Articles | Volume 7, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1575-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-1575-2022
Research article
 | 
22 Jul 2022
Research article |  | 22 Jul 2022

Spatiotemporal observations of nocturnal low-level jets and impacts on wind power production

Eduardo Weide Luiz and Stephanie Fiedler

Related authors

Interactions between atmospheric composition and climate change – progress in understanding and future opportunities from AerChemMIP, PDRMIP, and RFMIP
Stephanie Fiedler, Vaishali Naik, Fiona M. O'Connor, Christopher J. Smith, Paul Griffiths, Ryan J. Kramer, Toshihiko Takemura, Robert J. Allen, Ulas Im, Matthew Kasoar, Angshuman Modak, Steven Turnock, Apostolos Voulgarakis, Duncan Watson-Parris, Daniel M. Westervelt, Laura J. Wilcox, Alcide Zhao, William J. Collins, Michael Schulz, Gunnar Myhre, and Piers M. Forster
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2387–2417, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2387-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2387-2024, 2024
Short summary
Mapping land degradation risk due to land susceptibility to dust emission and water erosion
Mahdi Boroughani, Fahimeh Mirchooli, Mojtaba Hadavifar, and Stephanie Fiedler
SOIL, 9, 411–423, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-411-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-411-2023, 2023
Short summary
On the importance of moisture conveyor belts from the tropical eastern Pacific for wetter conditions in the Atacama Desert during the mid-Pliocene
Mark Reyers, Stephanie Fiedler, Patrick Ludwig, Christoph Böhm, Volker Wennrich, and Yaping Shao
Clim. Past, 19, 517–532, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-19-517-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-19-517-2023, 2023
Short summary
A new scanning scheme and flexible retrieval for mean winds and gusts from Doppler lidar measurements
Julian Steinheuer, Carola Detring, Frank Beyrich, Ulrich Löhnert, Petra Friederichs, and Stephanie Fiedler
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 3243–3260, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3243-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3243-2022, 2022
Short summary
Modifying emissions scenario projections to account for the effects of COVID-19: protocol for CovidMIP
Robin D. Lamboll, Chris D. Jones, Ragnhild B. Skeie, Stephanie Fiedler, Bjørn H. Samset, Nathan P. Gillett, Joeri Rogelj, and Piers M. Forster
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3683–3695, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3683-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3683-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Thematic area: Wind and the atmosphere | Topic: Wind and turbulence
Measurement-driven large-eddy simulations of a diurnal cycle during a wake-steering field campaign
Eliot Quon
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 495–518, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-495-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-495-2024, 2024
Short summary
The fractal turbulent–non-turbulent interface in the atmosphere
Lars Neuhaus, Matthias Wächter, and Joachim Peinke
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 439–452, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-439-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-439-2024, 2024
Short summary
TOSCA – an open-source, finite-volume, large-eddy simulation (LES) environment for wind farm flows
Sebastiano Stipa, Arjun Ajay, Dries Allaerts, and Joshua Brinkerhoff
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 297–320, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-297-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-297-2024, 2024
Short summary
Quantitative comparison of power production and power quality onshore and offshore: a case study from the eastern United States
Rebecca Foody, Jacob Coburn, Jeanie A. Aird, Rebecca J. Barthelmie, and Sara C. Pryor
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 263–280, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-263-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-263-2024, 2024
Short summary
The wind farm pressure field
Ronald B. Smith
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 253–261, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-253-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-253-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Abkar, M., Sharifi, A., and Porté-Agel, F.: Wake flow in a wind farm during a diurnal cycle, J. Turbulence, 17, 420–441, https://doi.org/10.1080/14685248.2015.1127379, 2016. a
Aird, J. A., Barthelmie, R. J., Shepherd, T. J., and Pryor, S. C.: WRF-simulated low-level jets over Iowa: characterization and sensitivity studies, Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 1015–1030, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-1015-2021, 2021. a, b
Andreas, E. L., Claffy, K. J., and Makshtas, A. P.: Low-Level Atmospheric Jets And Inversions Over The Western Weddell Sea, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 97, 459–486, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002793831076, 2000. a
Baas, P., Bosveld, F. C., Baltink, H. K., and Holtslag, A. A.: A climatology of nocturnal low-level jets at Cabauw, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 48, 1627–1642, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAMC1965.1, 2009. a, b
Banta, R., Newsom, R. K., Lundquist, J. K., Pichugina, Y. L., Coulter, R. L., and Mahrt, L.: Nocturnal Low-Level Jet Characteristics Over Kansas During Cases-99, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 105, 221–252, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019992330866, 2002. a, b
Download
Short summary
This work analyses a meteorological event, called nocturnal low-level jets (NLLJs), defined as high wind speeds relatively close to the surface. There were positive and negative impacts from NLLJs. While NLLJs increased the mean power production, they also increased the variability in the wind with height. Our results imply that long NLLJ events are also larger, affecting many wind turbines at the same time. Short NLLJ events are more local, having stronger effects on power variability.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint