Articles | Volume 10, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1451-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1451-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
22 Jul 2025
Research article |
| 22 Jul 2025
| 22 Jul 2025
Evaluating the potential of short-term instrument deployment to improve distributed wind resource assessment
Lindsay M. Sheridan
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, United States
Dmitry Duplyakin
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado, United States
Caleb Phillips
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado, United States
Heidi Tinnesand
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado, United States
One Power Company, Findlay, Ohio, United States
Raj K. Rai
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, United States
Julia E. Flaherty
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, United States
Larry K. Berg
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, United States
Related authors
Lindsay M. Sheridan, Jiali Wang, Caroline Draxl, Nicola Bodini, Caleb Phillips, Dmitry Duplyakin, Heidi Tinnesand, Raj K. Rai, Julia E. Flaherty, Larry K. Berg, Chunyong Jung, Ethan Young, and Rao Kotamarthi
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 1551–1574, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1551-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1551-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Three recent wind resource datasets are assessed for their skills in representing annual average wind speeds and seasonal, diurnal, and interannual trends in the wind resource in coastal locations to support customers interested in small and midsize wind energy.
Kyle Peco, Jiali Wang, Chunyong Jung, Gökhan Sever, Lindsay Sheridan, Jeremy Feinstein, Rao Kotamarthi, Caroline Draxl, Ethan Young, Avi Purkayastha, and Andrew Kumler
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-13, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-13, 2025
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents a new wind dataset, generated by a climate model, that can help facilitate efforts in wind energy. By providing data across much of North America, this dataset can offer insights into the wind patterns in more understudied regions. By validating the dataset against actual wind observations, we have demonstrated that this dataset is able to accurately capture the wind patterns of different geographic areas, which can help identify locations for wind energy farms.
Lindsay M. Sheridan, Raghavendra Krishnamurthy, William I. Gustafson Jr., Ye Liu, Brian J. Gaudet, Nicola Bodini, Rob K. Newsom, and Mikhail Pekour
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 741–758, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-741-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-741-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In 2020, lidar-mounted buoys owned by the US Department of Energy (DOE) were deployed off the California coast in two wind energy lease areas and provided valuable year-long analyses of offshore low-level jet (LLJ) characteristics at heights relevant to wind turbines. In addition to the LLJ climatology, this work provides validation of LLJ representation in atmospheric models that are essential for assessing the potential energy yield of offshore wind farms.
Raghavendra Krishnamurthy, Gabriel García Medina, Brian Gaudet, William I. Gustafson Jr., Evgueni I. Kassianov, Jinliang Liu, Rob K. Newsom, Lindsay M. Sheridan, and Alicia M. Mahon
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 5667–5699, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5667-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5667-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Our understanding and ability to observe and model air–sea processes has been identified as a principal limitation to our ability to predict future weather. Few observations exist offshore along the coast of California. To improve our understanding of the air–sea transition zone and support the wind energy industry, two buoys with state-of-the-art equipment were deployed for 1 year. In this article, we present details of the post-processing, algorithms, and analyses.
Lindsay M. Sheridan, Raghu Krishnamurthy, Gabriel García Medina, Brian J. Gaudet, William I. Gustafson Jr., Alicia M. Mahon, William J. Shaw, Rob K. Newsom, Mikhail Pekour, and Zhaoqing Yang
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 2059–2084, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2059-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2059-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Using observations from lidar buoys, five reanalysis and analysis models that support the wind energy community are validated offshore and at rotor-level heights along the California Pacific coast. The models are found to underestimate the observed wind resource. Occasions of large model error occur in conjunction with stable atmospheric conditions, wind speeds associated with peak turbine power production, and mischaracterization of the diurnal wind speed cycle in summer months.
Caleb Phillips, Lindsay M. Sheridan, Patrick Conry, Dimitrios K. Fytanidis, Dmitry Duplyakin, Sagi Zisman, Nicolas Duboc, Matt Nelson, Rao Kotamarthi, Rod Linn, Marc Broersma, Timo Spijkerboer, and Heidi Tinnesand
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1153–1169, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1153-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1153-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Adoption of distributed wind turbines for energy generation is hindered by challenges associated with siting and accurate estimation of the wind resource. This study evaluates classic and commonly used methods alongside new state-of-the-art models derived from simulations and machine learning approaches using a large dataset from the Netherlands. We find that data-driven methods are most effective at predicting production at real sites and new models reliably outperform classic methods.
Lindsay M. Sheridan, Caleb Phillips, Alice C. Orrell, Larry K. Berg, Heidi Tinnesand, Raj K. Rai, Sagi Zisman, Dmitry Duplyakin, and Julia E. Flaherty
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 659–676, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-659-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-659-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The small wind community relies on simplified wind models and energy production simulation tools to obtain energy generation expectations. We gathered actual wind speed and turbine production data across the US to test the accuracy of models and tools for small wind turbines. This study provides small wind installers and owners with the error metrics and sources of error associated with using models and tools to make performance estimates, empowering them to adjust expectations accordingly.
Lindsay M. Sheridan, Jiali Wang, Caroline Draxl, Nicola Bodini, Caleb Phillips, Dmitry Duplyakin, Heidi Tinnesand, Raj K. Rai, Julia E. Flaherty, Larry K. Berg, Chunyong Jung, Ethan Young, and Rao Kotamarthi
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 1551–1574, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1551-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1551-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Three recent wind resource datasets are assessed for their skills in representing annual average wind speeds and seasonal, diurnal, and interannual trends in the wind resource in coastal locations to support customers interested in small and midsize wind energy.
Jane Lockshin, Paula Pérez, Slater Podgorny, Michaela Sizemore, Paritosh Das, Jeffrey D. Laurence-Chasen, Paul Crook, and Caleb Phillips
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 1231–1248, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1231-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1231-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study examines the potential for distributed wind energy across the contiguous United States by leveraging a novel modeling approach that utilizes a high-resolution dataset and analyzes over 150 million parcels. Modeling results reveal substantial opportunities for energy generation using distributed wind technologies. Additionally, findings reveal a substantial increase from prior modeling results in estimated technical and economic potential for distributed wind.
Branko Kosović, Sukanta Basu, Jacob Berg, Larry K. Berg, Sue E. Haupt, Xiaoli G. Larsén, Joachim Peinke, Richard J. A. M. Stevens, Paul Veers, and Simon Watson
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-42, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-42, 2025
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
Most human activity happens in the layer of the atmosphere which extends a few hundred meters to a couple of kilometers above the surface of the Earth. The flow in this layer is turbulent. Turbulence impacts wind power production and turbine lifespan. Optimizing wind turbine performance requires understanding how turbulence affects both wind turbine efficiency and reliability. This paper points to gaps in our knowledge that need to be addressed to effectively utilize wind resources.
Kyle Peco, Jiali Wang, Chunyong Jung, Gökhan Sever, Lindsay Sheridan, Jeremy Feinstein, Rao Kotamarthi, Caroline Draxl, Ethan Young, Avi Purkayastha, and Andrew Kumler
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-13, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-13, 2025
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents a new wind dataset, generated by a climate model, that can help facilitate efforts in wind energy. By providing data across much of North America, this dataset can offer insights into the wind patterns in more understudied regions. By validating the dataset against actual wind observations, we have demonstrated that this dataset is able to accurately capture the wind patterns of different geographic areas, which can help identify locations for wind energy farms.
Sheng-Lun Tai, Zhao Yang, Brian Gaudet, Koichi Sakaguchi, Larry Berg, Colleen Kaul, Yun Qian, Ye Liu, and Jerome Fast
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-599, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-599, 2025
Revised manuscript accepted for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
Our study created a high-resolution soil moisture dataset for the eastern U.S. by integrating satellite data with a land surface model and advanced algorithms, achieving 1-km scale analyses. Validated against multiple networks and datasets, it demonstrated superior accuracy. This dataset is vital for understanding soil moisture dynamics, especially during droughts, and highlights the need for improved modeling of clay soils to refine future predictions.
William Radünz, Bruno Carmo, Julie K. Lundquist, Stefano Letizia, Aliza Abraham, Adam S. Wise, Miguel Sanchez Gomez, Nicholas Hamilton, Raj K. Rai, and Pedro S. Peixoto
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-166, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-166, 2025
Revised manuscript accepted for WES
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates how simple terrain can cause significant variations in wind speed, especially during specific atmospheric conditions like low-level jets. By combining simulations and observations from a real wind farm, we found that downstream turbines generate more power than upstream ones, despite wake effects only impacting the upstream turbines. We highlight the crucial role of the strong vertical wind speed gradient in low-level jets in driving this effect.
Ye Liu, Yun Qian, Larry K. Berg, Zhe Feng, Jianfeng Li, Jingyi Chen, and Zhao Yang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 8165–8181, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-8165-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-8165-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Deep convection under various large-scale meteorological patterns (LSMPs) shows distinct precipitation features. In southeastern Texas, mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) contribute significantly to precipitation year-round, while isolated deep convection (IDC) is prominent in summer and fall. Self-organizing maps (SOMs) reveal convection can occur without large-scale lifting or moisture convergence. MCSs and IDC events have distinct life cycles influenced by specific LSMPs.
Lindsay M. Sheridan, Raghavendra Krishnamurthy, William I. Gustafson Jr., Ye Liu, Brian J. Gaudet, Nicola Bodini, Rob K. Newsom, and Mikhail Pekour
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 741–758, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-741-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-741-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In 2020, lidar-mounted buoys owned by the US Department of Energy (DOE) were deployed off the California coast in two wind energy lease areas and provided valuable year-long analyses of offshore low-level jet (LLJ) characteristics at heights relevant to wind turbines. In addition to the LLJ climatology, this work provides validation of LLJ representation in atmospheric models that are essential for assessing the potential energy yield of offshore wind farms.
Raghavendra Krishnamurthy, Gabriel García Medina, Brian Gaudet, William I. Gustafson Jr., Evgueni I. Kassianov, Jinliang Liu, Rob K. Newsom, Lindsay M. Sheridan, and Alicia M. Mahon
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 5667–5699, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5667-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5667-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Our understanding and ability to observe and model air–sea processes has been identified as a principal limitation to our ability to predict future weather. Few observations exist offshore along the coast of California. To improve our understanding of the air–sea transition zone and support the wind energy industry, two buoys with state-of-the-art equipment were deployed for 1 year. In this article, we present details of the post-processing, algorithms, and analyses.
Sue Ellen Haupt, Branko Kosović, Larry K. Berg, Colleen M. Kaul, Matthew Churchfield, Jeffrey Mirocha, Dries Allaerts, Thomas Brummet, Shannon Davis, Amy DeCastro, Susan Dettling, Caroline Draxl, David John Gagne, Patrick Hawbecker, Pankaj Jha, Timothy Juliano, William Lassman, Eliot Quon, Raj K. Rai, Michael Robinson, William Shaw, and Regis Thedin
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1251–1275, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1251-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1251-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The Mesoscale to Microscale Coupling team, part of the U.S. Department of Energy Atmosphere to Electrons (A2e) initiative, has studied various important challenges related to coupling mesoscale models to microscale models. Lessons learned and discerned best practices are described in the context of the cases studied for the purpose of enabling further deployment of wind energy. It also points to code, assessment tools, and data for testing the methods.
Sheng-Lun Tai, Larry K. Berg, Raghavendra Krishnamurthy, Rob Newsom, and Anthony Kirincich
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 433–448, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-433-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-433-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Turbulence intensity is critical for wind turbine design and operation as it affects wind power generation efficiency. Turbulence measurements in the marine environment are limited. We use a model to derive turbulence intensity and test how sea surface temperature data may impact the simulated turbulence intensity and atmospheric stability. The model slightly underestimates turbulence, and improved sea surface temperature data reduce the bias. Error with unrealistic mesoscale flow is identified.
William J. Shaw, Larry K. Berg, Mithu Debnath, Georgios Deskos, Caroline Draxl, Virendra P. Ghate, Charlotte B. Hasager, Rao Kotamarthi, Jeffrey D. Mirocha, Paytsar Muradyan, William J. Pringle, David D. Turner, and James M. Wilczak
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 2307–2334, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2307-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2307-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper provides a review of prominent scientific challenges to characterizing the offshore wind resource using as examples phenomena that occur in the rapidly developing wind energy areas off the United States. The paper also describes the current state of modeling and observations in the marine atmospheric boundary layer and provides specific recommendations for filling key current knowledge gaps.
Lindsay M. Sheridan, Raghu Krishnamurthy, Gabriel García Medina, Brian J. Gaudet, William I. Gustafson Jr., Alicia M. Mahon, William J. Shaw, Rob K. Newsom, Mikhail Pekour, and Zhaoqing Yang
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 2059–2084, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2059-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2059-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Using observations from lidar buoys, five reanalysis and analysis models that support the wind energy community are validated offshore and at rotor-level heights along the California Pacific coast. The models are found to underestimate the observed wind resource. Occasions of large model error occur in conjunction with stable atmospheric conditions, wind speeds associated with peak turbine power production, and mischaracterization of the diurnal wind speed cycle in summer months.
Caleb Phillips, Lindsay M. Sheridan, Patrick Conry, Dimitrios K. Fytanidis, Dmitry Duplyakin, Sagi Zisman, Nicolas Duboc, Matt Nelson, Rao Kotamarthi, Rod Linn, Marc Broersma, Timo Spijkerboer, and Heidi Tinnesand
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1153–1169, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1153-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1153-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Adoption of distributed wind turbines for energy generation is hindered by challenges associated with siting and accurate estimation of the wind resource. This study evaluates classic and commonly used methods alongside new state-of-the-art models derived from simulations and machine learning approaches using a large dataset from the Netherlands. We find that data-driven methods are most effective at predicting production at real sites and new models reliably outperform classic methods.
Po-Lun Ma, Bryce E. Harrop, Vincent E. Larson, Richard B. Neale, Andrew Gettelman, Hugh Morrison, Hailong Wang, Kai Zhang, Stephen A. Klein, Mark D. Zelinka, Yuying Zhang, Yun Qian, Jin-Ho Yoon, Christopher R. Jones, Meng Huang, Sheng-Lun Tai, Balwinder Singh, Peter A. Bogenschutz, Xue Zheng, Wuyin Lin, Johannes Quaas, Hélène Chepfer, Michael A. Brunke, Xubin Zeng, Johannes Mülmenstädt, Samson Hagos, Zhibo Zhang, Hua Song, Xiaohong Liu, Michael S. Pritchard, Hui Wan, Jingyu Wang, Qi Tang, Peter M. Caldwell, Jiwen Fan, Larry K. Berg, Jerome D. Fast, Mark A. Taylor, Jean-Christophe Golaz, Shaocheng Xie, Philip J. Rasch, and L. Ruby Leung
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2881–2916, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2881-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2881-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
An alternative set of parameters for E3SM Atmospheric Model version 1 has been developed based on a tuning strategy that focuses on clouds. When clouds in every regime are improved, other aspects of the model are also improved, even though they are not the direct targets for calibration. The recalibrated model shows a lower sensitivity to anthropogenic aerosols and surface warming, suggesting potential improvements to the simulated climate in the past and future.
Lindsay M. Sheridan, Caleb Phillips, Alice C. Orrell, Larry K. Berg, Heidi Tinnesand, Raj K. Rai, Sagi Zisman, Dmitry Duplyakin, and Julia E. Flaherty
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 659–676, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-659-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-659-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The small wind community relies on simplified wind models and energy production simulation tools to obtain energy generation expectations. We gathered actual wind speed and turbine production data across the US to test the accuracy of models and tools for small wind turbines. This study provides small wind installers and owners with the error metrics and sources of error associated with using models and tools to make performance estimates, empowering them to adjust expectations accordingly.
Ye Liu, Yun Qian, and Larry K. Berg
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 37–51, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-37-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-37-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Uncertainties in initial conditions (ICs) decrease the accuracy of wind speed forecasts. We find that IC uncertainties can alter wind speed by modulating the weather system. IC uncertainties in local thermal gradient and large-scale circulation jointly contribute to wind speed forecast uncertainties. Wind forecast accuracy in the Columbia River Basin is confined by initial uncertainties in a few specific regions, providing useful information for more intense measurement and modeling studies.
Raghavendra Krishnamurthy, Rob K. Newsom, Larry K. Berg, Heng Xiao, Po-Lun Ma, and David D. Turner
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 4403–4424, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4403-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4403-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Planetary boundary layer (PBL) height is a critical parameter in atmospheric models. Continuous PBL height measurements from remote sensing measurements are important to understand various boundary layer mechanisms, especially during daytime and evening transition periods. Due to several limitations in existing methodologies to detect PBL height from a Doppler lidar, in this study, a machine learning (ML) approach is tested. The ML model is observed to improve the accuracy by over 50 %.
Caroline Draxl, Rochelle P. Worsnop, Geng Xia, Yelena Pichugina, Duli Chand, Julie K. Lundquist, Justin Sharp, Garrett Wedam, James M. Wilczak, and Larry K. Berg
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 45–60, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-45-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-45-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Mountain waves can create oscillations in low-level wind speeds and subsequently in the power output of wind plants. We document such oscillations by analyzing sodar and lidar observations, nacelle wind speeds, power observations, and Weather Research and Forecasting model simulations. This research describes how mountain waves form in the Columbia River basin and affect wind energy production and their impact on operational forecasting, wind plant layout, and integration of power into the grid.
Cited articles
Argonne National Laboratory (ANL): Argonne 60 m Meteorological Tower, Argonne National Laboratory [data set], https://www.atmos.anl.gov/ANLMET/, last access: 14 February 2022.
ArcVera: Mesoscale and Microscale Modeling for Wind Energy Applications: Next-Generation Numerical Weather Prediction for Wind Flow Modeling, https://arcvera.com/mesoscale-and-microscale-modeling-for-wind-energy-applications-next-generation-numerical-weather-prediction-for-wind-flow-modeling/, last access: 24 August 2023.
Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM): Atmospheric Radiation Measurement User Facility, Southern Great Plains Site, ARM [data set], https://www.arm.gov/capabilities/instruments?location[0]=Southern Great Plains, last access: 7 June 2021.
B2SHARE: The Tall Tower Dataset, B2SHARE [data set], https://b2share.eudat.eu/records/159158152f4d4be79559e2f3f6b1a410, last access: 9 March 2020.
Basse, A., Callies, D., Grötzner, A., and Pauscher, L.: Seasonal effects in the long-term correction of short-term wind measurements using reanalysis data, Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 1473–1490, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1473-2021, 2021.
Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL): Current Observations, Brookhaven National Laboratory [data set], https://wx1.bnl.gov/, last access: 14 April 2020.
BPA: BPA Meteorological Information, Bonneville Power Administration [data set], https://transmission.bpa.gov/Business/Operations/Wind/MetData/default.aspx, last access: 17 March 2022.
Carta, J. A. and Velázquez, S.: A new probabilistic method to estimate the long-term wind speed characteristics at a potential wind energy conversion site, Energy, 36, 2671–2685, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.02.008, 2011.
Carta, J. A., Velázquez, S., and Cabrera, P.: A review of measure-correlate-predict (MCP) methods used to estimate long-term wind characteristics at a target site, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 27, 362–400, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.07.004, 2013.
Chen, D., Zhou, Z., and Yang, X.: A measure-correlate-predict model based on neural networks and frozen flow hypothesis for wind resource assessment, Phys. Fluids, 34, 045107, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0086354, 2022.
Davis, N. N., Badger, J., Hahmann, A. N., Hansen, B. O., Mortensen, N. G., Kelly, M., Larsén, X. G., Olsen, B. T., Floors, R., Lizcano, G., Casso, P., Lacave, O., Bosch, A., Bauwens, I., Knight, O. J., Potter van Loon, A., Fox, R., Parvanyan, T., Krohn Hansen, S. B., Heathfield, D., Onninen, M., and Drummond, R.: The Global Wind Atlas: A High-Resolution Dataset of Climatologies and Associated Web-Based Application, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 104.8, E1507–E1525, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0075.1, 2023.
de Assis Tavares, L. F., Shadman, M., de Freitas Assad, L. P., and Estefen, S. F.: Influence of the WRF model and atmospheric reanalysis on the offshore wind resource potential and cost estimation: A case study for Rio de Janeiro State, Energy, 240, 122767, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122767, 2022.
Derrick, A.: Development of the measure-correlate-predict strategy for site assessment, in: Proceedings of the 14th British Wind Energy Association, Nottingham, UK, 25–27 March 1992, 1992.
Díaz, S. Carta, J. A., and Matías, J. M.: Performance assessment of five MCP models proposed for the estimation of long-term wind turbine power outputs at a target site using three machine learning techniques, Appl. Energ., 209, 455–477, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.11.007, 2018.
Dinler, A.: A new low-correlation MCP (measure-correlate-predict) method for wind energy forecasting, Energy, 63, 152–160, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.10.007, 2013.
Draxl, C., Wang, J., Sheridan, L., Jung, C., Bodini, N., Buckhold, S., Aghili, C. T., Peco, K., Kotamarthi, R., Kumler, A., Phillips, C., Purkayastha, A., Young, E., Rosenlieb, E., and Tinnesand, H.: WTK-LED: The WIND Toolkit Long-term Ensemble Dataset, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO (United States), NREL/TP-5000-88457, https://doi.org/10.2172/2473210, 2024.
FEMC: University of Vermont, Forest Ecosystem Monitoring Cooperative, Raw Proctor Maple Research Center Meteorological Data, FEMC [data set], https://www.uvm.edu/femc/data/archive/project/proctor-maple-research-center-meteorological-monitoring/dataset/proctor-maple-research-center-air-quality-1/overview, last access: 15 April 2020.
Friedman, J. H.: Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (with discussion), Ann. Stat., 19, 1–67, https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176347963, 1991.
García-Rojo, R.: Algorithm for the estimation of the long-term wind climate at a meteorological mast using a joint probabilistic approach, Wind Engineering, 28, 213–224, https://doi.org/10.1260/0309524041211378, 2004.
Gualtieri, G.: Reliability of ERA5 Reanalysis Data for Wind Resource Assessment: A Comparison against Tall Towers, Energies, 14, 4169, https://doi.org/10.3390/en14144169, 2021.
Hayes, L., Stocks, M., and Blakers, A.: Accurate long-term power generation model for offshore wind farms in Europe using ERA5 reanalysis, Energy, 229, 120603, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120603, 2021.
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.-N.: The ERA5 Global Reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 146, 1999–2049, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803, 2020.
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Biavati, G., Horányi, A., Muñoz Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Rozum, I., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Dee, D., and Thépaut, J.-N.: ERA5 hourly data on single levels from 1940 to present, Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS) [data set], https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.adbb2d47, 2023.
Iacono, M. J., Delamere, J. S., Mlawer, E. J., Shephard, M. W., Clough, S. A., and Collins, W. D.: Radiative forcing by long-lived greenhouse gases: Calculations with the AER radiative transfer models, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D13103, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009944, 2008.
Janjić, Z. I.: The step-mountain eta coordinate model: Further developments of the convection, viscous sublayer, and turbulence closure schemes, Mon. Weather Rev., 122, 927–945, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1994)122<0927:TSMECM>2.0.CO;2, 1994.
Jekabsons, G.: Adaptive Regressions Splines toolbox for Matlab/Octave, version 1.13.0, http://www.cs.rtu.lv/jekabsons/Files/ARESLab.pdf (last access: 13 January 2024), 2016.
Jimenez, T.: The Wind Powering America Anemometer Loan Program: A Retrospective, Tech. Rep., NREL/TP-7A30-57351, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, USA, https://doi.org/10.2172/1081367, 2013.
Joenson, A., Landberg, L., and Madsen, H.: A new measure-correlate-predict approach for resource assessment, in: 1999 European Wind Energy Conference, London, UK, 1–5 March 1999, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315074337, 1999.
Lackner, M. A., Rogers, A. L., and Manwell, J. F.: The round robin site assessment method: A new approach to wind energy site estimation, Renewable Energy, 33, 2019–2026, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2007.12.011, 2008.
Landberg, L. and Mortenson, N. G.: A comparison of physical and statistical methods for estimating the wind resource at a site, in: Wind Energy Conversion, 1993 Proceedings, 119–125, Mechanical Engineering Publications Limited, 1994.
LBNL: AmeriFlux, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory [data set], https://ameriflux.lbl.gov/sites/site-search/#filter-type=all&has-data=All&site_id=, last access: 16 April 2020.
Liléo, S., Berge, E. Undheim, O., Klinkert, R., and Bredesen, R. E.: Long-term correction of wind measurements, Tech. Rep., Elforsk Report 13:18, https://energiforskmedia.blob.core.windows.net/media/19814/long-term-correction-of-wind-measurements-elforskrapport-2013-18.pdf (last access: 3 August 2024), 2013.
MathWorks: fitrensemble, MATLAB [code], https://www.mathworks.com/help/stats/fitrensemble.html, last access: 13 December 2024.
Mifsud, M. D., Sant, T., and Farrugia, R. N.: A comparison of Measure-Correlate-Predict Methodologies using LiDAR as a candidate site measurement device for the Mediterranean Island of Malta, Renewable Energy, 127, 947–959, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.05.023, 2018.
Miguel, J. V. P., Fadigas, E. A., and Sauer, I. L.: The Influence of the Wind Measurement Campaign Duration on a Measure-Correlate-Predict (MCP)-Based Wind Resource Assessment, Energies, 12, 3606, https://doi.org/10.3390/en12193606, 2019.
Milborrow, S.: Earth: Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline Models [code], https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/earth/index.html (last access: 3 August 2024), 2016.
Mlawer, E. J., Taubman, S. J., Brown, P. D., Iacono, M. J., and Clough, S.: Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 16663–16682, https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD00237, 1997.
Murcia, J. P., Koivisto, M. J., Luzia, G., Olsen, B. T., Hahmann, A. N., Sørensen, P. E., and Als, M.: Validation of European-scale simulated wind speed and wind generation time series, Appl. Energ., 305, 117794, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117794, 2022.
National Data Buoy Center (NDBC): National Data Buoy Center [data set], https://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/, last access: 21 January 2024.
NREL: 2019COE_DW100_100kW_27.6, National Renewable Energy Laboratory [data set], https://nrel.github.io/turbine-models/2019COE_DW100_100kW_27.6.html (last access: 21 January 2024), 2019.
NREL: Flatirons Campus Data, NREL [data set], https://midcdmz.nrel.gov//apps/sitehome.pl?site=NWTC, last access: 16 February 2022.
NREL: WindWatts, NREL [data set], https://windwatts.nrel.gov/, last access: 13 December 2024.
NRG Systems: Wind Resource Assessment, https://www.nrgsystems.com/products/applications/wind-resource-assessment/, last access: 30 August 2023.
Olauson, J.: ERA5: The new champion of wind power modelling?, Renewable Energy, 126, 322–331, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.03.056, 2018.
Phillips, C., Sheridan, L. M., Conry, P., Fytanidis, D. K., Duplyakin, D., Zisman, S., Duboc, N., Nelson, M., Kotamarthi, R., Linn, R., Broersma, M., Spijkerboer, T., and Tinnesand, H.: Evaluation of obstacle modelling approaches for resource assessment and small wind turbine siting: case study in the northern Netherlands, Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1153–1169, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1153-2022, 2022.
PNNL: Distributed Wind Project Database, PNNL [data set], https://www.pnnl.gov/distributed-wind/market-report/data, last access: 12 January 2024.
Ramon, J., Lledó, L., Torralba, V., Soret, A., and Doblas-Reyes, F. J.: Which global reanalysis best represents near-surface winds?, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 145, 3236–3251, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3616, 2019.
Riedel, V. and Strack, M.: Robust approximation of functional relationships between meteorological data: alternative measure-correlate-predict algorithms, European Wind Energy Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2–6 July 2001, 806–809, 2001.
Rogers, A. L., Rogers, J. W., and Manwell, J. F.: Comparison of the performance of four measure-correlate-predict algorithms, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 93, 243–264, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2004.12.002, 2005.
Seto, C.: Can wind power the North? Innovation, https://www.innovation.ca/projects-results/research-stories/can-wind-power-north, last access: 30 August 2022.
Sheppard, C. J. R.: Analysis of the measure-correlate-predict methodology for wind resource assessment, Thesis, California State Polytechnic University, https://scholarworks.calstate.edu/concern/theses/9593tx516 (last access: 20 December 2024), 2009.
Sheridan, L. M., Phillips, C., Orrell, A. C., Berg, L. K., Tinnesand, H., Rai, R. K., Zisman, S., Duplyakin, D., and Flaherty, J. E.: Validation of wind resource and energy production simulations for small wind turbines in the United States, Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 659–676, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-659-2022, 2022.
Skamarock, W. C., Klemp, J. B., Dudhia, J., Gill, D. O., Barker, D., Duda, M. G., Huang, X., Wang, W., and Powers, J.: A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3, NCAR/TN-475+STR, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, https://doi.org/10.5065/D68S4MVH, 2008.
Soares, P. M. M., Lima, D. C. A., and Nogueira, M.: Global offshore wind energy resources using the new ERA-5 reanalysis, Environ. Res. Lett., 15, 1040a2, 10.1088/1748-9326/abb10d, 2020.
Tang, X-Y., Zhao, S., Fan, B., Peinke, J., and Stoevesandt, B.: Micro-scale wind resource assessment in complex terrain based on CFD coupled measurement from multiple masts, Appl. Energ., 238, 806–815, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.129, 2019.
Taylor, M., Mackiewicz, P., Brower, M. C., and Markus, M.: An analysis of wind resource uncertainty in energy production estimates, Proceedings of the European Wind Energy Conference and Exhibition, London, UK, 22–25 November 2004, https://www.scribd.com/document/358271449/An-Analysis-of-Wind-Resource-Uncertainty-in-Energy-Production-Estimates (last access: 3 August 2024), 2004.
Technical University of Denmark (DTU): Global Wind Atlas, DTU [data set], https://globalwindatlas.info/en/, last access: 13 December 2024.
Troen, I. and Petersen, E. L.: European Wind Atlas, Risø National Laboratory Report, https://backend.orbit.dtu.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/112135732/European_Wind_Atlas.pdf (last access: 20 December 2024), 1989.
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE): Atmosphere to Electrons, DOE [data set], https://a2e.energy.gov, last access: 13 February 2024.
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE): Energy Technology Innovation Partnership Project, https://www.energy.gov/eere/energy-technology-innovation-partnership-project (last access: 16 July 2025), 2025.
Vermeulen, P. E. J., Marijanyan, A., Abrahamyan, A., and den Boom J. H.: Application of matrix MCP analysis in mountainous Armenia, Wind Energy: Wind energy for the new millennium, 737–740, ISBN: 3936338094, 2001.
Weekes, S. M. and Tomlin, A. S.: Data efficient measure-correlate-predict approaches to wind resource assessment for small-scale wind energy, Renewable Energy, 63, 162–171, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.08.033, 2014.
Wilczak, J. M., Akish, E., Capotondi, A., and Compo, G.: Evaluation and Bias Correction of the ERA5 Reanalysis over the United States for Wind and Solar Energy Applications, Energies, 17, 1667, https://doi.org/10.3390/en17071667, 2024.
Woods, J. C. and Watson, S. J.: A new matrix method of predicting long-term wind roses with MCP, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 66, 85–94, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(97)00009-3, 1997.
Zakaria, A., Früh, W. G., and Ismail, F. B.: Wind resource forecasting using enhanced measure correlate predict (MCP), in: 6th International Conference on Production, Energy, and Reliability, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 13–14 August 2018, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5075569, 2018.
Short summary
A total of 12 months of onsite wind measurement is standard for correcting model-based long-term wind speed estimates for utility-scale wind farms; however, the time and capital investment involved in gathering onsite measurements must be reconciled with the energy needs and funding opportunities for distributed wind projects. This study aims to answer the question of how short you can go in terms of the observational time period needed to make impactful improvements to long-term wind speed estimates.
A total of 12 months of onsite wind measurement is standard for correcting model-based long-term...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint