Articles | Volume 9, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1507-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1507-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
12 Jul 2024
Research article |
| 12 Jul 2024
| 12 Jul 2024
Hyperparameter tuning framework for calibrating analytical wake models using SCADA data of an offshore wind farm
Diederik van Binsbergen
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, Brussels, 1050, Belgium
Department of Marine Technology, NTNU, Jonsvannsveien 82, Trondheim, 7050, Norway
Pieter-Jan Daems
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, Brussels, 1050, Belgium
Timothy Verstraeten
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, Brussels, 1050, Belgium
Amir R. Nejad
Department of Marine Technology, NTNU, Jonsvannsveien 82, Trondheim, 7050, Norway
Jan Helsen
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, Brussels, 1050, Belgium
Related authors
No articles found.
Kayacan Kestel, Xavier Chesterman, Donatella Zappalá, Simon Watson, Mingxin Li, Edward Hart, James Carroll, Yolanda Vidal, Amir R. Nejad, Shawn Sheng, Yi Guo, Matthias Stammler, Florian Wirsing, Ahmed Saleh, Nico Gregarek, Thao Baszenski, Thomas Decker, Martin Knops, Georg Jacobs, Benjamin Lehmann, Florian König, Ines Pereira, Pieter-Jan Daems, Cédric Peeters, and Jan Helsen
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-168, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-168, 2025
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
Wind energy use has been rapidly expanding worldwide in recent years. Driven by global decarbonization goals and energy security concerns, this growth is expected to continue. To achieve these targets, production costs must decrease, with operation and maintenance being major contributors. This paper reviews current and emerging technologies for monitoring wind turbine drivetrains and highlights key academic and industrial challenges that may hinder progress.
Faras Jamil, Cédric Peeters, Timothy Verstraeten, and Jan Helsen
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 1963–1978, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1963-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1963-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
A hybrid fault detection method is proposed, which combines physical domain knowledge with machine learning models to automatically detect mechanical faults in wind turbine drivetrain components. It offers detailed insights for experts while giving operators a high-level overview of the machine's health to assist in planning effective maintenance strategies. It was validated on multiple years of wind farm data and the potential faults were accurately predicted, which was confirmed by experts.
Simon Daenens, Timothy Verstraeten, Pieter-Jan Daems, Ann Nowé, and Jan Helsen
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 1137–1152, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1137-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1137-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents a novel model for predicting wind turbine power output at a high temporal resolution in wind farms using a hybrid graph neural network (GNN) and long short-term memory (LSTM) architecture. By modeling the wind farm as a graph, the model captures both spatial and temporal dynamics, outperforming traditional power curve methods. Integrated with a normal behavior model (NBM) framework, the model effectively identifies and analyzes power loss events.
Ivo Vervlimmeren, Xavier Chesterman, Timothy Verstraeten, Ann Nowé, and Jan Helsen
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-49, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-49, 2025
Revised manuscript accepted for WES
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce a new method to refine failure prediction for wind turbines, leading to better and more efficient alarming. We do this by filtering detected anomalies based on the anomalies from the whole fleet. We compare submethods and find one that removes up to 65 % of detected anomalies while leaving the failure-predicting ones. We also detail how we trained the model that generated these anomalies and discuss the construction of the scalable pipeline that was used to deploy such models.
Ryota Wada, Amir R. Nejad, Kazuhiro Iijima, Junji Shimazaki, Mihaela Ibrion, Shinnosuke Wanaka, Hideo Nomura, Yoshitaka Mizushima, Takuya Nakashima, and Ken Takagi
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-74, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-74, 2025
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
This paper identifies technology gaps on the path to achieve sustainable development of floating offshore wind in Japan. The key challenges emphasizing on unique conditions such as earthquakes and tropical cyclones are addressed. In Japan the absence of oil & gas has led to social challenges like lack of supply chain, infrastructure, and human resources in offshore wind. Site selection, design & operation, industry development, and contribution to national energy policy "S + 3E" are studied.
Stijn Ally, Timothy Verstraeten, Pieter-Jan Daems, Ann Nowé, and Jan Helsen
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 779–812, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-779-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-779-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Wind farms are crucial for a sustainable energy future. However, their power can fluctuate significantly due to changing weather conditions, which complexly affect their power generation. This paper presents a novel machine-learning-based method to enhance wind farm power predictions, enabling improved power scheduling, trading and grid balancing. This makes wind power more valuable and easier to integrate into the energy system.
Yuksel R. Alkarem, Ian Ammerman, Kimberly Huguenard, Richard W. Kimball, Babak Hejrati, Amrit Verma, Amir R. Nejad, Reza Hashemi, and Stephan Grilli
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-31, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-31, 2025
Revised manuscript accepted for WES
Short summary
Short summary
Laboratory testing campaigns for wind energy industry plays an essential role in testing innovative control strategies and digital twin applications. But incidents during testing can be detrimental and might cause project delays and damage to expensive equipment. We propose an anomaly detection scheme for laboratory experiments that are developed and tested to enhance reaction time and prediction quality, reducing the likelihood of damage to equipment due to human error or software malfunction.
Konstantinos Vratsinis, Rebeca Marini, Pieter-Jan Daems, Lukas Pauscher, Jeroen van Beeck, and Jan Helsen
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-32, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-32, 2025
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
Using data collected over 13 months at an offshore wind farm, our study shows that a wind turbine’s position within the farm influences its energy output at a given wind speed. Front-row turbines respond differently to similar wind speeds and turbulence than those further back. This finding suggests that current methods for characterizing inflow conditions may not fully capture actual wind behavior, underscoring the need for improved performance analysis techniques.
Jakob Gebel, Ashkan Rezaei, Adithya Vemuri, Veronica Liverud Krathe, Pieter-Jan Daems, Jens Jo Matthys, Jonathan Sterckx, Konstantinos Vratsinis, Kayacan Kestel, Amir R. Nejad, and Jan Helsen
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-173, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-173, 2025
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Short summary
A simulation model of a deployed offshore wind turbine was developed using real-world measurement data. The method shows how to obtain, update and validate a simulation model and allows to improve the efficiency and longevity of offshore wind turbines and support operation and maintenance decisions. Simulations were conducted to analyze the effects of turbulence and wind patterns on turbine lifespan, providing insights to improve maintenance planning and reduce operational costs.
Rebeca Marini, Konstantinos Vratsinis, Kayacan Kestel, Jonathan Sterckx, Jens Matthys, Pieter-Jan Daems, Timothy Verstraeten, and Jan Helsen
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-9, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-9, 2025
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
This work evaluated the wind profile in a Belgian offshore zone. The estimated wind profile was made using measurements that allow for reconstruction at heights along the rotor area. The IEC standard defines these profiles as a 1/7th power law, which is proven not to occur 100 % of the time. It is also possible to infer that there will be differences when using different wind profiles for load assessment, as more realistic profiles can lead to a better assessment of the wind turbine's lifetime.
Felix C. Mehlan and Amir R. Nejad
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 417–433, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-417-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-417-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
A digital twin is a virtual representation that mirrors the wind turbine's real behavior through simulation models and sensor measurements and can assist in making key decisions such as planning the replacement of parts. These models and measurements are, of course, not perfect and only give an incomplete picture of the real behavior. This study investigates how large the uncertainty of such models and measurements is and to what extent it affects the decision-making process.
Ashkan Rezaei and Amir Rasekhi Nejad
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-186, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-186, 2025
Revised manuscript accepted for WES
Short summary
Short summary
We analyzed the reliability of wind turbine blade bearings under extreme turbulence wind conditions to improve their safety and performance. Using simulations, we studied how factors like turbulence and design variations affect failure probability. Our findings show that current standards may underestimate these risks and highlight the need for stricter controls on critical design parameters.
Ali Dibaj, Mostafa Valavi, and Amir R. Nejad
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 2063–2086, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-2063-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-2063-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study emphasizes the need for effective condition monitoring in permanent magnet offshore wind generators to tackle issues like demagnetization and eccentricity. Utilizing a machine learning model and high-resolution measurements, we explore methods of early fault detection. Our findings indicate that flux monitoring with affordable, easy-to-install stray flux sensors with frequency information offers a promising fault detection strategy for large megawatt-scale offshore wind generators.
Yuksel Rudy Alkarem, Kimberly Huguenard, Richard Kimball, Spencer Hallowell, Amrit Verma, Erin Bachynski-Polić, and Amir Nejad
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-67, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-67, 2024
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Short summary
This research is a "less-is-more" demonstration of a novel concept that boost the efficiency of floating wind farms while maintaining fewer number of mooring line/anchors, reducing cost and the large footprint wind farms can have over the ocean bed and the water column. The novelty of this work lies in the passive wake steering method to enhance annual energy production and in integrating that with configurations that allow shared/multiline anchoring potential.
Xavier Chesterman, Timothy Verstraeten, Pieter-Jan Daems, Ann Nowé, and Jan Helsen
Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 893–924, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-893-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-893-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper reviews and implements several techniques that can be used for condition monitoring and failure prediction for wind turbines using SCADA data. The focus lies on techniques that respond to requirements of the industry, e.g., robustness, transparency, computational efficiency, and maintainability. The end result of this research is a pipeline that can accurately detect three types of failures, i.e., generator bearing failures, generator fan failures, and generator stator failures.
Adithya Vemuri, Sophia Buckingham, Wim Munters, Jan Helsen, and Jeroen van Beeck
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1869–1888, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1869-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1869-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The sensitivity of the WRF mesoscale modeling framework in accurately representing and predicting wind-farm-level environmental variables for three extreme weather events over the Belgian North Sea is investigated in this study. The overall results indicate highly sensitive simulation results to the type and combination of physics parameterizations and the type of the weather phenomena, with indications that scale-aware physics parameterizations better reproduce wind-related variables.
Amir R. Nejad, Jonathan Keller, Yi Guo, Shawn Sheng, Henk Polinder, Simon Watson, Jianning Dong, Zian Qin, Amir Ebrahimi, Ralf Schelenz, Francisco Gutiérrez Guzmán, Daniel Cornel, Reza Golafshan, Georg Jacobs, Bart Blockmans, Jelle Bosmans, Bert Pluymers, James Carroll, Sofia Koukoura, Edward Hart, Alasdair McDonald, Anand Natarajan, Jone Torsvik, Farid K. Moghadam, Pieter-Jan Daems, Timothy Verstraeten, Cédric Peeters, and Jan Helsen
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 387–411, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-387-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-387-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents the state-of-the-art technologies and development trends of wind turbine drivetrains – the energy conversion systems transferring the kinetic energy of the wind to electrical energy – in different stages of their life cycle: design, manufacturing, installation, operation, lifetime extension, decommissioning and recycling. The main aim of this article is to review the drivetrain technology development as well as to identify future challenges and research gaps.
Cited articles
Akiba, T., Sano, S., Yanase, T., Ohta, T., and Koyama, M.: Optuna: Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Framework, Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Anchorage, Alaska, USA, 4–8 August 2019, https://doi.org/10.1145/3292500.3330701, 2019. a, b
Allaerts, D. and Meyers, J.: Gravity Waves and Wind-Farm Efficiency in Neutral and Stable Conditions, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 166, 269–299, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-017-0307-5, 2017. a
Annoni, J., Gebraad, P. M. O., Scholbrock, A. K., Fleming, P. A., and van Wingerden, J.-W.: Analysis of axial-induction-based wind plant control using an engineering and a high-order wind plant model, Wind Energy, 19, 1135–1150, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1891, 2015. a
Archer, C. L., Vasel-Be-Hagh, A., Yan, C., Wu, S., Pan, Y., Brodie, J. F., and Maguire, A. E.: Review and evaluation of wake loss models for wind energy applications, Appl. Energy, 226, 1187–1207, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.085, 2018. a
Ávila, F. J., Verstraeten, T., Vratsinis, K., Nowé, A., and Helsen, J.: Wind Power Prediction using Multi-Task Gaussian Process Regression with Lagged Inputs, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 2505, 012035, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2505/1/012035, 2023. a
Baker, N. F., Stanley, A. P., Thomas, J. J., Ning, A., and Dykes, K.: Best Practices for Wake Model and Optimization Algorithm Selection in Wind Farm Layout Optimization, in: AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2019-0540, 2019. a
Barthelmie, R., Badger, J., Pryor, S., Hasager, C., Christiansen, M., and Jørgensen, B.: Offshore Coastal Wind Speed Gradients: Issues for the Design and Development of Large Offshore Windfarms, Wind Eng., 31, 369–382, https://doi.org/10.1260/030952407784079762, 2007. a
Barthelmie, R. J., Hansen, K., Frandsen, S. T., Rathmann, O., Schepers, J. G., Schlez, W., Phillips, J., Rados, K., Zervos, A., Politis, E. S., and Chaviaropoulos, P. K.: Modelling and measuring flow and wind turbine wakes in large wind farms offshore, Wind Energy, 12, 431–444, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.348, 2009. a, b
Bastankhah, M. and Porté-Agel, F.: A new analytical model for wind-turbine wakes, Renew. Energy, 70, 116–123, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.01.002, 2014. a, b, c, d
Bastankhah, M. and Porté-Agel, F.: Experimental and theoretical study of wind turbine wakes in yawed conditions, J. Fluid Mech., 806, 506–541, https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2016.595, 2016. a, b, c
Bastankhah, M., Welch, B. L., Martínez-Tossas, L. A., King, J., and Fleming, P.: Analytical solution for the cumulative wake of wind turbines in wind farms, J. Fluid Mech., 911, A53, https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2020.1037, 2021. a, b
Bay, C. J., Fleming, P., Doekemeijer, B., King, J., Churchfield, M., and Mudafort, R.: Addressing deep array effects and impacts to wake steering with the cumulative-curl wake model, Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 401–419, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-401-2023, 2023. a, b, c
Becker, M., Ritter, B., Doekemeijer, B., van der Hoek, D., Konigorski, U., Allaerts, D., and van Wingerden, J.-W.: The revised FLORIDyn model: implementation of heterogeneous flow and the Gaussian wake, Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 2163–2179, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2163-2022, 2022. a
Bergstra, J. and Bengio, Y.: Random Search for Hyper-Parameter Optimization, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 13, 281–305, 2012. a
Bergstra, J., Yamins, D., and Cox, D. D.: Making a Science of Model Search, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1209.5111, 2012. a
Bleeg, J., Purcell, M., Ruisi, R., and Traiger, E.: Wind Farm Blockage and the Consequences of Neglecting Its Impact on Energy Production, Energies, 11, 1609, https://doi.org/10.3390/en11061609, 2018. a
Blondel, F. and Cathelain, M.: An alternative form of the super-Gaussian wind turbine wake model, Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 1225–1236, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1225-2020, 2020. a, b, c
Bossanyi, E. and Ruisi, R.: Axial induction controller field test at Sedini wind farm, Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 389–408, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-389-2021, 2021. a
Branlard, E. and Forsting, A. R. M.: Assessing the blockage effect of wind turbines and wind farms using an analytical vortex model, Wind Energy, 23, 2068–2086, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2546, 2020. a
Branlard, E., Quon, E., Forsting, A. R. M., King, J., and Moriarty, P.: Wind farm blockage effects: comparison of different engineering models, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1618, 062036, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1618/6/062036, 2020. a
Campagnolo, F., Imširović, L., Braunbehrens, R., and Bottasso, C. L.: Further calibration and validation of FLORIS with wind tunnel data, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 2265, 022019, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2265/2/022019, 2022. a
Cañadillas, B., Beckenbauer, M., Trujillo, J. J., Dörenkämper, M., Foreman, R., Neumann, T., and Lampert, A.: Offshore wind farm cluster wakes as observed by long-range-scanning wind lidar measurements and mesoscale modeling, Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1241–1262, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1241-2022, 2022. a
Crespo, A. and Hernandez, J.: Turbulence characteristics in wind-turbine wakes, J. Wind Eng. Indust. Aerodynam., 61, 71–85, https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(95)00033-x, 1996. a
Daems, P.-J., Verstraeten, T., Peeters, C., and Helsen, J.: Effects of wake on gearbox design load cases identified from fleet-wide operational data, Forsch. Ingenieurwes., 85, 553–558, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10010-021-00444-3, 2021. a
Daems, P.-J., Peeters, C., Matthys, J., Verstraeten, T., and Helsen, J.: Fleet-wide analytics on field data targeting condition and lifetime aspects of wind turbine drivetrains, Forsch. Ingenieurwes., 87, 285–295, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10010-023-00643-0, 2023. a
Dilip, D. and Porté-Agel, F.: Wind Turbine Wake Mitigation through Blade Pitch Offset, Energies, 10, 757, https://doi.org/10.3390/en10060757, 2017. a
Doekemeijer, B. M., Wingerden, J.-W. V., and Fleming, P. A.: A tutorial on the synthesis and validation of a closed-loop wind farm controller using a steady-state surrogate model, in: IEEE 2019 American Control Conference (ACC), 10–12 July 2019, Philadelphia, PA, USA, https://doi.org/10.23919/acc.2019.8815126, 2019. a
Doekemeijer, B. M., van der Hoek, D., and van Wingerden, J.-W.: Closed-loop model-based wind farm control using FLORIS under time-varying inflow conditions, Renew. Energy, 156, 719–730, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.04.007, 2020. a, b, c
Doekemeijer, B. M., Kern, S., Maturu, S., Kanev, S., Salbert, B., Schreiber, J., Campagnolo, F., Bottasso, C. L., Schuler, S., Wilts, F., Neumann, T., Potenza, G., Calabretta, F., Fioretti, F., and van Wingerden, J.-W.: Field experiment for open-loop yaw-based wake steering at a commercial onshore wind farm in Italy, Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 159–176, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-159-2021, 2021. a, b
DTU: PyWake, GitHub [code], https://github.com/DTUWindEnergy/PyWake (last access: 26 June 2024), 2023. a
Fleming, P., Annoni, J., Shah, J. J., Wang, L., Ananthan, S., Zhang, Z., Hutchings, K., Wang, P., Chen, W., and Chen, L.: Field test of wake steering at an offshore wind farm, Wind Energ. Sci., 2, 229–239, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2-229-2017, 2017. a
Fleming, P., Annoni, J., Churchfield, M., Martinez-Tossas, L. A., Gruchalla, K., Lawson, M., and Moriarty, P.: A simulation study demonstrating the importance of large-scale trailing vortices in wake steering, Wind Energ. Sci., 3, 243–255, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-3-243-2018, 2018. a
Fleming, P., King, J., Dykes, K., Simley, E., Roadman, J., Scholbrock, A., Murphy, P., Lundquist, J. K., Moriarty, P., Fleming, K., van Dam, J., Bay, C., Mudafort, R., Lopez, H., Skopek, J., Scott, M., Ryan, B., Guernsey, C., and Brake, D.: Initial results from a field campaign of wake steering applied at a commercial wind farm – Part 1, Wind Energ. Sci., 4, 273–285, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-4-273-2019, 2019. a, b
Fleming, P., King, J., Simley, E., Roadman, J., Scholbrock, A., Murphy, P., Lundquist, J. K., Moriarty, P., Fleming, K., van Dam, J., Bay, C., Mudafort, R., Jager, D., Skopek, J., Scott, M., Ryan, B., Guernsey, C., and Brake, D.: Continued results from a field campaign of wake steering applied at a commercial wind farm – Part 2, Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 945–958, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-945-2020, 2020. a
Fleming, P., Sinner, M., Young, T., Lannic, M., King, J., Simley, E., and Doekemeijer, B.: Experimental results of wake steering using fixed angles, Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 1521–1531, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1521-2021, 2021. a
Fuertes, F. C., Markfort, C., and Porté-Agel, F.: Wind Turbine Wake Characterization with Nacelle-Mounted Wind Lidars for Analytical Wake Model Validation, Remote Sens., 10, 668, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10050668, 2018. a
Gebraad, P. M. O., Teeuwisse, F. W., van Wingerden, J. W., Fleming, P. A., Ruben, S. D., Marden, J. R., and Pao, L. Y.: Wind plant power optimization through yaw control using a parametric model for wake effects-a CFD simulation study, Wind Energy, 19, 95–114, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1822, 2014. a
Gebraad, P. M. O., Churchfield, M. J., and Fleming, P. A.: Incorporating Atmospheric Stability Effects into the FLORIS Engineering Model of Wakes in Wind Farms, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 753, 052004, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/753/5/052004, 2016. a, b
Göçmen, T. and Giebel, G.: Data-driven Wake Modelling for Reduced Uncertainties in short-term Possible Power Estimation, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1037, 072002, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1037/7/072002, 2018. a
Göçmen, T., Campagnolo, F., Duc, T., Eguinoa, I., Andersen, S. J., Petrović, V., Imširović, L., Braunbehrens, R., Liew, J., Baungaard, M., van der Laan, M. P., Qian, G., Aparicio-Sanchez, M., González-Lope, R., Dighe, V. V., Becker, M., van den Broek, M. J., van Wingerden, J.-W., Stock, A., Cole, M., Ruisi, R., Bossanyi, E., Requate, N., Strnad, S., Schmidt, J., Vollmer, L., Sood, I., and Meyers, J.: FarmConners wind farm flow control benchmark – Part 1: Blind test results, Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 1791–1825, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1791-2022, 2022. a, b, c, d, e, f, g
Hamilton, N., Bay, C. J., Fleming, P., King, J., and Martínez-Tossas, L. A.: Comparison of modular analytical wake models to the Lillgrund wind plant, J. Renew. Sustain. Energ., 12, 053311, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0018695, 2020. a
Hansen, K. S., Barthelmie, R. J., Jensen, L. E., and Sommer, A.: The impact of turbulence intensity and atmospheric stability on power deficits due to wind turbine wakes at Horns Rev wind farm, Wind Energy, 15, 183–196, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.512, 2011. a
IEA: Wind Electricity, licence: CC BY 4.0, https://www.iea.org/reports/wind-electricity (last access: 29 June 2023), 2022. a
Jensen, N.: A note on wind generator interaction, Rep. RISØ-M-2411, https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/a-note-on-wind-generator-interaction (last access: 26 June 2024), 1983. a
Katić, I., Højstrup, J., and Jensen, N.: A Simple Model for Cluster Efficiency, European wind energy association conference and exhibition, Rome, Italy, 6–8 October 1986, Vol. 1, 407–410, https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/a-simple-model-for-cluster-efficiency (last access: 26 June 2024), 1987. a, b
Kheirabadi, A. C. and Nagamune, R.: A quantitative review of wind farm control with the objective of wind farm power maximization, J. Wind Eng. Indust. Aerodynam., 192, 45–73, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2019.06.015, 2019. a, b
King, J., Fleming, P., King, R., Martínez-Tossas, L. A., Bay, C. J., Mudafort, R., and Simley, E.: Control-oriented model for secondary effects of wake steering, Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 701–714, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-701-2021, 2021. a, b, c, d
Lissaman, P. B. S.: Energy Effectiveness of Arbitrary Arrays of Wind Turbines, J. Energy, 3, 323–328, https://doi.org/10.2514/3.62441, 1979. a
Martínez-Tossas, L. A., Annoni, J., Fleming, P. A., and Churchfield, M. J.: The aerodynamics of the curled wake: a simplified model in view of flow control, Wind Energ. Sci., 4, 127–138, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-4-127-2019, 2019. a
Meyers, J., Bottasso, C., Dykes, K., Fleming, P., Gebraad, P., Giebel, G., Göçmen, T., and van Wingerden, J.-W.: Wind farm flow control: prospects and challenges, Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 2271–2306, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2271-2022, 2022. a, b
Mudafort, R., Fleming P., Bay, C., Hammond, R., Simley, E., Hamilton, N., Bachant, P., Fleming, K., Doekemeijer, B., Annoni, J., Quon, E., Stanley, P., Sinner, M., Ireland, P. J., Bensason, D., Schreiber, J., Quick, J., Seim, K. S., Benito Cia, P., Sortland, S., Martinez, T., Farrell, A., Duffy, P., and Zerweck, W.: NREL/FLORIS Version 3.4, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7942258, 2023.
Munters, W., Adiloglu, B., Buckingham, S., and van Beeck, J.: Wake impact of constructing a new offshore wind farm zone on an existing downwind cluster: a case study of the Belgian Princess Elisabeth zone using FLORIS, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 2265, 022049, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2265/2/022049, 2022. a
Nejad, A. R., Keller, J., Guo, Y., Sheng, S., Polinder, H., Watson, S., Dong, J., Qin, Z., Ebrahimi, A., Schelenz, R., Guzmán, F. G., Cornel, D., Golafshan, R., Jacobs, G., Blockmans, B., Bosmans, J., Pluymers, B., Carroll, J., Koukoura, S., Hart, E., McDonald, A., Natarajan, A., Torsvik, J., Moghadam, F. K., Daems, P.-J., Verstraeten, T., Peeters, C., and Helsen, J.: Wind turbine drivetrains: state-of-the-art technologies and future development trends, Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 387–411, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-387-2022, 2022. a
Niayifar, A. and Porté-Agel, F.: A new analytical model for wind farm power prediction, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 625, 012039, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/625/1/012039, 2015. a, b, c
Niayifar, A. and Porté-Agel, F.: Analytical Modeling of Wind Farms: A New Approach for Power Prediction, Energies, 9, 741, https://doi.org/10.3390/en9090741, 2016. a, b
Nygaard, N. G., Steen, S. T., Poulsen, L., and Pedersen, J. G.: Modelling cluster wakes and wind farm blockage, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1618, 062072, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1618/6/062072, 2020. a, b, c, d
Nygaard, N. G., Poulsen, L., Svensson, E., and Pedersen, J. G.: Large-scale benchmarking of wake models for offshore wind farms, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 2265, 022008, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2265/2/022008, 2022. a, b, c
Optuna: Optuna, Version 3.4.0, GitHub [code], https://github.com/optuna/optuna (last access: 26 June 2024), 2019.
Pedersen, J. G., Svensson, E., Poulsen, L., and Nygaard, N. G.: Turbulence Optimized Park model with Gaussian wake profile, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 2265, 022063, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2265/2/022063, 2022. a, b, c
Pettas, V., Kretschmer, M., Clifton, A., and Cheng, P. W.: On the effects of inter-farm interactions at the offshore wind farm Alpha Ventus, Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 1455–1472, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1455-2021, 2021. a
Porté-Agel, F., Bastankhah, M., and Shamsoddin, S.: Wind-Turbine and Wind-Farm Flows: A Review, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 174, 1–59, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-019-00473-0, 2019. a, b, c
Quick, J., King, J., King, R. N., Hamlington, P. E., and Dykes, K.: Wake steering optimization under uncertainty, Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 413–426, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-413-2020, 2020. a
Saltelli, A.: Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices, Comput. Phys. Commun., 145, 280–297, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-4655(02)00280-1, 2002. a
Saltelli, A., Annoni, P., Azzini, I., Campolongo, F., Ratto, M., and Tarantola, S.: Variance based sensitivity analysis of model output. Design and estimator for the total sensitivity index, Comput. Phys. Commun., 181, 259–270, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2009.09.018, 2010. a
Sanderse, B.: Aerodynamics of wind turbine wakes, Tech. rep., TNO, https://www.osti.gov/etdeweb/biblio/21162007 (last access: 26 June 2024), 2009. a
Sanderse, B., Dighe, V. V., Boorsma, K., and Schepers, G.: Efficient Bayesian calibration of aerodynamic wind turbine models using surrogate modeling, Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 759–781, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-759-2022, 2022. a
Schneemann, J., Theuer, F., Rott, A., Dörenkämper, M., and Kühn, M.: Offshore wind farm global blockage measured with scanning lidar, Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 521–538, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-521-2021, 2021. a
Schreiber, J., Bottasso, C. L., Salbert, B., and Campagnolo, F.: Improving wind farm flow models by learning from operational data, Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 647–673, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-647-2020, 2020. a, b, c, d
Sickler, M., Ummels, B., Zaaijer, M., Schmehl, R., and Dykes, K.: Offshore wind farm optimisation: a comparison of performance between regular and irregular wind turbine layouts, Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1225–1233, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1225-2023, 2023. a
Simley, E., Fleming, P., Girard, N., Alloin, L., Godefroy, E., and Duc, T.: Results from a wake-steering experiment at a commercial wind plant: investigating the wind speed dependence of wake-steering performance, Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 1427–1453, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1427-2021, 2021. a
Sobol, I.: Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates, Math. Comput. Simul., 55, 271–280, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-4754(00)00270-6, 2001. a, b
Teng, J. and Markfort, C. D.: A Calibration Procedure for an Analytical Wake Model Using Wind Farm Operational Data, Energies, 13, 3537, https://doi.org/10.3390/en13143537, 2020. a
Thomsen, K. and Sørensen, P.: Fatigue loads for wind turbines operating in wakes, J. Wind Eng. Indust. Aerodynam., 80, 121–136, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-6105(98)00194-9, 1999. a
Trabucchi, D., Trujillo, J.-J., and Kühn, M.: Nacelle-based Lidar Measurements for the Calibration of a Wake Model at Different Offshore Operating Conditions, Energy Proced., 137, 77–88, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.10.335, 2017. a, b
van Binsbergen, D. W., Wang, S., and Nejad, A. R.: Effects of induction and wake steering control on power and drivetrain responses for 10 MW floating wind turbines in a wind farm, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1618, 022044, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1618/2/022044, 2020. a
Veers, P., Dykes, K., Lantz, E., Barth, S., Bottasso, C. L., Carlson, O., Clifton, A., Green, J., Green, P., Holttinen, H., Laird, D., Lehtomäki, V., Lundquist, J. K., Manwell, J., Marquis, M., Meneveau, C., Moriarty, P., Munduate, X., Muskulus, M., Naughton, J., Pao, L., Paquette, J., Peinke, J., Robertson, A., Rodrigo, J. S., Sempreviva, A. M., Smith, J. C., Tuohy, A., and Wiser, R.: Grand challenges in the science of wind energy, Science, 366, 6464, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau2027, 2019. a, b
Veers, P., Bottasso, C. L., Manuel, L., Naughton, J., Pao, L., Paquette, J., Robertson, A., Robinson, M., Ananthan, S., Barlas, T., Bianchini, A., Bredmose, H., Horcas, S. G., Keller, J., Madsen, H. A., Manwell, J., Moriarty, P., Nolet, S., and Rinker, J.: Grand challenges in the design, manufacture, and operation of future wind turbine systems, Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 1071–1131, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-1071-2023, 2023. a, b
Verstraeten, T., Nowé, A., Keller, J., Guo, Y., Sheng, S., and Helsen, J.: Fleetwide data-enabled reliability improvement of wind turbines, Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev., 109, 428–437, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.03.019, 2019. a
Verstraeten, T., Daems, P.-J., Bargiacchi, E., Roijers, D. M., Libin, P. J., and Helsen, J.: Scalable Optimization for Wind Farm Control using Coordination Graphs, in: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2021), online, 3–7 May 2021, 1362–1370, https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3463952.3464109 (last access: 26 June 2024), 2021. a
Wang, C., Wang, J., Campagnolo, F., Carraón, D. B., and Bottasso, C. L.: Validation of large-eddy simulation of scaled waked wind turbines in different yaw misalignment conditions, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1037, 062007, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1037/6/062007, 2018. a
Wang, Q., Luo, K., Wu, C., Mu, Y., Tan, J., and Fan, J.: Diurnal impact of atmospheric stability on inter-farm wake and power generation efficiency at neighboring onshore wind farms in complex terrain, Energ. Convers. Manage., 267, 115897, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115897, 2022. a
Wu, K. and Porté-Agel, F.: Flow Adjustment Inside and Around Large Finite-Size Wind Farms, Energies, 10, 2164, https://doi.org/10.3390/en10122164, 2017. a
Zhang, J. and Zhao, X.: Quantification of parameter uncertainty in wind farm wake modeling, Energy, 196, 117065, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117065, 2020. a
Zong, H. and Porté-Agel, F.: A momentum-conserving wake superposition method for wind farm power prediction, J. Fluid Mech., 889, A8, https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2020.77, 2020. a
Short summary
Wind farm yield assessment often relies on analytical wake models. Calibrating these models can be challenging due to the stochastic nature of wind. We developed a calibration framework that performs a multi-phase optimization on the tuning parameters using time series SCADA data. This yields a parameter distribution that more accurately reflects reality than a single value. Results revealed notable variation in resultant parameter values, influenced by nearby wind farms and coastal effects.
Wind farm yield assessment often relies on analytical wake models. Calibrating these models can...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint