Articles | Volume 7, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2255-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2255-2022
Research article
 | 
22 Nov 2022
Research article |  | 22 Nov 2022

Evaluating the mesoscale spatio-temporal variability in simulated wind speed time series over northern Europe

Graziela Luzia, Andrea N. Hahmann, and Matti Juhani Koivisto

Related authors

Low-level jets in the North and Baltic seas: mesoscale model sensitivity and climatology using WRF V4.2.1
Bjarke T. E. Olsen, Andrea N. Hahmann, Nicolas G. Alonso-de-Linaje, Mark Žagar, and Martin Dörenkämper
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4499–4533, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4499-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4499-2025, 2025
Short summary
Evaluation of wind farm parameterizations in the WRF model under different atmospheric stability conditions with high-resolution wake simulations
Oscar García-Santiago, Andrea N. Hahmann, Jake Badger, and Alfredo Peña
Wind Energ. Sci., 9, 963–979, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-963-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-963-2024, 2024
Short summary
The Impact of Climate Change on Extreme Winds over Northern Europe According to CMIP6
Xiaoli Guo Larsén, Marc Imberger, Ásta Hannesdóttir, and Andrea N. Hahmann
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2022-102,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2022-102, 2023
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Current and future wind energy resources in the North Sea according to CMIP6
Andrea N. Hahmann, Oscar García-Santiago, and Alfredo Peña
Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 2373–2391, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2373-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-2373-2022, 2022
Short summary
Power fluctuations in high-installation- density offshore wind fleets
Juan Pablo Murcia Leon, Matti Juhani Koivisto, Poul Sørensen, and Philippe Magnant
Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 461–476, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-461-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-461-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Thematic area: Wind and the atmosphere | Topic: Wind and turbulence
Simulated meteorological impacts of offshore wind turbines and sensitivity to the amount of added turbulence kinetic energy
Daphne Quint, Julie K. Lundquist, Nicola Bodini, and David Rosencrans
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 1269–1301, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1269-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1269-2025, 2025
Short summary
Evaluating mesoscale model predictions of diurnal speedup events in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area of California
Robert S. Arthur, Alex Rybchuk, Timothy W. Juliano, Gabriel Rios, Sonia Wharton, Julie K. Lundquist, and Jerome D. Fast
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 1187–1209, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1187-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1187-2025, 2025
Short summary
Swell impacts on an offshore wind farm in stable boundary layer: wake flow and energy budget analysis
Xu Ning and Mostafa Bakhoday-Paskyabi
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 1101–1122, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1101-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1101-2025, 2025
Short summary
An analytical formulation for turbulence kinetic energy added by wind turbines based on large-eddy simulation
Ali Khanjari, Asim Feroz, and Cristina L. Archer
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 887–905, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-887-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-887-2025, 2025
Short summary
Tall wind profile validation of ERA5, NORA3, and NEWA datasets using lidar observations
Etienne Cheynet, Jan Markus Diezel, Hilde Haakenstad, Øyvind Breivik, Alfredo Peña, and Joachim Reuder
Wind Energ. Sci., 10, 733–754, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-733-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-733-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Badger, J., Hahmann, A., Larsén, X., Badger, M., Kelly, M., Olsen, B., and Mortensen, N.: The Global Wind Atlas: An EUDP project carried out by DTU Wind Energy, Tech. rep., DTU Wind Energy, https://orbit.dtu.dk/files/238494910/GWA_64011_0347_FinalReport.pdf (last access: 15 December 2021), 2015. a
Brown, T., Schlachtberger, D., Kies, A., Schramm, S., and Greiner, M.: Synergies of sector coupling and transmission reinforcement in a cost-optimised, highly renewable European energy system, Energy, 160, 720–739, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.222, 2018. a
Cannon, D., Brayshaw, D., Methven, J., Coker, P., and Lenaghan, D.: Using reanalysis data to quantify extreme wind power generation statistics: A 33 year case study in Great Britain, Renew. Energy, 75, 767–778, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.10.024, 2015. a
CESAR Database: Cabauw Experimental Site for Atmospheric Research, https://ruisdael-observatory.nl/cesar/, last access: 15 December 2020. a, b
Das, K., Litong-Palima, M., Maule, P., Altin, M., Hansen, A. D., Sørensen, P. E., and Abildgaard, H.: Adequacy of frequency reserves for high wind power generation, IET Renew. Power Generat., 11, 1286–1294, https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rpg.2016.0501, 2017. a
Download
Short summary
This paper presents a comprehensive validation of time series produced by a mesoscale numerical weather model, a global reanalysis, and a wind atlas against observations by using a set of metrics that we present as requirements for wind energy integration studies. We perform a sensitivity analysis on the numerical weather model in multiple configurations, such as related to model grid spacing and nesting arrangements, to define the model setup that outperforms in various time series aspects.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint