Articles | Volume 9, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1507-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1507-2024
Research article
 | 
12 Jul 2024
Research article |  | 12 Jul 2024

Hyperparameter tuning framework for calibrating analytical wake models using SCADA data of an offshore wind farm

Diederik van Binsbergen, Pieter-Jan Daems, Timothy Verstraeten, Amir R. Nejad, and Jan Helsen

Related authors

Modular deep learning approach for wind farm power forecasting and wake loss prediction
Stijn Ally, Timothy Verstraeten, Pieter-Jan Daems, Ann Nowé, and Jan Helsen
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 779–812, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-779-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-779-2025, 2025
Short summary
Investigating Lab-scaled Offshore Wind Aerodynamic Testing Failure and Developing Solutions for Early Anomaly Detections
Yuksel R. Alkarem, Ian Ammerman, Kimberly Huguenard, Richard W. Kimball, Babak Hejrati, Amrit Verma, Amir R. Nejad, Reza Hashemi, and Stephan Grilli
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-31,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-31, 2025
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Impact of inflow conditions and turbine placement on the performance of offshore wind turbines exceeding 7 MW
Konstantinos Vratsinis, Rebeca Marini, Pieter-Jan Daems, Lukas Pauscher, Jeroen van Beeck, and Jan Helsen
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-32,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-32, 2025
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
System identification of offshore wind turbines for model updating and validation using field measurements
Jakob Gebel, Ashkan Rezaei, Adithya Vemuri, Veronica Liverud Krathe, Pieter-Jan Daems, Jens Jo Matthys, Jonathan Sterckx, Konstantinos Vratsinis, Kayacan Kestel, Amir R. Nejad, and Jan Helsen
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-173,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-173, 2025
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Assessing the impact of wind profiles at offshore wind farm sites for field data-enabled design
Rebeca Marini, Konstantinos Vratsinis, Kayacan Kestel, Jonathan Sterckx, Jens Matthys, Pieter-Jan Daems, Timothy Verstraeten, and Jan Helsen
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-9,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2025-9, 2025
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary

Related subject area

Thematic area: Fluid mechanics | Topic: Wakes and wind farm aerodynamics
Spatial development of planar and axisymmetric wakes of porous objects under a pressure gradient: a wind tunnel study
Wessel van der Deijl, Martín Obligado, Stéphane Barre, and Christophe Sicot
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 719–732, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-719-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-719-2025, 2025
Short summary
Numerical investigation of regenerative wind farms featuring enhanced vertical energy entrainment
YuanTso Li, Wei Yu, Andrea Sciacchitano, and Carlos Ferreira
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 631–659, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-631-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-631-2025, 2025
Short summary
Convergence and efficiency of global bases using proper orthogonal decomposition for capturing wind turbine wake aerodynamics
Juan Felipe Céspedes Moreno, Juan Pablo Murcia León, and Søren Juhl Andersen
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 597–611, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-597-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-597-2025, 2025
Short summary
Direct integration of non-axisymmetric Gaussian wind-turbine wake including yaw and wind-veer effects
Karim Ali, Pablo Ouro, and Tim Stallard
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 511–533, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-511-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-511-2025, 2025
Short summary
Turbine- and farm-scale power losses in wind farms: an alternative to wake and farm blockage losses
Andrew Kirby, Takafumi Nishino, Luca Lanzilao, Thomas D. Dunstan, and Johan Meyers
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 435–450, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-435-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-435-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Akiba, T., Sano, S., Yanase, T., Ohta, T., and Koyama, M.: Optuna: Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Framework, Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Anchorage, Alaska, USA, 4–8 August 2019, https://doi.org/10.1145/3292500.3330701, 2019. a, b
Allaerts, D. and Meyers, J.: Gravity Waves and Wind-Farm Efficiency in Neutral and Stable Conditions, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 166, 269–299, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-017-0307-5, 2017. a
Annoni, J., Gebraad, P. M. O., Scholbrock, A. K., Fleming, P. A., and van Wingerden, J.-W.: Analysis of axial-induction-based wind plant control using an engineering and a high-order wind plant model, Wind Energy, 19, 1135–1150, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1891, 2015. a
Archer, C. L., Vasel-Be-Hagh, A., Yan, C., Wu, S., Pan, Y., Brodie, J. F., and Maguire, A. E.: Review and evaluation of wake loss models for wind energy applications, Appl. Energy, 226, 1187–1207, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.085, 2018. a
Ávila, F. J., Verstraeten, T., Vratsinis, K., Nowé, A., and Helsen, J.: Wind Power Prediction using Multi-Task Gaussian Process Regression with Lagged Inputs, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 2505, 012035, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2505/1/012035, 2023. a
Download
Short summary
Wind farm yield assessment often relies on analytical wake models. Calibrating these models can...
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint