driven_commission_en.pdf (last access: 15 September 2021), 2018. a
EU: A European Green Deal,
https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en,
last access: 14 August 2020b. a
Feng, M., Ma, H., Li, Z., Wang, Q., and Wen, B.: An improved analytical method
for calculating time-varying mesh stiffness of helical gears, Meccanica, 53,
1131–1145, 2018. a
Fiszer, J., Tamarozzi, T., and Desmet, W.: A semi-analytic strategy for the
system-level modelling of flexibly supported ball bearings, Meccanica, 51,
1503–1532, 2016. a
Fleming, P., Annoni, J., Shah, J. J., Wang, L., Ananthan, S., Zhang, Z., Hutchings, K., Wang, P., Chen, W., and Chen, L.: Field test of wake steering at an offshore wind farm, Wind Energ. Sci., 2, 229–239, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2-229-2017, 2017. a
Fleming, P. A., Van Wingerden, J.-W., Scholbrock, A. K., Van der Veen, G., and
Wright, A. D.: Field testing a wind turbine drivetrain/tower damper using
advanced design and validation techniques, in: 2013 American Control
Conference, pp. 2227–2234, IEEE, 2013. a
Frank, M., Frauenhofer, J., van Hasselt, P., Nick, W., Neumueller, H., and
Nerowski, G.: Long-term operational experience with first Siemens 400 kW HTS
machine in diverse configurations, IEEE T. Appl.
Supercon., 13, 2120–2123, 2003. a
Frederik, J. A., Weber, R., Cacciola, S., Campagnolo, F., Croce, A., Bottasso, C., and van Wingerden, J.-W.: Periodic dynamic induction control of wind farms: proving the potential in simulations and wind tunnel experiments, Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 245–257, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-245-2020, 2020. a
Fu, L., Wei, Y., Fang, S., Zhou, X., and Lou, J.: Condition monitoring for
roller bearings of wind turbines based on health evaluation under variable
operating states, Energies, 10, 1564, https://doi.org/10.3390/en10101564, 2017. a
Gabhane, P. and Kaddoura, M.: Remanufacturing in Circular Economy-A Gearbox
Example, Master thesis, Division of Environmental Systems Analysis, Chalmers University of Technology, https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12380/252053, 2017. a
Gaertner, E., Rinker, J., Sethuraman, L., Zahle, F., Anderson, B., Barter,
G. E., Abbas, N. J., Meng, F., Bortolotti, P., Skrzypinski, W., Scott, G., Feil, R.,
Bredmose, H., Dykes, K., Shields, M.,
Allen, C., and Viselli, A.: IEA
wind TCP task 37: Definition of the IEA 15-megawatt offshore reference wind
turbine, Tech. rep., National Renew. Energ. Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United
States), 2020. a
Gallego-Calderon, J. and Natarajan, A.: Assessment of wind turbine drive-train
fatigue loads under torsional excitation, Eng. Struct., 103,
189–202, 2015. a
Garlick, W. G., Dixon, R., and Watson, S. J.: A model-based approach to wind
turbine condition monitoring using SCADA data, Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on Systems Engineering, Coventry, UK, 8–10 September 2009, 2009. a
Godwin, J. L. and Matthews, P.: Classification and detection of wind turbine
pitch faults through SCADA data analysis, International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management, 4, 90–100, 2013. a
Göksu, Ö., Altin, M., Fortmann, J., and Sørensen, P. E.: Field
validation of IEC 61400-27-1 wind generation type 3 model with plant power
factor controller, IEEE T. Energy Conver., 31, 1170–1178,
2016. a
Gray, C. S. and Watson, S. J.: Physics of failure approach to wind turbine
condition based maintenance, Wind Energy, 13, 395–405, 2010. a
Guo, Y. and Parker, R. G.: Stiffness matrix calculation of rolling element
bearings using a finite element/contact mechanics model,
Mech. Mach. Theory, 51, 32–45, 2012. a
Guo, Y., Lambert, S., Wallen, R., Errichello, R., and Keller, J.: Theoretical
and experimental study on gear-coupling contact and loads considering
misalignment, torque, and friction influences, Mech. Mach. Theory,
98, 242–262, 2016. a
Habib, K. and Wenzel, H.: Exploring rare earths supply constraints for the
emerging clean energy technologies and the role of recycling,
J. Clean. Prod., 84, 348–359, 2014. a
Hart, E.: Developing a systematic approach to the analysis of time-varying main
bearing loads for wind turbines, Wind Energy, 23, 2150–2165, 2020. a
Hart, E., Turnbull, A., Feuchtwang, J., McMillan, D., Golysheva, E., and
Elliott, R.: Wind turbine main-bearing loading and wind field
characteristics, Wind Energy, 22, 1534–1547, 2019. a
Hart, E., Clarke, B., Nicholas, G., Kazemi Amiri, A., Stirling, J., Carroll, J., Dwyer-Joyce, R., McDonald, A., and Long, H.: A review of wind turbine main bearings: design, operation, modelling, damage mechanisms and fault detection, Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 105–124, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-105-2020, 2020. a
Harzendorf, F.: Geared vs. direct drive – a holistic system comparison, in:
Conference for Wind Power Drives 2021: Conference Proceedings, 9–11 March 2021, Aachen, Germany, 2021. a
Harzendorf, F., Schelenz, R., and Jacobs, G.: Reducing cost uncertainty in the drivetrain design decision with a focus on the operational phase, Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 571–584, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-571-2021, 2021. a
He, G., Ding, K., Wu, X., and Yang, X.: Dynamics modeling and vibration
modulation signal analysis of wind turbine planetary gearbox with a floating
sun gear, Renew. Energ., 139, 718–729, 2019. a
Helsen, J.: Review of Research on Condition Monitoring for Improved O&M of
Offshore Wind Turbine Drivetrains, Acoust. Aust., 49, 251–258, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40857-021-00237-2, 2021. a
Helsen, J., Vanhollebeke, F., Marrant, B., Vandepitte, D., and Desmet, W.:
Multibody modelling of varying complexity for modal behaviour analysis of
wind turbine gearboxes, Renew. Energ., 36, 3098–3113, 2011. a
Helsen, J., Vanhollebeke, F., Vandepitte, D., and Desmet, W.: Some trends and
challenges in wind turbine upscaling, in: Proceedings of ISMA International
Conference On Noise And Vibration 2012, vol. 6, pp. 4345–4359, Katholieke
Univ Leuven, Dept Werktuigkunde, 2012. a
Helsen, J., Peeters, C., Verstraeten, T., Verbeke, J., Gioia, N., and Nowé,
A.: Fleet-wide condition monitoring combining vibration signal processing and
machine learning rolled out in a cloud-computing environment, in:
International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering (ISMA), 17-19 September 2018, Leuven, Belgium, 2018. a
Ho, D. and Randall, R.: Optimisation of bearing diagnostic techniques using
simulated and actual bearing fault signals,
Mech. Syst. Signal Proces., 14, 763–788, 2000. a
Hoang, T.-K., Quéval, L., Berriaud, C., and Vido, L.: Design of a 20-MW
Fully Superconducting Wind Turbine Generator to Minimize the Levelized Cos of
Energy, IEEE T. Appl. Supercon., 28, 1–5,
https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2018.2810309, 2018. a
Hu, Y., Talbot, D., and Kahraman, A.: A Gear Load Distribution Model for a
Planetary Gear Set With a Flexible Ring Gear Having External Splines, J. Mech. Design, 141, 053301, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4041583, 2019. a
Huang, N. E., Shen, Z., Long, S. R., Wu, M. C., Shih, H. H., Zheng, Q., Yen,
N.-C., Tung, C. C., and Liu, H. H.: The empirical mode decomposition and the
Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis,
P. Roy. Soc. Lond. A Mat., 454, 903–995, 1998. a
Ibrion, M., Paltrinieri, N., and Nejad, A. R.: On risk of digital twin
implementation in marine industry: Learning from aviation industry, in:
Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1357, p. 012009, IOP Publishing,
2019. a
Jensen, O. L., Heuser, L., and Petersen, K. E.: Prevention of “white etching
cracks” in rolling bearings in Vestas wind turbines, in: Conference for
Wind Power Drives 2021: Conference Proceedings, 9–11 March 2021, Aachen, Germany, 2021. a
Johansen, S. S. and Nejad, A. R.: On digital twin condition monitoring approach
for drivetrains in marine applications, in: ASME 2019 38th International
Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, American Society of
Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection, 2019. a
Johnson, K. L.: Contact mechanics, Cambridge university
press, 90–104 pp., ISBN 0521 34796 3, 1987. a
Kahn-Jetter and, Z. L. and Wright, S.: Finite element analysis of an involute
spline, J. Mech. Des., 122, 239–244, 2000. a
Kazachkov, Y., Feltes, J. W., and Zavadil, R.: Modeling wind farms for power
system stability studies, in: 2003 IEEE Power Engineering Society General
Meeting (IEEE Cat. No. 03CH37491), vol. 3, pp. 1526–1533, IEEE, 2003. a
Kim, K., Parthasarathy, G., Uluyol, O., Foslien, W., Sheng, S., and Fleming,
P.: Use of SCADA data for failure detection in wind turbines, Tech. rep.,
National Renew. Energ. Lab.(NREL), Golden, CO (United States), 2011. a
Kirschneck, M., Rixen, D. J., Polinder, H., and van Ostayen, R. A.:
Electromagnetomechanical coupled vibration analysis of a direct-drive
off-shore wind turbine generator,
J. Comput. Nonlin. Dyn., 10, 041011, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4027837, 2015. a
Koukoura, S., Carroll, J., and McDonald, A.: A Diagnostic Framework for Wind
Turbine Gearboxes Using Machine Learning, in: Annual Conference of the PHM
Society, 21–26 September 2019, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA, vol. 11, 2019. a
Kowal, D., Sergeant, P., Dupré, L., and Vandenbossche, L.: The effect of
the electrical steel properties on the temperature distribution in
direct-drive PM synchronous generators for 5 MW wind turbines, IEEE
T. Magn., 49, 5371–5377, 2013. a
Kuang, J. and Yang, Y.: An estimate of mesh stiffness and load sharing ratio of
a spur gear pair, Advancing power transmission into the 21 st century, pp.
1–9, https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC1992-0001, 1992. a
Kusiak, A. and Li, W.: The prediction and diagnosis of wind turbine faults,
Renew. Energ., 36, 16–23, 2011. a
Kusiak, A. and Zhang, Z.: Analysis of wind turbine vibrations based on SCADA
data, J. Sol. Energ. Eng., 132, 031008, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4001461, 2010. a
Kusiak, A., Zheng, H., and Song, Z.: Models for monitoring wind farm power,
Renew. Energ., 34, 583–590, 2009. a
Larumbe, L. B., Qin, Z., and Bauer, P.: Introduction to the analysis of
harmonics and resonances in large offshore wind power plants, in: 2018 IEEE
18th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference (PEMC), 26-30 August 2018, Budapest,
Hungary,
pp. 393–400, IEEE, 2018. a
Larumbe, L. B., Qin, Z., and Bauer, P.: Output impedance modelling and
sensitivity study of grid-feeding inverters with dual current control, in:
IECON 2019-45th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, 14–17 October 2019, Lisbon, Portugal,
vol. 1, pp. 4007–4012, IEEE, 2019. a
Larumbe, L. B., Qin, Z., Wang, L., and Bauer, P.: Impedance Modelling for
Three-Phase Inverters with Double Synchronous Reference Frame Current
Controller in the Presence of Imbalance, IEEE T. Power
Electron., 37, 1461–1475, https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2021.3107045, 2021. a
Leclère, Q., André, H., and Antoni, J.: A multi-order probabilistic
approach for Instantaneous Angular Speed tracking debriefing of the CMMNO14
diagnosis contest, Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 81, 375–386,
2016. a
Li, H., Hu, Y., Yang, C., Chen, Z., Ji, H., and Zhao, B.: An improved fuzzy
synthetic condition assessment of a wind turbine generator system,
Int. J. Elec. Power, 45, 468–476,
2013. a
Li, J., Lei, X., Li, H., and Ran, L.: Normal behavior models for the condition
assessment of wind turbine generator systems, Elect. Pow. Compo.
Sys., 42, 1201–1212, 2014. a
Li, S. and Kahraman, A.: A tribo-dynamic model of a spur gear pair, J.
Sound Vib., 332, 4963–4978, 2013. a
Lim, T. C. and Singh, R.: Vibration transmission through rolling element
bearings, part I: bearing stiffness formulation, J. Sound Vib., 139, 179–199, 1990. a
Loriemi, A., Jacobs, G., Reisch, S., Bosse, D., and Schröder, T.:
Experimental and simulation-based analysis of asymmetrical spherical roller
bearings as main bearings for wind turbines, Forsch. Ingenieurwesen,
85, 189–197, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10010-021-00462-1, 2021. a
Lu, B., Li, Y., Wu, X., and Yang, Z.: A review of recent advances in wind
turbine condition monitoring and fault diagnosis, in: Power Electronics and
Machines in Wind Applications, PEMWA 2009, IEEE, pp. 1–7, IEEE, 2009. a
Lydia, M., Kumar, S. S., Selvakumar, A. I., and Kumar, G. E. P.: A
comprehensive review on wind turbine power curve modeling techniques,
Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev., 30, 452–460, 2014. a
Manobel, B., Sehnke, F., Lazzús, J. A., Salfate, I., Felder, M., and
Montecinos, S.: Wind turbine power curve modeling based on Gaussian
Processes and Artificial Neural Networks, Renew. Energ., 125, 1015–1020,
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2018.02.081, 2018. a
Marrant, B., Vanhollebeke, F., and Peeters, J.: Comparison of multibody
simulations and measurements of wind turbine gearboxes at Hansen’s 13 MW
test facility, in: European Wind Energy Conference and Exhibition (EWEC),
20–23 April 2010, Warsaw, Poland, 2010. a
McDonald, A. and Bhuiyan, N. A.: On the optimization of generators for offshore
direct drive wind turbines, IEEE T. Energy Conver., 32,
348–358, 2016. a
McDonald, A. and Jimmy, G.: Parallel wind turbine powertrains and their design
for high availability, IEEE T. Sustain. Energ., 8, 880–890,
2016. a
Mehlan, F. C., Nejad, A. R., and Gao, Z.: Estimation of wind turbine gearbox
loads for online fatigue monitoring using inverse methods, in: Proceedings of
the ASME 2021 40th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic
Engineering OMAE 2021, ASME OMAE2021: Virtual Conference: 21–30 June 2021, pp. OMAE2021–62181, ASME, 2021. a
Moghadam, F. K. and Nejad, A. R.: Theoretical and experimental study of wind
turbine drivetrain fault diagnosis by using torsional vibrations and modal
estimation, J. Sound Vib., 509, 116223, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2021.116223, 2021. a
Moghadam, F. K. and Nejad, A. R.: Online condition monitoring of floating wind
turbines drivetrain by means of digital twin, Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 162, 108087, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108087, 2022. a, b
Moghadam, F. K., Rebouças, G. F. D. S., and Nejad, A. R.: Digital twin
modeling for predictive maintenance of gearboxes in floating offshore wind
turbine drivetrains, Forsch. Ingenieurwesen, 85, 273–286, 2021. a
Moore, S.: U.S. Seeks Superconducting Offshore Wind Generators,
https://spectrum.ieee.org/energywise/green-tech/wind/us-seeks-superconducting-offshore-wind-generators (last access: 12 September 2021),
2020. a
Morales-Espejel, G. and Gabelli, A.: A major step forward in life modeling,
Power Transmission Engineering, 11, 36–40, 2017. a
Nejad, A. R., Gao, Z., and Moan, T.: On long-term fatigue damage and
reliability analysis of gears under wind loads in offshore wind turbine
drivetrains, Int. J. Fatigue, 61, 116–128,
2014a. a
Nejad, A. R., Odgaard, P. F., Gao, Z., and Moan, T.: A prognostic method for
fault detection in wind turbine drivetrains, Eng. Fail. Anal.,
42, 324–336, 2014b. a
Nejad, A. R., Bachynski, E. E., Kvittem, M. I., Luan, C., Gao, Z., and Moan,
T.: Stochastic dynamic load effect and fatigue damage analysis of drivetrains
in land-based and TLP, spar and semi-submersible floating wind turbines,
Mar. Struct., 42, 137–153, 2015. a
Nejad, A. R., Odgaard, P. F., and Moan, T.: Conceptual study of a gearbox fault
detection method applied on a 5-MW spar-type floating wind turbine, Wind
Energy, 21, 1064–1075, 2018. a
Nejad, A. R., Bachynski, E. E., and Moan, T.: Effect of axial acceleration on
drivetrain responses in a spar-type floating wind turbine,
J. Offshore Mech. Arct., 141, 031901, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4041996, 2019. a
Nordmark, D. and Boyeye, J.: Service Optimization of Wind Turbine Drivetrains
through Digital Solutions, in: Conference for Wind Power Drives: Conference
Proceedings, 9–11 March 2021, Aachen, Germany, 2021. a
Palermo, A., Mundo, D., Hadjit, R., and Desmet, W.: Multibody element for spur
and helical gear meshing based on detailed three-dimensional contact
calculations, Mech. Mach. Theory, 62, 13–30, 2013. a
Pandit, R. and Infield, D.: Gaussian Process Operational Curves for Wind
Turbine Condition Monitoring, Energies, 11, 1631, https://doi.org/10.3390/en11071631, 2018a. a
Pandit, R. K. and Infield, D.: SCADA-based wind turbine anomaly detection
using Gaussian process models for wind turbine condition monitoring
purposes, IET Renewable Power Generation, 12, 1249–1255,
2018b. a
Pandit, R. K., Infield, D., and Carroll, J.: Incorporating air density into a
Gaussian process wind turbine power curve model for improving fitting
accuracy, Wind Energy, 22, 302–315, 2019. a
Peeters, C., Guillaume, P., and Helsen, J.: Vibration-based bearing fault
detection for operations and maintenance cost reduction in wind energy,
Renew. Energ., 116, 74–87, 2018. a
Peeters, C., Leclere, Q., Antoni, J., Lindahl, P., Donnal, J., Leeb, S., and
Helsen, J.: Review and comparison of tacholess instantaneous speed estimation
methods on experimental vibration data, Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 129, 407–436, 2019. a
Polikarpova, M.: Liquid cooling solutions for rotating permanent magnet
synchronous machines, PhD thesis at Lappeenranta University of Technology, Lappeenranta, Finland, https://lutpub.lut.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/101756/Thesis_Mariia Polikarpova_A4.pdf?sequence=2 (last access: 25 September 2021), ISBN 978-952-265-672-8, 2014. a
Polinder, H., Van der Pijl, F. F., De Vilder, G.-J., and Tavner, P. J.:
Comparison of direct-drive and geared generator concepts for wind turbines,
IEEE T. Energ. Convers., 21, 725–733, 2006. a
Polinder, H., Ferreira, J., Jensen, B., Abrahamsen, A., Atallah, K., and
McMahon, R.: Trends in Wind Turbine Generator Systems, IEEE J.
Em. Sel. Top. P., 1, 174–185,
https://doi.org/10.1109/JESTPE.2013.2280428, 2013. a
Qiao, W. and Qu, L.: Prognostic condition monitoring for wind turbine
drivetrains via generator current analysis, Chinese Journal of Electrical
Engineering, 4, 80–89, https://doi.org/10.23919/CJEE.2018.8471293, 2018. a
Qin, Z., Liserre, M., Blaabjerg, F., and Wang, H.: Energy storage system by
means of improved thermal performance of a 3 mw grid side wind power
converter, in: IECON 2013-39th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial
Electronics Society, pp. 736–742, IEEE, 2013. a
Qin, Z., Blaabjerg, F., and Loh, P. C.: A rotating speed controller design
method for power leveling by means of inertia energy in wind power systems,
IEEE T. Energy Conver., 30, 1052–1060, 2015a. a
Qiu, Y., Feng, Y., Tavner, P., Richardson, P., Erdos, G., and Chen, B.: Wind
turbine SCADA alarm analysis for improving reliability, Wind Energy, 15,
951–966, 2012. a
Rai, A. and Upadhyay, S.: A review on signal processing techniques utilized in
the fault diagnosis of rolling element bearings, Tribol. Int., 96,
289–306, 2016. a
Randall, R. B.: Vibration-based condition monitoring: industrial, aerospace and
automotive applications, John Wiley & Sons, https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470977668, 2011. a
Rassõlkin, A., Kallaste, A., Orlova, S., Gevorkov, L., Vaimann, T., and
Belahcen, A.: Re-use and recycling of different electrical machines, Latvian
J. Phys. Tech. Sci., 55, 13–23, 2018. a
Reisch, S.: Elastic interaction of the gearbox in powertrain concepts with
increased integration level, in: Conference for Wind Power Drives 2021:
Conference Proceedings, 9–11 March 2021, Aachen, Germany, 2021. a
Ren, Z., Verma, A. S., Li, Y., Teuwen, J. J., and Jiang, Z.: Offshore wind
turbine operations and maintenance: A state-of-the-art review, Renew.
Sustain. Energ. Rev., 144, 110886, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2021.110886,
2021. a, b
Renew. Energ. Agency, I.: RENEWABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES: COST ANALYSIS
SERIES Volume 1: Power Sector Acknowledgement,
https://www.irena.org/Publications (last access: 20 September 2021), 2012. a
Röckmann, C., Lagerveld, S., and Stavenuiter, J.: Operation and
Maintenance Costs of Offshore Wind Farms and Potential Multi-use Platforms in
the Dutch North Sea, in: Aquaculture Perspective of Multi-Use Sites in the Open Ocean, edited by: Buck, B. and Langan, R., Springer, Cham.,
97–113,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51159-7_4,
2017. a
Rolink, A., Schröder, T., Jacobs, G., Bosse, D., Hölzl, J., and
Bergmann, P.: Feasibility study for the use of hydrodynamic plain bearings
with balancing support characteristics as main bearing in wind turbines, in:
Journal of Physics: Conference Series, TORQUE2020,
28 September–2 October 2020, online,
vol. 1618, p. 052002, IOP Publishing,
2020. a, b
Rolink, A., Jacobs, G., Schröder, T., Keller, D., Jakobs, T., Bosse, D.,
Lang, J., and Knoll, G.: Methodology for the systematic design of conical
plain bearings for use as main bearings in wind turbines, Forsch.
Ingenieurwesen, 85, 629–637, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10010-021-00452-3, 2021. a
Roscher, B., Werkmeister, A., Jacobs, G., and Schelenz, R.: Modelling of Wind
Turbine Loads nearby a Wind Farm, in: Journal of Physics: Conference Series,
vol. 854, p. 012038, IOP Publishing, Wake Conference 2017, 30 May–1 June 2017, Visby, Sweden, 2017. a
Sartori, L., Bellini, F., Croce, A., and Bottasso, C.: Preliminary design and
optimization of a 20MW reference wind turbine, in: Journal of Physics:
Conference Series, vol. 1037, p. 042003, IOP Publishing, The Science of Making Torque from Wind (TORQUE 2018), 20–22 June 2018, Milan, Italy, 2018. a
Sawalhi, N. and Randall, R. B.: The application of spectral kurtosis to bearing
diagnostics, in: Proceedings of ACOUSTICS, Proceedings of ACOUSTICS 2004, 3–5 November 2004, Gold Coast, Australia,
pp. 393–398, 2004. a
Sethuraman, L., Venugopal, V., Zavvos, A., and Mueller, M.: Structural
integrity of a direct-drive generator for a floating wind turbine, Renew.
Energ., 63, 597–616, 2014. a
Sharma, V. and Parey, A.: A review of gear fault diagnosis using various
condition indicators, Procedia Eng., 144, 253–263, 2016. a
Sheng, S.: Wind turbine gearbox condition monitoring round robin
study-vibration analysis, Tech. rep., National Renew. Energ. Lab. (NREL),
Golden, CO (United States), 2012. a
Shipurkar, U., Ma, K., Polinder, H., Blaabjerg, F., and Ferreira, J. A.: A
review of failure mechanisms in wind turbine generator systems, in: 2015 17th
European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications (EPE'15
ECCE-Europe), 8–10 September 2015, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1109/EPE.2015.7311669, 2015. a
Shipurkar, U., Polinder, H., and Ferreira, J. A.: A review of methods to
increase the availability of wind turbine generator systems, CPSS
T. Pow. Electron. Appl., 1, 66–82,
https://doi.org/10.24295/CPSSTPEA.2016.00007, 2016. a
Shrestha, G., Polinder, H., Bang, D., and Ferreira, J. A.: Structural
Flexibility: A Solution for Weight Reduction of Large Direct-Drive
Wind-Turbine Generators, IEEE T. Energ. Con., 25,
732–740, 2010. a
Siemens: Wind Generators,
https://new.siemens.com/global/en/markets/wind/equipment/energy-generation/windgenerators.html (last access: 21 September 2021),
2020. a
Sieros, G., Chaviaropoulos, P., Sørensen, J. D., Bulder, B. H., and Jamieson,
P.: Upscaling wind turbines: theoretical and practical aspects and their
impact on the cost of energy: Upscaling wind turbines: theoretical and
practical aspects, Wind Energy, 15, 3–17, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.527, 2012. a
Silva, P., Giuffrida, A., Fergnani, N., Macchi, E., Cantù, M., Suffredini,
R., Schiavetti, M., and Gigliucci, G.: Performance prediction of a multi-MW
wind turbine adopting an advanced hydrostatic transmission, Energy, 64,
450–461, 2014. a
SKF: Wind Generators,
https://www.skf.com/mena/services/recondoil (last access: 21 September 2021), 2021. a
Slootweg, J., De Haan, S., Polinder, H., and Kling, W.: General model for
representing variable speed wind turbines in power system dynamics
simulations, IEEE T. Pow. Syst., 18, 144–151, 2003. a
Sopanen, J., Ruuskanen, V., Nerg, J., and Pyrhonen, J.: Dynamic torque analysis
of a wind turbine drive train including a direct-driven permanent-magnet
generator, IEEE T. Ind. Electron., 58, 3859–3867, 2010. a
Spinato, F., Tavner, P. J., Van Bussel, G. J., and Koutoulakos, E.: Reliability
of wind turbine subassemblies, IET Renew. Pow. Generation, 3, 387–401,
2009. a
Steffen, B., Beuse, M., Tautorat, P., and Schmidt, T. S.: Experience Curves
for Operations and Maintenance Costs of Renew. Energ. Technologies,
Joule, 4, 359–375, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOULE.2019.11.012, 2020. a
Stehouwer, E. and van Zinderen, G. J.: Conceptual nacelle designs of 10-20 MW
wind turbines, Tech. Rep. Deliverable D3.41, 2016. a
Stetco, A., Dinmohammadi, F., Zhao, X., Robu, V., Flynn, D., Barnes, M., Keane,
J., and Nenadic, G.: Machine learning methods for wind turbine condition
monitoring: A review, Renew. Energ., 133, 620–635, 2019. a
Struggl, S., Berbyuk, V., and Johansson, H.: Review on wind turbines with focus
on drive train system dynamics, Wind Energy, 18, 567–590, 2015. a
Tartt, K., Nejad, A. R., Amiri, A. K., and McDonald, A.: On lifetime extension
of wind turbine drivetrains, in: Proceedings of the ASME 2021 40th
International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering OMAE 2021, ASME OMAE2021: Virtual Conference: 21–30 June 2021,
pp. OMAE2021–62 516, ASME, 2021. a, b
Tchakoua, P., Wamkeue, R., Ouhrouche, M., Slaoui-Hasnaoui, F., Tameghe, T. A.,
and Ekemb, G.: Wind turbine condition monitoring: State-of-the-art review,
new trends, and future challenges, Energies, 7, 2595–2630, 2014. a
Topham, E. and McMillan, D.: Sustainable decommissioning of an offshore wind
farm, Renew. Energ., 102, 470–480,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.10.066, 2017. a
Topham, E., Gonzalez, E., McMillan, D., and João, E.: Challenges of
decommissioning offshore wind farms: overview of the European experience, in:
Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1222, p. 012035, IOP Publishing, WindEurope Conference and Exhibition 2019, 2–4 April 2019, Bilbao, Spain,
2019a. a
Topham, E., McMillan, D., Bradley, S., and Hart, E.: Recycling offshore wind
farms at decommissioning stage, Energ. Pol., 129, 698–709,
2019b. a
Torsvik, J., Nejad, A. R., and Pedersen, E.: Main bearings in large offshore
wind turbines: development trends, design and analysis requirements, in:
Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1037, p. 042020, IOP Publishing, The Science of Making Torque from Wind (TORQUE 2018), 20–22 June 2018, Milan, Italy,
2018. a, b
Torsvik, J., Nejad, A. R., and Pedersen, E.: Experimental field study of
floater motion effects on a main bearing in a full-scale spar floating wind
turbine, Mar. Struct., 79, 103059, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2021.103059, 2021. a, b
Tracht, K., Goch, G., Schuh, P., Sorg, M., and Westerkamp, J. F.: Failure
probability prediction based on condition monitoring data of wind energy
systems for spare parts supply, CIRP Annals, 62, 127–130, 2013. a
Trevisan, A. S., El-Deib, A. A., Gagnon, R., Mahseredjian, J., and Fecteau, M.:
Field validated generic EMT-type model of a full converter wind turbine based
on a gearless externally excited synchronous generator, IEEE T.
Pow. Delivery, 33, 2284–2293, 2018. a
Turnbull, A., Carroll, J., McDonald, A., and Koukoura, S.: Prediction of wind
turbine generator failure using two-stage cluster-classification methodology,
Wind Energy, 22, 1593–1602, 2019. a
Ugalde-Loo, C. E., Ekanayake, J. B., and Jenkins, N.: State-space modeling of
wind turbine generators for power system studies, IEEE T.
Indust. Appl., 49, 223–232, 2012. a
Ullah, N. R., Larsson, A., Petersson, A., and Karlsson, D.: Detailed modeling
for large scale wind power installations-a real project case study, in: 2008
Third International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation and
Restructuring and Power Technologies, pp. 46–56, IEEE, 2008. a
Vaes, D., Clement, P., and Lindstedt, U.: Roller bearings for the next
generation of wind gearboxes, in: Conference for Wind Power Drives 2021:
Conference Proceedings, 9–11 March 2021, Aachen, Germany, 2021. a
van Binsbergen, D. W., Wang, S., and Nejad, A. R.: Effects of induction and
wake steering control on power and drivetrain responses for 10 MW floating
wind turbines in a wind farm, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1618,
022044, TORQUE2020,
28 September–2 October 2020, online, 2020. a, b, c, d, e
van Binsbergen, D. W., Nejad, A. R., and Helsen, J.: Dynamic model development
of wind turbine drivetrains by using sensor measurments, in: Proceedings of
the ASME 2021 40th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic
Engineering OMAE 2021, 21–30 June 2021, pp. OMAE2021–61 939, ASME, 2021. a
Vanhollebeke, F., Peeters, J., Vandepitte, D., and Desmet, W.: Using transfer
path analysis to assess the influence of bearings on structural vibrations of
a wind turbine gearbox, Wind Energy, 18, 797–810, 2015. a
Večeř, P., Kreidl, M., and Šmíd, R.: Condition
indicators for gearbox condition monitoring systems, Acta Polytechnica, 45, 35–43, https://doi.org/10.14311/782,
2005. a
Veers, P., Dykes, K., Lantz, E., Barth, S., Bottasso, C. L., Carlson, O.,
Clifton, A., Green, J., Green, P., Holttinen, H.,
Laird, D., Lehtomäki, V., Lundquist, J. K., Manwell, J., Marquis, M., Meneveau, C., Moriarty, P., Munduate, X., Muskulus, M., Naughton, J., Pao, L., Paquette, J., Peinke, J., Robertson, A., Rodrigo, J. S., Sempreviva, A. M., Smith, J. C., Tuohy, A., and Wiser, R.: Grand challenges in
the science of wind energy, Science, 366, 6464, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau2027, 2019. a, b
Vijayakar, S.: A combined surface integral and finite element solution for a
three-dimensional contact problem, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 31, 525–545, 1991. a
Vree, D., Larumbe, L. B., Qin, Z., Bauer, P., and Ummels, B.: Impact of WTG
converter impedance model on harmonic amplification factor of the Dutch 110kV
transmission network using a 383MW wind farm case study, in: Cigre 2020
E-session, Cigré, 2020. a
Wächter, M., Lind, P., Hernandez, I. H., Rinn, P., Milan, P., Stoevesandt,
B., and Peinke, J.: Efficient load and power monitoring by stochastic
methods, EWEA 2015 Annual Event, 17–20 November 2015, Paris, France, 2015. a
Wang, Q., Zhao, B., Fu, Y., Kong, X., and Ma, H.: An improved time-varying mesh
stiffness model for helical gear pairs considering axial mesh force
component, Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 106, 413–429, 2018. a
Watson, S., Kennedy, I., and Gray, C.: The use of physics of failure modelling
in wind turbine condition monitoring, in: EWEA Annual Conf, vol. 2011, 14–17 March 2011, Brussels, Belgium, pp.
309–312, 2011. a
Weber, C. and Banaschek, K.: The deformation of loaded gears and the effect on their load-carrying capacity, British Scientific and Industrial Research, Report No. 3, 111 pp., 1949. a
Wind Europe: Offshore Wind in Europe, Key trends and statistics 2019,
https://windeurope.org/wp-content/uploads/files/about-wind/statistics/WindEurope-Annual-Offshore-Statistics-2019.pdf,
last access: 14 August 2020. a
Windpower, Z.: Modular Gearbox Platform Designs,
https://www.zf.com/products/en/wind/shift/shift.html (last access: 21 September 2021), 2021. a
Wiser, R., Bolinger, M., and Lantz, E.: Assessing Wind Power Operating Costs in
the United States: Results from a Survey of Wind Industry Experts, Renew. Energ. Focus, 30, 46–57, 2019. a
Wu, Z. and Huang, N. E.: Ensemble empirical mode decomposition: a
noise-assisted data analysis method, Adv. Adapt. Data Anal., 1,
1–41, 2009. a
Yang, W., Court, R., and Jiang, J.: Wind turbine condition monitoring by the
approach of SCADA data analysis, Renew. Energ., 53, 365–376, 2013. a
Yang, W., Tavner, P. J., Crabtree, C. J., Feng, Y., and Qiu, Y.: Wind turbine
condition monitoring: technical and commercial challenges, Wind Energy, 17,
673–693, 2014. a
Yaramasu, V., Wu, B., Sen, P. C., Kouro, S., and Narimani, M.: High-power wind
energy conversion systems: State-of-the-art and emerging technologies,
Proceedings of the IEEE, 103, 740–788, https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2014.2378692,
2015. a, b
Zaher, A., McArthur, S., Infield, D., and Patel, Y.: Online wind turbine fault
detection through automated SCADA data analysis, Wind Energy: An
International Journal for Progress and Applications in Wind Power Conversion
Technology, 12, 574–593, 2009. a
Zakrajsek, J. J., Townsend, D. P., and Decker, H. J.: An analysis of gear fault
detection methods as applied to pitting fatigue failure data, Tech. rep.,
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Cleveland OH Lewis Research
Center, 1993. a
Zhou, D., Blaabjerg, F., Lau, M., and Tonnes, M.: Thermal profile analysis of
doubly-fed induction generator based wind power converter with air and liquid
cooling methods, in: 2013 15th European Conference on Power Electronics and
Applications (EPE), 2–6 September 2013, Lille, France, pp. 1–10, IEEE, 2013. a
Zhou, J., Guo, P., and Wang, X. R.: Modeling of wind turbine power curve based
on Gaussian process, Proceedings – International Conference on Machine
Learning and Cybernetics, 1, 71–76, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMLC.2014.7009094, 2014. a
Zhu, J., Nostrand, T., Spiegel, C., and Morton, B.: Survey of condition
indicators for condition monitoring systems, in: Annu. Conf. Progn. Heal.
Manag. Soc, vol. 5, pp. 1–13, 2014. a
Ziegler, L., Gonzalez, E., Rubert, T., Smolka, U., and Melero, J. J.: Lifetime
extension of onshore wind turbines: A review covering Germany, Spain,
Denmark, and the UK, Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev., 82,
1261–1271, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.100, 2018. a
Short summary
This paper presents the state-of-the-art technologies and development trends of wind turbine drivetrains – the energy conversion systems transferring the kinetic energy of the wind to electrical energy – in different stages of their life cycle: design, manufacturing, installation, operation, lifetime extension, decommissioning and recycling. The main aim of this article is to review the drivetrain technology development as well as to identify future challenges and research gaps.
This paper presents the state-of-the-art technologies and development trends of wind turbine...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint