Articles | Volume 9, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1305-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1305-2024
Research article
 | 
10 Jun 2024
Research article |  | 10 Jun 2024

An actuator sector model for wind power applications: a parametric study

Mohammad Mehdi Mohammadi, Hugo Olivares-Espinosa, Gonzalo Pablo Navarro Diaz, and Stefan Ivanell

Related authors

Machine learning methods to improve spatial predictions of coastal wind speed profiles and low-level jets using single-level ERA5 data
Christoffer Hallgren, Jeanie A. Aird, Stefan Ivanell, Heiner Körnich, Ville Vakkari, Rebecca J. Barthelmie, Sara C. Pryor, and Erik Sahlée
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 821–840, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-821-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-821-2024, 2024
Short summary
Brief communication: On the definition of the low-level jet
Christoffer Hallgren, Jeanie A. Aird, Stefan Ivanell, Heiner Körnich, Rebecca J. Barthelmie, Sara C. Pryor, and Erik Sahlée
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1651–1658, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1651-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1651-2023, 2023
Short summary
The winds are twisting: analysis of strong directional shear across the rotor plane using coastal lidar measurements and ERA5
Christoffer Hallgren, Heiner Körnich, Stefan Ivanell, Ville Vakkari, and Erik Sahlée
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-129,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2023-129, 2023
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Actuator line model using simplified force calculation methods
Gonzalo Pablo Navarro Diaz, Alejandro Daniel Otero, Henrik Asmuth, Jens Nørkær Sørensen, and Stefan Ivanell
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 363–382, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-363-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-363-2023, 2023
Short summary
Classification and properties of non-idealized coastal wind profiles – an observational study
Christoffer Hallgren, Johan Arnqvist, Erik Nilsson, Stefan Ivanell, Metodija Shapkalijevski, August Thomasson, Heidi Pettersson, and Erik Sahlée
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1183–1207, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1183-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1183-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Thematic area: Fluid mechanics | Topic: Wakes and wind farm aerodynamics
Hyperparameter tuning framework for calibrating analytical wake models using SCADA data of an offshore wind farm
Diederik van Binsbergen, Pieter-Jan Daems, Timothy Verstraeten, Amir R. Nejad, and Jan Helsen
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1507–1526, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1507-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1507-2024, 2024
Short summary
Synchronised WindScanner field measurements of the induction zone between two closely spaced wind turbines
Anantha Padmanabhan Kidambi Sekar, Paul Hulsman, Marijn Floris van Dooren, and Martin Kühn
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1483–1505, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1483-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1483-2024, 2024
Short summary
Wind farm structural response and wake dynamics for an evolving stable boundary layer: computational and experimental comparisons
Kelsey Shaler, Eliot Quon, Hristo Ivanov, and Jason Jonkman
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1451–1463, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1451-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1451-2024, 2024
Short summary
Improvements to the dynamic wake meandering model by incorporating the turbulent Schmidt number
Peter Brugger, Corey D. Markfort, and Fernando Porté-Agel
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1363–1379, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1363-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1363-2024, 2024
Short summary
Wind tunnel investigations of an individual pitch control strategy for wind farm power optimization
Franz V. Mühle, Florian M. Heckmeier, Filippo Campagnolo, and Christian Breitsamter
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 1251–1271, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1251-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1251-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Asmuth, H., Navarro Diaz, G. P., Madsen, H. A., Branlard, E., Meyer Forsting, A. R., Nilsson, K., Jonkman, J., and Ivanell, S.: Wind Turbine Response in Waked Inflow: A Modelling Benchmark Against Full-Scale Measurements, SSRN Electron. J., 191, 868–887, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3940154, 2021. a, b
Churchfield, M., Lee, S., Moriarty, P., Martinez, L., Leonardi, S., Vijayakumar, G., and Brasseur, J.: A Large-Eddy Simulation of Wind-Plant Aerodynamics, in: 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nashville, Tennessee, ISBN 9781600869365, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-537, 2012.  a, b
Churchfield, M. J., Schreck, S. J., Martinez, L. A., Meneveau, C., and Spalart, P. R.: An Advanced Actuator Line Method for Wind Energy Applications and Beyond, in: 35th Wind Energy Symposium, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Grapevine, Texas, ISBN 9781624104565, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2017-1998, 2017. a
Dağ, K. O. and Sørensen, J. N.: A new tip correction for actuator line computations, Wind Energy, 23, 148–160, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2419, 2020. a
Fleming, P., Gebraad, P. M., Lee, S., Van Wingerden, J.-W., Johnson, K., Churchfield, M., Michalakes, J., Spalart, P., and Moriarty, P.: Simulation comparison of wake mitigation control strategies for a two-turbine case: Simulation comparison of wake mitigation control strategies for a two-turbine case, Wind Energy, 18, 2135–2143, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1810, 2015. a
Download
Short summary
This paper has put forward a set of recommendations regarding the actuator sector model implementation details to improve the capability of the model to reproduce similar results compared to those obtained by an actuator line model, which is one of the most common ways used for numerical simulations of wind farms, while providing significant computational savings. This includes among others the velocity sampling method and a correction of the sampled velocities to calculate the blade forces.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint